After WWII Germans were required to grovel at an Olympic level. And nobody knew how to grovel like the Allied WWII generation.
But even though Germans are required by law to beg for the right to unzip every Jewish male’s trousers, nobody really expects a German to actually LIKE a Frenchman. No one expects a Pole to LIKE a Ukrainian or a Russian.
So I EXPECT a Jew to hate us. He is being a Jew. Every Saturday he is taught how the Jews have always been sweet and innocent and every Goy was out to get him.
Today there are the Jewish Adoptees, which includes all non-whites who don’t hate Israel. Franz Boas instituted this dream that Jews, as one of the truly persecuted minorities, would take over the world in an alliance with OTHER persecuted minorities.
Blacks are looked on by Jews as Jewish adoptees. That is why Farrakhan particularly hurt them with his diatribes against Jews.
How sharper than a serpent’s tooth to have a thankless child! And that is literally how Jews look upon blacks who have betrayed their adopters.
My point is that I do not ask even a post-War German to be unreservedly fond of Frenchmen in general, and I get a bit weary when BUGS commenters do not just sit back and GET my point
A Jew is effectively in uniform. He is a Jew and he would therefore be very happy if all the white Goyim disappeared from the earth. The only problem is that white gentiles refuse to understand that every word Jews utter about white gentiles is a demand for our end, our genocide, our termination.
This has been true at least since a Jewish writer invented the term “Melting Pot” in the late nineteenth century. The Yankees’ Founding Mother of America, Emma Lazarus, was known as a neophyte of the most fanatical Zionists of her day, and she demanded the melting pot for the American Goyim.
Someone has to have a skull made of reinforced carbon or diamond to fail to get what Jews have been saying for at a least a century and a half to white gentiles: You must go and we must be preserved.
Jews are NOT sneaking anything over on us.
But I do not get as upset with a Jew who uses Hitler as an excuse for what he always wanted. If Goyim are too stupid to get the message, that is not the Jew’s fault.
On the other hand, if an enemy is coming at you in uniform and you sound the alarm, and the guy beside you says, “Why should I care?” you do not debate him.
You SHOOT him.
Get off the Evil Plot crap and realize that HATRED is reserved for TRAITORS. The person who should be burned alive is that blond goy who says, “Why should I care?” not the screaming Jew.
I will keep repeating this until EVERY BUGSER gets it.
#1 by Dave on 08/20/2012 - 12:12 pm
Identifying traitors is essential.
The way things actually transpire is subtle. For example, I noticed that the whole tenor of the “gun rights” debate in America changed when gun grabber US Attorney Thomas Wales was assassinated in Seattle in 2001 by an expert assassin who has yet to be identified.
Suddenly, it seemed to me, prosecutors all over America had a whole lot less interest in their prior fervent desire to disarm the American people.
It was a tipping point. After that, nerds playing god with their Ivy League law degrees immediately understood that there were real consequences for arrogance that previously they did not perceive as arrogance.
Maybe this same process will kick in regarding whites who think it is OK to be loyal to the broad Establishment definition of “Americans” instead of specifically loyal their own people. It seems to be coming.
#2 by Simmons on 08/20/2012 - 4:30 pm
The personal pronoun “you” is as effective as a bullet, if not more so since it can be effortlessly broadcast.
But that is where our intellectuals fall down once they try to placate Mommy Prof by not making it personal. It is personal, and as I say make it personal but not threatening.
#3 by JustAWhiteMom on 08/20/2012 - 12:16 pm
Swarm this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Be-x-NgyILY&feature=youtu.be
#4 by Gavin on 08/20/2012 - 1:16 pm
The ONLY problem our race faces is race traitors. If it weren’t for race traitors all the anti-White Jews, Blacks, Asians and assorted other non-Whites couldn’t do a thing to us.
If it weren’t for race traitors our race would not be in the position we are in today…where we have no countries of our own, White children are taught to despise their own race in schools and White genocide by assimilation is glorified as “progressive” while opposition to the genetic elimination of our race is considered “backward and bigoted.”
Harping on about some Jew who hates White gentiles or Black Panther who wants to “kill da cracka!” is useless because those people are not our problem. Our problem is the White race traitor.
If you attack the White goy hating Jew or loundmouth White bashing Black…but leave the anti-White race traitor alone or excuse his actions as being “mistaken” or “brainwashed.” He is free to continue to destroy us fearing no punishment for his crimes.
#5 by Gavin on 08/20/2012 - 1:27 pm
White race traitors are the ONLY problem our race faces. Even if every Jew and Black on the planet was anti-White they still wouldn’t be able to harm us.
The real threat comes from the White race traitors. They are the ones who through their actions or indifference have gotten us to the point where we have no countries of our own, schools teach young Whites to hate themselves and our genetic destruction by assimilation is glorified as “progressive” and opposition to it is denounced as “backward and bigoted.”
