One of the keys to modern history has been that Marxism has a grade of A quadruple plus on getting into power, but the system itself is just plain silly.
As a political professional, I am mesmerized by the expert work that goes into putting Marxists into power.
Today Marxist thought rules the entire political landscape, but most of the people who are doing it have no idea that they are Marxists.
This gives me some possible insights into history one simply cannot have unless he sees Political Correctness, which is a term no one but Marxists used until the seventies — in the 60s they knew it was Marxist — is a religion.
It is not by accident that I keep bringing the degenerate Zoroastrianism of St. Paul’s time into my overview.
First, remember that by the time of Christ Zoroastrianism was well over thousand years old and I am talking about a DEGENERATE FORM of Zoroastrianism. Z was a healthy religion which allowed only Aryans to join it — just as one had to swear one was of “pure Hellenic blood” to be in the real Olympics of the time.
There was absolutely nothing in old Zoroastrianism, or for that matter in old Judaism, to have made Paul such a fanatical enemy of women.
It goes carefully unnoticed in theology schools that that screaming opposition to marriage and children had nothing whatever to do with anything Jesus said or, excepting Eve, the Old Testament contained.
The demand for sterility began with total abruptness with St. Paul.
The four Gospels were carefully chosen when Constantine, whom the bishops referred to as the bishop of bishops though he had never even been baptized, held a council for that purpose.
Before the fourth century there were many, quite possibly hundreds, of Gospels, each of which was recognized by a segment of Christianity as THE Gospel.
You can almost date a rejected Gospel, like the Gospel of Judas, by how much of the Death Religion, the hate women verbiage, that it has in it. That is fascinating to me, since I make not the slightest claim to special Biblical knowledge beyond my Bible Belt upbringing. But I can date a “false” Gospel better than any scholar who does not know this simple rule.
This understanding of how the “intellectual” ideas of degenerate intellectuals in Persia took over a large part of the Christian theology in much the same way that Marxist “intellectualism” is an integral part of the thought of those who were once genuine liberals.
In fact Mani, who claimed to synthesize Christianity and Zoroastrianism, the two main religions of his time, preached what we call Manichaeism, which is total death religion dedicated entirely to the Death Religion. It is so extreme that it was denounced by Trappist monks as a heresy.
And in this synthesis of Christianity and Zoroastrianism, there is not a hint of any connection with Christ or Zoroaster.
But that self-hatred is the main force in destroying our race.
#1 by Gavin on 09/09/2011 - 6:50 am
“Today Marxist thought rules the entire political landscape, but most of the people who are doing it have no idea that they are Marxists.”
One of the big paradigm shifts for me was when I stepped outside of the whole marxist thought matrix. The first time I heard “racist” and rather than taking it seriously I just thought “oh another marxist thinker”
“Political Correctness, which is a term no one but Marxists used until the seventies — in the 60s they knew it was Marxist — is a religion.”
It is a religion that white people are REQUIRED to be a part of, non-whites are given a lot of leniency. This upsets a lot of whites because they know they are required to believe it but then they see non-whites getting a pass.
I never signed up to be a political correctness believer, I had it shoved on me as a child and I was punished for stepping outside of it’s bounds. Now these religious fanatics get mad when they find out that I do not share their beliefs but I have learned how to fight back and beat them bad because they have never even been hit before.
#2 by BGLass on 09/09/2011 - 9:59 am
Today Marxist thought rules the entire political landscape, but most of the people who are doing it have no idea that they are Marxists….’
Met “tea partiers” who are more communist than any card-carriers and they “home school” (passing on their public educations), and so on, and are very “right wing.” Proudly, they announce their tea-partying.
