The 2012 election destroyed the temporary myth of Respectable Conservatism
The epitaph should read the one phrase respectable repeated most, millions of times:
“There is nothing racial about it.”
For God’s sake, listen to the Silence!
In every election campaign and commentary since the 50s, “There is nothing racial about it” was repeated endlessly and aggressively by all the Buckleys and Hannitys and O’Reillys.
For Lord’s sake, gang, PLEASE note how “There is nothing racial about it,” disappeared without trace in ALL 2012 commentary.
PLEASE notice above all that it sank in total, complete, unmentioned SILENCE.
If you don’t learn to listen to the Silence no one will.
Listen to the Silence! REPORT the Silence!
This epitaph relates to another point I keep hammering on.
Conservatives for two generation at least have repeated that they are actually more anti-white than liberals. It has been another thing they said at least a million times and at every opportunity.
British Conservatives have insisted that while leftists support multiculturalism, multiculturalism gets in the way of the True Goal, which is Assimilation.
In rejecting multiculturalism recently the Netherlands dedicated its race relations to a Committee on Integration. They don’t even bother with the code word “desegregation.”
Conservatives insist they want some controls on immigration because it is an economic issue, not a racial one. They don’t want to limit immigration to ALL white countries and ONLY white countries, God forbid.
Conservatives until now have not even mentioned that massive immigration means a solid influx of liberal votes.
Conservatives love another pre-2012 epitaph phrase: America is being “overwhelmed.”
It is time that somebody besides Bob is able to see all these slips and slides from the truth for what they are.
Massive immigration to All white countries and ONLY white countries is NOT, is NOT a wholly or primarily economic issue:
Massive third world immigration to ALL white countries and ONLY white countries is not largely a cultural issue. A nonwhite can adapt enough Western terminology so that, with the fanatical dedication of the media, he is the epitome of looking culturally Western;
Massive third world immigration to ALL white countries and ONLY white countries and ONLY white countries is not a cultural issue;
In summation, every single word you utter that goes the easy way of economic “overwhelming” or “they don’t speak English” is traitorous to the whole pro-white cause.
#1 by Jason on 12/14/2012 - 8:33 am
Bob has been putting out some extra good ones lately. I have to admit something about my writing. At TOO, I could easily create tons of material because everyone accepted the polysyllabic verbiage as a sign of intelligence. They rewarded undisciplined philosophic musings (at least in the comments sections).
Here, the approach to comments and writing articles is more serious. Economy in writing is important, as is sticking to a relevant point. It’s not about rambling along, dropping names like Aristotle or Nietzsche to sound smart. And it’s not News and Jews.
This is a great improvement but it leaves me a bit stymied. It’s a bit like writer’s block. I feel like whatever I write will be 2nd class.
So, I admire Bob more than any other writer out there today, but I kind of resent him for making me really think about what I’m doing. The whole change in perspective throws a person for a loop. I think we all have to write like ourselves, not try to copy Bob’s style. But at the same time, we must learn to nail down a logical argument, that is relevant to Whites, as efficiently as possible.
Or maybe Mantra writing isn’t about complex arguments anyway. See, I confuse myself pretty easily! `
#2 by Daniel Genseric on 12/14/2012 - 11:10 am
Everything will be gravy once you learn to replace that resentment with gratitude. Bob is doing this for his health. He is doing this for US.
To give you an idea of an example of “complexity” I encountered recently:
I was talking to a man in his early 60’s about the information technology, aka IT, field he works in. He was telling me that iPad/iPod has caused some of the incoming generation to adopt Mac’s in the office place. I said to him, “Well, they are powerful machines.” He told me that, “Yeah. But they’re so s-i-m-p-l-e. It makes tackling complex issues with them challenging.”While chuckling a little bit, I told him that was the beauty part of the Mac. That is their market niche. They’re powerful & user-friendly. He didn’t have anything to offer after that as he is “loyal” to his PC.
So loyal is he, that he immediately went back to navigating web news articles at the coffee shop with an iPad 2 over his $1k+ laptop sitting on the table.
He’s a Mac. He just doesn’t know it yet.
#3 by Jason on 12/14/2012 - 7:24 pm
On IT, I once knew an older IT guy who told me he preferred VAX machines over PCs! Some of that was being familiar with VAX’s, but I suspect a lot of it was the allure of how complex the VAX systems were. Those who understood them could hold themselves out as a priestly class (sound familiar?)
On Bob, just to be clear, I am grateful for everything he does, including his influence on all of us, When I say I “resented” him, I meant it as a back handed compliment. I’m sure everyone got that but I just wanted to be sure!
#4 by dungeoneer on 12/14/2012 - 9:26 am
There`s not much variety in variations of “Massive third world immigration to ALL white countries and ONLY white countries and ONLY white countries”, and people don`t like accepting such a dry diet.
Jason: “At TOO, I could easily create tons of material because everyone accepted the polysyllabic verbiage as a sign of intelligence. They rewarded undisciplined philosophic musings (at least in the comments sections)”
Words read is oxygen breathed and message time wasted.
Jason: “This is a great improvement but it leaves me a bit stymied. It’s a bit like writer’s block. I feel like whatever I write will be 2nd class.”
I often find myself stuck on the point being made and afraid of just saying the standard stuff, which is silly because even some standard stuff if it`s reinforcing the basics is better than nothing and lessens your fear of people laughing at you for what you write.
Jason: “we must learn to nail down a logical argument”
“See, I confuse myself pretty easily! ”
Yep.
#5 by Jason on 12/14/2012 - 7:30 pm
Yes, with Mantra work I do a lot of copy/paste. I suspect that is why some other pro-Whites don’t like it: it doesn’t appeal to the ego. But, if they would wake up, they would realize the Mantra gives them far more influence than whatever verbiage they spit out.
It doesn’t bother me, because I think of it as having my own personal speech writer!
#6 by Dave on 12/14/2012 - 12:25 pm
Any law enforcement investigation of white collar crimes rests upon the skill in which suspects are interviewed.
You listen to the body language, you LISTEN TO THE SILENCE.
Why is white collar crime so rampant? It takes a high IQ to craft effective interviews! How many high IQs do the police have???
We here at BUGS are the high IQ contingent of the police force of real politics. You can’t be a real BUSER if you don’t know how to interview suspects and don’t have the IQ for it.
But in truth, we have little problem in this regard. That’s because it is so easy to detect the guilty!
Interviewing suspects is NOT interrogation. Interrogation is something far different. In interrogation, you don’t ask questions. You don’t “interview”. INSTEAD, YOU DO THE TALKING! THAT’S BECAUSE YOUR PURPOSE IS TO EXTRACT A CONFESSION!!!
Interrogation is a monologue aimed at getting your suspect to confess!
That’s the Mantra! It is a tool of INTERROGATION.
WE KNOW THE BASTARDS ARE GUILTY!!!
We need them to confess and get on their knees and beg for mercy.
That’s the Mantra.
#7 by Conrad on 12/14/2012 - 9:51 pm
A few thoughts on this subject came to mind as I read. There really isn’t any such thing as liberal or conservative, just overt and covert. Liberal = overt anti-white and conservative = covert anti-white. Also, there are those that believe that saying the Mantra over & over is ineffective and boring. We should keep this in mind that even if one repeats the mantra 1000 times that there are 300 million people in America that need to hear it until they get it. Now I must ask, how many times did you need to hear the Mantra before YOU caught on to it? You do the math.
………
Jack’s War
http://www.jackswar.com