The first line about everybody says there is this race problem has given anti-whites their best chance to try to change the subject,

From our experience USING the Mantra — which is what counts — the first line should now be “African for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody! WITHOUT the everybody says line.

Please note that I have admitted you’ve come very far when we consider changing the Mantra itself.

Naturally we will continue to need to move wording around to get around the despots.

But please remember that having to get around censorship is an HONOR. It demonstrates you are dealing with tyranny, which shows you are hitting the bad guys where it HURTS.

Our Dave’s statement about the close relation between Mantra Thinking and my time as an interrogator continues to be a source of fascination and of joy to me.

Despite my bitching, our commentary is at a high level, but I long for a seminar participant who gives ME something to mull over.

An interrogator is irritating. He lets you get away with NO assumption.

So in my racial discussions, when someone says : “It’s just the color of the skin,” I am the only living human being who asks, “Why is that?” “What does the color of the skin mean to people?”

Everybody knows that. But that is exactly the kind of obvious remark in normal discussion that an interrogator in a serious interrogation will not allow to pass.

I have had people give me the Old, Old Story about how whites mistreat non-whites, tell me about racial discrimination and so forth. We have to accept that now but the time will come when you stop blacking out and can be more free in some of YOUR discussions.

Let me repeat that I had the anti-whites on their asses in such a short time that it was a standing joke as my colleagues watched another “anti-racist” get chopped up and they would bet on how many minutes I would take at it this time.

I used different methods depending on how the anti-white recitation started out, as I could long since handle any of them in a DISCIPLINED way.

If the standard sermon started out on how non-whites were oppressed, I would ask, “Is ALL of this just Evil Oppression?” You would be surprised at how difficult a question like that is to a person who is used to merely Reciting the Creed.

I would point out that all countries with colored skins were poor unless they sat on top of oil extracted by others. “Is all this just hate?”

This doesn’t sound like me now, but back then it was a game, because I wanted the people who were listening, and who had seen victims get in the Whitaker Slaughter House before to enjoy some variety, so others would come listen.

And it made things VERY hard on the anti-white.

It was, as Dave would indicate, a habit that made a good questioner. I went on to kill them with the developing Mantra, but an interrogator, unless time is limited as your case, NEVER allows his victim to just ride along and say what he always says.

And someone who is fresh from a thousand sermons from Father Mommy Professor is more shocked at being questioned than any black kid who was driving slowly through a rich neighborhood with a screw driver by happenstance.

Father Mommy Professor’s congregation was always so shocked to be questioned on doctrine and heresy that it made the process not only irresistible to an interrogator, but just plain FUN.

I am anxious for you to get past the Blackouts so you can eventually have some productive fun. An interrogator on a bus-man’s holiday can really make a curse for the bad guys.

But you have to get the basics right first. No more complicated stuff when they say race doesn’t exist. The Mantra says THEY define white. No more Jewaholism. No more maudlin “I love all races equally when only ours is threatened.”

The list goes on and on. But take my word for it, once you get those Blackouts hammered out, you can have some real bus-man’s vacation FUN.

I may be preaching to the converted, but I seem to have seen the Mantra begin with “They say there is a race problem…,” and I now find that isn’t direct enough. Now that my mind is aging, I may be more in tune with many of the minds we have to deal with.

To this seminar, I suggest that the lead, which is the last thing I added to the Mantra, should be included whenever possible as the first punch.

I also favor capitalizing ONLY and ALL in relation to white countries. That is more important to me than whether White is capitalized or not, which is an echo of the time we spent all our resources on that kind of detail.

I use white rather than White because it is easier to show that THEY define white every time they assign guilt and every time they demand a country take immigration and assimilate. Insisting on White screws that simple message up.

Those in charge define the rules and the definitions.

So there are Two Sides: The Ruling Side and everybody who opposes it in any way.

So pro-whites are lumped in with anti-white Catholic theologues as “the right,” because they both oppose some Ruling Side, leftist, European programs.

Professional conservatives are allowed to make their living by the Ruling Group. So no one demands a death penalty for heresy more than conservatives do.

Conservatives earn their keep by RATIFYING liberal policies. The Ruling Class puts in a policy and conservatives denounce it for a generation.

