Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Murder and the Mantra

Posted by Bob on July 29th, 2011 under General

Wouldn’t it be wonderful for a killer if he could tell the police, “You have asked that question twenty times. You ought to be ashamed of yourself for being so repetitious.”

No doubt it does make them look unsophisticated, but the police are not respectable conservatives. They simply will not stop asking a question until it has been answered. In fact they don’t stop asking it after it has been answered because they want to be sure your answer is consistent.

But everybody seems to be a sucker for this “repetitious” line.

Normally all a liberal has to do is make it clear that that point has been made enough and a conservative backs off, or he will lose his respectable paycheck.

But if it ever happens that some respectable conservative has cajones enough to keep demanding an answer, there is one way to shut him up..

The liberal says, “I already answered that.”

When you have chased an anti-white around over all over with the Mantra, they will refer to the thousands of words they and other have said and claim the question has already been asked over and over and ANSWERED over and over.

Respectable conservatives get paid for falling for that line, but a cop who did would be looking for a new line of work.

That “You already asked that” and the follow up “I already answered that” simply do not work with grownups.

  1. #1 by BGLass on 07/29/2011 - 9:16 am

    Respectabiles are odd ducks, but one cannot tell them.

    It’s like when argument is used against Southern groups that they “just want slavery” (150 years after war), as a shut-up way to end any conversation NOW about theories of local, regional self-governance. Naming names of all the absentee “plantation” (big farm) owners who really lived in NYC, or illustrating how few south soldiers owned slaves, could never matter.

    Respectabiles are Materialists, just like communists. Hannity is for the military taking the productivity of labor and innovation (ironically from corporate, which he claims to support too, never making a choice), and using it to police people, so is a pundit for TAKING taxes (while saying he is low tax). If he is for Corporate, then why not just let Blackwater businesses pay for soldier-workers?

    Respectabiles kids, like communist party, are groomed for overseas, more likely to learn Bantu as a second language than anything European, read Harry Potter, invest no time in their real historical backgrounds, etc.

    “Class” means money. If you can afford it, materially, you are “in.” There is no other criterion for being anywhere except money (and no matter how you get it.)

    So Cunninghams have Sopranos for neighbors, and in real life, maybe not as funny to live through as t.v.. as Nelson DeMille’s Gold Coast pointed out. But if money no longer indicates “nice factor” in neighborhood, (b/c how one got the money no longer matters and class=money only) then why spend your money on “location, location, location,” lol. It’s a 50-50, so be smart and get a shack, right?

    Such is the New Materialist Community, for both”left” and “right.” If a Bantu immigrant is given equal money to an Asian immigrant, then they have both been able “to buy in.” Both have equal opportunity and Freedom to shop and choice of product, and so they are “in a community together.” A Somalian and Spanish speaking S. American the same— “a community” since they have “bought in.”

    Economicism at its best. Human subject reduced to pure money.

  2. #2 by BGLass on 07/29/2011 - 9:23 am

    A funny thing about this Materialism of “right” and “left,” is that it does depart from Marxism on a point— he said that HOW YOU GET your money is what FORMS “class consciousness.”

    Nor can this be overcome by “Central Planning.” B/c In Central Planning, you have an Overlord Class (the Party). Also, Administrative Classes, etc. It’s simply structured a little differently via the various “redistribution channels” and ‘recipient channels.”

    But even MARX said HOW YOU GET the money decides what “class” is, (and under any system). “Class” was HOW YOU THINK because of HOW YOU GET.

    Both “left” and “right” want to forget that, lol— morals can be such a pain in the ass.

You must be logged in to post a comment.