I am really upset when someone gets off white genocide in our WORK section or in our outside arguments and gets onto Jesus Saves or Jews or ANYTHING.

It is the one weapon that has caused me to lost my attack on anti-whites, because it comes from OUR side and then becomes a legitimate subject of the cornered anti-whites to escape to.

Verbal diarrhea is our ULTIMATE enemy.

The KKK’s burning cross has nothing to do with The Old Rugged Cross. It was adopted by a group that had Clan in its name (Dixon’s book was called the Clansman, not the Klansman) because the South identified with Scotland. When an English Army entered Scotland, every Scotsman up to the Northern Islands knew it because those who saw the English went to the top of a hill — in land filled with hills from top to bottom, and lit a huge cross.

That cross at the border was seen miles further north, where they also found the highest hill and lit a huge cross on it.

Now in a truly idiotic insane world, some kook who saw the burning cross might have said, “Well, it is very important that the English Army is attacking, but I am also pissed at the French for some of the things they do. I am going to put up an extra thing for that. It’ll take a few days to work it out and build it, but it’s IMPORTANT.”

No, that couldn’t have happened, you know it and I know it. Somebody like that would be put in a madhouse.

But with us, it happens ALL THE TIME. We are lighting the Mantra Cross on the hills while MOST of our fellows want to talk about crime statistics, Jews, or just how bad everything is getting.

Do these brain-damaged people actually go home and drool in the evenings?

Why is information produced? This question is pure Mantra Thinking because it goes directly to the base, it starts at the beginning, it is not premised on proving the person asking it is Up on Things or doing Complex Thinking or any of the other real motives people have for discussing a topic.

The information we receive most is panic. How many hours have we wasted reading about the latest cancer cause.

Demography is a branch of economics, but it is looked down on by serious economists as “Panic Studies” because the only demography anybody knows about is the stuff that gets published about how, since the population growth varied ten percent in the last decade, a projection of this shows the world will be elbow to elbow or else totally depopulated in a hundred years.

In fact, the news is made up almost entirely of crises that occurred because, when something could have been done about it, everybody was talking and thinking only about a crisis at that time which had reached crisis level precisely because nobody had been thinking about that problem because when something could have been done they were fascinated by another crisis from the same cyclical cause.

And, of course, there is never time to stop and think about this fundamental problem because people are concentrating on the latest frontline crises.

Which is why BUGS and Mantra Thinking can NEVER reach the heights of interest The Jewish Conspiracy or the Big Bad Bankers Conspiracy or the Communist Plot did.

People do not want to read about reality and Mantra Thinking on what can be done in the real world. They want to drool over the War in Iraq or the Latest…

Well, the Latest Anything.

And when a crisis occurs, who gets all the consulting money? The EXPERTS in the area where the crisis is occurring of course.

Try to think of a business surviving that way. One section of the company has become so bad that it is about to destroy the whole company.

Would the company then raise the pay of those who had been running that section and call ONLY the people who CAUSED the crisis to solve it?

“What we need to do about this disaster is to call in ONLY the people who CAUSED it to tell us what to do about it.“

In the real world, with real money, a company that called in the experts who formulated the policy disaster to solve it would be put under psychiatric observation.

We have a psychotic system because we do not do Mantra Thinking.

Someone put a general comment about how education was the problem, a straight Stormfront comment, not only into the Swarm, but into the main topic there, “Where did you post the Mantra Today?”

I asked the commenter, “What is this Stormfront comment doing HERE?”

For me, the Swarm is what membership and money are to Jared Taylor.

Doing Mantra WORK is what I get out of handful of the thousands who read BUGS.

You can, as some do, make BUGS the place you do your own blog because you don’t want to bother to set up your own and work up an audience.

But NOT the Swarm!

The Swarm is STRICTLY for the handful of people who are actively changing the world

Mantra Thinking, like Hoffer’s “American,” will probably never have a strict definition. Hoffer defines “American” by his usage of the term in actual experiments, which jibes with that of his millions of readers.

