Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Too Many of You are Still Jewaholics

Posted by Bob on May 6th, 2012 under Comment Responses

Somebody threw in “Israel for Jews” into my nice, neat, Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans.

Outside of satisfying your ADDICTION for talking about Jews, what GOOD does that do?

The Jews and Hitler are what every anti-white is desperate to get into. He can get off into a discussion of the Middle East

Worst of all, any mention of Jews or Israel is completely familiar to everybody, and gets their minds off of our NEW points about white genocide that they have never heard of before.

The best thing you can do for anti-whites is to talk abut Jews and Communists. We work our asses off to put them on totally unfamiliar ground where they can’t come up with anything, and then some drooling institution escapee EXPOSES JOOS or Commies.

Why don’t you just cut our legs off LITERALLY.

If you come from BUGS and talk about Jews, Israel, or whatever Stormfront addiction you are addicted to, I beg you to GO ELSEWHERE.

And, please, I was in alcohol and drug recovery and I sponsored a number of people, so don’t tell me you can take just one little sip, one little mention of JOOS and then leave it alone.

If you are a jewaholic, don’t take the first goddam drink, and don’t mention the first Jew.

  1. #1 by Jason Here on 05/06/2012 - 6:27 am

    If someone feels an uncontrollable urge to discuss Joos, I might suggest at least do it on your own time, so to speak, not in anyway mixing it with the Mantra or any of the concepts in it. Do it under some other name and distance yourself. I have my pet issues, but I don’t combine it with Mantra work.

    I’m saying (as a metaphor) that if you have to go to a topless bar, at least take the company ID off your shirt before you go in. 🙂

  2. #2 by Gar5 on 05/06/2012 - 6:55 am

    Here at Bugs we’re fixing bayonets and charging! Stopping half way across the battlefield and saying “hey let’s get those other people” will get you shot by the people that you were suppose to get.

    • #3 by Dissident on 05/06/2012 - 10:28 am

      To be blunt, what I see at Bugs is a group of people posting comments on web sites.

      Meanwhile, the city I live in has gone from being predominantly white to a white minority in roughly a decade. It’s getting worse by the day, and I know that it’s happening across white countries.

      Not to rain on anyones parade or discourage anyone, but do you think that posting comments on the internet is going to get the job done? It’s helpful, sure, but do you honestly think that it is adequate to counter what’s happening?

      I’m sorry, but it reminds me of a video of a protest between white Americans and Mexicans that I saw in which a Mexican said, “shouldn’t you be at home typing on your computer”?

      • #4 by steadiness on 05/06/2012 - 2:03 pm

        nothing will be done about white genocide until we redpill enough whites. Fortunately, with Eric Holder looking after his people, after months of Trayvonmania, and the overreach of Tim Wise and others in directly insulting white people, (e.g. ), it seems like white people are finally waking up. I know that just a year ago I wouldn’t have been caught dead on a site like this.

      • #5 by James C on 05/06/2012 - 6:10 pm

        If some mexican is too dumb to realize that the internet is the mass media of the 21st century, too bad for him.

        • #6 by dungeoneer on 05/06/2012 - 7:53 pm

          Smelling authentic taco breath on counter demonstrations or planting the mantra in x-number of white brains,decisions decisions!

      • #7 by beefcake on 05/07/2012 - 10:08 am

        So, Dissident, what you are wanting is INSTANT results?

        What is happening was imposed, and is held together by words used to make people dismiss anyone who talks about what is happening.

        The Mantra is truth forged into a WEAPON to cut through and EXPOSE the LIES of our Enemy that hold this very system together.

        The swarm has less than 300 people at the moment.

        We have been around, as a swarm, for less than 2 years. So we are growing fast, and you are already seeing a difference in our own terminology, even in non-Mantra Pro-Whtie circles.

        The White Genocide meme is growing too.

        Protesting things in the street does not work unless you have MASSIVE numbers.

        You don’t get to have massive numbers unless you are on a consistent message.

        If you want to keep decrying the Mantra, and our Method, then you are just like the guy who told Thomas Payne that HIS method of spreading around pieces of paper was not DOING anything.

  3. #8 by dungeoneer on 05/06/2012 - 6:56 am

    I was a chronic case.I used to wake up and fall asleep everyday soaked in Jewspittle.I`ve been in recovery for a year and a half here at BUGS.

    Stay strong Jew addicts,you can beat this thing.

  4. #9 by Dick_Whitman on 05/06/2012 - 8:56 am

    “Somebody threw in “Israel for Jews” into my nice, neat, Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans.” (Bob)

    You caught me, I relapsed. I was keeping a flask of “Joo Beam” in my coat pocket when I wrote that.

    I admit I am powerless to control this addiction and put it in the hands of my higher power.

    I apologize to anyone here who I may have hurt with my addiction.

    I will continue to take a moral inventory of myself and improve my SWARM work as much as possible.

    • #10 by Dick_Whitman on 05/06/2012 - 2:53 pm

      “I admit I am powerless to control this addiction and put it in the hands of my higher power.” (DW)

      I’ll let Jesus/Thor/The Kalki handle the Joos, as I just remain on message.

