The announcement we reproduced here for the East Tennessee meeting September 17 used the word “displacement.”
Why we are ASKING to be DISPLACED rather than genocided? Displacement is a Tea Party Term, like “anti” instead of “anti-white.” It is popular because it doesn’t challenge that God of Respectability, Marriage for Love between a Negro and a white who happen to LOVE each other.
Coo! Coo! Coo!
If a person cannot find a single mate among the billion members of his own race, he doesn’t need integration, he needs therapy.
So all the respectables bubble over what a beauty Halle Berry is and then insist that a black man is dead if he isn’t allowed a white wife.
The only people who take offense at my militant attack on “displacement” and “anti” are those who do not understand political warfare. They think that, if someone is allowed to get upset about something, it should be something like page 209 in Spengler’s book compared with some other highly intellectual obscurity.
Which is why they are helpless against the political pros on the other side.
In fact, respectable conservatives use displacement because they hold onto intermarriage to keep from offending the media owners. The conservative who talks about “displacement” is exactly the one who complains that minorities don’t “assimilate.”
You see, if they would just marry us, our culture, which is all we are, wouldn’t be displaced.
They PAY respectable conservatives to hedge on critical points and use words like “displacement” and “anti-racist.”
The word is anti-white.
The word is genocide.
Period.
#1 by stradivari on 08/06/2011 - 1:54 pm
It’s only displacement if you have somewhere to go. Immigration and Integration are being pushed in ALL WHITE COUNTRIES. There is NOWHERE to go. This is ANTI-WHITE. This is GENOCIDE.
#2 by stradivari on 08/06/2011 - 2:05 pm
Marxist (liberals,progressives,etc,etc) are fond of saying ” Everyone has their place”. Apparently EVERYONE doesn’t include White Folks. They say they are Humanist, what they are is ANTI-WHITE. What they want is WHITE GENOCIDE. Humanist is a CODEWORD for ANTI-WHITE. Multiculturalism is a CODEWORD for WHITE GENOCIDE.
#3 by Scythian on 08/06/2011 - 2:52 pm
The realization that all this – third world immigration pouring into EVERY white country and ONLY white countries and for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites – is NOT just “displacement”, but is in fact geNOcide is why we’re all here.
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of “displacement” against my race, the white race…………
It’s not LIKE fatal, it IS fatal.
#4 by Scythian on 08/06/2011 - 5:09 pm
At least in my experience, the word ‘genocide’ is what awakened me to the fact that it’s not just about immigration and white flight, or news, jews, crime and IQ’s. I didn’t even totally understand ‘Anti-racist is code word for anti-white’ until I worked it out for myself by posting numerous mantra concepts as best I could.
In other words, w/o the word ‘genocide’ in an abridged version of the mantra that I read that first time, I probably would have never bothered to find national salvation – which led to BUGS.
Perhaps there is a word or the creation of a new word that can be used as a link to BUGS so that if you google the word, BUGS is on the top of the list? This word could be used at the end of youtube comments for example.
#5 by stradivari on 08/06/2011 - 5:27 pm
White Flight is what Anti-Whites cal ethnic cleansing when it happens to Whit Folks. We should call it what it is WHITE ETHNIC CLEANSING.
#6 by stradivari on 08/06/2011 - 5:36 pm
Mexican Aliens have ETHNICLY CLEANSED huge portions of the American Southwest. They’ve done it by BEATING and RAPING WHITE CHILDREN. The Invaders don’t even bother to claim they are trying to Bring People Together. They are outspokenly ANTI-WHITE. They claim Whites have no right to be in the Western Hemisphere. They are openly commiting WHITE ETHNIC CLEANSING. WE have NOWHERE to run to. This is WHITE GENOCIDE. Hmm, I wonder why the mainstream media doesn’t report more on this? Don’t you, haha
#7 by Scrivener on 08/06/2011 - 7:20 pm
Do you think displacement is fatal to our point in all contexts? I am guilty of using it alone as a shorthand in some cases, and I’ll be monitoring myself more closely to make sure I don’t in the future.
However, I most often use a phrase like “physical displacement and the encouragement of intermarriage” to describe what can constitute acts of genocide under international law. I don’t think it’s fatal in that context, but I’m willing to entertain reasons why it is.
#8 by OldBlighty on 08/06/2011 - 9:28 pm
Using displacement instead of genocide is Political Correctness. Political Correctness is code for not telling the truth, because someone somewhere, might be offended by it.
Displacement was never the goal of the anti-whites. Genocide is their goal and that is why they demand laws to force racial integration.
Without forced racial integration, they would not get their blended humanity in only white countries and they know it. That is why they Demand those laws.
Choosing to run to something better, does not mean you are being forcibly displaced. If people were being forcibly displaced, there would be laws, police and soldiers enforcing it.
However, there are laws, police and soldiers if necessary, Forcing racial integration in all white countries, which is genocide for white people.
As usual Bob chooses the correct words at the right time, for maximum effect.
Seems to me, part of what Bob does is, figure out what the truth is and no matter how much some people don’t like it, he tells it over and over.
#9 by Genseric on 08/06/2011 - 10:10 pm
I have used ‘displacement’ too. Far too many times. Bob is absolutely correct. It isn’t effective and it doesn’t do the crime justice. The audience is ALWAYS watching for evidence of efficacy.
It is spelled genocide.
#10 by Marco on 08/07/2011 - 6:41 am
Genocide is wrong, shame on the marxists.
#11 by BGLass on 08/07/2011 - 9:27 am
“…Genocide is wrong, shame on the marxists.”
Well, shame on ANYONE who enjoys it— but more, they are committing a crime under International Law after 1948.