But then conservatives demand the death penalty for the same heresy that was their platform a decade earlier. At that point liberal columnists announce that “Even a conservative columnist now agrees with this policy>“

The Magic Phrase: “BOTH SIDES AGREE.”

I have to keep reminding people that “racist,” though the term is denounced by liberals, and respectable conservatives demand racists be burned alive, is effective because it never occurs to anybody to question it because BOTH SIDES agree about it.

So it comes as a shock when we don’t have a Blackout and point out that even if BOTH SIDES AGREE, “racism” is just the speaker’s opinion.

It was William Buckley, who was the only columnist to endorse the six-year prison sentence given by Austria for Holocaust Denial, who made it BOTH SIDES.

Dave, our own BUGSER Dave, not Dr. Duke, is exactly right when he points out how closely related my time as an interrogator is related to Mantra Thinking. You cannot let the other side get away with ANYTHING.

BOTH SIDES has nothing to do with reality.

One commenter said I am just like Jim Jones, and thank God we are not in Jonestown. I guess it would be Bobstown.

How many people would take an insult like that?

No one has even mentioned my discussion of the fact that after I wrote about Jewaholism and then wrote another argument, over seventy comments came in about Jews and Jewaholism and only one comment on the new article had anything to do with the new article.

I pointed out briefly that that was enormously insulting, but no one has mentioned it since.

It seems to me that insulting me is free of charge here.

Someone once called me white trash, and I pointed he had just proven I wasn’t. I pointed out that at that time in South Carolina, if he had called white trash white trash they would have pulled out their broad-bladed knife, which they opened with one hand, and slashed his face if he was lucky, his throat if he was not

Anything even vaguely approaching a Cult would make it fatal for a person to call me Jim Jones.

It doesn’t bother me. I expect a lot of silliness.

But if you’re going to learn to Mantra Think, you first have to be able to see reality.

Out of the eight or nine Crusades, only one was at all successful. More interesting is the fact that, in two or three of them, the Crusaders were on the verge of victory, their numbers were there and all enemy fortresses and forces had been dispersed.

In every one of those cases, the different leaders got down to disputing who was The Leader and how to proceed with the attack on that basis. In all two or three cases the Moslems had time to completely recover and totally defeat and in one case almost wipe out the Crusaders.

In one huge battle between a German tribe and Rome, the Germans were doing fine until one of their great leaders died. They then proceeded to go into official mourning, right there in the middle of the battle. It was a matter of Principle or Morality or whatever the hell else nitwits used to justify something besides fighting to win.

The Romans, surprisingly, did not go along with this quaint custom. They went out for a good old fashioned slaughter while the Germans were weeping.

I don’t CARE about Justice. I care about winning.

The traitors who are destroying us deserve no mercy, and the person saying this has been in through world wars. I am only interested in saying what is most effective to win and, once we gain the advantage, don’t follow the history of those dumbass Germans or the Crusaders.

As one commenter said, even the Tribunals demanded by the most chest beating glorifier will miss a LOT of the enemy. In the real world, most of the guilty will buy their way out, and, above all, the search will end.

Almost my sole interest is that we USE the money method our enemies have worked out so well.

Believe it or not, what I am most afraid is not Tribunals, but that once the tribunals are over, you’ll forget all about the pay system to keep people researching who and whose heirs must keep paying, not just after the tribunals are over, but ten years from now and a century from now.

Yes, yes, we are talking about Mere Money versus Human Life and all the rest. But in the real world and in the long term, all that chest-beating crap amounts to getting all the steam off.

Nobody remembers the Nuremberg Trials. Nobody is afraid of being called to a Tribunal in the real world. The Holocaust is remembered every day because it pays out billions of dollars each year.

As I just pointed out, professional conservatives are still decrying Hitler and none of them are asking that any Communist crime be punished for the simple reason that they will lost their JOBS if they get off the Holocaust-racist message.

Whatever else you do when the time COMES, please do not STOP with tribunals.

Keep the steam on.

With mere, dirty old MONEY.

