A commenter pointed to
http://ozconservative.blogspot.ca/2012/10/german-far-left-hates-germany-maybe.html
as sickening.

Actually, it is more important to us because both the 300 leftists who are carrying signs declaring their hatred for Germany are clearly reacting to the Mantra!

Before now, no matter how much they obviously hated their race and country, leftists NEVER declared it out in public.

But there s much more. One sign and the march in general declared it was in favor of Genocide!

Specifically.

A person advocating genocide in Germany gets an automatic number of years in prison.

Unless he is a leftist. It never even came up.

Does anyone see what this means?

While everybody from PWAMs to liberals are out there declaring that genocide is not n issue, the far left has openly declared for genocide.

There is no question of a question that they can get by with it in the world most Thought Police controlled country. Any other group that even MENTIONS genocide in Germany is facing prosecution.

But the far left, bless their black little souls, is taking us up on it.

And there is only one US I can be talking about. There is only one reason they could possibly be on the streets declaring their hatred of their own people, and that reason is not TOO.

The Silence only works if they don’t have any nut cases who will scream their hatred. As the man said, “Three men can keep a secret. If two of them are dead.”

When Christianity was the only religion, all other theologies were declared heresy, except for Jews, of course. But all other religions were heresy.

In our day we have exactly the same phenomenon. All political positions which are not Politically Correct constitute something called “the right.” “The right” includes groups as disparate as the Heresies of the older established religions.

A Buddhist would have laughed at the idea that he was the same as a Shintoist. He would, rightly, consider anyone who said that as a total rube. But when you have an established religion, you are an intellectual hick.

In fact the best way to be sure a people has an established religion is to note that nobody even notices that their language puts everyone who is not Of The Faith into a single category.

This is a recognition of The Faith that is so routine that nobody notices what they’ve done. That is ESTABLISHED.

The established religion seldom calls itself “the left.” But everyone understands that all opponents of the established faith constitute something called “the right.”

Everyone who denies God in the name of science is called an atheist. But astrologers were also accused, often correctly, of being atheistic. They considered astrology to be a science. Hence the more dedicated astrologers denied the power of any gods because it was the stars that determined everything.

This was a very serious split in its time, but we can’t even see it, because to those of our present established religion as to every other established religion in history, all who are outside The Faith are the same.

As Zoroastrianism began to admit non-Aryans in its latter declining days, it also lost faith. The Magi became more and more astrologers, the science of the time. So today the Wise Men were considered astrologers, and may well have been.

These distinctions become totally lost in a society that has a really established religion, as we do. The mind actually rots intellectually.

Mantra thinking is really the only thinking that is really outside the whole suffocating and wide spread chokehold of the religion of Political Correctness.

My proposal for what to do to anti-whites is paid informers, who will always get a percentage of the money we take from anti-whites and their heirs because of information they give us. So we will have people combing the records for records of every anti-white action.

What is funny to me is this scheme was attacked for being too “soft.” The attacker(s) banged their chests and said that they would hold tribunals and prosecute the bad guys and string them up.

It reminds me of the years when the Mantra was constantly attacked on Stormfront by people who weren’t going to sit around and work in the “unreal world” of computer. They were going out there and take the streets and conquer the world

Same difference. My objection is not to the violence, my objection is the simple fact that they ain’t going to do a damned thing.

I have been there when my side won. In 1981 everyone who had been doing nothing but attacking liberals and moderates suddenly had the government dumped in their laps. On most things, they were clueless.

One thing that stood out was how fast those who had been screaming for many years on the outside lost their ardor when they got on the inside. The first thing the Reagan top-level appointees did was dump those who were serious.

I was the last person to sign off on Federal civil service staffing before the Director. I wanted to do what every other administration in history did: get our people into the permanent civil service, so when we went out of office we would still have lots of contacts.

I was forbidden to do that. I was forbidden to give anybody on our side information or contacts for getting into those thousands of positions that regularly opened up! I could have put in hundreds who had vet pref alone.

No, Reagan’s Director said, “We are here to clean out the swamp, not to join the alligators.”

Cute. But among other things that assumes is that “we” would leave office with a wholly cleaned out government. As soon as Bush took office in 1989 he got rid of every single Reagan presidential appointee, top to bottom!

So I have observed how cowardly a formerly dedicated group becomes when it actually takes office.

At such a time, everybody who used to be a fanatic is jockeying for position. In the real world, you need a SEPARATE, self-perpetuating means of doing all the stuff you shouted you were going to do.

I’m not soft. I just know what I’m doing.

Very often people visiting Capitol Hill would smile at me and say with a Shrewd look, “I know that the staff really runs Capitol Hill.”

This is one of those statements that is so dumb I didn’t usually bother to dispute it. It’s what us old country Southerners call “bein’ Shrewd,” which is exactly what Oliver Hardy of Augusta, Georgia meant when he said “There is nothing dumber than a dumb man who thinks he’s smart.”

Capitol Hill is all about power. Every member of each House can tell to millimeter just how much real influence he has over a bill or in a debate by just a few words inserted into the Record or into a bill that most people world not even notice.

In the places I worked, any staffer who even slightly tried to run things would be out on his ass and nobody else would hire him.

To say that staff runs Capitol Hill is exactly like saying, Shrewdly, “The clerks at the bank control all the money.”

What would YOU say if some nut told YOU that?

Banks are ABOUT money. Congress is ABOUT power.

Clerks and managers don’t rule the money. Staff doesn’t quietly seep power from the boss any more than a bank manager secretly sneaks money home each night.