Whining about anti-White Jews gets us no where because it leaves anti-White Whites free to do us harm. Yelling “The Jews are going to destroy our race!” only works if everyone in our race agrees that being destroyed is a bad thing…if you have some members of our race that are indifferent or even in favor of our destruction they are our FIRST priority. You cannot put up any kind of defense if you have traitors in your midst.
#6 by shari on 08/20/2012 - 1:47 pm
I was going to say much the same as Gavin, so I’ll just add my agreement.
#7 by Harumphty Dumpty on 08/20/2012 - 2:35 pm
With the possible exception of some of our elites, our traitors have had their brains stolen and don’t even know that they are traitors.
The weapon Bob has forged is the remedy.
Well let me be honest. At the present point in my understanding, I’m thinking that it’s also important to get whites experiencing a feeling that I believe they all have lightly sheltered inside them, the feeling that they are white. When not granted the status of white because they support white genocide, they become quite angrily caught up in proclaiming their whiteness.
I’ve said enough about that recently and must resist the urge to mention it at every opportunity, since pursuing it is just my idea and not part of our program.
And possibly the Mantra alone will awaken the feelings of whiteness…I’m not quite seeing that, but I suspect that may be because I’m still a long ways from fully understanding the reach of the Mantra.
#8 by Wm White on 08/20/2012 - 2:42 pm
Marcus Tullius Cicero, (106-43 B.C.) a Roman.
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”
In America today, the traitor is more at home and accepted than at any time in our history. In fact treason against Western White culture and people is looked upon as the norm.
#9 by Gavin on 08/20/2012 - 3:04 pm
“In fact treason against Western White culture and people is looked upon as the norm.”
The “culture” word you use puts me on edge. We are not here to defend our “culture.” We are here to defend our race from genocide.
There are plenty of groups out there talking about saving “Western culture.” That is not what BUGS is about. BUGS is about saving our White RACE.
#10 by Wm White on 08/20/2012 - 4:26 pm
Good point, since many non-whites say they are part of Western culture yet defend their anti-white position of justifying white genocide. In fact there was a video I watched where a sikh (complete with turban and beard) and mid-western accent was telling the newsreader, he was born in the US and considered himself American.
“White genocide thru massive 3rd world immigration into white countries and ONLY white countries.”
#11 by Bob on 08/20/2012 - 3:33 pm
Gavin’s point is critical. We must check our working to be sure that BUGSERS never sound ANYTHING LIKE any of the old failed groups.
No more senile drifting over into “culture” Or Nazi or Traditional Values, etc.
Our language is meant to shock, not to give comfort.
#12 by shari on 08/20/2012 - 3:36 pm
I think that one way to assess whether the traitor KNOWS what they do or not, is if they are smart enough to get THAT job. If they are, say the chair of the sociology department, I think you can assume they know what they do. A kindergarten teacher? Probably not.
#13 by Bob on 08/20/2012 - 3:45 pm
HD, on the questions you asked me in Guts and later, tomorrow we hope to announce my new open Skype experiment. YOu can contact me on that, as can others.
PLEASE NOTE that, while I will answer HD, any other contacts to me there will be on the basis of realizing I may not answer.
I am just trying this for a while. If it makes you madder than not having a direct contact, I’ll drop it.
#14 by Harumphty Dumpty on 08/20/2012 - 4:54 pm
Bob, that sounds like a great idea for us, and thanks! I’m sure we will drive you nuts with all our stuff though.
And now I must learn about skype…I knew it would catch up with me someday.
#15 by Jmcaul on 08/20/2012 - 4:07 pm
I always look forward to what Bob has to say as I have read one of his books (why Johnny Can’t Think) and was deeply impacted by his ability to cut straight through the crap that is dished out at us day and night and expose the blatant contradictions. Bob has an almost unmatched ability to clearly cry out time and time again “the emperor has no clothes!” I DO however wonder if he proofreads his articles for errors that could be mis-construed or confused by his readers? Here is an example from above: “But I do not get as upset with a Jew who uses Hitler as an excuse for what he always wanted. If Goyim are too stupid to get the message, that is to the Jew’s fault.” I am not sure what ‘that is TO the jew’s fault’ means and wonder whether Bob meant to say ‘that is NOT the jew’s fault’ OR if Bob was just using an obscure Southern colloquialism??
If it is not the latter, it would be nice if Bob would perhaps do a quick proof read of what he’s posting so as not to throw us simpler readers off? thank you.
#16 by Harumphty Dumpty on 08/20/2012 - 5:16 pm
Lol, and ditto to everything!
