Probably the hardest part of Mantra in action is leaving out so much. Those without Mantra discipline are quickly put on the defensive by anti-white yells of “racism” and “ignorance.”

We, on the other hand, put the enemy in a defensive position.

More than that, we put them in a DESPERATE position.

While other pro-whites find themselves on the defensive reciting volumes of information, our opponents are desperate to change the subject with standard nonsense we refuse to deal with, and with personal insults.

But there are points that are very important for us to KNOW but which our discipline does not allow us to discuss. In the years to come, when we have progressed to the point beyond repeating the Mantra, we will have to have a basic world view.

One of these points is wordism. We simply don’t have the time during our assaults to explain that anyone who is not a nationalist or a racist is a wordist. He has given up all natural loyalties or blind loyalty to a bunch of words.

We don’t enjoy forcing our way into discussion groups on other subjects, but we have to because no one gives us a chance to discuss our subject.

A white traitor, any traitor, is far far worse than an enemy.

It bothers me when commenters go into a theory that indicates they have forgotten the basics.

These are the basics on which we must construct our world in future. That is a reason for having this page here, while the real work goes on over in the Swarm.

One of the major lessons of the 2012 and 2016 elections, (the paycheck conservatives will get a boost in 2014 and claim that whatever they did worked), will be that as a matter of arithmetic whites will have to negotiate as whites. To repeat, this is a matter of arithmetic.

The white minority will remain an overwhelming plurality. But no one can succeed in the future without seeing us a huge, self-supporting minority rather than as some sort of wordism to be imposed on everybody.

There is a great legal distinction between those who abuse children and those who do not report it.

It can be doubted whether there is a moral distinction.

Anti-whites only talk about one accusation of genocide. In the case of the Holocaust they constantly denounce what they call “the good Germans,” Germans who they say knew about a mass slaughter of Jews but did not openly object to it.

But there is a huge difference between Good Germans then and Good Whites now, even if all the assumptions are true. Being a Bad German would have been suicide and would have had no effect. The implicit claim here is that today’s brave anti-whites would have defied Hitler and the SS.

Good Whites today are in an entirely different category. They are the people who refuse to mention child abuse. They are the ones who complain about our shoving white genocide onto all their fun sites while knowing full well that we are forcefully prevented from arguing our case elsewhere.

There are plenty of Good Germans today. They refuse to object to laws that make it a felony to offend political correctness. Today’s Good Germans could quite legally do what Rowan Atkinson and Paul Fromm and many others have done.

In Nazi Germany a free speech movement would have been grounds for arrest. If the old Germans were evil, then the Good Canadian, the Good French, the Good British and all the rest of modern Good Guys have wiped out even the theoretical distinction between those who commit crimes and those who refuse to acknowledge them.

Jason commented on my article “Why Do Those Who Benefit From the Mantra Attack It?

JASON says: “Everyone commented on how Horus’s optimism sparked their interest in the Mantra. None of the groups mentioned are optimistic. I still visit those sites, but none of them have ANY agenda that I can see.”

“That ties into the lack of optimism. They aren’t pushing for anything”.

“Pro-Whites will eventually benefit from what we are doing, but it may not be those groups. It will probably be an entirely new set of leaders.”

“Was there a parallel in the USSR? Were there dissidents who were against the use of propaganda pamphlets? What happened to them?”

Since the media has forgotten the fall of the USSR, and I am one of the few Americans who dealt with samizdat, I’ll try an answer.

The publishers of samizdat (It means “self-publication,” a crime in the USSR where all private production, especially of information, was outlawed) were astonished that, when the USSR failed, so did their own publications.

They soon realized that they were publishing illegal goods, and whatever they wrote would be bought on the black market. But when the press became free, they had no experience competing in the open market.

The Party hacks turned Pravda into a saleable publication. They even included one of MY articles, since I was a professional writer with experience. The idea that PRAVDA would have a Bob Whitaker article really blew my mind!

Also it was the Party hacks like Putin who took over in the power vacuum, not the dissidents, except for Walesa in Poland. Walesa had already had some practical political experience.

So, as usual, Jason’s question hits an important point. In order to succeed in a power struggle you have to have some experience with power struggle. And to succeed in a writer’s competitive market requires more than only black market experience.

That is why Sam Adams had so much to do causing the American Revolution, but it was his second cousin John who became president.

JASON SAYS:

“Is there more than one kind of silence? Sometimes, a group of people will remain silent, but the moment somebody speaks out, the ice is broken and they all start speaking the some obvious truth.

Other times, they cower in fear when someone speaks a truth everyone finds inconvenient. Or they may actually attack the truth-teller. The taboo must be maintained! It’s as if they believe some angry god will punish them all for saying blasphemous words. They have seen the “white racist” destroyed too many times in real life and in media images. This is one advantage we have with a MESSAGE focus as opposed to a PERSONALITY focus. Any single person can be destroyed. But a message is hard to stop.

Whites are seeing the Mantra message everywhere, every day. They see that the anti-Whites cannot answer it and cannot suppress it. That itself is powerful. It shows that the anti-White gods are not so powerful after all.

Once the anti-White gods are seen as paper tigers, an ocean of pent-up passion will be unleashed. This is why it is critical that as many posts, flyers, videos and whatever other form the Mantra can come in be produced and put out there for Whites to see – in virtually every venue imaginable. They will see that the taboo can be broken and the world doesn’t end.
And then they will get the courage to do it themselves”.

I would say that the answer to “Why shouldn’t they marry if they want to” would be to stay on the attack:

“You are saying that this whole program of immigration and assimilation and chasing down every white on earth who wants to live in a white community is just for True Love?”

Any other approach is tailgating.