We Mantra types have a hellish time getting pro-white National Leaders to take us seriously.
I was in exactly the same place before. When we conservative leaders at the University wrote a latter to Barry Goldwater in 1962 urging him to run for president, you probably know who did the writing, and it emphasized appealing to the South and to white Democratic workers specifically.
Goldwater in 1964 ran all right, but not our way.
In fact, Goldwater had about 32 percent of the vote just before the election. So he got desperate about busing in New York City and the threat of it, as well as the other issues some of us peasants pushed..
Under those circumstances, so soon after the assassination, he couldn’t have won anyway. But if you know political statistics, 38.8 percent is one hell of a bump from 32 in a couple of weeks.
He could have been defeated, but not humiliated.
I spent the next sixteen years getting out into white working areas — as I had done before — urging an appeal to what the national media, and therefore Buckley, sneered at as “Wallace Democrats.”
Appealing to peasants was considered HAADDIBLY Lowah Clahss of me.
My time in the absolute back of the bus lasted until 1974, when Republicans had gotten so bad there was serious talk of ending the party. William Rusher switched to my side that year. He wrote the Foreword to my book A Plague on Both Your Houses the following year, and said that I DID in fact represent the people he had been meeting on the working class right.
Funny thing. I’d just spent a quarter of century working with them and somehow my talk sounded like theirs.
For me the attitude of our leadership to me was pure déjà vu. The attitudes to the Mantra Approach were EXACTLY the same as that of the Respectables.
After YEARS of trying, I finally got a few of you, I think Lord Nelson was the first on board.
And then YOU ran head on to the attitude I have been putting up with at least since 1958!
You raised bloody hell.
It wasn’t nearly the same shock to me.
Not just because I had already dealt with it, though that DID help.
Much more important is the fact : When I got assigned to the Lowah Clahss before and stayed on under that storm of crap for twenty years, I FINALLY WON.
My strategy was a key right into the campaign of 1980, when Rusher and others transmitted it without my name attached to it. But the Business As Usual Crowd fought tooth and nail to make Reagan’s campaign into a Nixon campaign.
Later, Reagan had to put the words “Mr. Gorbaczev. Tear down this wall!” THREE TIMES when it was removed from each draft by his speechwriters, the BAU crowd.
He had to reinsert “The Evil Empire” over and over as well in his speeches.
But the strategy to get rid of the USSR stayed in, even with Bob as the ghost writer’s ghost writer.
Let me finish this part by making this point: It is HARD to be totally kept out and regarded as Lowah Clahs. I’m only human.
But what I remember is that it WON.
No, it never got me into the Respectables Uppah Clahss. What the HELL would I do THERE?
No, what it won was the Cold War.
The enemy is dead.
You can keep the Medal.
#1 by Jason on 06/22/2012 - 9:00 am
It finally struck me that the term “Evil Empire” had to be used for the same reason we have to use the phrase “White Genocide”. Anything else waters it down. When you called the Soviets the Evil Empire, it destroyed their moral legitimacy, especially when stated by a US President.
Saying anything less would not have worked. Terms like “Aggressive Empire” or “Russian Empire” don’t work. Even “Communist Empire” doesn’t work. You named it as EVIL. Not in some ironic way, but earnestly. And they could squawk all they wanted, but they couldn’t argue the point and deep down they knew it was true (both the Soviets and their defenders). Besides, when a group argues over whether they are evil or not, they are losing.
Same thing with WHITE GENOCIDE. Genocide is evil. No moral ambiguity. The moment anti-Whites try to argue technicalities about whether they are committing Genocide or not, they are losing. And just like the need for the phrase, The Evil Empire, the term White Genocide is needed to make the point. Softer phrases like “displacement” or “dispossession” or “demographic shift”, don’t do the trick. It doesn’t name it as evil. And that’s what moves people.
So the current Establishment of the Pro-White movement is oblivious to this truth, or even worse, resistant to it. I’m afraid most of them are busy creating their own Really Cool Programs they want us to adopt. or off doing street theater. As Bob said, most of them are trying to sell something beside White Survival.
So history repeats, and it will be the insurgents that drag the PW “establishment” kicking and screaming in the right direction. I’m afraid Ole Bob will be attached to the Mantra in the pages of history, whether he likes it or not.
#2 by Bob on 06/22/2012 - 9:14 am
Jacob, you GOT it!!!
All the media attacked the words “The Evil Empire,” while it caused almost maniacal cheering among the dissidents inside the Soviet Empire.
Joe Blow didn’t even notice it.
So no one today is likely to understand what the dissidents mean when they say that that was what made the crack in the USSR
#3 by BGLass on 06/22/2012 - 9:52 am
Let me finish this part by making this point: It is HARD to be totally kept out and regarded as Lowah Clahs. I’m only human….”
That is hard! The worst may be being crapped on by “respectable lower middle class” (i.e. Statist pensioners who think they are elites, who “served time to the public” and for biting back anything they really thought, get the payoff of a couple years vacation before they pass on. Deep down —and unconsciously— no one seems angrier than people who abnegated their free speech, free thought, free association, real property rights, etc (i.e. their human LIFE) — under the banner of the “right wing.”
They always tell themselves they “did it” for someone else; they have sacrificed themselves (some of them like Jesus, in their minds, as if the real Jesus would have told them to sell themselves to The State, lol—wasn’t that the point of the tale of the Roman Soldier?). Anyway, they seem to most hate anyone who tried not to sell themselves out— but don’t admit this to themselves.