So when I discuss Mantra Thinking, it is in jabs at reality.

For example, Mantra Thinking involves a great deal more Rethinking that what professors think of as thinking. The Mantra, for example, is very hard to grasp precisely because those who hear of it have never actually THOUGHT about what their actual ASSUMPTIONS are.

Not only is it difficult for people to realize that all their talk about “men love one another” and “assimilation” applies entirely and unquestionably ONLY to white countries and to ALL white countries. As I have repeatedly pointed out, as soon as the Soviet Empire collapsed, the question came up, “When will Eastern Europe be ready for immigration?”

No one would ask, if North Korea were freed, “When will it be ready for immigration?” Some one who brought up that question in relation to North Korea would be considered a kook: “What in the hell does immigration policy have to do with just having overthrown Communism?”

But the same question was instantaneous in the case of Eastern Europe, and no one asked why because they all KNEW why.

Eastern Europe is WHITE.

The assumption is so deep no one asks about it, but EVERYONE goes by it.

No one is going to be praised for taking that question out and asking it.

That is NOT what is considered “thinking” in this society.

So a major part of Mantra Thinking is going back over the assumptions that got us here.

That used to be called Heresy. It is now called Politically Incorrect.

Eric Hoffer, whose short biography is worth reading, defined the term “American” as I use it. He was a real worker, a longshoreman on the docks, and went never went to school until he was signed on as a full professor temporarily.

Hoffer wrote his first book, The True Believer, when he was 49.

Considering himself entirely American, he spent his life among American working people and reading widely. He never left the United States once. He said he was on the bridge across to Mexico, smelled the rot, and came back before he reached the Mexican side.

He defined the Kennedys, for example, as Europeans. Like me, he defined all of what we would call the blue states as European. He did not define what he meant, it was a matter of gut feel which was obviously shared by his millions of readers.

A New Englander or a San Franciscan would feel right at home in a European or Canadian voting booth.

Like Mantra Thinking, Hoffer’s “American” is in a constant process of identification. So my mind makes stabs at partial explanations.

One difference, vague as it is, between an American and a European strikes me as what might be called A Search for Authority.

Englishmen probably understand more than Americans when I describe professors as merely the priesthood of Political Correctness. The disastrous experiment with socialism Britain chose at the end of World War II made England by the late 50s economically The Sick Man of Europe. Huge numbers of British workmen were going to Germany to earn double the wages they got in England, and to pay less taxes on them.

After 1945, a huge part of Britain stopped looking to Tradition and the Uppah Clahss. But they substituted professors for them, “degreed” persons, especially from the Labor Party’s London School of Economics. Under the semi-Marxist regime, professors were quoted AND OBEYED by the left the way clergy had once been in the Middle Ages.

Americans reject authority, and they find ways to do it. The Bible, for example, allows Americans to contradict the “eggheads.” and the Bible is as certain to say what they want to believe as Political Correctness and the Rule of the Intellectuals always turns out to be what the professors want to believe.

But the Bible is interpreted by Americans in the teeth of the professors. It always has been.

It is generally known that Americans tend to be both more religious and more anti-clerical than Europeans. We do not respect the word of the clerics, the Authority, but Europeans tend to search for living authorities.

In fact, Europeans really look for their living authorities in America. No one could imagine a Frenchman saying that there is no such thing as a French culture. They were boring about it. But the minute “multiculture” became a Harvard and New York credo, centuries of monomaniacal obsession in Paris with “French Culture” simply evaporated.

So, like Hoffer, I simply discuss the phenomenon of “American” versus “European” instead of trying to define it. Language, as Webster said, is usage. Definition is simply a means of describing usage.

SysOp and I would like to request that each and everyone of you change your passwords to a combination of upper and lowercase with numbers.

http://www.whatsmyip.org/random-password-generator/

Tick off the top 5 boxes and set to 12.