But if you’re somewhat new you might not know that it’s much harder (if I’m understanding correctly…I may be putting my foot in it) for Bob to do stuff like proofreading than it is for most of us.
If I’m right, I wish he had someone to do it for him.
When I was reading all of David Duke’s stuff, I started sending him proofs just because I couldn’t stand seeing the errors, and he used them for awhile. But I could always tell what David was intending to say…hm!… while Bob is always in territory previously uncharted, and so I rarely know what Bob’s intending unless he says it rather clearly.
I get exasperated, but what Bob has given me is so huge that I just suffer (but not in silence).
I came across a post of Bob’s from several years ago in which he stated that it was very difficult for him to take the pains required to write as clearly as he did in his books, and he wasn’t going to put himself through that in his daily writings here.
I read “Why Johnny Can’t Think,” and virtually all of it was as clear as a bell to me, which means it was very clear indeed.
#17 by OldBlighty on 08/20/2012 - 6:13 pm
“On the other hand, if an enemy is coming at you in uniform and you sound the alarm, and the guy beside you says, “Why should I care?” n you do not debate him.
You SHOOT him.”
That is why officers in the military carry pistols.
#18 by Adit on 08/20/2012 - 7:20 pm
There is blog by a South African I follow from time to time to see what’s happening to Whites over there. He makes a lot of noises like a Pro-White, but in reality he is no better than the typical Cultural Marxist/Liberal, he says he despises. Where the liberals have their lips firmly glued to the arse of anything non-white, this guy has his lips glued firmly to the arse of anything wearing a yarmulke.
There is no difference between him and the Liberals. He is Anti-White. He is also the worst kind of traitor and is more dangerous to Whites than any Jew or Liberal will ever be.
I dislike the Jews immensely, but I can understand them because they are following the Natural Laws. They want to run the show so they need to get rid of Whites, just like Lions and Leopards clash in nature. Nothing new in the Natural Order of things. People who advocate for other races or wish the destruction of their own race flies directly in the face of the Natural Laws. Anything that defies the Natural Order always causes death and destruction.
#19 by Jason on 08/20/2012 - 8:21 pm
Great article. Jews are certainly a problem that must be understood, but it is the White Traitor, often disguised as a Great White Liberal (GWL), who is the true traitor.
In war time (correct me if I’m wrong), enemy soldiers are taken prisoner if they surrender and treated fairly well until the end of the war. But what about traitors discovered on your own side? They are shot ASAP. Why the difference? The traitor is far more dangerous than the open enemy. And they have betrayed something far deeper.
Enemy groups annoy me no end, but I personally reserve the strongest animosity toward those who are part of us yet betray us. In Dante’s Inferno, isn’t the very lowest level of Hell reserved for traitors?
#20 by Gavin on 08/20/2012 - 10:17 pm
” Great article. Jews are certainly a problem that must be understood, but it is the White Traitor, often disguised as a Great White Liberal (GWL), who is the true traitor.”
Why do you say that “liberals” are the only traitors to our race? In my observation it’s “conservatives” who always try to be more anti-White than the liberals. A liberal might entertain a pro-White and hear us out…a respectable conservative will freak out and throw us out of the room lest he be associated with a racial heretic and get a spanking from big Momma Liberal.
#21 by Jason on 08/21/2012 - 1:09 am
Good point – I din”t mean to say liberals are the only Anti-Whites. And yes, ‘respectable conservatives’ are often the worst. Now, I don’t actually run into too many open-minded liberals that will entertain anything remotely pro-White, but I get your point.
#22 by CrunchLab on 08/20/2012 - 10:05 pm
Which came first? The chicken or the egg?
No one really knows.
Which came first? The Jew or the White traitor?
We know the answer to that one:
The Jew.
The White traitor is a relatively new phenomenon whose emergence only came as a result of the rise of Jewish power in the past few centuries.
The Jews, however, have been among us for at least the last 1,000 years, although never in quite the position of power they have today. By only focusing on the White traitors and not on the CAUSE of White treason, you are simply trimming the branches but leaving the root. And you know what the result of that is going to be.
For every White traitor you shoot, the Jewish universities, TV networks, and Hollywood movies will churn out a dozen more. You will end up having to shoot half of our own race before all is said and done (especially if you include the “why should I care” types who are not necessarily traitors, but rather people who are so distracted by wealth and technology that they would rather not be bothered with anything that requires a bit of austerity).
Shooting half of our race would technically make you the White genocidalist.
To keep the weed from growing back, you have to remove the root. To cure the disease you have to remove the cause. Leave the root and the weeds grow back. Leave the cause, and the disease returns. It is as simple as that.
The cause of White treason is the Jew among us. The cause of White genocide is the Jew among us. To save our race, the focus must be on removing the Jew from all facets of our life. Any straying off from that is only trimming the branches.
