I said in an article that our Boss here was not Bob, but whether what we try WORKS. A commenter asked, quite reasonably, “How do you know if it works?’
I am delighted that BUGSERS have already become experts at doing what it took me decades to learn: they look for OUR words, like “anti-white,” to appear. Only we know they are unique, and that is how I tracked my own trend during earlier battles.
In more specific terms you can only learn to gauge whether a particular approach works if you are in the midst of a debate, and can tell what is getting through. This is difficult, but there is joy in knowing that the other side has no idea you are doing this.
You can have the joy of knowing that the anti-whites, like all my foes and hurtful allies over the years, have not the slightest idea you have a means of tracking success which has nothing to do with Bill Buckley or some other Name approving you.
In fact, as I have said repeatedly, tracing an idea to me is fatal, because very, very few people really put their cause above their ego. So I had to find the signals and see them while absolutely no one else saw them, as we do with “anti-white,” “respectable conservative“ and the rest of a long list..
Most people simply will not join in a cause which has no polls and no score card. This is an INTEGRAL PART of my exercise of power. I took no credit, I had no ego. All I wanted was power.
And if there is no poll or other public indicator like a national columnist naming you, people will simply refuse to do the WORK.
I just want to rule the world. The rest was for the Big Names.
If you genuinely cannot figure out, in all those exchanges, whether something is working or not, you should stick strictly to the BUGS routine. If one in a hundred of our regular readers did that, we would be on our way.
Our routine has changed the language of politics enormously already, and nobody notices it but us.
Finding out how to judge our success in general and your success in particular is learned in the field.
But a few of us have greatly changed the language already.
Don’t vary it until you are sure you can judge the results.
Discussing theoretical changes with theoretical results is what makes one a Stormfronter instead of a BUGSER.
#1 by Genseric on 06/05/2012 - 8:42 am
This is a great piece, Bob. Especially the last line:
“Discussing theoretical changes with theoretical results is what makes one a Stormfronter instead of a BUGSER.”
There exists an OCEAN of difference between the two.
——————————–
Another commonly overlooked cardinal rule of practical politics is “If you want to affect change, then you must be willing to make a difficult decision. Let someone else take ALL of the credit.” How important is it to you to STOP White genocide? Only you can be certain.
#2 by BGLass on 06/05/2012 - 10:09 am
—Not so down on polls, in the sense that they are part of creating arguments— “buzz,” framing the debate, producing controlled opposition. Like, instead of saying “there is white genocide,” it’s “IS THERE white genocide…” then others are left to do the work of going on and on about it, in the circular ‘debates’ that are calculated never to be solved, putting the idea out there (whether or not the players profess that they are “pro” or “con”). An endless argument, an issue on which one must “take sides,” puts a repeater word into the world more than anything else. So, asking “why do you not believe in it????…but, but…”
#3 by David Joop on 06/05/2012 - 10:26 am
To those still unsure about the mantra, read this.
#4 by six gun on 06/05/2012 - 10:57 am
This is indeed an inspiring post. Bang on the money.
A mini Mantra tailored to perfection.
Because it was delivered perfectly in context and perfectly tailored for the context it was a bull’s eye shot.
No-one could knock it back with “racist.”
This baby flies right under the anti-racist ack-ack guns
They were left speechless.
It was so audacious it would have had a profound impact on at least one person in the class.
Diversity is not a term that features in the Mantra.
In my opinion the Mantra is a source of inspiration not a tablet of stone.
#5 by six gun on 06/05/2012 - 3:16 pm
I have read through the whitenewsnow thread.
I recommend everyone read this account.
I really enjoyed Ahnenerbe’s writing.
What I did notice is he created his own propaganda verses based on Mantra logic.
The Mantra was like a Meccano set; with him bolting bits together as he saw fit and adding his own parts as he wished.
Of course I spotted the Korea insertion for Taiwan, but more than this his mix and match philosophy made the “Everybody says” and “Everybody is told” arguments appear puerile.
The issues I had with the Mantra was its apparent rigidity. Operating like this chap suits me many times better.
The second point is all his Mantra “combat” was face-to-face. The point I made in the thread before last was I could not care less what the anti-White thinks after the skirmish, they are dead souls in my eyes BUT what about the ordinary White rabbit onlookers? How do we know they are coming on board when we do not hear their reactions most of the time? How do we know it has thawed these little White rabbits frozen in the PC headlights?
