Jason discussed one of the basics of BUGS: we recognize that those who make the future world almost never get credit for it.
If you don’t come in realizing that, you read history the way others do, as a series of Great Events.
Then, naturally, you assume that in order to save the world, you must be in on a Great Event.
A Great Event of this century was the nomination of Ronald Reagan. Nobody but us knew it yet, but it was the beginning of the end for one of the world’s two Superpowers and a Great Evil.
I had one of those wildly prized invitations to go to both Reagan inaugurations.
I gave them away.
I had already been in on the history. In 1981 I was working on 1984, in 1984 I was well into the strategy that did the World Deed. I had no reason to go and hear what people like me had written.
Nobody, but NOBODY, can influence history if he concentrates on Great Events. In the 1980s nobody but us had the vaguest hint that the USSR was coming down.
Least of all the experts and the Recognized Authorities.
#1 by Epiphany on 12/23/2012 - 7:39 am
Interesting, how the non–Whites speak as if we are oppressing them, instead of the other way about. Political Correctness is almost humourous when you think of it like that!
#2 by BGLass on 12/23/2012 - 8:43 am
Things that get named Great Events seem events on which the people come forth, but spoken of as if the energy wasn’t already there, happening long before. When tides are turned, or things come to a head, or are created, a culmination-of-this-energy-moment becomes the great event.
Lately, more seem to talk in fewer abstractions. Like instead of ‘our founders,’ it’s my great-granpa, which may be the proverbial wall coming down as they are returned to the realm of the real, to realizing who they are and how things affect them and their children. What kind of people don’t realize, when a guy says “kill all the white people…how great is that?”—he is talking about real white people, about you, about your own children? Not realizing that is not normal.
#3 by OldBlighty on 12/23/2012 - 4:10 pm
“Jason discussed one of the basics of BUGS: we recognize that those who make the future world almost never get credit for it”
If I explain the methods we are using at BUGS and what our enemies have been using against Whites, to intellectuals and skeptics I know, they can’t comprehend it. It is alien. To them, history is a juggernaut that goes places on its own.
“In the 1980s nobody but us had the vaguest hint that the USSR was coming down. Least of all the experts and the Recognized Authorities.”
The same “intellectuals” that said the Soviet Union would stand forever, say the poor Soviet economy was to blame for the collapse.
DUH… When are Communist economies ever good?
These people are D grade thinkers.
#4 by dungeoneer on 12/23/2012 - 8:57 pm
“The same “intellectuals” that said the Soviet Union would stand forever, say the poor Soviet economy was to blame for the collapse. ”
Even more hilarious, I`ve been told by anti-whites and News and Jewsers: “Communism had outlived it`s usefulness to the Russian and Western leadership”
Point A straight to Point C, and the Grand Conspiracy rolls ever onward totally unaffected by the actions of mere mortals changing the political landscape with new words and ideas.
#5 by Epiphany on 12/23/2012 - 4:25 pm
W e should torment and torment them about the crimes of the Communists against Christians, until Kingdom Come!
#6 by Frank on 12/23/2012 - 9:52 pm
Our enemies, the anti-whites, constantly call us “nazis” … which of course we translate back to naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews when we point out our enemy’s support for White Genocide.
Of late, I’ve used the term “Not-Sees” as a taunt for them when doing BUGSer work here and there.
I’d like comment on this from the “uber” BUGSers hereabouts.
While “Not-Sees” doesn’t “go through it” like the Mantra version does, it does sort of taunt them and call them blind bitches, which I find useful in getting their feathers ruffled so they further expose their genocidal intent.
What say ye?
#7 by Epiphany on 12/24/2012 - 4:06 am
Interesting that these anti–Whites are so fixated on the Germans and the English in particular. Could it be envy? Could the anti–Whites actually fear, in their hearts, that the British Imperialists and the German National Socialists were correct, and that the English and Germans were the purest specimens of the Aryan Race? I suspect so. I really do!
#8 by dungeoneer on 12/23/2012 - 11:50 pm
I`ll promote myself to the rank of Uber BUGSer and say taunting or ridiculing anti-whites is fine as long as you`re still pushing the message.
#9 by Epiphany on 12/24/2012 - 4:30 am
Whenever I see those pledges to stand behind Israel, I am reminded that we should have stood behind Apartheid South Africa. Most arguments in support of The State of Israel could also have been said in favor of Apartheid. This is an angle we can use!
#10 by Epiphany on 12/24/2012 - 4:40 am
We need to use this South African angle. It is most useless to complain about what the Israelis do to the Palestinians. All that gets one is the label anti–Semite!
Yes, that is the idea. Keep on harping about the plight of the Whites in South Africa instead. That is a good idea. I am getting more into this idea whenever i think of it.
Another tip is this: just like they always harp on the Holocaust, we can harp on what had happened to Christians in the Gulag. This would really be a good idea. There is also the issue of what the North Koreans did to U.S. Soldiers during the War in Korea too. We can harp on that for all it is worth as well. The Holocaust, it seems to me, is their Meal ticket. Not only is its memory implemented to make those of German descent feel bad about themselves, but also exists to make Whites in general feel bad about who they are. We should not overlook the anti–White angle to the entire scheme.
Eventually and inevitably all will change for the better. We must not lose hope! Remember, whenever anyone claims to support the State of Israel, one should say, “You should have supported Apartheid South Africa!”