#23 by Daniel Genseric on 08/20/2012 - 10:37 pm
There’s so much human resources work to do here. I don’t know how Bob does it.
“Saint Robert of Pontiac – Patron Saint of Patience and the Eternal Suffering of Mental Midgets.”
“Pray for us.”
#24 by daedalus on 08/20/2012 - 11:10 pm
blond goy comment is straight out of khazar land.
this site is becoming a spill over from sheeple land.
#25 by Jason on 08/21/2012 - 1:39 am
We all know how that was meant. And I hope the Neo-Nazis – thick headed goons that they are – will reflect on what Bob is saying. I wonder how many decades modern Nazis have set back Whites?
#26 by Gavin on 08/21/2012 - 8:28 pm
You have to talk to people in a language they can relate to. If someone is stuck in joooooooooland Bob will speak to them in terms they can understand.
For someone who is not a jooooo obsessive it will seem weird but you are not the one Bob is trying to pull back to reality.
#27 by Jmcaul on 08/22/2012 - 3:41 am
This thread has got to the discussion of ‘is life worth living’ talk. I am in this phase of my whiteness awakening. All my life, I’ve been raised in protestant churches, taught ‘Jesus loves me” and arrived at the place where the only thing that has made life worthwhile is the hope of life to come and a consciousness of a loving God. Now, with my new awareness of the jews and who’s running things (especially white genocide) I have arrived a SERIOUS doubts. I realized that I was clinging to a hope of an afterlife to make my today worthwhile. I have come (painfully at first) to the conclusion that I NO LONGER NEED THAT CRUTCH in order to consider living worthwhile. Fighting for a suitable world for myself and for my children and getting in touch with and expressing my pagan Viking/Celt roots is more than sufficient.
The PROBLEM IS, prior to this awakening, I had blindly passed on that judiazed value system to my four white children…The oldest two are in their early 20’s and are dutifully following their jewish ‘lord,’ seeing the jews as God’s ‘chosen’ and looking only to the next life rather than to a future for their own descendants. I have an 18 yo son who is not so sold on the church, there seems to be hope for him, he is open to racial ideas but clumsy in wielding them. My husband is completely devoted to the judeo-christian ideal, has a ‘relationship’ with jesus, is born again and will not even entertain the possibility that is’ all been a jew plot to turn us all into slaves.
The REAL issue right now is my 14 year old daughter who is torn between two viewpoints. She is in tears frequently (not necessarily unusual for a 14 year old girl) but often my new opinions and views are the cause. She is actively being told by my older children not to listen to me and she says she doesn’t know WHO to believe anymore. This is truly painful to watch and I don’t know how to answer her as I am really groping along in the dark as well. I want to impart a healthy sense of racial identity and destiny in her but I don’t want to undo the strong moral boundaries that church has given her, nor have her secretly fearing she will be damned to hell if she turns from much of the church experience.
My family is increasingly upset with me and I half expect to be siezed and burned at the stake at any moment.
Any insight, experience others here can share or direct me to would be greatly appreciated. Thank you,
A (white) mom fighting for the future of her beautiful, white children.
#28 by OldBlighty on 08/22/2012 - 1:28 pm
Hi Jmcaul,
I’m in a similar boat as you. Anti-white family members left and right (no religious fanatics, except the left wing and respectable conservative kind). I’ve found if you mention “jewish conspiracies” around them, they become stubbornly anti-white.
What works in my situation is using anti-white and talking about white genocide over and over. They used to puff up their chests, like proud little pigeons, when they thought up reasons why, non-whites should flood white countries. They don’t do that any more. They have lost their pride.
They won’t ever vote nationalist, the costumed Nazis have seen to that. But they do not campaign for white genocide around me any longer and that is really something.
The most stubborn family member, is a respectable conservative and is 100% loyal to you know who.
Recently I said to him, jews are loyal to jews and that’s good. You are fiercely loyal to jews, but are not loyal to your own kind. What’s up with that?
You say we must protect jews and ensure their survival, but you are not loyal to your OWN kind and you don’t care about OUR long term survival. Whats up with that?
He hasn’t responded so far. He looks like a deer caught in headlights, so I know it works on him. lol
Jmcaul, if you are worried it will mess up your marriage, tone it down. Insert anti-white and white genocide concepts here and there. Don’t push it overly and take the long term view.
Don’t try to convince them to join our side, just grind them down, little by little. Wear down their anti-white pride.
#29 by shari on 08/22/2012 - 7:00 pm
I second Old Blighty’s excellent advise. I’ve had a similiar situation with religion and family and four children, all grown, myself. I was much later smart than you, unfortunately. We have the moral high ground so don’t back down even if you have to careful.
ps. I still have family problems! I think from being so late smart!