“I am embarrassed to have to ask such a thing and mean no disrespect, but can someone explain how I can use the information in today’s article to help end White genocide and secure a future for my White children? Thank you.”
The best questions I get in comments begin with an apology.
As another commenter pointed out earlier, writing is a lot of work, and I want comments on what I WROTE, and an apology means the commenter has READ what I wrote and is so on target he doesn’t want to hit too hard.
Dungeoneer answered Jm’s question by saying that I give you things to demonstrate and give you a chance too think of things in a Mantra way. Which is very true.
Jm’s concern maybe is that I keep insisting that YOU stick to the Mantra, while I seem to roam all over the place.
I am trying to an officer’s job, which is to work out a strategy while the soldiers do their job.
The problem is that in our case, the only people worth consulting with on strategy are the soldiers who know what the whole thing is about and, more importantly, how convincing people really works. 
This is unique to our war. The last thing any general wants is his soldiers’ opinions. Hell, even the general’s opinion is of no importance, since the outcome has already been determined by the time the first shot is fired, by people no one hears about.
As I have said here at least fifty times, I do not expect to be here when it is time to go beyond the Mantra alone, so I want to leave you with as much practical preparation as I can for that time.
“How Things Work” is one of my regular topics. It is what I got paid for in practice: making things work in real power politics.
I repeat things endlessly because many commenters would see “upstate New York congressmen” and talk about that. But it is for you to get into any political maneuvering in the real world, and then the question of what sort of gathering to make a decision is likely to come up.
Do we “include everybody?” The paradox here is that “including everybody” means excluding everybody who is not already part of the elite. While I have to give examples from my time and my experience, the point of this article was to warn you that the bigger the assembly, the more the new people, you, are effectively excluded from it.
Go back and read “Democratizing Dictatorship” again and be sure that, when you finally have a chance to enter real politics, and are at the beginning, the elite doesn’t exclude you by “including everybody.”
#1 by The Cheshire Cat on 01/05/2013 - 8:25 am
“When you finally have a chance to enter real politics, and are at the beginning, the elite doesn’t exclude you by “including everybody.”
Bob’s Whitakerisms are shockingly connected to reality. This happened to me with Asa Hutchinson. That’s all I am willing to say about that.
#2 by Dave on 01/05/2013 - 12:05 pm
Stupid dog trick politics are endless. Do you think Congress or any legislature is capable of keeping anything straight and coherent? That is the job of specialists nobody ever hears about and there are too FEW of them. The general public is clueless. The public is unaware of the extent to which members of Congress daily tremble lest the public find out about yet another embarrassing stupidity they have stumbled into. It’s Laurel and Hardy on steroids.
If a relatively small body like Congress (small in relation to the millions its purports to govern) can’t keep anything straight, how do supposed “democratic” assemblies orders larger keep anything straight?
There is a dearth of competence everywhere. The truth is absurd. Robert Whitaker is the ONLY voice of competence in the political field. There is only ONE guy folks!
That is the appalling truth. The Mantra is prescient. It holds the heart and center of war and political conflict. There was only ONE meaningful outcome from WW II, a war where perhaps over 40 million people died. That was the Geneva Convention laws defining and prohibiting genocide and the very essence of the outcome of WW II is being ignored!!!
Instead, the Establishment is suborning attacks on the innocent and genocide everywhere and their genocidal intent is orthodoxy! The white race is being throttled worse than our race was throttled during WW II.
Where in the hell are the police? The Mantra is the police! Robert Whitaker is the police!
#3 by Jason on 01/05/2013 - 9:19 pm
Thanks for the question Jmcault and Bob’s answer did illuminate it for me. Adding people to a process can have the effect of watering down each individual’s impact.
It’s well known that major public corporations can be controlled by someone owning just a small percentage of the stock, because the rest of the shareholders are so scattered. And it’s on old saying that with every extension of the franchise (right to vote), everyone lost freedom. Not exactly the same concept, but related.
Maybe this is why the Consistent Message of the Mantra we put out can wield so much influence. The rest of what you see online is a mass of noise, canceling each other out. But the Mantra is like a strong signal you find on the radio in the midst of static (remember a.m. radio?!). I can see the value of not needlessly expanding a group just for the sake of more size.
#4 by Jmcaul on 01/07/2013 - 3:30 am
Ok. Stream of consciousness time here. I hope I am not speaking out of turn. For some reason this article calls to my mind the recent examples of both occupy Wall Street (OWS) and the tea party (TP) in light of some lessons from early Follow the White Rabbit podcasts.
BUGS represents an ‘energy flow.’ OWS and TP were both energy flows. In each case I think it can safely be said that powerful players behind the scenes were able to infiltrate and redirect both energy flows thus fairly dissipating that energy. Both ‘movements’ seem to have fizzled. Both movements seemed to be ‘including everyone’ as well, and in the end, no clear leader or strategy or goals emerged.
I appreciate Bobs looking beyond his involvement as the head and founder of BUGS, the maker of the ‘silver whistle’ (the mantra) that we happily blow on. Bob is a man with a vision for the future well-being of our race. A vision we all share. (I personally think being the mother of White children is what has made me so passionate about this although even a childless White person has no desire find themselves aging and at the mercy of an ‘assimilated’ populace.)
As we continue to spread the mantra and increase awareness of White genocide in the real world, the time will come for us to have a specific set of well defined goals to bring to the awakened public consciousness.
I can’t help but always go back to the example of the transition from the former USSR to today’s Russia. Was there a roadmap there? Who made it? What lessons can we learn today from that (still spectacular to me) example?
I don’t know the answers. As I have stated before I don’t have any real world experience in bringing down closed systems; just a restless mind and an ABSOLUTE commitment to not only ending White genocide but also bringing about a system that ENSURES the conditions that my race needs to not only survive but to thrive AND EXCEL into the future and in perpetuity.
A future where our White children are no longer taught to hate our race but rather taught to love, appreciate and value it, and where they understand the danger of EVER allowing an anti-White system to take root again. Anything less in my mind is not acceptable.