This is more important to me than the whole question of your dramatic tribunals. I disavow tribunals now because they get us off the subject. I am even more worried that having anything that dramatic will blow off the steam and lead to the just as dramatic Love Fest afterwards.

WHATEVER YOU DO, KEEP ON THE STEAM!!!

The respectable conservative mantra has always been “It’s not about race.”

John Derbyshire was just fired by National Review because, among other things, he warned whites against going to a place which is almost all black. He did not make on single statement in that article that could be factually disagreed with by anybody who read it.

It was a set of banned truths.

For example, people often slip into saying that police are not allowed to “profile.” Then you watch a TV program the hero of which is a Police Profiler.

Racial profiling is outlawed, but not because it is not based on facts. A black person is six to twenty times as likely to have committed a crime than a white person.

This is the important point: The police are required to ignore that. Border patrols are required to insist that a person who is blond and has no accent is just as likely to be an illegal Mexican immigrant in El Paso as a brown person who speaks only Spanish.

This is for REAL, gang!

What is also for real is that any respectable conservative who repeats what I just said is fired.

Any respectable conservative who asks to for a definition of the word “racist” that he has just been called will be looking for a new job in this depression economy.

The same is true for any law enforcement officer.

Meanwhile, who mentions any of this?

Your Obedient Servant and no one else.

If commenters would stop worrying about how complicated Mantra Thinking is, they could concentrate on reading articles like this and learning that Mantra Thinking is ridding your mind of all the standard blocks. That is extremely difficult, but it is NOT complicated.

When someone says “racist,” point out that what he means is that IN HIS OPINION something is racist.

This changes the dialogue. He is now demanding laws to punish, not Racism, but ANYTHING HE CHOOSES TO CALL racism. But nobody, I mean NOBODY but me, and now the White Rabbit, can be trusted to say that.

I just had an article about how the media get away with short statements in the midst of articles which are dead wrong, fatally wrong, but anyone outside of Bob and Company will talk about the whole article and try to put that totally false statement “in the context” of the article.

We are always seeing professional conservatives say, “It’s not a matter of race.” According to present wage-earning respectable conservatives, nothing is a matter of race.

Especially race.

This Week Magazine had an article about different kinds of diets. It said, in passing, “Tests have shown that people on low carb diets do not lose more weight than those on other diets taking in the same number of calories.”

Low carb diets threatened to begin doing to the giant Nutritional Education Profession exactly what the discovery of bacteria did to medicine. Bacteria began the total destruction of everything Doctors of Medicine at the University had been paid to learn and know for a thousand years.

There have been plenty of those tests, but they certainly have not shown what the professional nutritionists would give a fortune to prove: that calories are all that matter.

If this had been a headline in a newspaper, it would have been subjected to complete scrutiny. I have been on low carb diets, and while it may not be true that “Calories Don’t Count,” it is for sure I lost a more weight and took in more calories.

But here is the problem: This was NOT a newspaper headline. It was a line in an article. A person who doesn’t think in Mantra terms wouldn’t even notice it.

Yet right here is what we observe all the time: An outright lie, but a lie in low key, a lie told while your attention is focused on where the article is taking you.

Another article in This Week said that “a test had proven” that people who are strongly against gays have gay tendencies themselves. In other words, instead of stating the standard Politically Correct line, they stuck it in the middle of a paragraph in the middle of an article.

ONLY, I repeat, ONLY a Mantra Thinker would say, “Hold it right there!”

I am not saying that there are no such tests. I am saying that the statements are lies.

I remember very well when anyone who said that blacks TESTED lower than whites was anaziswhowantedtokillsixmillionjews.

A Mantra Thinker is always on guard for that stray sentence that completely strips the speaker or writer of any credibility. Unlike most people, the instant he hears a statement like this dropped in, he goes through ALL the implications.

One of BUGsers’ most infuriating and effective strategies is that we don’t let go.

While The Party Line in The Week goes unquestioned, a professional interrogator would be useless if he let ONE such remark go without wringing every drop of sweat and admission he possibly could out of it. These sentences, in the hands of a Mantra Thinker, can destroy the entire credibility of the writer.

But the average person would simply do what most of our main page commenters do: He would take the article on diets AS A WHOLE and discuss what his World View on that question is.