  5. #11 by Dissident on 05/06/2012 - 9:51 am

    Dwell on the crime, but don’t mention the perpetrator! That is akin to Politically Correct media that talks about crime, yet refuses to mention race.

    To be frank, I think your “Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans” is flawed. Haiti and Jamaica are not in Africa, but they are predominantly black.

    Using the “third world” in the mantra may also be problematic. First of all, it’s pejorative, and second, not all non-whites live in the third world. Is it ok for Japanese to flood into a white country? America has more blacks than the entire population of Canada. Would it be ok for them to flood into Canada and become the majority because they have American citizenship?

    Why is it that our politicians argue that Israel must be recognized as a “Jewish state,” yet argue for “diversity” in predominantly white countries? Why not point that out and put them in the uncomfortable position of having to explain it?

    If you do not accept Israel as a “Jewish state,” you are an “anti-semite.”

    If you do not accept “white countries for everyone,” you are a “naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

    It’s not suggesting some conspiracy — just pointing out a reality.

    But if you mention Israel, you will get dragged into discussion about the Middle East? Not anymore than you would get dragged into discussion about Africa by saying, “Africa for the Africans,” or a discussion about Asia by saying, “Asia for the Asians.”

    I don’t come from Stormfront, but if it offends you so much, why have a link to it on your web site?

    If you hate it when people talk about Jews so much, why do you think that David Duke, who has pretty much dedicated his life to it, is such a wonderful guy? Be consistent… isn’t that what you preach?

    • #12 by H.Avenger on 05/06/2012 - 10:45 am


      Ole Bob is addressing the Swarm. He teaches practical politics. Which starts with a message and staying on message. He is bitching at someone for going OFF message.

      In context, there would be areas in a particular discussion to potentially discuss the numerous Jewish contradictions.

      “To be frank, I think your “Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans” is flawed. Haiti and Jamaica are not in Africa, but they are predominantly black.”

      Amateurs get it half right. The easy half. What do you know about writing consistent messages? What do you have in resume in regards to writing effective consistent messages that ACTUALLY work?
      If you knew anything about consistent messages. You would know there is no perfection to be found. We use the term optimal. And optimal simply means the message works. The message is easily spread. The message is workable for anyone. A 5 year old can go out and see that it works.

      Basically, BUGS is a study in doing WHAT Works. And when something does work…..we just keep it doing it and we don’t tinker.

      In regards to David Duke, I have been on his Rense show. And most notice one thing very quickly about David. He is very good at getting out the message of Jewish Supremicism. He has been a powerhouse of performance on this issue. He DOES not bother to come over and post on the Swarm. He has HIS OWN site for this. David understands what we are doing over here. And knows the Swarm is for Spreading our Message about White Genocide. Ole Bob is making sure the SWARM remembers WHAT the SWARM is for…..that is Bob’s Job

      • #13 by Dissident on 05/07/2012 - 3:09 am

        “African countries for Africans” is simple, no? Or, is it no longer optimal if you add an extra letter and a two-syllable word? What about “black countries for blacks”? Too complicated?

        When something works, you should be able to measure success. Has the change in demographics slowed down or accelerated? I know what you’re going to say: demoralized society… 15 years… internet…. So, we’re back to posting on the internet while things are rapidly changing in the real world. That will work?

        You expect that what you say be accepted as fact without evidence. How is that any different from “wordism”? Just accept that these words are true….

        I know, I’m being critical, asking questions and being a smart ass about it. That’s not something that people on Bugs should do, right?

        • #14 by Jason Here on 05/07/2012 - 3:47 am

          Here is one sign that there is something good about the Mantra: I have yet to hear anyone in real life have a good comeback. All the anti-Whites respond with just a few things, such as name calling or admitting they want White Genocide, which works to our advantage. When the other side can’t respond, that is powerful

        • #15 by H.Avenger on 05/07/2012 - 10:56 am


          You are not being a smart ass. You are being a dumb ass. We have been around 3 years over at WRR. We got a Swarm. And IF you did your homework. We have metrics. Check out a good example below.

          I expect pretty big advances in the coming months (especially over the next 12). When you are operating under the “basics” things tend to happen in your favor. We are on the eve of the Berlin Wall coming down. At BUGS, we are doing our historic part. Putting out a message that fractures the wall itself (this ain’t Bob’s first rodeo)

          On the eve of the Berlin Wall coming down, I expect to get a lot of posts like yours. So thanks for posting. I am always excited to read skeptical posts. You and your kind are a proxy that we are much closer to a breakout event. There are going to be a lot of skeptics and “all hope is lost” types running around assuming that the status quo is never going to change……right at the end.

          Thanks for commenting. And stick around awhile….breakout events tend to happen when the lemmings least expect them.

    • #16 by beefcake on 05/06/2012 - 10:59 am

      Dissident, how much success have you had waking up Whites by talking about Jews?

      Does it actually wake them up?

      Notice how you lose the Audience and leaves you frustrated that they will not stick around to listen to you rant on about Jews?

      We have enough Gentiles who look White who are Anti-White as traitors who are just as problematic.

