Bob and others at BUGS have discussed how organizations tend to be more concerned with their own existence than for the purpose they were originally created for. Many times organizations will shift the scope of their mission based on the wishes of their highest donors. We at BUGS do not have this problem since we don’t have donors and aren’t even an organization. As a result BUGS is populated by people who do the work purely for ideological reasons.
I do think however, that it would be useful to at least have a brainstorming session on what a BUGS organization would look like. The reason being for the slight chance that there may be some wealthy philanthropists out there who want to give us resources to fight White genocide. Of course one can make the argument that making BUGS into an organization could endanger it by making it vulnerable to mission creep. While this must be kept in mind, I think we should at least make it known to potential philanthropists that if they want to give us money, that we will accept it, and use it as efficiently as possible to fight White genocide. Here’s what I got:
1) The main purpose of the organization would be to get out our message. The main effort would be internet based and would include paying people to disseminate our message. This pay would either be commission based or salary based. The workers would be teleworkers in that they wouldn’t report to an office each day. There would be a quality control component that monitored the work and examined the links being reported.
2) Another component of the organization would be the artistic/animation unit. This unit would do the animation that the White Rabbit and his team have been doing but they would be paid for the work. This would allow them to produce more animation more quickly.
3) Another component would be a public relations person(s) who would do interviews and give presentations. This person or persons would handle news interviews and would give presentations at universities, community events, and anywhere else that requested a presentation.
4) There should also be a unit that focuses on spreading the message outside of the internet This unit would think of ways to get the message out in creative ways other than the internet. Flyers, billboards, street theater, advertising on radio or TV, models walking around in White rabbit costumes handing out the mantra, supporting candidates for office who use the message, etc., etc. This unit would also provide funding to outside people who have ideas for spreading the message. If someone has an idea, they would propose their idea to the unit and receive funding if the unit thinks it’s worthy.
So that’s what I came up with so far. I’d like to hear what other BUGSsers think? I realize that there are many more details to consider. For example, would there be an office, or would it all be online? I think it’s best all online, with quarterly meetings in a central location? The most critical thing is that we keep to our mission. We would have to take every precaution to not be diverted from our mission or our message. Someone could show up one day and offer to double our funding as long as we stop using the word “genocide.”
If there are any wealthy men or women out there who have millions of dollars to spare, please consider donating it to us. We’re attempting to stop the largest program of genocide to ever be carried out on earth (the program of White genocide by forced diversity). We are the Light in the Darkness that is enveloping this world in ugliness, indecency, and chaos. By supporting us you have a chance to change the world in a way that your future posterity will praise you to the heavens for. Think of the legacy you would leave by funding this holy mission. I know it may seem risky, but as wealthy individuals was it not risk taking which brought you your wealth in the first place? Remember, you can’t take your wealth with you to the next life, but the deeds of virtuous men and women live on forever.




#1 by Undercover Lover on 11/25/2012 - 11:36 am
I think this is a bad idea.
Organizations are Organisms.
A soon as they come into existance, they want to eat, grow and reproduce. Eventually that is all they do.
There will be politicians making organizations and groups like this everywhere. We already have david duke and jared taylor as examples. The problem is they are not on message.
We are not about getting more people to be members of our group. We are about spreading a message.
Admittedly, I would like to get paid for this but I think the best thing is for our group to remain unpaid. Have it remain a purely voluntary type organization. We seem to be doing pretty good right now anyways.
#2 by Dick_Whitman on 11/25/2012 - 4:40 pm
Yes yes,yes but if someone got their dividends check back this year and wanted to give us 2, 3, 4 million dollars to fight White Genocide, certainly we wouldn’t turn it down? Right?
So just think of this post as a brainstorming session for what we would do if we had some money.
#3 by OldBlighty on 11/26/2012 - 1:56 am
If someone was throwing that kind of money around, I’d recommend we use it to file law lawsuits – As many as are necessary to get legal precedents set.
Forget useless institutions. Hire the meanest, nastiest lawyers in the country and send them after the anti-Whites’ institutions and personal fortunes.
Talking about practical steps to take all of their money, is the only thing that really upsets the anti-Whites, so lets do that.
