SPLC had a fundraiser that sounded like me with a gallon of bourbon in me.
SPLC was raising hell about the LACK OF BLACKS in Northern Idaho!
This was a fund-raising issue, taken seriously by SPLC donors.
I saw no one but me on our side even comment on this.
Nor would anyone else get the point. I doubt if Adolf Hitler himself ever stated that “The Aryan race cannot survive if there is one single Jew left on earth.”
But leaders of Hispanics, Jews, blacks, gypsies, you name it, are all saying, ALL THE TIME:
“My people cannot survive if the future allowed one single white gentile to exist.”
No, they have to build giant conspiracies between Commies or Jews to show what the official attitude is.
Meanwhile, all the authorities are saying, “No other group can exist if the future allows one single white gentile to exist.” When will someone besides Bob throw their own words in their faces and demand why we not only are not allowed to survive, but are not allowed to TALK about our survival?
I want less world views and more militant translations.
The Mantra is a militant translation.
The Mantra is NOT “the sounds of one hand clapping.” The Mantra does not dazzle you with the Old Man’s Wisdom.
The Mantra is one old man who is sick and tired of people trying to show people how smart they are and refusing to take down their words and use them against them, again and again and again and again and ad infinitum.
#1 by Epiphany on 07/27/2012 - 9:58 am
The use of the term anti–White is good.
#2 by Dave on 07/27/2012 - 10:30 am
The Mantra is THE RACIAL NARRARTIVE for white people for the 21st century. Of all the racial narratives that support white racial interests, the Mantra alone makes the claim that SYSTEMIC genocide is being enacted against the white race.
The Mantra is a powerful racial narrative. Before Robert Whitaker, the white race DID NOT HAVE A RACIAL NARRATIVE WITH ANY ENDURING FORCE.
Pay attention to the narratives that serve racial interests.
The semantic domains of religions serve to conflate racial interests.
The lynchpin is the nonracial recognition that all races are comprised of individuals that are fully and comprehensively persons and share that fact.
This, however, DISSERVES RACIAL INTERESTS as USURPERS are permitted to LEVERAGE RELIGION to infiltrate another race, their heritage, lands, and posterity.
IT IS RELIGIOUS. The semantic domain of “social justice” used by our enemies is religious.
There is a fundamental conflict between a people’s need to preserve their interests, heritage, and posterity and the requirement to recognize that all people share the fact that they are indeed, each individually, “people”, fully and completely.
This is what incites moral outrage in claims of genocide. GENOCIDE NEED NOT BE SYSTEMIC. IT CAN BE ACCIDENTAL AND CIRCUMSTANTIAL. AND IT CAN BE SUICIDIAL IN THAT A PEOPLE (WHITE PEOPLE) FAIL TO DEFEND THEMSELVES UPON THE CAUSE OF THEIR “SHARED HUMANITY” (RELIGIOUSLY AND MORALLY CONSTRUED) WITH A USPURPER. THAT IS THE WATER THE WHITE RACE USES TO BATHE AND THE VERY WATER THAT SHALL EVENTUALLY DROWN THE WHITE RACE.
There is no “get out of jail free card” except in the consolations of “faith”. And hence there is an irreconcilable conflict that cannot be parried except through lies.
#3 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 07/27/2012 - 11:03 am
If the Loony Leftists are in favor of exterminating all White Folks (and they are, they say they are, and they take steps to accomplish that goal) and they truly believe that “we are all the same” then are Loony Leftists in favor of exterminating everybody?
#4 by elcyCesreveR on 07/27/2012 - 12:36 pm
When you have the moral high ground on an issue dealing with something like human rights, there is no reason to be anything other than militant.
The views of the anti-whites need to be publicly recognized, publicly humiliated, and “laughed out of existence” as Bob has put it.
“When will someone besides Bob throw their own words in their faces and demand why we not only are not allowed to survive, but are not allowed to TALK about our survival?”
This is why I have NO problem trolling with the mantra. We can’t even talk about it in RELEVANT issues, so why shouldn’t we interject the MANTRA into EVERY issue until the human rights of white people are addressed? I see a lot of people putting the mantra into videos that are dealing with hate crimes, immigration, and relevant issues… which is a good place to find like minded people. I choose to interject viral videos with the mantra, I don’t care if it’s relevant or not… the issue has to be addressed
#5 by steadiness on 07/27/2012 - 2:48 pm
dave, that made 0 sense. You got Bob’s style of syntax down, but then you start playing with categories and acting intellectual. The result is that you end up with nonsense words like “racial narrative”.