      We, the SWARM, put BOTH Jews and Gentile traitors into the same category, Anti-Whites.

      We point that finger at ANYONE who looks like us who has no loyalty to us, but we got ONE label, Anti-Whites. We are busy waking up Whites to White Genocide, not wasting time breaking down every enemy into little categories for an Audience that is not even aware of the Big Picture yet.

      There are many reasons for this, not least of which is, when you start talking about JOOS you LOSE the Audience.

      We have to use terminology that our enemy has not been able to brainwash and condition people to dismiss.

      The WHOLE POINT is to wake up the Audience to White Genocide.

      When the AUDIENCE is trained to dismiss anyone who talks about JOOS as an evilracistnaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews, then by talking about Jews you cause the Audience to be dismissive of everything else you have to say.

      The OTHER issue is you invite in Mantra Cock Blockers who are other Non-Mantra using Pro-whites who want nothing more than to talk about Jews, to end up losing the Audience in front of us.

      If you talk about something that loses the Audience then nothing else you have to say will be heard.

      So there are certain subjects we stay away from.

      It DOES NOT MATTER if something is true information if it causes the Audience to dismiss you.

      Joos are just a puzzle piece anyway. You don’t show people the big picture by talking about the puzzle pieces. You got to show them the big picture, and THAT is White Genocide.

      It is something the Audience cannot be trained to dismiss. That is WHY we keep the subject on White Genocide.

      Talking about Joos is not effective. If it was effective then all Whites would ALREADY be awake, as Pro-Whites have been losing the Audience to Joo talk for decades.

      Having a pile of truth is no more useful than a pile of steel. You need to forge it into a weapon, and the Mantra is truth forged into a Weapon.

      That is why even if what you say about Joos is true, it is left out of the Mantra for a reason.

    • #17 by dungeoneer on 05/06/2012 - 11:20 am

      You don`t come from Stormfront,you`re not a BUGSer,and you have no experience in political warfare to show us, but you decide to use this opportunity to give us your reasons not to use the mantra because in your opinion it does`nt work.

      Comical,and insulting.

    • #18 by Harumphty Dumpty on 05/06/2012 - 2:28 pm

      “Dwell on the crime, but don’t mention the perpetrator! That is akin to Politically Correct media that talks about crime, yet refuses to mention race.”

      It’s “akin” in your mind, but not in the mind of a large number of Whites, who aren’t aware that any crime has been committed. They APPROVE of school desegregation, so I can post forever the article in the Jewish Journal about all the Jewish lawyers in the case having their reunion and celebrating all the Jewish influence that was brought to bear on that case, without accomplishing anything except strengthening the view of my White readers that Jews are fine people who help us to progress.

      First things first!

      • #19 by Harumphty Dumpty on 05/06/2012 - 2:53 pm

        And in the areas where Whites do feel there is some crime being committed against them, when someone starts talking about Jews to them almost all of them just feel more irritated than before that the only people taking their side are cranks.

        That’s just the sad state of affairs, that anti-Whites have worked long and hard and successfully to bring about.

        Our methodology sidesteps the terminology and falsehoods that anti-Whites have successfully implanted in Whites, and eventually replaces them with our pro-White terminology and understandings.

  6. #20 by Dick_Whitman on 05/06/2012 - 11:00 am

    Dissident, listen to “Beefcake’s Boot-camp” for a good lesson on our message and a consistent message in general. See link below:

    You should start with eposode #1 and listen to all of them.

    Or, a good one for you to start with would be episode 9 “Do not tailgate.”

  7. #21 by Epiphany on 05/06/2012 - 12:01 pm

    BGlass has an interesting point: America is called an Experiment, and Americans are called Consumers, not Citizens, in this society. Indeed, the word “Consumer” does sound rather parasitic. For, what does a “Consumer” do but “Consume”?

    It does sound rather sickening too. The image comes to mind of Evil Scientists trying to experiment on said “Consumers” implementing all sorts of Propaganda techniques, via television and the movies, to manipulate them into thinking illogical things and acting against their best interests.

  8. #22 by backbaygrouch on 05/06/2012 - 12:15 pm

    Shuffling some boxes of books yesterday I came across on the Spanish Civil War, Sir Arnold Lunn’s Spanish Rehearsal, reprinted with a forward by William Buckley in1974. It fell open right after reading Bob’s article.

    A tidbit from WFB: “Arnold Lunn exhibited the kind of indignation over the atrocities visited upon innocent Christians which is taken for granted – I mean the indignation – when the victims are Jewish. This volume shows not the selective indignation….”

    This observation is obvious to the point of triteness, but in the hands of the hatemongers at the ADL or the SPLC he would be castigated as an anti-Semite today. Could it be that the Grand Inquisitor of Pat Buchanan and Joe Sobran was a recovering Jewaholic?

    Mea culpa.

  9. #23 by Harumphty Dumpty on 05/06/2012 - 2:06 pm

    Well I’ll be darned. I’ll erase that one from my list of mini-mantras. I’ve been using it ever since I saw it on the post-seminar thread at SF way back then, and it seemed to work pretty good. It never got me in trouble that I know of. I had thought of it as being a different breed of animal from other Jew stuff, which I’ve railed against here.

