Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

A New Name is not a New Thing

Posted by Bob on August 21st, 2011 under Coaching Session


The fact that something has acquired a name does not make it new.

What we have recently begun to call Stockholm Syndrome has been all over forever.

Every drunken father who spent his life beating his family and was loved by that family for the times when he had a little mercy demonstrated what we now call Stockholm Syndrome. The people Stalin DIDN’T send to the Gulag the night before were sincerely in love with him.

Respectable conservative behavior toward leftists has been straight Stockholm Syndrome for well over fifty years while I have observed it. Leftists have no mercy, and conservatives are lucky if they get off with just being called racists. On the other hand, Buckley was so flattered that Professor Galbraith would associate with him it, made one sick to read him glory in it.

Nowadays I get the impression that if Christopher Hitchens visited National Review the male staff would rape him. He said some honest things about the Clintons during the controversy and conservatives keep praising this rather mindless Marxist to the skies.

Stockholm Syndrome has been around the corner with every little toady who ever came to love his buddy because the bully didn’t hit HIM.

People who find Stockholm Syndrome novel are exactly like someone who read Newton for the first time and said, “Gee, I never noticed this gravity stuff before!”

But people do not analyze what they have no name for. We always knew political correctness was required by leftists. But it was not really discussed generally until the standard Marxist term slopped over into everyday discussion.

The fact is that one can prevent people from thinking about something by not giving it a name.

One’s brain, like any computer, is limited in the number of steps it naturally makes. So if every time one hears someone say political correctness and that person does not know it is a standard Marxist term, one must go through that extra mental step, and the process stops there.

The establishment sets a limit for how much any conservative who wants to make his living on his respectability can go. Twenty years ago one could debate Martin Luther King’s politics. The day came when anyone who wanted to make a living as a “conservative” had to grovel when the Great Name was spoken.

When a paradigm like this changes, you are ruined if you don’t know it and you are ruined if you mention it. This is the environment I made my living in.

The day that something becomes verboten for a respectable to say is a lot like the Israeli Lobby on Capitol Hill. Everybody knows that you never mention it, only respectfully and as little as possible. When you do mention it you talk about it as if it were just one of many lobbies.

But if you ever really BELIVED the Israeli Lobby is one of many lobbies you could never get a job anywhere near a congressional office. Anybody who doesn’t make the facts about that group part of his everyday thinking would have to be a genuine retard.

In the case of knowing exactly when a respectable disavows the stance his side made a quarter of a century ago, there is nobody who is a practicing professional on either side who talks about it, and there is nobody on either side who is smart enough to get a job who doesn’t recognize it.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Dave on 08/21/2011 - 9:44 am

    This type of thing has been going on since the beginning of time.

    It is like a preacher who has a talent for well said prayers. But well said prayers are not necessarily well founded prayers or true prayers. True prayers are the kind of prayers that can be heard by God, and how well the prayer is said has nothing to do with it.

    That is our opposition and the anti-white whites. They are talented in well said prayers and they are insistent on PRESCRIBING prayers. That’s why they insist on Martin Luther King worship. This is no different than what the Moslems do. A Moslem is required to say his or her PRESCRIBED prayers five times each day. But no matter how faithfully the PRESCRIBED prayers are said, that doesn’t necessarily make the worshiper a speaker of a true prayer.

    True prayers are often said, but not often heard. I learned this wandering in the alleys off Skid Road and reading the prayers written on the walls. A lot of people die in those alleys, and true prayers are often said by dying people. You can find true prayers written on walls of the alleys around Skid Road.

    Poetry is the curse of the kind of well said prayers that are not true prayers and Leftists love poetry. That is why in the United States Abraham Lincoln is forever celebrated for his poetry and Martin Luther King was set up in that line also. But Lincoln was assassinated by some very heroic people, people who knew how to say true prayers.

    And the fundamental sin was to cease saying those prayers for as long as true prayers are said, freedom remains possible. That was the reason those accused of conspiring in Lincoln’s assassination were so quickly put to death. True prayers are intolerable to the practitioners of poetry, who do not want their PRESCRIPTIONS challenged.

    This “respectable conservative stuff” has been going on forever. Nothing ever really changes. Who is a “respectable conservative”? That is a person who doesn’t know the difference between well said prayers and true prayers.

  2. #2 by BGLass on 08/21/2011 - 1:02 pm

    met a fierce tea party activist. His house is on land devalued by policy then bought up cheap, so he was able to build a house on it cheap, in much the same way people will someday live on the land where the smelts were saved in San Joaquin valley, necessitating the turning off of water in farmlands. The activists lifelong pay came 100% from the tax chest, as did his daddy’s. In fact, he knows of no one in his family history who has lived otherwise.

    He champions ‘Free Markets,” and is angry about paying for “freeloaders,”– but in a free market his entire life would have been impossible. Cashing in 100% on what he professes to hate, he could not be more moral.

    A Respectable, poseur, double-thinker, sinner, etc.

  3. #3 by Gator61 on 08/21/2011 - 10:29 pm

    Thanks Bob. I know just what to do with this.

  4. #4 by Genseric on 08/23/2011 - 11:01 am

    You can think it. Just-don’t-SAY-it (Silence GAINS Acceptance). Sit back, smile and nod. We’ll do The Rest. Now that’s Respectable.

    Pay me. I am here damn it!

    Signed,
    Not a Respectable Human Being

You must be logged in to post a comment.