A few people remember, but never mention, that there was no autopsy on Ted Kennedy’s victim. If he had been a Southern politician, nobody would ever have been allowed to forget it.
Another of these cases where if it had been done by Southerners it would-be national news was the New York convention.
If I remember correctly, of the two major parties in each of fifty states, only one nominated its candidates by convention rather than by primary. In fact, only one of the two parties in that single state did it.
The party was Republican and the state was New York.
The reason was that a majority of New York Republicans at that time were very conservative and ruled the upper part of the state. A primary would have thrown out Rockefeller, Javits, and all the other liberals the convention nominated.
If this had been done for segregationist governors in the South, it would still be mentioned regularly.
It was and is absolutely unmentioned.
We kept score then on conservatives by their getting a low score on the ADA board and a high score on the ACA board. Of New York’s 43 representatives, 19 had over 90% ACA and under 10% ADA scores.
The “flyover” part of New York State was bypassed by a convention.
This is a rule of politics most people are not aware of: If you want to strangle democracy, you have a HUGE legislature or convention.
The Soviets had what was called “democratic centralism.” This meant that the local Party convention was huge, and each of those in turn members of HUGE regional convention. They all elected a HUGE legislative body for the Republic, and each Republic, even the smallest, elected a giant house to Moscow, for the Party, for the government, for whatever.
At each level, as in New York, there were so many members that every minute of speaking time was ruled from the podium. As in New York, the convention decided who was genuinely a delegate. This was all, of course, to avoid democracy, unmentioned in the USSR just as the New York convention went into the Silence here.
This highly inclusive system of representation is a standard way to centralize all power. A Member of Parliament in Britain is powerless. The Prime Minister is essentially a dictator in the same way Joe Cannon was the dictator of the House of Representatives around 1910.
#1 by Jmcaul on 01/03/2013 - 11:05 am
I am embarrassed to have to ask such a thing and mean no disrespect; but can someone explain how I can use the information in today’s article to help end White genocide and secure a future for my White children? Thank you.
#2 by Jmcaul on 01/03/2013 - 3:35 pm
ok, back to posting the mantra I go.
#3 by dungeoneer on 01/04/2013 - 3:14 am
An important aspect of mantra thinking is not overcomplicating simple things.
The present anti-white system maintains it`s existence with it`s pretence of democracy and “mass involvement”
Bob is giving us some historical info to reinforce that crucial point.
#4 by Tom Bowie on 01/03/2013 - 6:41 pm
Some topics are just for Mantra Thinking.
Pointing out what’s right there if you think about it. Seeing and/or being around Mantra Thinking helps me sharpen and/or keep my Mantra Thinking sharp.
Much like I once kept my body it good shape for the other kind of war; now it’s my mind that must be in good shape. I have no desire to win a debate, only to crush Anti-Whites and their program of White GeNOcide.
If they are not in top shape, that’s good but if they are I want to win.
#5 by Epiphany on 01/04/2013 - 3:30 am
Notice, Whites are subcategorized into Irish Americans and Italian Americans and German Americans to keep them divided against each other. Blacks are not subdivided into Ibo Americans and Hutu Americans and Zulu Americans. No, all of them are called African Americans. This shows that the Powers That Be desire Whites to be divided against each other, but not Blacks.
Once the Whites are divided against each other, this weakens the White Race, considerably!