    Oh, I see the author! Ah well…I always wanted to meet you and congratulate you on that, but I guess I won’t now!

    I never thought about that mini-mantra before, but now I am and I see Bob’s right…there’s lots of reasons not to use it, all having to do with exactly what he says.

  10. #24 by Coniglio Bianco on 05/06/2012 - 3:37 pm


    Did you realise that Duke came out with his new ‘human diversity’ paradigm the day before having you on his show? Why do you think he would do that Horus? I’ll tell you why it’s because Duke sees you as competition. He doesn’t want to lose the limelight so he came up with his own solution to our problem. A ‘new paradigm’ that will completely revolutionise our way of thinking. Instead of embracing the mantra or talking about White genocide he has decided that promoting ‘human diversity’ is the answer. It’s the answer because he is the one who came up with the idea. Obviously he doesn’t believe that the mantra is the solution or else he would be out promoting it instead of his drivel about ‘human diversity’.

    Duke is not interested in the mantra. Duke is interested in himself. He is controlled opposition.

    Wake up and smell the carrot juice Horus.

    • #25 by dungeoneer on 05/06/2012 - 4:12 pm

      Dr Duke is making a mantra point by saying “Diversity” that does not include white people is a sham.

      • #26 by Harumphty Dumpty on 05/06/2012 - 6:48 pm

        Exactly, and beautifully put!

    • #27 by Dick_Whitman on 05/06/2012 - 5:01 pm

      Is he interested only in himself or is he controlled opposition?

      Either way he does use peculiar tactics?

      If he’s worried about Horus taking “the limelight” then it’s funny that he would invite Horus on his show 2 or 3 times?

      If he’s controlled opposition (and not interested in the mantra) it’s funny that he would invite Horus on his show and spend the whole time talking about BUGS talking points? I’ve also noticed him using BUGS concepts and talking points in his videos.

      I am slow in my mental facilities so maybe I just don’t understand this obviously sinister man’s strategy?

      If only I had the same level of illumination as Coniglio Bianco, I would be able to see (and comprehend) these mysteries myself?


      • #28 by Harumphty Dumpty on 05/06/2012 - 6:49 pm

        Lol…this is a beautiful post too!

      • #29 by Coniglio Bianco on 05/06/2012 - 10:22 pm

        It’s called keeping your friends close and your enemies closer. Duke is attempting to take advantage of Horus and boost his own popularity in the process. I don’t trust Duke’s motivations because I have never seen him do anything that he didn’t personally benefit from in one way or another.

        Duke’s strategy is and always has been shameless self-promotion.

        • #30 by Gavin on 05/06/2012 - 11:34 pm

          Yeah, I’m sure that David has done everything he has done because of the great personal benefits that come from being a pro-White dissident; you know all those jail sentences, harassment and vicious personal attacks.

          I honestly cannot fathom how anyone can call David Duke “controlled opposition” he speaks out against White genocide, he doesn’t back down or compromise on his loyalty to our race.

          I completely disagree with your view of David Duke.

          • #31 by Coniglio Bianco on 05/07/2012 - 2:53 pm

            You mean great personal benefits like never having to work a day in your entire life? You mean the jail sentences that come from defrauding your supporters out of hundreds of thousands of dollars and spending the proceeds of your crime gambling on riverboat casinos?

            The only thing that Duke has never compromised is his willingness to rip off his own supporters to fund his extravagant jet-setting womanizing lifestyle.

            If you want to associate the mantra with a known huckster and con-artist then go right ahead. Don’t say no one ever warned you.

        • #32 by H.Avenger on 05/07/2012 - 11:07 am


          He is doing a piss poor job of taking advantage of me. He should be having me on more. He should put up a cool link on his very popular website. He should give me free ad time on his radio show. YES, he should take advantage and “ride the white rabbit comet”.

          David Dukes does his own thing. His own way. He is a dissident. They are all self promoters. AND DUHHH……why in the hell would he have anyone on his show that WAS NOT going to bring in listeners. So yes, if you ever have a radio show you should bring on guests that are popular. This is just common sense.

    • #33 by Harumphty Dumpty on 05/06/2012 - 6:46 pm

      Duke had his “new” paradigm quite awhile before Horus appeared on his show, if we’re thinking of the same fairly recent appearance.

      And the paradigm isn’t really new…after Duke announced it, I realized it had just been sitting there in what he’s already been saying for years (I must have listened to at least a 100 of his earlier podcasts), just waiting for him or someone to see it. He had been presenting such statements as additional material, and apparently he realized that they actually provide a useful context for everything else he says.

      And the Mantra also fits perfectly within the context of his paradigm. He cherishes (and I have no reason to doubt it, since he seems to enjoy the world) the preservation of all peoples in their diversity, and believes all people need a homeland for themselves where they can maintain themselves biologically and culturally.

      Don’t you feel the same? I do. When I go to Mexico, I want to feel like I’m in Mexico (I don’t quite anymore), and when I return to the U.S. I definitely would like to feel like I’m in the U.S. (I certainly don’t anymore).