They “see” things entirely through the lens of materialism, (but consider themselves religious “good” people). “Not caring about money” means they make less than they could (as if, in regards to money, all they have to do is decide how much to get, what hubris)— and they do not understand they could discern things through a lens other than money, (so complete is their self-centered xenophobia). They go on about “free markets” which they say they live in, and this is part of the reason for their own success (survival of the fittest and they are the fittest in their view— and they are the first to call others “losers”) even though they, themselves, have public jobs and are markedly uncreative people
They are materialists without knowing it, without knowing materialism is marxist, or why, nor how “anti-racism” is connected to political movements; the “liberalizing” of Vatican II was bad, but they are in a country that required the pope do these ecumenical councils, they feel, just as non-catholic ministers have been required to do certain things– they pride themselves on sophistication due to eating in “ethnic” restaurants— and they have no ties to culture of origin and “ethnic” mostly means publicly funded “ethnic” parades and fast food. Freedom is freedom of “choice in products,” that they have been told people do not have in communist countries. What makes “america great” is they can get anything they want.
They joke about political correctness, marking it with irony, like wishing people “happy kwanza” but they don’t really know anything about kwanza, nor would find out, and so the irony, itself, is supposed to communicate they are “right wing.”
But the joke never ends.
The shallowness inherent in all this could not be easily explained to them— in former times, it would be said they “Lacked Integrity” b/c their Ideas and actions are so unconsciously contradictory, or they would be called “mockers.” but they get up, go to work, don’t smoke, drink, and pay their bills, and have well-behaved children, which is to them “right wing” behavior, (as if communist economic theory is related to drinking, necessarily).
People dance around trying to explain this conventional shallowness, the contradictions of the right wing marxist. They say they are “stupid right wingers,” or “don’t read books,” or are “all about shopping,” and yet that doesn’t really describe it, as they do read (some) books, and they do try to think, or to care about things (they have joined a tea party, after all), and they really don’t care about fancy clothes, but invest in stocks instead. They don’t understand how people in cities live with such dependency on government, and feel they should “do it right” as they did, and move to planned community subdivisions and so on, which is “freedom.”
#3 by shari on 09/09/2011 - 1:29 pm
Anyone who doesn’t notice that the church they have lived and made their way in, is on FIRE are lulled to sleep. Even those who no longer go to church. The great success of marxist religion has been it’s lulling of so many via “education.” Education is always seen as a good and holy thing without examination. But as with degenerate zorasterism, this is not new. Anti-racist is code for anti-white. Always has been.
#4 by shari on 09/09/2011 - 7:37 pm
White people need to see the self-hatred is cruel to other white people.
#5 by Epiphany on 09/10/2011 - 5:43 am
Sometimes, it seems that different Whites fight each other over how Blacks should be treated. That was what it is really all about.
Besides, it is really intriguing how fixated the U.S. Media is, especially television and Hollywood, on the Germans and the White Southernors. It is like White Liberals assume that, except perhaps for those two ethnic groups, people are basically good.
This, of course, is nonsense. After all, people are basically evil.
#6 by Epiphany on 09/10/2011 - 5:47 am
Marxist drivel permeates a lot of things. But not the Old Kind, rather Cultural Marxism. Notice, whereas the Neo Nazis claim only Whites are good, the Cultural Marxists claim that only Whites are evil– all others are, or were before contact with the White Man, Noble Savages living in peace with Nature.
German Americans and White Southernors should join together and boycott the Hollywood movies that vilify them both.
#7 by Epiphany on 09/10/2011 - 6:03 am
We should stop watching their movies, and stop watching their television shows. All they do now is vilify Whites in general, and Germans and White Southernors in particular. Germans and Southernors are the new scapegoats of this society. And, it is bleeding into an overall anti–White stereotype.
I am in particular intrigued by how although they glorify those US troops who fought and died in the European theater, they vilify those US troops who fought and died in the Pacific theater. This is a particularly egregious and heinous double standard if ever there was one. Besides, what about the troops who fought and died in Korea and Vietnam, fighting against the Communists? What about them?
All we usually here about is the US Troops who fought and died in the European Theater. Yes, and when we do here about the Pacific Theater it is not to commemorate the US Troops who fought against the Japanese, but to vilify them!
#8 by BGLass on 09/11/2011 - 9:12 am
@ “Germans and Southernors are the new scapegoats of this society….”
They are the American Jesus.
@ “After all, people are basically evil….”