Anyway, because the “working class” was not attacked by “the long march through the institutions” they may have a higher chance of being normal. In the “New South,” the working class transplants seem a world away from the Statist Respectable “right wing” “conservative” Pensioners with their Paper Hatism and “I’m the Boss Now” vanity plates.
Also, this whole “upper-lower-middle” class words seem useless sometimes, since it seems what occurred was not most significantly a change in money (how MUCH)— but a whole reconfiguration of WHO is “class,” under a Redistributive System. I.e., the rise of the Military as a class/ distinct large subculture, and the rise of the “Intellectuals” / “education workers” as a culture. (So— commercials on t.v. are about Education (funding) or Military “like, Proud to be an American” (funding) or human interest segments about volunteering for those groups, or some Medical thing: health spots, shrink spots, race for cure spots. (soon to be funding). The only other thing is “adopt animals” commercials, where local people show cute pets, to nurture the “feel sorry for others” mentality.
So— sometimes, you hear of “corporate” or “business class” or the Respectable favorite “Small Business Owner” (usually living on markup, however, not innovation. i.e. the “middle man.”)
On t.v., the talk is of “the middle class sinking into the lower” or “being underemployed”— but doesn’t the previous middle class just represent another system of values, entirely— (those who ‘weren’t quite right’ to move up in the Redistributive Hierarchy— who were holding to libertarian ideals, or Meritocracy ideals, self-sufficiency) Like, how “innovation” (which used to mean a free society that nurtured creativity in the common people, by offering leisure to create, education with an emphasis on real thinking, etc, to them) became “Importing the most intelligent people one can find from not-White countries.”
That’s a big change in the definition of “Innovation.” When Respectables talk about “Innovation” on t.v., they do not mean producing a climate in which small-town Americans will come up with a product, but Importing Talent.
Nobody ever says, “Can you define Innovation? What are we really talking about here?”
Just thinking these things would make one Lowah Claaah now!
#4 by BGLass on 06/22/2012 - 10:03 am
can’t edit—
But at least communist on t.v. are SOMEWHAT more honest than the Respectables. (And what is this attachment to “Leftist?” Respectables use it all the time, interchangeable with “nanny state.” Do they mean communist? Neo-feudalist? What? Shouldn’t they make it clearer for the stupid lowah clahs — and under the Religion of PC, aren’t we supposed to feel sorry for the poor proletariat underclass (like, wouldn’t that be the stupid, racist, redneck, hick, disenfranchised people, anyway??) —the whole thing is sort of confusing.
#5 by Simmons on 06/22/2012 - 12:15 pm
“Intellectuals” are trained, BUGs trains them even if they won’t admit to being trained. At another website one of the intellectuals went to South Africa to interview one of the Boer’s intellectuals, and right off the bat the Boer said, “The ANC is the most ‘anti-white’ government in the world.” Notice said intellectual did not lead off with a 5000 word essay on crime and IQ.
Now closer to home if we could get this woman to stop babbling about her feelings before the younger men here start taking after her and start babbling about their feelings to the point our effectiveness suffers. I noticed this yesterday some of the younger men started off on tangents of “feelings.”
#6 by Genseric on 06/22/2012 - 12:58 pm
“Let me finish this part by making this point: It is HARD to be totally kept out and regarded as Lowah Clahs. I’m only human.
But what I remember is that it WON.
No, it never got me into the Respectables Uppah Clahss. What the HELL would I do THERE?
No, what it won was the Cold War.
The enemy is dead.
You can keep the Medal. – Bob”
I posted this earlier today and oddly enough it applies to this last bit by Bob.
“There are MILLIONS waiting to hear the Manta…Once that happens, there are going to be some people HERE who don’t like what happens next. I guarantee that.”
#7 by David Joop on 06/22/2012 - 1:43 pm
“No, what it won was the Cold War.”
Bob. Have you read ‘The $5 Trillion Cold War Hoax’ by Eustace Mullins?
#8 by David Joop on 06/22/2012 - 2:21 pm
The Evil Empire is alive and kicking today. Its tentacles stretch into almost every White country (and non-white) country on earth.
Hopefully the techniques Bob taught us will be just as effective at stopping it, and its goal of White geNOcide and global tyranny as they were in stopping the USSR.
And PERMANENTLY this time.
#9 by Gar5 on 06/22/2012 - 6:39 pm
I think this image is quite relevant 🙂
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t856164-3/#post10353402
#10 by cecilhenry on 06/22/2012 - 7:11 pm
Don’t think there is a plan to genocide white ethnic groups and nations and destroy their futures?
This is pure genocide. Camp of the Saints. Speak up.
Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everybody.
See below.
EU Should ‘Undermine National Homogeneity’ Says UN Migration Chief
Brian Wheeler, BBC News, June 21, 2012
The EU should “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states, the UN’s special representative for migration has said.
#11 by Dick_Whitman on 06/23/2012 - 12:39 am
We will disseminate the Mantra until the anti-White system is a pile of dust.
Anti-White MMs who worship “G” + the HAMMER(the MANTRA) = dust
I I + —U = dust @ “thedaywemustneverforget”
#12 by dungeoneer on 06/23/2012 - 1:10 am
Just listened to Coach`s RBN broadcast:
http://theunsolicitedopinion.com/podcasts-2/
and I agree the common touch gets things done.