      Have you spent any time with Duke? I saw him at the seminar, and was with him up close on the nature hike the next day. I’ve never met anyone who gives less appearance of having a monster ego, or seems more sincerely dedicated and worthy of respect. Just my impression and opinion.

      • #34 by The Seeker of Truth on 05/07/2012 - 4:57 pm

        I don’t know about all that but I certainly saw that wonderful piece of Ukranian eye candy he had on his arm!

  11. #35 by Simmons on 05/06/2012 - 5:05 pm

    Are jews anti-white?

    If you cannot learn to ask questions you are a tool, literally.

    • #36 by Genseric on 05/07/2012 - 5:30 am

      Is a 40-pound rabbit fat?

  12. #37 by James C on 05/06/2012 - 6:25 pm

    I think that one reason mentioning israel and the jews is counterproductive is that a great deal of genuine leftists are anti-zionist as well.

    The Palestinians have a lot more sympathy among non-neo cons and non-zio”christians” than you might realize.

    We don’t want to cast ourselves as wanting to be those brutal israelis no do we?

    • #38 by Harumphty Dumpty on 05/06/2012 - 7:05 pm

      “a great deal of genuine leftists are anti-zionist as well.”

      Absolutely. The Palestinians have fit very nicely in the left’s category of “the oppressed peoples of the world.”

      That’s the reason I’d stopped using lately that mini-Mantra that Bob is addressing (even though I had fallen in love with it when I first saw it, and had raved about it on the SF thread I found it on)…it’s message was a bit confusing since many of the people we argue with are anti-Israel. I even heard Mark Potok (half-Jewish, he says) say in a radio interview with Jim Giles that he didn’t care much for Israel and its policies, and anyone familiar with how leftists say those things could tell he meant it.

      When I came to this thread today, having seen the title I was curious who had transgressed this time…I was surprised to find that me and my second favorite mini-mantra were among the number! But I do get it. I was a beginner and didn’t think about this mini-mantra when I received it. Not that I might have done any better thinking about it on my own now.

  13. #39 by AnotherWhiteRabbit88 on 05/06/2012 - 6:39 pm

    My name is AnotherWhiteRabbit and I am a Jewaholic – I am guilty of posting “Israel for Jews or your an anti semite!” which was contained in a Mantra I copied and pasted from another location on the web. This will not happen again and I will strive my hardest to beat my addiction and become the best man that I can be…

    Thankyou… 🙂

  14. #40 by Jason Here on 05/06/2012 - 7:53 pm

    In addition to Jew-intoxication, I think we should all remember what beefcake (I think it was him) said about posting to pro-White forums – take ‘er easy. I think I was actually DELAYED from coming here for close to a year because someone took over a thread at TOO and posted the Mantra over and over and got a bit belligerent with anyone that complained. I say, post it once, and then answer questions if they come up. I just remember it was a big turn off initially to see it posted 3 or 4 times in a thread that was already pro-White.

    • #41 by Harumphty Dumpty on 05/07/2012 - 3:50 pm

      This is an extremely important comment, and I hope we all note it.

      Jason, are you speaking of posting the full Mantra, or even just making Mantra points and using some Mantra phrases as well?

      I do the latter, but need to avoid drifting into belligerence with it.

      Do you think even that is too much?

      • #42 by Jason Here on 05/07/2012 - 7:34 pm

        It was the full mantra posted several times I believe. I have a hard time not getting belligerent too by the way! Once you “get it”, you want others to snap out of their haze. There is nothing wrong with just using some of the phrases I don’t think. I honestly don’t know what the best approach with the pro-White but anti-Mantra crowds is. I don’t think it really took me a year, but it was several months, maybe it just takes time to work.

        On TOO, so many are caught up in Wordism. It’s more fun to express their own “creative” ideas about Christ or whatever than to do the hard (and sometimes less exciting) work of posting the Mantra. Intellectuals see themselves as deep thinkers – lol.

        Matt thinks being concerned with race as the primary goal is too “reductionist”, if I understand him correctly. He thinks Whites require a Fairy Tale to be motivated or some deep inner journey (as you can tell I’m not a fan of that approach). I’m not against religion, I just don’t think White people are looking to us for spiritual salvation, and all such Wordist debates just divide us. Greg Johnson and the Royal Prince just seem to love Hitler and Fascism. I don’t think people like that will ever be won over.

        Kevin MacDonald is a fan and that is good. So, after all this verbiage, I have nothing, sorry. I just wish we could get 10 more solid posters soon.

  15. #43 by Jason Here on 05/07/2012 - 2:17 am

    I see Bob’s point in action tonight. A good thread on the Greek election has good comments from our side, but a few want to veer off onto the Jew-thing. They may be rabid Christians. It takes the conversation off White Genocide and puts it on esoteric conspiracy theories that turn people off. Bob is right.

  16. #44 by Jason Here on 05/07/2012 - 4:42 am

    This is a response to one of my posts on Genocide. I actually think this works FOR us. He said:

    “Seeing your verbal diarrhea and “genocide” spewed all over this board I really don’t see anything there that is worth preserving… What’s so great about being white if all we can do is spew some half brained rhetoric about us being “genocided out of existence”?”