#4 by Undercover Lover on 11/26/2012 - 12:15 pm
Now that’s an idea.
#5 by Conrad on 11/25/2012 - 12:19 pm
How about books? See, Jack’s War.
I am working on J W 2 now. I am including parts of the Mantra in this book as well.
#6 by Peter Cottontail on 11/25/2012 - 1:10 pm
I believe any potential organization should reside outside of BUGS. It could be led by a Bugster but should not replace the current structure (or lack of) of Bugs. Horus is doing his own thing as are the people at whitegenocideproject.com. Johnnywhiterabbit sells music with mantra messages, etc. Give any of these Bugsters boatloads of cash and they can do some great things.
I like your ideas. Don’t forget Bob’s prescribed punishment for anti-Whites: Hire lawyers to sue corporations for supporting White genocide. It becomes self funding.
#7 by Vale on 11/25/2012 - 1:41 pm
I like Dick’s idea. Sure, BUGS should not become an organization – but then again it doesn’t need to. Just start a new organization built on solid BUGS principles, and keep it separate.
I don’t think we need a philanthropist either (although that would be nice). I don’t earn much but I will commit to sending a monthly amount to the Anti-White Resistance (if it is ever set up). It wouldn’t take a lot of BUGS members (or anonymous supporters) to make enough funds to further the BUGS cause in lots of new ways.
BUGS has a massive impact with zero funding, and it must remain independent. But, a new organization can take BUGS principles and spread its message in new ways. Instead of funding the GOP or other hopeless causes we can fund our own race’s survival. That sounds good to me.
I liked Dick’s idea so much I made a flag/logo:
http://valeofdarkness.blogspot.co.uk/p/awr.html
Long live the Anti-White Resistance.
#8 by Harumphty Dumpty on 11/25/2012 - 2:48 pm
I like that top flag a lot, except for the color. For me, that color doesn’t arouse.
What about the same design, but in red, white, and blue?
#9 by daedalus on 11/25/2012 - 6:55 pm
The flag idea looks ‘fun’.
How about using primarily White and Blue.
as a bonus it begins jamming the khazar-state association which Blue-White now has.
#10 by John Locke on 11/25/2012 - 1:57 pm
Just a Paypal account where people can buy 30 Mantra posts for $3 if they want to help but don’t want to post themselves. We can prove posts with links.
#11 by Harumphty Dumpty on 11/25/2012 - 2:44 pm
redaction:
If I imagine myself spreading our message while also feeling inside me a need for donors,…
#12 by Harumphty Dumpty on 11/25/2012 - 2:45 pm
Sorry, I meant this to follow my own comment below.
#13 by Harumphty Dumpty on 11/25/2012 - 2:41 pm
If we had an organization, does that mean we could have a brand new website instead of this rickety old thing held together with baling wire? 🙂
Right now, an organization would just impose the senseless burden of having to attend to the details of having an organization.
If we ever do get some money, whichever bugsters use it will have to organize their use of it, and thus some degree of organization will occur in a natural way as needed, which IMO is the only way we should saddle ourselves with the extra burden of organization.
And if any billionaire were to have his eye on us, he might sensibly like to see what we could do with just a little bit of money for starters!
I think Dick’s article is useful in opening up our minds to possibilities. We might have a thread, “Projects Awaiting Donors,” to describe potential projects that require funds, such as the young lovelies Dick mentioned dressed up in bunny outfits…that reminds me of something…ah yes, Hugh Hefner’s Playboy mansion! Lol! Great idea though.
Such a thread would be a place for us to drop ideas we might otherwise not even think about because of the cost, and the thread’s existence might somehow reach the attention of donors…I guess that’s possible.
But making a need or a desire for donors part of our psyche worries me a bit. Don’t we operate, in a certain sense, from a mindset of “plenty” rather than a mindset of “scarcity”? If I imagine myself spreading our message while also feeling a need for donors, I think I might not feel quite the same swashbuckling, arrogant confidence I do now. Possibly that’s just me. But I doubt it.
#14 by Vale on 11/25/2012 - 3:21 pm
I’m seeing someone like Beefcake armed with cash, and imagining the devastation… Early Christmas.
