Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Errors Are for Learning

Posted by Bob on December 17th, 2012 under Coaching Session


Years ago, Lord Nelson made a very fortunate error. In the course of his debates on Stormfront, LN began to rely more and more on whites “being overwhelmed” by immigration.

It turned out to be the path of least resistance. Many, many people could go along with a criticism of immigration while being absolutely blind to the ongoing genocide. So LN didn’t realize that he was increasingly emphasizing the standard immigration angle, which even respectable conservatives can talk about.

But the problem is not just immigration. It is GENOCIDE.

LN got my point the moment I made it to him. It was an important example of what can happen with the subtlest from of tailgating. And what is more important, the moment I mentioned this to LN he got it.

Unless you are IN the fight, you will wonder what the big deal is, but LN got it instantly. THAT, not the error, was the point.

But I still had to suffer through it three or four times when Lord Nelson Admitted of the Error of His Way.

Hey, gang, this is not a confessional. I like to point out this error because LN GOT it immediately, proving that only those who get out there and USE the Mantra understand the approach. Hearing repeated apologies was a pain in the keester.

So I was delighted with OldMan’s little error, but only because it led to such an ACCURATE criticism from practicing BUGSERS. All OldMan did was add an extra word to “anti-whites.” He said Anti-White Racists.” Hardly a mortal sin.

All that matters is not what OldMan did, but how our few really active BUGSERS reacted to it.Photobucket

After all their EXPERIENCE, they instantly realized that one extra word, “racist,” gave the enemy an out.

Here we are, bearing down on the enemy’s tail in a dogfight, and the enemy is presented with that lovely word “racist” to dive into like a cloud.

You could instantly tell who had been in the fight and who hadn’t. No matter how many philosophical pieces you write for comments, you don’t instantly get the importance of a point like that until you have seen it in action.

Keeping on the enemy’s tail, not allowing him any escape from YOUR point, GENOCIDE, is critical in a way only EXPERIENCE shows you.

No problem, OldMan.

Way to go, TROOPS!

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Daniel Genseric on 12/17/2012 - 9:08 am

    Addressing errors along with acknowledging small successes is the only way you can grow.

    Trying to explain that to someone out in Reality almost always proves futile. Mommy Prof. has trained them to value their ‘feelings’ over everything. Instead of finding out “What went wrong?” or “Would you do anything differently next time?” he asks “How does that make you feeeeeel?” It’s rarely, if ever, a debrief. So, we see that information is poured through a Politically Correct, emotional filter.

    Nothing is actually learned in this manner. He plays on their emotions and keeps them weaker than they could be. Just like her economy and water nobody dare drink, she keeps them stagnant.

    Conditioning our children to learn this way is a damn crime.

  2. #2 by Conrad on 12/17/2012 - 11:03 am

    The people out there in “reality land” only imagine their version of reality. It’s only their emotions playing tricks on their minds.

    I think that there is a reason that Mommy Professor, and all the other propaganda agencies, use ‘feelings’ so much. It is because emotions are the quickest way to the center of the mind. Reason and logic takes time and effort. The pro-white-genocide forces know that they are running out of time, therefore they must rely on the shortcut of emotions. It is a standard propaganda method – any advertising agency can tell you all about it. I wrote about this in Jack’s War. Well okay, feelings work for us as well. A fair number of leftists have changed sides after their ‘feelings’ got hurt, especially when there was blood on their faces. We need to be certain that we engage the reason and logic circuits of the brain as well to fix them firmly in the pro-white position once they get here.

    Okay I’m going too long here, but I just thought of this because of what I wrote in Jack’s War. Speaking of that – I am working on volume two in this series and book 2 will contain more of what we generally call “Mantra speak.” I am trying to do this in a manner that will move the reader gently in our direction before they realize what has happened.

    Just as a footnote, “How does that make you feel” is an evasion technique that teachers use when they don’t have an intelligent answer to a question.

    • #3 by John Locke on 12/17/2012 - 12:35 pm

      Book 1 was a bit violent. I don’t like love stories.

      Book 2 could be about how Jack ends White Genocide by getting people to spread mini-mantras. I would like to see mini-mantras incorporated.

      • #4 by Conrad on 12/17/2012 - 1:22 pm

        Book one was intended as an introduction explaining why & how Jack ended up on this path. Also, the book is an attempt to move the reader – emotionally – by small steps. I want the book to have a broad appeal to the masses. Young white girls will be moved more readily by the love story angle than other things. Yes it is violent just like so many other action adventure books. I am hoping that this will be a good platform for catching the attention of the masses as well. Look at the book shelves, this type of book is everywhere.

        By the way, Jack & Libby are NOT just two people. These characters are analogies. Jack represents our race as it is, Libby is our race as it should be in the future. Jack’s hesitation cost him his future. Just like with our race, if WE continue to hesitate. This is meant to subconsciously reinforce the genocide angle in people’s minds.

        Discussions and comments about the book, Jack’s War can be made at my web site – http://www.jackswar.com – I’m not sure that Bob would want too much of that here.

  3. #5 by Dave on 12/17/2012 - 12:45 pm

    The great thing about BUGS is the focus on basics.

    When historical wrongs are alleged to have been committed by our people, war is being made against us.

    You cannot tailgate. You have to directly confront the accusation for what it is, an act of war.

    Atrocity claims are the very warp and woof of the fabric of war.

    You can be certain that when your people are accused of an atrocity, an atrocity is aimed at your people.

    That is why the allegation of the genocide of white people is the most critical piece of the Mantra.

    Do not say “white genocide”. This will be interpreted as the genocide of nonwhites by whites.

    You have to say, “The genocide of white people”.

    Never let an opponent ask you a question. YOU are the questioner. If your opponent asks you a question reply, “Shut up! “I” am asking the questions!”

    We don’t have a goddamned thing to debate. We are interrogators. We are police. We are fighting the crime of the genocide of white people.

  4. #6 by Conrad on 12/17/2012 - 1:36 pm

    “When historical wrongs are alleged to have been committed by our people, war is being made against us.”

    True. There are three weaknesses in their argument.
    1. They must completely ignore the historical wrongs of other races, which are usually much worse than ours. 2. They must also ignore the good that we have done. 3. They are stating their reason for causing another genocide. If the people saying this are white you have them in a crossfire of their own making. They are just evil whites, once again, creating another atrocity.

    • #7 by dungeoneer on 12/17/2012 - 2:17 pm

      “True. There are three weaknesses in their argument.
      1. They must completely ignore the historical wrongs of other races, which are usually much worse than ours. 2. They must also ignore the good that we have done. 3. They are stating their reason for causing another genocide. If the people saying this are white you have them in a crossfire of their own making. They are just evil whites, once again, creating another atrocity.”

      1, Their mandated opinions exist thanks to censorship and tyranny.

  5. #8 by Lord Nelson on 12/19/2012 - 12:06 pm

    Anti-Whites get upset if there are not enough non-whites on TV or in a football team. That’s why we must have “affirmative action”. But to those same Anti-Whites a world without any white people is just a non-event.

    Anti-Racist is just a code word for Anti-White!

    • #9 by Jason on 12/20/2012 - 11:02 am

      Absolutely. No one is trying to bring diversity to El Paso or Detroit. They are fully “diverse”, i.e. non-White.

You must be logged in to post a comment.