    That is a great response because the person has literally exposed himself as being FOR White Genocide. He has made our case for us. I love this approach of letting the anti-Whites expose themselves. Bob, Horus and Beefcake (and the rest of you guys) are right – once you say “I’m for genocide”, you lose. And way too many of these anti-White goobers are willing to admit it.

  17. #45 by John White on 05/07/2012 - 5:26 am

    I appreciate Mr. Whitaker’s emphasis on the need to stay on message and to use the approach that works most effectively for the general public.

    That being said, I think it would be nice if we could -for once- make our point without attacking other people, groups or websites. We can do our own thing and leave others alone doing theirs.

    I say this because I’m detecting a worrying tendency of Mantra-ism, in the sense that every other group who is not using the Mantra is being insulted or looked down upon.

    I have yet to see an advertisement who insults those it tries to get to buy the product.

  18. #46 by BGLass on 05/07/2012 - 10:08 am

    I don’t really get N&J, not that I don’t know everything about jews that the N&J-ers have to say. I do.

    But I’m not one. And not Catholic, either. To me, and to many friends, those two are just different groups from us, both have factions with highly organized and highly political aims— both have factions that hate us, and some that want nothing more than our white subgroup genocide. And that’s a fact. In Europe, they’ve pretty much wiped us out. The u.s. was a blessing for awhile, a place to live, to “do it” FROM (to create and build), but it is no longer the same kind of blessing now.

    (Why they are so hellbent on wiping us out –and not just recently, but for centuries) I really do not know—as we have quite a lot to offer and are good thinkers, honest, value truth, and are acknowledged as such, and much more–so couldn’t these other white groups make use of that?)

    Anyway, if someone goes into N&J— first I just assume they are really catholic. Just like the jews going on about “christians,” by which they usually mean –if you listen— a) organized romanism from the pope’s politicking or b) germanic looking people (blonde) which can be a code for protestant often, but is reacted to mostly because they have been t.v. nazis for so long, (always the little demon children like the blonde demon babies in Village of the Damned). Blonde equal nazi-demon in t.v. speak.

    Many other white groups benefit from this demonizing.

    If someone goes on about how badly the Irish were mistreated in the u.s. (and without have any blame worthy behaviors in their own groups in the past, of course, which might cause that)— what is the difference between this (on a level) and blacks going on about THEIR miserable treatment, and with no blame worthy behaviors, etc. Or Jews and the holocaust.

    It all just adds up to more people bitching about how evil I AM, and how they do no wrong, but I am the grand mistreater of the whole universe.

    N&J- era are just the people who blame the jews, and like said, often assume they are catholic, as —as it is presented now– are a reactionary movement to jews (and I am not involved in any reactionary movement to jews). Luther went on about jews AND the pope, not that I’m lutheran, either, but just to point out that it’s not an either/or. Like, you have to “side” with either jews or the pope. Who cares?

    Then there’s this thing: are they a race or religion. Well, obviously many of them think they are a race. But SINCE THAT IS THE MEME put out there— that they are a religion, then that just makes the catholics and jews equal. Like, we learn that they are a “religion” not race.

    And from the nationalist perspective, that actually makes jews better (at least they are tribal and admit it where the catholic is a “universal religion).

    Anyway, both those religions (that are both tied to ethnic groups, racial groups, actually) have factions that hate me and would like to see me wiped out, and historically have actually succeeded in wiping me out in parts of the world, in europe, especially, but also in South Africa, for instance.

    Frankly, the whole thing —if you look at it honstely— would just make a Nordicist out of you.

    Jews and catholics are the people most prominent on things such as Supreme Court and involved in Hart-Celler and on t.v. shows like Fox or CNN, and absolutely make up the WHITE majority in the Central Power Cities (NYC is only 4% WASP, likewise chicago, d.c., L.A., etc.) The white breakdowns do not include the ethnic group most associated with the founders at all, nor the majority religion (actually still protestantism) in the greater u.s. (The numbers are deceptive b/c the (non-protestant) Powers That BE count each protestant “heretical” “sect” separately in their statistics.

    One of the problems is how deeply the average Northern European non-jew/ non-catholics feel alienated from what was once their country, identifying as NO harmed out group, no Irish persecution in nyc, as only “the bad whites”— the NON-immigrants, the smallpox bearing pioneers, the murderers of the wise indians, etc, etc.

    And so there you are.

    And the rest is just a bunch of people bitching about you—- whether it’s a holocaust, or diseases you brought, or Irish need not apply signs, (didn’t we fight the fucking English even if we were English anyway you idiots?—so there and quit griping), then the slavery, etc…

    Oh— and we’re too logical, too Germanic, too smart, too Anglo-Saxon, too REASONABLE (god forbid).

    This means… we are stiff, without life, bloodless, “can’t dance,” or “can’t jump” (Woody Harrelson movie). And on and on.

    N&J is just “Irish need not apply,” or a holocaust or slavery or whatever—- more bitching blaming.