In both cases, there is an accounting and it comes quick.

I believe this a major problem I have with Jared and DD. I am not interested in leading a Movement. I leave that job gratefully to them just as I left the job of getting elected gratefully to the guy in the front office.

When John Ashbrook hired me, he told me that he was busy twenty eight hours a day, and he didn’t have time to sit and do the THINKING he needed to do. So I studied HIS views and did the thinking he had not the time to do.

It may be bit hard to Jared and the Blacks to understand that I am NOT trying to replace anybody in the heavy work load they have to keep their organizations running.

This also is a bit of a reminder to our radio hosts.

I am a STAFFER. What I do is think about how we can win and work very hard to come up with ways to break through, like the term “anti-white.”

I have no wish whatever to dominate someone else’s agenda.

All I ask is that they TRY what we come up with. We are asking very, very little, and if all those cries about how it would ruin them turn out to have merit, do what a congressman does with a staffer’s recommendations if they don’t work: drop ‘em.

But I repeat: Good staff work is a gift, not an imposition.

Back in the old days, the Great Wisdom was that if you wanted to make money, you went to where the money was.. The immediate conclusion was you went into banking.

In the real world, money, the real money is often back in the sticks. Sears Roebuck was declaimed by many because it was going out to the sticks. It came back in the form of sticks sold gold.

But Sears Roebuck had a product, thousands of products. What do you do when you have absolutely nothing to offer but need to make a living?

You go where the money is. There is more money being handed around by redistribution than Sears ever imagined.

And the agents get PAID.

In every other industry where money goes the immediate question on everybody’s mind is: Cui bono? What capitalist exploiter is fattening on that government contract?

But that question never comes up when other government expenditures are involved.

Almost every student who makes good grades wants to be like Mommy Professor: Never to leave school. He wants to spend his entire life where he is good at something.

Mommy Professor never has to grow up. He has NEVER left school.

Everybody expects industry to oppose taxes and regulation. Every person in an industry is expected to have a giant idea of how important that profession is.

Except Mommy Professor.

And, unlike people in other industries or occupations, there is no discussion of any bias in Mommy Professor’s industry.

That is a simple Mantra-like explanation of the fantasy world college graduates have made for us.

Fred Richthoffen sent in this check list as a comment on my article on “Slipping.”

I wish we all kept it to check with.

“This is my check list so I don’t lock my keys inside my car or start “slipping”. After I have completed my argument…

✓Did I mention open borders, forced integration, and assimilation?

✓Did I mention anti-racist is a code word for anti-White?

✓Did I mention RACE and GENOCIDE in caps to make them uncomfortable and draw attention?”

All of us who have been here for a while remember when the standard attack on the Mantra in Stormfront was that we were just sitting in our rooms writing on the net while they were going to go out and take the streets.

It’s kind of funny that now the standard and packaged attack on the Mantra is that we are ruining the wonderful reputation for logic and stability and just plain admirability that white nationalists now have.

“I cannot believe that Jared doesn’t know that our problem is white self-hatred.

“The fact that whites applaud when told whites will soon be a minority in their own countries is the problem.

“A lot of anti-whites have used Jared’s argument. But the fact that it is whites who seek the destruction of their own race does not make white genocide healthier, it makes the whole thing sicker.

“Jared says that so long as whites are destroyed by whites, things are okee-dokee.

“A lot of anti-whites have tried that tactic against us, and they got squashed every time.”

My reply, needless to say, is “under moderation” at
http://whitegenocideproject.com/too-hard-to-awaken-whites-to-white-genocide-an-exchange-with-jared-taylor/#comment-2098

One thing you should keep realizing is how points made here seem to tell the future.

For example, it looked a little funny to some people that, when I was concentrating on race, I had a lot of space on the nature of institutions. Now we are running into a situation where American Renaissance must be understood as an institution.

We certainly LIKE American Renaissance, but the danger is that it will go the Republican/respectable conservative route.

In the early 1960s the very idea of a conservative getting air time was intolerable. All political discussions on national TV consisted of two liberal Democrats and one or two liberal Republicans.

Two SEPARATE things happened. First, conservatives stopped being purely defensive and began to denounce the shibboleths of liberalism openly. By 1968 Nixon and Wallace had an overwhelming majority of the vote.

This was undermined, not by a Conspiracy meeting in Lower Broscupal or somewhere, but by a natural tendency. Liberals, who owned the media both literally and figuratively, chose conservative “opponents” they felt comfortable with.

The result was surprisingly effective for the left. Conservatives survived professionally if they looked like all-out opponents to their own featherheads but gave the other side what it needed.

Respectable conservatives have taken on a role as RATIFIERS of liberal policy. No one denounces “reactionaries” and “racist” as loudly as the professional right. But this obedience is not the big thing, the ratification.

Leftist policies go through many years of being denounced by professional conservatives. But, inevitably, the day when they can say, “Even conservative columnist George Will” or “even William Buckley now agree that…”

This means the policy has now become that of “both sides,” and there is no room for further debate.

Anyone who listened to part of the debate Jared was part of in Canada can see how this could easily happen to pro-white institutions. From the first word, Jared conceded and conceded and conceded, not by statements but by silence.

And silence is the other side’s weapon.

If there is a policy in place to wipe your race off the face of the earth and you join with the other side in refusing to mention, that it is too radical, it is ratification. I have no suspicion that Jared and friends are doing this on purpose.

They are just politically naïve.

I have been in the midst of things while politically naïve conservatives became the best friends leftism ever had.