“Anti-white” is a term only people who have been directly or indirectly exposed to us use.

This can be trivialized by pointing that Louis Farrakhan was regularly called “anti-white.”

So it is critically important that Farrakhan was NEVER called “anti-white.”

He was ALWAYS called “anti-white AND anti-Semitic.” You will play hell trying to find the few, if any, times that someone was ever called “anti-white,” and in every case, it was just sloppiness.

But here is the problem. We will be looking for terms like this that show our imprint, and somebody says “Nobody says just anti-white, it’s always anti-white AND anti-Semitic.” And the point will be entirely lost.

Why? Because all pro-whites except us will use this as an example of ABOUT JEWS.

Anti-whites will try to get the conversation over to anti-Semitism. As usual, our main leadership and the anti-whites end up talking about the same thing, and the real point is totally forgotten.

Which is why I am so touchy when a commenter makes a standard point here. What I am saying is VERY hard to get across. Once you get out in the field and start using the Mantra, it’s hard to believe that you ever saw that crazy old Whitaker using it over and over and over and over, smashing the anti-whites in Opposing Views, and saying, “DUHHH!”

Then, the most usual way of excusing themselves from the Mantra was people would say, “Well, I SAID more or less that in a couple of my statements.”

Not only is “more or less” no good, it is the single most deadly weapon I have run into. So “anti-white AND anti-Semitic” becomes a point in the ENEMY’S favor if you don’t grab onto the distinction HARD.

Like the Mantra, this absolute necessity that you get the SUBTLETY is critical and extremely hard to explain.

Someone wrote me that, the Occupy Wall Street Movement was dying out.

I took a deep, deep sigh and pointed out:

“My whole point was that there WAS no Occupy Wall Street Movement.”

I wasted a couple of articles TRYING to point out an important lesson about intellectual bankruptcy that is CRITICAL to US. It is, in fact, critical to our thinking.

This was the critical chance for me to point out that 1) They have enormous, titanic resources and NO MESSAGE; and 2) We have tiny resources but we have one hell of a message.

Can you imagine the feeling it gives me when someone brightly pops up with “I don’t like bankers, either,” or “This MOVEMENT is petering out.”

This is the kind of distinction I got PAID for.

If you are going to go to the mea culpa when I criticize something, PLEASE don’t say, “I guess it is my doing, I was responding to X who was responding to Y.”

That’s MORE goddamned STATIC.

If you want to talk about an error you made, talk about THE ERROR. I’m not a priest, I am a coach. The only response is to GET IT RIGHT. Explain what I said again.

No more STATIC!