    The only good thing about N&J—- is the catholics seem to be off how protestants destroyed the u.s. for five minutes. It’s a relief, in a way, not be on the blame seat (and that’s all.)

    N&J—- from the wasp perspective— (this is never mentioned)—- means only one thing: the wasp is not the target of the scapegoating for a second.

    And that is all it means to a lot of wasps.

    It’s hard not to take the bait on the issue of how boring N&J is.

  19. #47 by BGLass on 05/07/2012 - 10:34 am

    Boiled down: all N&J means is that –I personally– am off your scapegoat seat for a minute.

    While it’s nice not to be Evil-of-the-whole-Universe for a minute—- it would also be FOOLISH not to notice this ploy to engage my affections, for me to “take sides”

    —- what’s offered TO ME is that I can gang up on someone else (to blame them) in exchange for not being blamed myself.

    And that’s what kind of friendship is offered here. It may be useful, it may not be.

    But to blindly jump on the N&J Bandwagon out of sheer relief at not BEING the blame-victim, myself, would just expose me as being useable…right?

  20. #48 by BGLass on 05/07/2012 - 10:49 am

    and just an aside— I disagree with Horus in his pod that Technology trumps Land in terms of how we survive.

    It’s true in a way, but the whole point of Land is having a place to do it FROM. This idea that we must be totally mobile and create technology— is fine, in the sense that we CAN do it, we are adaptable, but nothing beats having a home and a home means land— a place to create it FROM.

    Also, from the land comes all forms of abundance of life— seeds, food, sustainable animals to eat, wood and materials for shelters, etc. Every single thing that one needs for life comes from Land.

    That’s why “elites” cordon off so much of it. To control the LAND is to control life, itself. By controlling land, one controls food supply, seeds, housing, etc.

    Gotta side with aristocracy on that one.

    Once you have a castle, a home, LAND, you can do anything. You can’t eat airplanes.

    • #49 by James C on 05/07/2012 - 6:58 pm

      In 1480 the Indians had a lot more land than Europeans, but we had the technology.

      Today the Indians only have the land that White governments let them have.

      If you have the best technology, you can take any land you want.

      • #50 by Dick_Whitman on 05/07/2012 - 7:14 pm

        That was the thinking in Vietnam as well. The US lost that war. OF course, the US didn’t have the WILL to fight in Vietnam like it did with the Indians or even the Germans in WWII (meaning the US had the WILL to keep bombing civilians until they gave up).

        Anyway. none of that matters now.

        Now we must WILL the Mantra to the tipping point.

        We will WILL the Mantra to the tipping point (tipping point meaning the point where the anti-Whites system goes into free fall and collapses into a pile of dust (figuratively of course).

  21. #51 by BGLass on 05/07/2012 - 11:04 am

    People stuck on N&J are in the business of Assigning Blame— and one unspoken part of this is how they train the gaze away from THEMSELVES.

    So, the most important thing about N&J is to note the speaker. Who wants to place blame where and why, and why now?

    That’s why I usually framed it by saying “The catholic-jewish coalitions of the 60s are breaking down.”

    Catholics want me to join them in blaming jews (obviously) — why? What’s in it for me?— other than not being used as a cultural punching bag, myself.

    And really, do we have to have a punching bag… etc.

    How deeply is this cultural Scapegoating NEED of some white groups associated with “judeo-christianity?”

    Judeo— from the jews’ goat in Leviticus, who they have to pray the sins of the community into, before throwing the goat off a cliff, celebrated by yom kippur.

    Christian in that Jesus became the goat.

    But underlying this… the whole issue of Self-Abnegation that Mr. Whitaker discusses. This need not to accept responsibility for living, which would include one’s sinning, etc. This need to maintain “morality.”

  22. #52 by BGLass on 05/07/2012 - 11:13 am

    A final note on morality—

    It’s clear that Appearing Moral (not being moral) is very important to the white person.

    THEREFORE— withholding morality from the anti-white becomes the next move.

    Let people do whatever they will, have whatever they can take—- but REFUSE to let them see themselves as GOOD because of it.

  23. #53 by BGLass on 05/07/2012 - 11:26 am

    Final observation—

    From being in big cities, where the often minority-white population is made up of majority catholics and a minority of jews who are then seen to have “disproportionate” power (to catholics who are the only other whites there and who are the majority numerically like in nyc, detroit, chicago, etc.)—

    Such issues just have nothing to do with wasps, as wasps are not involved in those areas, (or pretty much anywhere as they have been wiped out, right?)

    LOL— to say “Jews are so smart” (and be upset about it) is just to say they are smarter THAN YOU, (usually this is what you really mean).

    So, careful in saying those things, since it just exposes your own ambitions and failings, possibly.

    Wearing it all on your sleeve is a vulnerability.

  24. #54 by BGLass on 05/07/2012 - 11:50 am

    Face it—

    It was OTHER WHITE PEOPLE who changed “The American Dream” of a home (that one really owned, i.e. with no mortgage, no taxes so neo-feudal lords can’t take it away, and gun rights to defend it) — into one more cheesy portfolio investment.

