Heredity and environment, nature and nurture.

The problem is that nurture is a one-shot deal.

Mommy Professor tells us that if you just let him rule for a generation the world will be transformed.

In fact the effect of what you do to nurture in any one generation becomes less in the next and a quarter of that in the next, and so on. But the genes just STAY there.

I think all of us know that, whatever they did about literacy or the national debt in the last century, what matters is the color of the people they produced. If you put our “racist” expectations on a statistical curve back in the 1950s, you would have what you have today, a steady transition in the economy, in living standards, in morality, towards a third world country.

People whose real bottom line is making a show of “starting” on dealing with the national debt are the same people who decided that the way to deal with our race problem was to get on a track that led inevitably to getting rid of whites.

If you are white and you don’t care about whites, the bottom line is that you don’t care about anything but here and now.

The paper hats brag that they fought A Great War for Freedom. That’s what they told themselves then and that is what they choose to believe now.

Never does it occur to one of them that the direct result of their Great War for Freedom was to turn one third of the human race over to Communism. They whooped and told each other how great they were in 1945 and not a thought has crossed their minds since.

No generation has ever heaped such praise on itself as the one that gave Stalin and Mao Tse Tung a third of humanity.

The actual result of what they did made no difference to them.

It is not entirely accidental that this was the generation that put us on the road to the destruction of whites.

It is certainly not accidental that they see America in third world stagnation, with a rate of drug addiction and illegitimacy rates that would have shamed blacks and Puerto Ricans in the 1950s, and yet they celebrate every single step that led us to here.

In short, they are without shame.

Why should it be a surprise that a people without shame really couldn’t care less what other burdens they pass on to future generations, fiscal or genetic?

BUGS SWARM

These articles are becoming difficult because I do not want to get your attention off what we have settled on as our millennial mission: spreading the Mantra and Mantra Thinking.

When someone puts a link in BUGS SWARM where we can hit them with the Mantra, please go there and hit them with it. Nothing is more effective than a reputation for jumping on an opportunity.

If you ever wanted to thank those who have had to fight this battle alone, like me, this is the way to do it.

For decades I have faced the anti-white’s great weapon: Silence. You cannot imagine what a lift it is for people in BUGS SWARM to be reporting that anti-whites are bitching about the endless repetition of the Mantra everywhere they go!

It is also hilarious to hear anti-whites bitching about REPETITION!

But I don’t get the lift unless you REPORT this to BUGS SWARM.

A swarm cannot be too large.

When you hit a site, put a sentence in SWARM to let us know you DID it.

No matter how often your school teacher may have told you that you shouldn’t brag, it does NOT apply here.

If you don’t like signing in often, write down your actions and put them in one sentence comments. In THIS case, and in THIS case only, several one-sentence comments are OK, because each represents a separate ACTION.

Repeat: A SWARM cannot be too large, as long as each bee is real.

In the 1920s one main line magazine pointed out, “But Mussolini is not perfect…”

Today the idea that someone would have the impression that Mussolini was perfect is astonishing.

In the 1920s main line magazines were organs of the capitalist establishment, in line with Calvin Coolidge and Warren G. Harding. If this line is quoted at all, it is not put into that context.

Only in context do historical incidents make sense.

Today one can easily find some equivalent in main line magazines to “Mao was not perfect…”

Mao’s slaughters and starvation make Hitler or even Stain look like a piker. The Cultural Revolution made Lenin’s Terrors look placid. But The Sayings of Chairman Mao is not criticized, the way any copy of Mein Kampf would be.

You can use an incident to shock and awe or you can use it to demonstrate the real-world context.

In the 1920s Mussolini was very much like Mao today. He did what America’s ruling group desperately wanted done, and the only criticism was that he was a bit too far in his methods, he was, as the media like to see it, a bit too idealistic.

Mussolini came along right after the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia at the end of World War I when Europe was in shambles and Communist revolutions were breaking out all over Europe. It is easy for us to put it into context today, but at that time no one knew how far it would go.

In the United States and Britain, the stability of society stopped Communism, but even in these countries the Red Scare was extreme.

In Europe only the fascists put the Red threat down firmly. Elsewhere on the Continent, the Communist Party was firmly established and places like Hungary and Bavaria were actually temporarily ruled by Communist governments.

In our historical context, Communism has always been there but contained. No one had such a context in the 1920s.

Once again, we cannot get the lesson out of “Mussolini is not perfect” because of temporal provincialism.

You can tell the nature of the group that is in power by how it treats extremists. Today, Maoists are discussed as a reasonable if extreme point of view whereas Hitler, and to far lesser extent Mussolini, are pure Satanism.