#15 by WhiteRabbitAwake on 11/25/2012 - 4:43 pm
Had a few thousand stickers printed, I’ve thought about slipping some teenagers a little pocket money to plaster an area with them. Some I put up in places have remained so.
Small audience but the message is repeated to that same audience when they use the same route and see it over and over.
Banners. From overhead bridges or over hoardings on busy routes would be seen by thousands. Have to be disposable though, could put up stealthily but unlikely to be able to retrieve! Have an idea for good sized ones for low cost, they would not look professional but the message is the message…!
Assistance putting them up on several arterial routes around a city simultaneously would be advantageous.
Fit vehicles with a good sound system, external PA even, and play Johnny White Rabbits’s music LOUD! Van or A board with Mantra livery.
#16 by Daniel Genseric on 11/25/2012 - 8:43 pm
We are getting ahead of ourselves.
#17 by Frank on 11/25/2012 - 11:26 pm
Precisely.
BUGsers don’t need no stinkin’ “Institutions”.
Open System Thinking is tied down by “institutions”.
Did Bob need an “institution” to get this ball rolling? Does it need an “institution” to keep rolling?
Nyet.
#18 by Dick_Whitman on 11/26/2012 - 12:35 am
Sure, but if someone offered us 100,000, would you object to us accepting it? If we did accept it, how could we best use it to accomplish our mission?
#19 by Harumphty Dumpty on 11/26/2012 - 1:39 am
Dick, I’m sure I’ll be inspired to think about that…when it happens!
Actually, my thought is that penthouse apartments in Manhattan for the writers at White GeNOcide Project would be the best use of any big money.
#20 by Harumphty Dumpty on 11/26/2012 - 4:14 am
“Did Bob need an ‘institution’ to get this ball rolling?”
SF?
#21 by Daniel Genseric on 11/26/2012 - 7:57 am
What?
Suddenly SF is the ONLY place Bob could have found anti-whites while he was developing the Mantra?
He didn’t use it on “White Nationalists”. He used it on anti-whites. Some of us are going to have to do some REAL HARD THINKING about Storefront’s role in the real r-word. shhhhhh
#22 by Harumphty Dumpty on 11/26/2012 - 11:22 am
Where else but at SF could Bob have wasted anti-whites in full view of the same pro-whites over and over until a handful of those pro-whites began to see a light? Without SF, his efforts would have been diffused out in the vast mainstream, coming to the attention of no one.
So it seems to me, but my mind is open.
#23 by Daniel Genseric on 11/26/2012 - 2:56 pm
This logic is flawed in that we have BUGSters who haven’t and WON’T post on SF.
#24 by Harumphty Dumpty on 11/26/2012 - 3:23 pm
And what drew those bugsters here? Not spotting one lone man out posting in the mainstream, which probably would have escaped their notice.
I assume Truck Roy, Derek Black, and the early bugsters were mostly not even posting in the mainstream. Their only likely way of seeing Bob’s work would have been to come here and click on any links Bob gave to his posting in the mainstream. And even if Bob were so in love with doing stuff on the computer that he would post in the mainstream, and record his links here, what would have drawn anyone here to check it all out?
Instead Bob set up operations in an already going concern where his operations would be observed.
But maybe you’re considering a larger question: If there were no SF, in what ways good and bad would that affect the white movement?
I think we’d be poorer without SF, that all those people would NOT find something more constructive to do instead.
Well, some of them might. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if BUGS was the go – to place instead of SF, so newcomers would stumble into a culture of doing (and of course doing what we believe is the needed thing to do) instead of a culture of commenting.
#25 by Harumphty Dumpty on 11/26/2012 - 3:33 pm
SF does draw a lot of newcomers into a culture of commenting instead of doing. I hadn’t seen that clearly before.
Don Black said on his radio show that he’s looking for a new name for the show. I suggested on the SF thread about the show that he up the stakes and name the show “Fighting White Genocide.”
He could probably do a bit more to establish more of a culture of activism around White Genocide at SF.
Okay, Genseric, you can laugh at me if you wish now! Lol! I plod along!
