Old Blighty, not Bob, points out:

The anti-whites are reacting to us again.

They have removed this quote from the Wikipedia entry on Genocide.

“Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.”
-Raphael Lemkin

Previously, it was the very first quote, of the very first link, if you Google Genocide. Now they are trying to make it go down the memory hole.

I found it in a far less prominent position here:

http://www.genocidewatch.org/genocide/whatisit.html

Jason says:

“Whenever anyone tells us the Mantra can’t work for this-or-that reason, ask them what kind of roadtesting they’ve done to establish that. It will always be a big fat zero.”

“’We’ Whites talk about all Whites, as if there was no such thing as race-traitors. As if we didn’t have millions of traitors among us. It is not ‘Whites’ in general who decided to flood their countries with Third Worlders, desegregate their schools, and force assimilation. It was Anti-Whites that did that, including big numbers of White race traitors.”

“None of those Anti-White measures would pass a popular vote among Whites, even to this day. These Anti-Whites have assumed a position of power among Whites, but they have no loyalty to Whites.”

“They are not mere puppets being led astray by ‘the Jew’ or helpless victims of Illuminati mind control. No, they are fully responsible for their actions.”

“If normal Whites have a flaw, maybe it’s being too good-natured; not seeing the prevalence of traitors in their midst. This is why we must push the concepts of ‘Anti-Whites’, ‘race-traitors’, and ‘White Genocide’, into the mainstream, so that future generations have some protection. And we must add to that the Sociopath (or the borderline case disguised as a Hipster or Yuppie) who may not necessarily promote genocidal policies, but has a nonchalant attitude toward the genocide of his people.”

Most AMPWs attack the Mantra and throw in a sure-fire answer to it that the other side, they say, could easily use to knock it down. This is humorous to any of us who have actually USED the Mantra, but keep in mind that none of those people have ever seen any debate using the Mantra.

Thus Jared made up a sure-fire argument that would knock the Mantra down in his quick dismissal of it. He said all the other side has to do is say that whites made their own immigration and assimilation policies, and, theoretically, could reverse them in a split second.

Like every other argument the anti-Mantra pro-whites (AMPWs) throw in, that one has been tried in the real world, and we have cut it to pieces.

From the get go we know that white traitors are the problem, both the active and passive race traitors.

I am a white man. I am NOT a traitor. This distinction never occurred to Jared because he has never had any reason to think of it. He is too busy with the same old stuff. The same is true of all the other TOOs who throw in a sure-fire answer to the Mantra.

If a country favors a tyrant, as the Democratic Republic of Korea’s population unquestionably does its ruler, does that make telling them that they are living in Hell any less valid?

Whites, like the North Koreans, accept white genocide first of all because it’s the law and they have to live with it.

Jared’s naiveté I can understand.

But NOT BUGSERS’. I have seen comment after comment talking about Jared’s answer referring to “We” and ”Us” as in “We are largely responsible for white genocide.

The “We” they are referring to is white people.

How in the HELL can a BUGSER call anti-white whites “We.”

WE, meaning BUGSERS, have no relationship whatsoever with passive or active traitors to our race!

That is the mistake Jared and TOOs make, but you have not the slightest excuse for it!

A commenter pointed to
http://ozconservative.blogspot.ca/2012/10/german-far-left-hates-germany-maybe.html
as sickening.

Actually, it is more important to us because both the 300 leftists who are carrying signs declaring their hatred for Germany are clearly reacting to the Mantra!

Before now, no matter how much they obviously hated their race and country, leftists NEVER declared it out in public.

But there s much more. One sign and the march in general declared it was in favor of Genocide!

Specifically.

A person advocating genocide in Germany gets an automatic number of years in prison.

Unless he is a leftist. It never even came up.

Does anyone see what this means?

While everybody from PWAMs to liberals are out there declaring that genocide is not n issue, the far left has openly declared for genocide.

There is no question of a question that they can get by with it in the world most Thought Police controlled country. Any other group that even MENTIONS genocide in Germany is facing prosecution.

But the far left, bless their black little souls, is taking us up on it.

And there is only one US I can be talking about. There is only one reason they could possibly be on the streets declaring their hatred of their own people, and that reason is not TOO.

The Silence only works if they don’t have any nut cases who will scream their hatred. As the man said, “Three men can keep a secret. If two of them are dead.”

When Christianity was the only religion, all other theologies were declared heresy, except for Jews, of course. But all other religions were heresy.

In our day we have exactly the same phenomenon. All political positions which are not Politically Correct constitute something called “the right.” “The right” includes groups as disparate as the Heresies of the older established religions.

A Buddhist would have laughed at the idea that he was the same as a Shintoist. He would, rightly, consider anyone who said that as a total rube. But when you have an established religion, you are an intellectual hick.

In fact the best way to be sure a people has an established religion is to note that nobody even notices that their language puts everyone who is not Of The Faith into a single category.

This is a recognition of The Faith that is so routine that nobody notices what they’ve done. That is ESTABLISHED.

The established religion seldom calls itself “the left.” But everyone understands that all opponents of the established faith constitute something called “the right.”

Everyone who denies God in the name of science is called an atheist. But astrologers were also accused, often correctly, of being atheistic. They considered astrology to be a science. Hence the more dedicated astrologers denied the power of any gods because it was the stars that determined everything.

This was a very serious split in its time, but we can’t even see it, because to those of our present established religion as to every other established religion in history, all who are outside The Faith are the same.

As Zoroastrianism began to admit non-Aryans in its latter declining days, it also lost faith. The Magi became more and more astrologers, the science of the time. So today the Wise Men were considered astrologers, and may well have been.

These distinctions become totally lost in a society that has a really established religion, as we do. The mind actually rots intellectually.

Mantra thinking is really the only thinking that is really outside the whole suffocating and wide spread chokehold of the religion of Political Correctness.