    Such WHITES exposed that they DO NOT really NEED A HOME (a place to create things FROM)— a “safe base of operations.”

    THEY, themselves, turned their homes into high-taxed, high-mortgaged, investment opportunities.

    They, themselves, worked as Realtors in the process.

    These WHITES couldn’t even park their own ass somewhere— much less use their positions of “power” when they weaseled into government, to hang onto the real rights inherent in having a home, (no tax, guns, etc.) so it’s no wonder the larger homeland was diminished.

    Concentrate on getting a neighborhood, then maybe you get a country, right?

    Those silly WHITES of the sort who NEED no home (except as an “investment” that might double because they have nothing TO DO, nothing to create, nothing burning to think about that would require them to have a “home” in the way Americans used to)—

    at root, materialism exposes a gutting of the human potential. What happens when people become non-creators. Then things such as turning homes into “investment opportunities” happen.

    If they burned to create or make, then they would crave a real home.

    — this thing about land is interesting.

  25. #55 by The Seeker of Truth on 05/07/2012 - 4:52 pm

    “Somebody threw in “Israel for Jews” into my nice, neat, Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans.

    Outside of satisfying your ADDICTION for talking about Jews, what GOOD does that do?”

    What do you mean what good does that do? That is a perfect example of the double standard set in place against us. Why is it okay for Israel to kick out Ethiopians? Why is it okay for Israel to have Jew only neighborhoods? Why is all of that denied my people?

    H. Avenger, I guess you can call me a dumb ass as well because I agree with Dissident. Harping on Jews is counterproductive. Pointing out double standards is not.

    P.S. This cult mentality is a little tiresome.

    • #56 by dungeoneer on 05/07/2012 - 7:05 pm

      “What do you mean what good does that do? That is a perfect example of the double standard set in place against us.”

      WHY do you think Israel is a more “perfect” example than:

      “Africa for the Africans,Asia for the Asians…” ?

      From a white survival viewpoint it`s just another non-white country that does`nt have genocide forced on it,and you can`t deny that it comes with a mountain of political baggage that plain old non-white countries don`t.

    • #57 by James C on 05/07/2012 - 7:28 pm

      “Why is it okay for Israel to kick out Ethiopians?”

      “Harping on Jews is counterproductive. Pointing out double standards is not.”

      Putting ourselves on the wrong side of a double standard argument is counterproductive.

      Zionist israel isn’t anywhere near as popular as seen on tv. I don’t want the fate of my race tied to the fate of israel.

      Israel is the least popular country in the world, huindreds of millions of people deplore their oppression of the Palestinians. Neo-cons even complain that college campuses are “rife with anti-semitism” (really anti-zionism).

      White people tend to see israeli jews as white, and Palestinians as non-white. They see the same white oppressor, non-white victim dynamic they’ve been taught their whole lives.

      We’ve got our own alleged “sins” to deal with, we don’t need their too. Do you want to fight an energy flow or use it to our advantage?

      Bob and Horus know what they are talking about. A wise man knows when to learn from a genuine expert.

    • #58 by Jason Here on 05/07/2012 - 7:43 pm

      In my experience, talking about Israel bores most White people to death. They really try and avoid thinking about it. Israel is such a complicated issue on so many levels, that you can spend hours going through it all. No one is going to sit still for that. Not that Israel should get a free ride – among people who are interested, there is plenty of good information out there. But the purpose of the Mantra, as I understand it, is to change how the MASS of White people think.

      The other problem is that some people who talk about Israel endlessly don’t really care about Whites at all, they just hate Jews. From my limited experience, they do more harm than good. They will step all over good pro-White points in order to get the thrill of verbally insulting Jews.

  26. #59 by Dick_Whitman on 05/07/2012 - 5:23 pm

    “But I’m not one. And not Catholic, either. To me, and to many friends, those two are just different groups from us, both have factions with highly organized and highly political aims— both have factions that hate us, and some that want nothing more than our white subgroup genocide. And that’s a fact. In Europe, they’ve pretty much wiped us out.” (BGLass)

    The Catholic Church is no different than any other large organization in that it’s complicit in the program of White genocide. But I see no difference in attitudes towards White genocide with the average Catholic than I do the average Protestant. In fact, the Catholics are much less destructive when compared with the John Hagee type evangelicals.

    Perhaps in the future BUGSters can learn to keep their personal gripes with this or that religion or sub-ethnic group to themselves.

  27. #60 by BoardAd on 05/07/2012 - 8:12 pm

    Get off of it people.

    Comments closed.

  28. #61 by shari on 05/07/2012 - 7:17 pm

    BGLass You say so much that I agree with, though I’m not a Southerner, but a Westerner. I have always thought something was missing though. The West is too recent.
    Our little house is “paid” for. I know it’s never paid for, but I never thought of a house as an investment. I’ve always felt very stupid and unastute though, for my thoughts. I want very much the end of all this Anti-White evil
    I am not Catholic either, though I tried. It didn’t work. I have always thought there was something beautiful there though. Methodism was already pretty anemic by the Sixties.

    Sorry for the digression.

Comments are closed.