A council of war is under way. General Ridgeway says that it will begin with an artillery barrage. General Gitsby says, “Artillery barrage, artillery barrage. We are always doing artillery barrages!
“I was reading an enemy publication and it says we are just stuck on artillery barrages. They say it is making us look ridiculous. We don’t want to look ridiculous, so I say we send all our artillery back for scrap metal.”
Such a statement would immediately cause Gitsby’s fellow warriors to conclude that the responsibility has really gotten to him, and they would recommend that he be retired immediately.
But the Gitsby Approach is the way the paycheck right chooses its leaders. When the paychecks stumble onto an argument that is really simple, effective and unanswerable because it is obviously true, the left simply sneers at it and the paychecks abandon it.
I have mentioned this repeatedly and gotten no comments on it:
“When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns” is true and effective. But all the anti-gun crowd had to do was have somebody fashionable like Christopher Hitchens say, “These hicks are going to use the old refrain that if guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns.”
This instantly causes every respectable conservative publication to stop it just as it caused Gitsby to want to scrap his artillery. The only difference is that Gitsby would be retired, while a respectable conservative or most TOO types would get promoted for it.
The army that retires Gitsby has an excellent chance of winning. An army that promotes Gitsby for throwing away his artillery to be respectable is doomed.
#1 by Lord Nelson on 02/21/2013 - 6:39 am
Bullseye Bob!
The simple truth we are pointing out over, and over, should be obvious to anyone who has outgrown their ‘educating’. We repeat it because it is true. And we will keep on repeating it until even the most ‘educated’ moron gets it.
Africa for the Africans. Asia for the Asians. White countries for Everyone. It’s GENOCIDE!
Anti-Racist is a code word for Anti-White.
#2 by Simmons on 02/21/2013 - 9:46 am
Since we are dealing with cultists, they fear being singled out, that is why the personal pronouns centered on “You” are effective. “You want to take away mine and my family’s guns so only outlaws will have and use them against the people you disarm.”
Try it, even the cult minders think they are channeling some higher power that absolves them of that dreaded “responsibility.”
#3 by Dave on 02/21/2013 - 10:09 am
The disorientation of South Africa is a marker for the US where it is likely to get wildly bizarre as white political rights recede behind the absurdity of nonwhite minds.
It is like seeing street lights rocking back and forth with the rage of a riot and knowing how irrelevant and meaningless it is.
The mainstream media have something to talk about, that’s all.
The paycheck conservative (General Gitsby) thinks he is a participant when in actuality he’s a clown on a street corner who can’t even see the swinging and twisting of the traffic lights above his head.
And he is blind to what is right, distillate, pure, perfect, and clear; and to seers, hearers, and men and women of knowledge.
#4 by Jmcaul on 02/21/2013 - 5:46 pm
We will need to continue spreading and proclaiming the mantra until he word ‘racist’ becomes an antiquated curiosity. Remembered only for its utter ridiculousness. People will look back at the concept of ‘racism’ that permeates these times with the same sort of puzzlement that we now look back on flat-earthers, midieval medical practices, and other assorted mass-insanities that took hold in other ages.
I feel that only when every person on earth views someone who denounces another as a ‘racist’ with the same incredulity with which they would view someone denouncing a drowning man struggling to breathe as a ‘breath-ist!’ will our job be done. And even then, we will have to remain vigilant.
#5 by c-bear on 02/21/2013 - 11:41 pm
It’s fairly easy to turn around: “Only a genocidal lunatic would ridicule a genocide claim, specifically the crime of White Genocide.”
#6 by Harumphty Dumpty on 02/22/2013 - 2:27 am
“These hicks are going to use the old refrain that if guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns.”
I guess this kind of “argument” works because it’s an invitation to feel superior?
The speaker is really saying, “Listen to me, jerks, can’t you hear how superior I’m able to feel when I use this ‘argument’? Don’t you want to feel superior too?”
But why does it shut the other side up?
#7 by Harumphty Dumpty on 02/22/2013 - 2:40 am
I guess it shuts the other side up because it heaps scorn on the other side before the other side has even said anything, and it automatically delivers more scorn without anything more even being added, if the other side goes ahead and speaks its “refrain” anyway.
Ehhhh, I still don’t understand why the “argument” works. It’s so obviously silly. But of course now I’m being obviously silly.
#8 by Jmcaul on 02/22/2013 - 10:56 am
gun-grabbing sociopath: “These hicks are going to use the old refrain that if guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns.”
Mantra thinker response: “Only a genocidal sociopath would say such a thing about people seeking to be able to defend themselves.”
#9 by Jason on 02/22/2013 - 3:23 am
I think it means the person doesn’t really think our side can win. So, in order to have any kind of voice, he thinks we must appear “reasonable” to the enemy, because this “far superior” enemy can ruin us at any moment.
They aren’t playing to win; they have accepted being eternally out of power, they just want to register their “dissent” and be considered a worthy and respectable opponent.
Ironic, because I suspect the KGB had more authentic respect for Reagan after he defeated them, than they dd for all the respectable conservatives and liberals who pushed detente.
#10 by Bob on 02/22/2013 - 10:08 am
As I have pointed out a hundred times here, the other side selects its opposition, making them “respectable.” Those who will stop using facts which embarrass the enemy are naturally, not conspiratorily, invited to debate issues and get paychecks.
#11 by Jmcaul on 02/22/2013 - 11:15 pm
(I feel foolish every time I do this but here goes anyways.)
In the future, it is WE who will be selecting the ‘opposition.’
#12 by Jmcaul on 02/22/2013 - 11:01 am
“only a genocidal lunatic would ridicule a genocide claim, specifically the BLATANTLY OBVIOUS crime of White Genocide. People once also ridiculed those who said the earth was not flat.”
#13 by J Locke on 02/22/2013 - 12:23 pm
@Bob: I made a cartoon poem about your idea of the Mommy Professor a few months ago at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IY3JeEDV1-o
Now in a politics course and my professor looks exactly her. Wow:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=289934631135042&set=a.246749382120234.59800.100003555229680&type=1&relevant_count=1&ref=nf