Idk, Epiphany— people are people. They can do good or bad to others. They can do “good” things in corrupt environments and cause evil, unwittingly, and more. It takes all kinds. What goes toward Life is good and many strive toward that even when it is difficult
#9 by Scrivener on 09/11/2011 - 5:13 pm
I’ve always said that Germans and the Southern variety of the White Anglo-Saxon Protestants ARE the most hated ethnic groups on the planet (I think Southerners have the #1 spot, after all, we’ve been hated LONGER, but that could just be because I’m American).
Germans and Southerners are followed VERY closely by White Africans (Afrikaners, Anglo-Africans, Rhodesians and the like).
#10 by meawhiterabbit on 09/12/2011 - 5:19 am
Regarding the Jews debate. Check this interview with Bob
http://reasonradionetwork.com/downloads/pswop/PS_20080723.mp3
He gets into the Jew question towards the end.
#11 by BGLass on 09/12/2011 - 8:25 am
“….Germans and Southerners are followed VERY closely by White Africans (Afrikaners, Anglo-Africans, Rhodesians and the like)….”
Germans, Southerners follow White Africans/overseas Germans, also, are drawn to things German,etc. The whole colonial experience is shared with the White Africans, but not other “americans”— so colonial-identified people look abroad for what is happening to them now, things not noticed even by many other ‘european-identified americians. The colonial-identifieds love Australians, as well. The Austrailian actors translate very well. Mel Gibson crosses the religious question easily and seems totally ‘american.’
Its easier to feel White Africans, Australians are one’s people than other ‘americans.’ And Americans have shared much of the post-WWII propaganda. Like, Tomorrow the World, played to so many americans, with Emil’s transformation from nazi, and so on. As physical types and real genetic ancestry (b/c so many americans were German)— there is a split identification when watching any such film (Americans watch them as Germans, as identifying themselves as Germans)— but no one ever discussed this. Same with the “hitler channel.” Many watching are Germans in ancestry.
#12 by BGLass on 09/12/2011 - 11:52 am
As a curiosity– some movies s/a Tomorrow the World got a start on Broadway. How they played to the Lower East Side that got them produced was different to reception of the mid-west American audience (given the difference in ethnicity of viewers).
Even to remark such a thing is to ‘step out as a real person’— to suddenly break the silence that one WAS NOT identifying entirely as a non-German, or as a victim of Hitler, etc— but rather was watching with an entirely different ethnic identification.
It has never occurred to many Americans that other “americans” (especially more generational ones) DO NOT necessarily share their perceptions. Many “assimilated into” a nation that was already foreign to many generational Americans.
A great failing on the part of such Americans has been not correcting others on this, “standing idly by.” But one reason for it—- is that the ethnic group often values passive-resistance — “to give people enough rope to hang themselves by.”
The idea that some wasps are fully conscious and just watching the groups that vilify them, try to co-opt their history and so on— is rarely considered. Eg— the recent article at TOO by Dr. MacD. about wasps “disempowering themselves” in the 60s.
What other groups do with that can then be noticed.
#13 by Gavin on 09/13/2011 - 5:47 am
“The idea that some wasps are fully conscious and just watching the groups that vilify them, try to co-opt their history and so on— is rarely considered. Eg— the recent article at TOO by Dr. MacD. about wasps “disempowering themselves” in the 60s.”
Yeah, that sure was nice of them to do to their children. Leave them a world where not only where they hated and vilified by the media but even other whites would attack them if they stood up for themselves. Do we naturally degenerate into self-hatred or is it something that just happened and we can fix it?
#14 by BGLass on 09/13/2011 - 5:25 pm
no idea what was thinking. It truly is amazing what they left others to deal with— it’s arrogance, maybe. The feeling that says, “we’re on top (really), and can “take it,” and others are just jealous and we’re powerful enough to let them go on and on about our evil— realizing too late the extent to which we, ourselves, take it in, internalize it, the effect of the years of being ‘hate object extraordinaire” — an aspect of having once had power, maybe– thinking it won’t affect you, touch you, you’re above it.