—————-

It appears we are all clear. Let us know if you experience any more weirdness in the operation.

Again, we are grateful that there was not any damage done.

Thank you.

SysOp

I know I ask an awful lot of the handful of real BUGSERS.

You do your work alone and unappreciated, two things I have learned to take for granted. This is because you get POWER for doing things like that. There are a lot more people available to get praise or names for themselves or even to march in a group. That is why the very, very few like me WIELD so much real power.

Unfortunately very few people can keep on doing things entirely because they NEED doing. The only really anonymous donors are people who are too rich to care about enhancing their names.

How many people hit the Internet with the Mantra and report back here? We dream of White Rabbit’s goal of 300, but the real number now is probably about 50.

Yet those fifty are spreading the Mantra around the world.

I promised you real power, but I also warned you about the price.

From Norway comes word that they are grouping together. One of our folks has set up a BUGS Circle.

Obviously we desperately need TEAM SPIRIT.

I have worked alone all my life, and I do NOT recommend it for most people.

FIRST, you pay your dues by posting and REPORTING it, as White Rabbit says.

But we also desperately need some sense of BELONGING, some TEAM SPIRIT.

When someone asks you to back them up in an ongoing battle, GO. When someone asks you to “approve” one of his postings, DO IT.

Add a little report that you did. Talk to the BUGSER you just helped, very briefly, right here on the Swarm “Where did you post the Mantra Today?” which to me is far the most important part of BUGS now.

The Legions had the pilum, the soft sword and discipline. But they were also TOGETHER. They couldn’t have done what they did without pride of membership and the feeling of BELONGING.

Only by stating my worry can I raise a possibility it will not come true:

I often feel that I will be the last, as I was the first, true Mantra thinker.

Let me go straight to an example, the mammoth.

In my last book I actually set out the priorities of Political Correctness in English, something no one else would do. I said black good, white bad; female good, male bad; and a list of list of others, Then I discussed, in English, the conflicts that every professional commentator faces when, say, black male rapes white female and how the categories of Good/Bad are balanced.

Few people I know would ever GET there, and no one but me would have gone on BEYOND there.

The English prof who reviewed my first book in National Review, called his review, “Read This One!” and said the best thing about the book were the coruscating insights. I get a lot of insights by going on with my reasoning rather than stopping to find a news item or an impressive philosophy it lets me expound on.

For example, another rule of Political Correctness is “Animal Good, People Bad” Then while thinking over conflicts, I discovered something. It hit me that funded science — which is a good term in itself — has done a screeching U-turn on the extinction of the mammoths. Everybody used to agree that when men came across he Bering Strait, mammoths and nearly every other large animal disappeared.

So the information justified the funding because it fitted the “man evil, animals good” rule. I thought about this screeching U-Turn, where every documentary tries desperately to prove that animals who lived through numerous ice ages simply happened to drop dead in the one when “humans” came over.

What happened was that they ran into a conflict. “Man” almost invariably means the Evil White Man. But according the rules of that day, there wasn’t a single Evil White Man involved.

Just the opposite! The humans who would have killed the Mammoths, according to the rules then, world have been the Good Humans, the Native Americans, those who cry like a baby when a white man takes a pee in their woods!

Somewhere this conflict was noted. I had heard the screech when documentaries abruptly started denying that man killed the mammoths, but until I did some Mantra Thinking while writing, I didn’t realize why.

And no one in our Stormfront-trained generation ever will.

The coruscating insights in my books came from continuing on with my assumptions. All others today get from one statement right into how it fits in being Profound or hits the headlines or their pet ideology.

If I talk about how their media defending them from challenges has weakened the other side, the main thing people think about is how the example I give deals with slavery.

I live in hope that some BUGSERS — and we are VERY few — will begin to learn how to follow these assumptions and sometimes not worry about how the first assumptions offend the present ruling class.

THAT would take you time.

It took ME many years.