Not in the book but in the movie, Robinson Crusoe leaves some thieves on the island where he dwelt for so many years.
Having spent decades absolutely alone he said to them, “You have each other.” hardly something that would occur to one as a gift, since they were all nasty bastards, but for Crusoe, anything was better than being absolutely alone.
I do appreciate commenters who sympathize with the decades I spent absolutely with simple, obvious truths. It is was impossible for anyone to understand what Crusoe meant fully unless they had spent all those decades alone.
But I can say, with exactly the same authority:
“BUGSERS, you have each other!”
If you empathize with me, the same feeling will help you understand what a blessing you are to each other.
#1 by ozwhiterabbit on 11/07/2012 - 6:34 am
A comforting truth!
#2 by Jason on 11/07/2012 - 7:40 am
Boy, do I appreciate BUGS. Now more than ever. The other WN groups are talkin’ Talmud 24/7 and the GOP leaders are saying they MUST put a Latino and black on top of the ticket next time!
I wish I had known about this site years ago, as many of you did. Bob has a unique constitution, not only to have all these ideas, but to have kept pushing them when no one was listening. Thank God.
#3 by Scythian on 11/07/2012 - 1:56 pm
Hispanics will vote for whoever will let more hispanics into the U.S. It’s that simple and nobody says it in “the land of free speech”. The most accurate indicator of a country’s economy is the skin color of the people who inhabit the country, yet in the “land of free speech”, an “economic patriot” loses his job for pointing out this obvious reality while America goes from being white to brown. It’s funny how we who point out that preserving and vitalizing one’s RACE is infinitely more worthy than preserving a social construct such as a country are by default infinitely more patriotic than those who believe the opposite.wordists making the point that preserving and vitalizing the white race is the only thing that will preserve this country. This of course is true in every majority white country. Non-white immigration and “assimilation” will tear this country apart, you can count on that. Either way, pro-whites will win in the end.
I’ve asked this question over and over and over again: why is ethnic-ism or even national-ism A-okay, but RACE-ism is the worst thing in the world?
It was greeted by SILENCE for a long time. Finally, an anti-white actually tried to counter with “nationalism is loving your nation while racism is hating other races”.
Of course, all I did was reverse it to show how SILLY the anti-white’s answer is.
#4 by Scythian on 11/07/2012 - 2:20 pm
The edit/deletion function doesn’t work, the following words should be erased from my comment: ‘wordists making the point that preserving and vitalizing the white race is the only thing that will preserve this country.”
This is parts of two separate sentences that got strung together as I edited/erased while writing and didn’t notice it until after I submitted the comment.
Please erase the entire comment so I can re-post it properly.
#5 by Jason on 11/07/2012 - 9:36 am
I enjoy the writing of Satoshi Kanazawa, un-PC Japanese psychologist. He writes on his blog that there is no such thing as a “Multicultural Society”. If you truly have multiple cultures, than you necessarily have multiple societies, not one.
http://bigthink.com/e-pur-si-muove/why-multicultural-society-is-a-logical-impossibility
They won’t allow us Whites to be separate and have our own culture/society.
#6 by j1mmyZeta on 11/08/2012 - 7:22 pm
A “multicultural society” is really a multi-society society.
I like it!
#7 by shari on 11/07/2012 - 1:44 pm
I think that it’s true. Bugsers can’t hide from each other. If one starts trailing off in another direction, it will be quickly seen. I also think that Bugsers are pretty troll proof.
#8 by Frank on 11/07/2012 - 3:12 pm
Another “comforting truth”, which I’m sure Bob sees, is that we BUGSers are like those guys Crusoe left behind.
We are NASTY BASTARDS.
I take great pride in collaborating with a batch of NASTY BASTARDS who all have the short swords pointed in the right direction.
If you were not NASTY BASTARDS, you wouldn’t be worth a damn.
#9 by steadiness on 11/07/2012 - 3:19 pm
Why do you think it takes a nasty bastard to do what needs to be done? Yesterday’s ideal man would be a nasty bastard today.
The progressives say that that’s because of social progress. But in human relations, there are no new things under the sun.
#10 by Frank on 11/07/2012 - 3:35 pm
As a man who appreciates a brand of beer labeled “Arrogant Bastard Ale”, I submit that “NASTY BASTARD” is a two faced term. The “good” face is that it takes WILL to do what calls for doing. NASTY BASTARDS have WILL. Also perseverance, which is present at BUGS in spades.
Being a NASTY BASTARD, when the swords are pointed in the right direction …
is anything but “nasty”.
#11 by steadiness on 11/07/2012 - 3:16 pm
In Mississippi, 37% Black, Romney won with 55%. In Iowa, 93% White, Obama won with 52%
This electorate was something like 75% White. 99% of Blacks vote for Obama, the best the Republicans have ever done with Hispanics was 40%, and Jews always vote for Democrats by two thirds.
If 66% of us had voted for Romney, then even if 100% of everyone else voted for Obama, Romney would have won.
What do the Blacks, Hispanics, and Jews have that we don’t have in Iowa, but do have in Mississippi?
Racial consciousness.
Why don’t we have racial consciousness in Iowa? Because in a 93% White state, people rely on stereotypes of others that they get from the media. But in Mississippi, we have personal contact with Blacks and through this diverse cultural enrichment stereotypes like the magic negro and that only a few evil-minded Whites care about their own kind are dispelled.
That is the goal of BUGS: to establish racial consciousness. It was never going to happen overnight, even if we controlled the traditional media. However, racial consciousness is starting to show like the first shoots in a newly ploughed field.
Last decade, if you were trying to describe a Black to another White, you were expected to mention his hair color and eye color and hair type and height and body shape – the first three variables only being variable among Whites – and studiously ignore his race if mentioning race would help the description. If you asked about ethnicity, you would get answers like Irish, Scottish, Spanish, Polish, or Italian from Whites, and Black, Hispanic, or Jewish from Blacks, Hispanics, or Jews.
In this decade, we’re allowed to describe Blacks as Blacks and ourselves as White. This is progress.
#12 by Dick_Whitman on 11/07/2012 - 6:40 pm
Steadiness,
you’re right. Proximity to diversity creates racial consciousness. The most racially conscious people in the North are blue collar whites who live in neighborhoods near diversity.They used to call these people “white ethnics.”
Constant increases in forced diversity & the Mantra. They go well together.
Regarding the election, I was watching FOX news; Respecticons Brit Hume and Karl Rove agree, the GOP has to “tone it down” regarding immigration. LOL.
Are not respecticons the most pathetic creatures on earth? I literally get sick to my stomach when I see them.
#13 by Simmons on 11/07/2012 - 10:24 pm
The election was side issues, mucho N&J.
Bob was lonely while whites N&Jed. So how do we make sure we are not the lonely type wallowing in misery and despair?
Break the censorship that prevents whites from discussing their fates.
Job #1 ensure whites have free speech, job #1.
People will flock to us.