#26 by Daniel Genseric on 11/26/2012 - 8:00 am
I knew somebody would say it for me.
I am thankful for Frank.
#27 by Jason on 11/26/2012 - 3:37 am
I have become skeptical of institutions myself, yet they play an undeniable role in human affairs. It’s always a mixed bag at best, but some are indispensable.
For example, the NRA has accomplished some good things for gun owners and gun rights. The trick is to not make the institution itself the purpose of the institution.
Maybe having competition among various BUGS types groups, if that day ever comes, is the best approach. Diversity of thought and institution, with no absolute monopoly given to any singe group.
#28 by Harumphty Dumpty on 11/26/2012 - 4:07 am
Tomorrow’s article: “What will we do if someone donates us a large bakery?” 🙂
#29 by Harumphty Dumpty on 11/26/2012 - 4:10 am
Apologies, Dick! But I can’t quite get in tune with this exercise!
#30 by Harumphty Dumpty on 11/26/2012 - 11:08 am
This topic diffuses my focus rather than sharpening it. Frankly, it produces in me the same feeling of irrelevancy as the posts at TOO and SF that debate one plan or another while turning away resolutely from the HERE AND NOW.
I agree entirely with Genseric that we are getting ahead of ourselves. I feel bad saying this because I’m fond of the blog’s author, but I truly have found this particular blog disturbing, in the same way I feel disturbed when I’m at TOO and SF. I sense that some others here may have reacted the same.
I hadn’t appreciated before how much the blogs here usually do something for my morale, even when I’m frustrated from not understanding some things in them. The feeling of intense, focused energy in the present has still been imparted to me by almost all the blogs here. This one feels like fantasizing, and I’m sorry, but I really don’t like it!
#31 by Harumphty Dumpty on 11/26/2012 - 11:38 am
Redaction:
“This topic diffuses my focus rather than sharpens it”
(I hate leaving awkward wording in a post. If we get 100,000 dollars, could we get our edit function repaired?)
#32 by Creator on 11/26/2012 - 3:12 pm
I second OldBlighty:
If someone was throwing that kind of money around, I’d recommend we use it to file law lawsuits – As many as are necessary to get legal precedents set.
Forget useless institutions. Hire the meanest, nastiest lawyers in the country and send them after the anti-Whites’ institutions and personal fortunes.
Talking about practical steps to take all of their money, is the only thing that really upsets the anti-Whites, so lets do that.
And Peter Cottontrail:
I believe any potential organization should reside outside of BUGS. It could be led by a Bugster but should not replace the current structure (or lack of) of Bugs. Horus is doing his own thing as are the people at whitegenocideproject.com. Johnnywhiterabbit sells music with mantra messages, etc. Give any of these Bugsters boatloads of cash and they can do some great things.
I like your ideas. Don’t forget Bob’s prescribed punishment for anti-Whites: Hire lawyers to sue corporations for supporting White genocide. It becomes self funding.
#33 by Frank on 11/26/2012 - 4:14 pm
One of my friends who comments regularly at TOO recently talked about the shape and form of social “things”. He noted …
“Why not look into a future of a distributed network of nodal identities, all free to be what they want, on their own terms, and yet still connected to and protecting each other and their mutual interests ..”
As I read this, I didn’t think about BUGS at first. I thought of this as a new way of seeing what everyone insists on calling “White Nationalism”, as if that were some big institution all “Whites” have to belong to, and all agree on THE dogmas of the Established Religion of White Nationalism.
Now I think about BUGS and realize that our EFFECTIVENESS is actually situated in the FORM of BUGS, which is formless. BUGS “is” a distributed network of “nodal entities” who have self-enrolled in a project. The resulting “thing” can never be tied down by becoming a static, institutional “thing”.
BUGSers, we exist inside that “thing” called Open Systems Thinking, and it happens BECAUSE of the formlessness of this thing Bob has started.
The “formlessness” of our “thing” is the source of its power.
#34 by Daniel Genseric on 11/26/2012 - 7:25 pm
Leaderless, non-cellular resistance.
Just try and nail some hair gel to the wall and see how far you get.
What little BUGS has done with money leads me to believe the ONLY thing we should ever purchase is a retainer agreement.