Incidentally, I stopped listening to the actual Communists when I heard the nonsense word “labor aristocracy”.
#6 by Dave on 07/27/2012 - 3:03 pm
Steadiness,
“Narratives” also go by the term “party line” which is basic to all politics.
You have learned a “party line” where you dismiss aguments by ad hominen accusations of “acting intellectual”.
#7 by David Joop on 07/27/2012 - 4:19 pm
Dave, I disagree with your point about genocide being ‘accidental’ or ‘circumstantial’.
This is being DELIBERATELY inflicted on us. That’s what we’re trying to show people.
Good article.
#8 by Dave on 07/27/2012 - 4:35 pm
David Joop,
All I am saying that large numbers of people have died when forced from their homes usually because of war where the cause of death was sickness, starvation, etc. in circumstances where there was no intentional policy of genocide.
My point was meant to be the opposite. The importance of the Mantra is that it makes a claim of SYSTEMIC (not accidental or circumstantial) genocide. SYSTEMIC genocide is accomplished through an intentional policy and harm is intended.
The systemic genocide of whites is the (critically important) point the Mantra makes and that is what makes the Mantra the 21st century narrative for the salvation of the white race.
My other point is that the white race is failing to defend itself because of conflict between white decency toward nonwhites (the fullness of their humanity is recognized) and the FACT that our lands are being overrun by nonwhite usurpers.
#9 by David Joop on 07/27/2012 - 5:38 pm
I reread your earlier post and can see what you meant.
I agree with you that the mantra is a complete game changer. I’d never thought of it as being a ‘genocide’ before reading Bob. He managed to articulate it perfectly and show what we are fighting against & how to stop it.
#10 by Jason on 07/27/2012 - 9:40 pm
I didn’t even know SPLC had this event. How are we supposed to develop responses to what they say if we don’t ever discuss what the Anti-Whites do around here? I understand not talking News and Jews, but we don’t talk about the actual process of White Genocide in any detail (maybe I’m missing it). Isn’t that necessary if we are to have good militant comebacks?
The Mantra works, but it can’t be treated as a form of Wordism itself. Our complete knowledge of the world can’t be restricted to its words. We should all develop a real working knowledge of White Genocide and the Anti-Whites, not just rhetorical points.
For some, posting the Mantra is just another way of shouting “1488!” That isn’t enough. And all of us need to know more FACTS about what is happening worldwide. But how are we going to do that if we don’t discuss them anywhere?
#11 by c-bear on 07/28/2012 - 12:46 am
Point taken Bob. Let’s get out there and fight the anti-whites on their own turf!
#12 by Epiphany on 07/28/2012 - 5:16 am
The non–Whites are jealous, because we Whites are better looking than they are!
#13 by cecilhenry on 07/28/2012 - 11:35 am
Where can I get more INFO on this SPLC speech.
This kind of behavior on their part is really offensive and needs to be called out and drawn attention to.
Every time these groups say them want more ‘diversity’, it just means they want fewer whites.
In other words, dispossession and genocide.
#14 by BGLass on 07/28/2012 - 1:13 pm
today’s opening on the aol page is the story of the execution style murder of two white teenage boys in Detroit. Right beneath it, is running a video presentation of “tragic crimes in detroit”—- and all the victims shown are black.
One cannot IMAGINE that, every time a violent execution of blacks occurred (done by another race)—- that the story would have to run ALONG WITH a long video presentation about all the non-blacks ever murdered in history, in order to minimize the deaths.
Like, for every Travon– you would have to have videos and of hispanics who’d been hurt or killed.
It’s such a repeater that it is normalized and no one can even see it.
Unless, of course, you’re personally involved— and your ownchild is taken in such a way— and then all they will show you on t.v. is, say, videos of blacks who had been murdered in the past, not even by white people, and nothing about your own kid.
That has become a reality for millions of people. They are directly hurt…then this is what they see.
To simply expose this —to remark it— is more than many can do.
#15 by Bob on 08/02/2012 - 6:37 pm
cecilhenry the SPLC crusade to get more blacks into northern Idaho got to me in the form of a fundraising letter. They have McGovern or some other lib sign these letters and send them to their list.
#16 by seapea on 08/03/2012 - 2:15 am
My mother lives in Northern Idaho and the folks around there have been having a hard enough time with the influx of Whites from California moving in the area over the last decade, adding non-Whites to the mix… well you know, NOT good.
I would really like to have a copy of that fund-raising letter to pass around. I’m sure the folks in N. Idaho might find the great work of the SPLC very interesting.