We are presently engaged in trying to convince Jewaholics and passive-aggressive anti-whites that genocide is a crime. Doing away with whites is not only not idealistic, it is the sort of thing a lot of people got hanged for.
So it is far, far too soon to point out that genocide is, believe it or not, considered a more serious crime than discrimination. Certainly we cannot discuss future racial policy with anyone outside BUGS until free, and I mean totally free discussion, has LONG since been allowed on the present policy of demanding that ALL white countries and ONLY white countries be open to massive third-world immigration and forced into assimilation, with assimilation meaning intermarriage and an end of what THEY call the white race.
The general one comment per article policy has been totally ignored by many, so I will once again repeat this for those who are too rude or too stupid to understand what I said:
We cannot discuss future racial policy with anyone outside BUGS until free, and I mean totally free discussion, has LONG since been allowed on the present policy of white genocide.
We cannot discuss future racial policy with anyone outside BUGS until free, and I mean totally free discussion, has LONG since been allowed on the present policy of white genocide.
We cannot discuss future racial policy with anyone outside BUGS until free, and I mean totally free discussion, has LONG since been allowed on the present policy of white genocide.
So it is far, far too soon to point out that genocide is, believe it or not, considered a more serious crime than discrimination.
Until we get the basic message of white genocide across, we cannot go on to say that genocide is considered a far, far more serious crime than discrimination. The idea that a plan to completely get rid of a non-black race is worse than putting black people at the back of a bus that would meet screams of resentment and bring out the Thought Police.
But we are faced with the utter destruction of what THEY call white people when there is immigration or punishment to be inflicted. THEY have set the precedents when it comes to discrimination.
If mere discrimination is cause for affirmative action, genocide is far more so. Which means that the program of doing away with all white people to the point where Europe and America are to be majority non-white in this century requires a lot more than merely changing this policy. It calls for affirmative action at a far higher level to make up for this criminal behavior.
It will call for affirmative action so extreme that it is as alien to this genocidal age as the mention of hiring blacks over whites would have been when slavery was the issue.
And slavery is a lesser crime than genocide.
#1 by Simmons on 06/30/2012 - 11:56 am
It is about reclaiming moral superiority over the anti-whites. This is something our geniuses who can write 5000 word essays on “facts” at the drop of a hat have forgotten.
But I might add that censoring us whites from forming a group defense is a breach of the Genocide Convention.
#2 by Dave on 06/30/2012 - 12:23 pm
The realization of genocide comes late. It is in the nature of genocide. I look at it as a tidal river of ruin. It simply flows and flows beneath our feet while our people remain in denial of the genocidal war that is being carried out against them.
The genocide of white people has become normative. The genocide of white people has become banal. The genocide of white people has become standard operating procedure.
People adapt to anything. ANYTHING.
It is only us feral dogs who are alerted. It is only us enslaved feral dogs that see clearly.
It is only us feral dogs who know who is responsible for ending this. And of course the answer to that is feral dogs are responsible.
Tame dogs ain’t got the guts.
#3 by Dick_Whitman on 06/30/2012 - 1:46 pm
“We cannot discuss future racial policy with anyone outside BUGS until free, and I mean totally free discussion, has LONG since been allowed on the present policy of white genocide.” (Bob)
You are correct Sir.
Anti-Whites aren’t even capable of having this discussion at this point. They react too much like animals (pig-dogs?). They’re not capable of acting like rational human beings.
The most prominent and influential anti-Whites are probably CHOSEN because of their proclivity towards animal like reactions.
Animals still have rights.
BUT ONLY GOD DAMN FOOLS TRY TO HAVE RATIONAL CONVERSATIONS WITH ANIMALS!!!
#4 by Jason on 06/30/2012 - 6:41 pm
Things are bad and can get worse. Rodney King, a drunken criminal, was just given a heroes funeral. What was his act of heroism? He fought White police officers and then when THEY were not found guilty, black rioters killed over 50 people.
#5 by Bob on 07/01/2012 - 1:20 pm
Jason, that goes in Stormfront.
#6 by Gavin on 07/01/2012 - 6:06 pm
We have no reason to discuss what racial policy any of us would like until we have exposed the fact that the unspoken racial policy of the current ruling establishment is genocide.
A common tactic our enemies use is to get us talking about what we want…this gets the subject off what they are doing, White genocide.
I view myself not as a “White nationalist” or anything like that, but as a White man exposing a program of genocide against my race. That is a winning mindset.