B. U. G. S.

seapea points out:

http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=a/res/260(III)

The above link use to have the full text of the General Assembly resolution 260 (III) of 9 December 1948 (where we get the geNOcide definition) but now

it spits out a “NO AUTHORIZATION” error page. It’s been a few months since I’ve pulled that page up but I find it curious that we can’t view it any

longer and still there other pages on the UN’s site that link back to that document which is now being blocked.

Is it getting dumped into the memory hole too?

UL says:

I actually thought this was going to happen a while ago. I noticed we brought up international law alot and figured they would try to change/get rid of

the law so we would have no grounds.

Shear stupidity. The law is out there for anyone to look up. We already have everything we need from the law too. We have the law itself and the man who

wrote it.

Any attempt to change/forget the law could be interpreted UNDER THE LAW as them trying to commit genocide.

Even if they were able to succeed in changing the law, the original law is still all over the internet and them changing “genocide’s” meaning is a

violation of genocide’s meaning. Only someone who wanted to commit genocide a certain way would want to alter it.

This is just more proof that we truely are dealing with a bunch of genocidal freaks.

I actually thought this was going to happen a while ago. I noticed we brought up international law alot and figured they would try to change/get rid of

the law so we would have no grounds.

Shear stupidity. The law is out there for anyone to look up. We already have everything we need from the law too. We have the law itself and the man who

wrote it.

Any attempt to change/forget the law could be interpreted UNDER THE LAW as them trying to commit genocide.

Even if they were able to succeed in changing the law, the original law is still all over the internet and them changing “genocide’s” meaning is a

violation of genocide’s meaning. Only someone who wanted to commit genocide a certian way would want to alter it.

This is just more proof that we truely are dealing with a bunch of genocidal freaks

Old Blighty adds:

I have used that quote for around 2 years and revisited that page often. I also told many anti-whites to search for that quote under Genocide.

The first time I noticed something was up, they added an awkward explanation at the top saying, Don’t be confused, genocide really is just about killing

lots of people…

Then I returned this week and the non-violent definition was removed and now it is only found among violent definitions to muddy the waters.

***

When they react to something you are doing, they are telling you, that you are hurting them.

What do you do when they react to something? You push harder at that precise point.

@Epiphany

“Wow, sounds exactly like what is happening to Whites today!”

Yes it is creepy isn’t it? It is a carbon copy of the so called multiculturalism policy, they demand for all white countries and only white countries.

It was meant to be a warning against genocide and they have been using it as a how to manual.

But our Professionals keep explaining to us that anti-whites are not concerned about the Mantra and can knock it over with a sentence.

But then again they have no more taken a look at reality than any of them has ever actually LOOKED at a Mantra debate.