The real reason I asked this question is I strongly suspect certain words and certain lines throw up problems for my audience. No matter now.
Ahnenerbe was pushing out verse that I am certain will hit the mark, so I will adopt, use and modify his as well as inventing my own.
Jobs a good’un.
#6 by Harumphty Dumpty on 06/05/2012 - 9:45 pm
That post also appeared on the post-seminar SF thread last September. I fell in love with that mini!
Those of us who only post don’t get to observe the immediate reaction of our target audience, the silent white onlookers.
But Derek Black at the seminar said that he had spoken before groups of whites and used the mantra approach, and liked the reactions he observed MUCH better than the reactions when he had spoken to such groups before he learned Mantra, to put it mildly.
#7 by Bob on 06/05/2012 - 11:33 am
Thanks, David Joop!
Finally, someone with the guts to try the Mantra out in public!
The Mantra is legal in Canada! My last book, which contains the Mantra repeatedly, was grabbed from Eric Fromme by hte Thought Police and it took two months, but they cleared it.
A BNP review of the book pointed out it was legal in Britain, too.
#8 by six gun on 06/05/2012 - 12:35 pm
Why Johnny can’t read is on sale through stores in the UK. I have not been arrest for this [yet].
#9 by David Joop on 06/05/2012 - 5:05 pm
I thought it was called ‘Why Johnny can’t think’?
#10 by six gun on 06/05/2012 - 5:34 pm
Hmmm – I have it in front of me now – clearly I can’t read either, I think.
#11 by runner on 06/05/2012 - 6:12 pm
The White Voice podcast wants to interview you, Bob.
“Would you help me get an interview with Bob himself? I have a way of making people shine. This would be a must hear!”
Talk to Joe to line it up at joe@savewhitepeople.com
You can hear the podcast at http://savewhitepeople.com
#12 by dungeoneer on 06/05/2012 - 6:10 pm
I saw someone had butchered one of my mini-mantras,taking out white genocide replaced it with Multi-Culturalism,and replaced anti-whites with cultural marxists.
The only thing he kept was “small malignant minority”.
Maybe next time round the BUGS magic will make him fully effective.
#13 by six gun on 06/05/2012 - 6:37 pm
Where was this posted?
When I have asked for alternatives for Liberal and respectable conservative, I have been given cultural Marxist as a suggestion.
Well that is going to be as clear as mud to 98% of the populous, so it went straight in the rubbish bin.
Did you pick this person up for this?
I think it is essential to do so as soon as it is spotted.
They mean well but these are the folk who should stick with the basic Mantra.
#14 by dungeoneer on 06/05/2012 - 7:31 pm
You have problems with “whiteness” re:anti-whites.
#15 by Harumphty Dumpty on 06/06/2012 - 1:25 am
“Discussing theoretical changes with theoretical results is what makes one a Stormfronter instead of a BUGSER.”
If the changes are never put to the test, and the theoretical discussion is the end of it, I agree.
But none of us proceed by saying, “Hey, I feel like trying something new, whatever it is,” and then proceed to try out any random idea that comes to mind.
Unless one is an intuitive genius as Bob seems to be, whose first thoughts may be so good that they bear testing against reality without further ado, people involved in serious enterprise reflect on any new idea they have before expending the time, energy, money, etc. involved in putting it to the test.
Most new ideas are bad ideas that a little thought could dispense with before the damage is done.
I think the interplay between theorizing and testing is one of the most beautiful inventions of the white race. From the fields of math and science it’s spread to other areas where it’s the mode of most real advancement.
#16 by six gun on 06/06/2012 - 5:27 am
A thread appeared last night on SF. It has a resonance with me. A member posted a link to an article decrying “Net Nazis.”
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t891984/
That the obsession of some with Hitler and National Socialism as well as the “Jewaholic” addiction, to use a Whitakerism, was alienating White Nationalism from the very people it had to reach.
I applauded this view. I said SF needed the mother of all spring cleans. Of course this rattled some cages. There were a few sidewise comments about traitors, gutless, Troll, Jew blah blah. I also got a number of rep’s with members tired of this lead weight obsession and they had been saying the same for years.
I held up the Mantra as a beacon of purity. The moral high ground.
I think there are so many people on SF living in a bubble, an unreality.
I am so glad that BUGS is reality and engages in practical solutions to the most pressing problem of the 21st century. There is some sanity in all this madness.