A few commenters have recently repeated some of the more important points I have made twenty or more times here.
You are catching on a lot faster than the Names in any movement ever did.
This is not an insult. What I am most proud of is the moral courage and Patience I have had over the years in going on when absolutely nobody around me could get the most obvious points. In 1968, Wallace and Nixon had a landslide between them, and this is half the story if you had seen the polls before election day.
Nixon immediately appointed a pro-busing Head of the Education Department and disclaimed all appeals to what they called “Wallace” voters, National Review of course leading the charge.
Then came Watergate, and finally and suddenly Bill Rusher, NR’s publisher who had been in the lead denouncing any association with dirty old working people, met with me.
We are not talking about the few years that even our oldest BUGSERS have been here. I fought for this obvious coalition year after year after year. But every single Name in the Conservative Movement was on the other side.
Rusher came in too late, after Watergate. But we did get Reagan the nomination in 1980. Read the Name in History in the Reagan election of 1980, and every single one you see was part of the solid bloc of Names who had opposed appealing to “Wallace voters.”
Suddenly, after the 1980 election, they became the “Reagan Democrats” and everybody had always been all for them.
If you read history or fund raisers, you have no idea how things actually work.
#1 by Sentinel on 04/10/2013 - 6:39 am
The Selfservatives will do anything to remain respectable, including genocide of their own people!!! That is nothing short of sick.
So we, as Samizdat, must change what is respectable from the fashion which trickles down from evil minds… to simple, natural logic. Nature is on OUR side, so we don’t need force or big cash to do it – just a dedicated few.
Anti-Whites of all kinds demand our silence. We expose them whether they like it or not. And none do.
#2 by Daniel Genseric on 04/10/2013 - 7:51 am
A friend of mine complained that you can be “too cryptic”, Bob.
I tried, but I don’t see it.
Personally, I’m willing to let ANYBODY take credit for YOUR work as long as it means we get to win.
Few understand how exactly we exercise power, but it’s still happening – regardless of their level of comprehension.
Thank you for giving “the movement” some actual movement.
#3 by Jason on 04/10/2013 - 8:06 am
Patience … ah Patience.
I am trying to understand the voting demographic in 5 to 10 years. America is 72% White. However that includes Hispanic Whites, which may be a tricky category. Martin Sheen is Hispanic White. So is Carmen Diaz and Rachel Welch. Most of us call them White. But others might be not be so clear cut.
White non-Hispanics are only 63%. So, I assume the real number of Whites in US is somewhere between 63% and 72%. This will fall a few points by the end of the decade.
And Arab and Jews are counted as White. Some Arabs would seem White to us, some not. So, when you get down to what most of us call White, I am guessing it will be a little over 50% in a few years.
I can’t imagine us getting 90% of the White vote (due to liberals and race traitors). This makes multiple political parties essential to gain power in the future, so that power can be gained with under 50% of the vote.
I believe Bob has said that will happen. But it is hard for me to wrap my mind around the scenarios.
I suppose you will all say I am focused on things that are a distraction right now. But a man needs some vision of how things will work out to stay motivated!
#4 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/10/2013 - 3:04 pm
“But a man needs some vision of how things will work out to stay motivated!”
I don’t think beyond the fact that our work is critical in making Whites less conditioned and more awake.
My motivation for fighting back is just my anger over what’s being done to us and the arrogant confidence of those who are doing it.
Every White alive now, however young, has IMO been born into the generations that must fight and struggle, and are not likely to see “victory” in their lifetimes. I hope I’m wrong.
As the struggle enlarges beyond the propaganda stage it’s in now, I also don’t see the skill sets in our present group (at least to my knowledge) that indicate that we will enlarge with it. Those of us here now, I expect will remain propagandists of some sort, even if it’s the propaganda of actions.
Persons like Matthew Heimbach, who have natural political skill and are honing that skill every day by constantly acting politically in the “real” world (which we of course are not–we just send messages into the “real” world to change the mentality there so that the Matthew Heimbachs of the future will find Whites more friendly to their leadership) will be the White Revolutionary leaders of the future, if Whites are lucky.
As for our own political skills…well so far I haven’t even been able to organize but a few people HERE to “sign up” as “Stalwarts” who will sign the petitions the first day they are up, when they remember to do so and are able to! Lol! Even if I were young now, I don’t think I have the skills to ever help organize a revolutionary action group or a political group such as Heimbach is leading so ably.
We who are presently here at BUGS know how to do one extremely important thing, and how to do it rather well.
Outside of that, to be honest, I believe we are “dream warriors” ourselves, imagining that we have skills that we don’t possess.
My three cents.
I’d add that if the bugster group remains propagandist, a lot of its job will be to propagandize the Heimbachs to maintain in the manner Bob has discussed the victories that are won.
Four cents.
#5 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/10/2013 - 3:22 pm
Redaction (the editor function seems to have gone out again):
“As for our own political skills…well so far I haven’t been able to organize even HERE more than just a few people…”
#6 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/10/2013 - 3:52 pm
I’d like to thank these bugsters who have “signed up” as “Stalwarts” to help get the petitions up on the first day of each month (so that I’m not wiped out by that labor as I was this month, and we don’t have a gap of several days every month), and encourage the rest of you to do the same.
Fred Richthofen
Steve Goode
jmcaul
shari
4MyNation
Dungeoneer
Ryan O’Malley
JohnnyMantraseed
Soldier Ant
Sentinel
http://whitegenocideproject.com/hey-buddy-can-you-spare-5-minutes-at-the-beginning-of-each-month-to-help-stop-white-genocide/
#7 by Asgardian117 on 04/10/2013 - 9:36 pm
I Wouldnt say we are dream warriors i for one after reading your comments believe that YOU do have the skillset to do this its not YOU that needs to change, its the mindset of other whites that are either brainwashed or to scared to speak up that needs to change and thats OUR job, i believe we will get there sooner than later like some1 said before NATURE is on our side, i have faith in our people….they’re not done yet. 🙂
#8 by Asgardian117 on 04/11/2013 - 3:52 pm
I signed them is there antything else i need to do? Let me know when u get the chance please
#9 by Conrad on 04/10/2013 - 11:29 am
The Conservatives and Christian churches have always lied to us & stabbed us in the back. They’re all just traitors. But they will learn too late, as they always do, that it will cost them everything in the end.
………
Jack’s War
https://www.createspace.com/3820778/
#10 by FirstTube11100 on 04/10/2013 - 5:59 pm
All of these intentionally inflammatory comments will prevent intelligent, prescient types like myself from frequenting this blogrolll’s comment section.
#11 by Lord Nelson on 04/10/2013 - 6:21 pm
Do you mean inflammatory comments like: RACIST, NAZI, HATER, WHITE SUPREMACIST, etc…. etc….
Which are the “inflammatory comments” you are referring to?
#12 by Southern Nationalist on 04/10/2013 - 12:10 pm
Just wanted to point out that we now see the mainstream publication ‘Daily Caller’ using the word ‘anti-White’ in the title of their story on Toure, an anti-White media personality. Of course, as Bob said in one of his porch talks, they always include ‘anti-Semitic’ and this time is no exception in that they included that in the body of the article. However, the headline focus is on ‘anti-White.’ I also notice that they use the word ‘militant’ in the title. Why is that? It seems to me it takes away from the word ‘anti-White.’ It softens it. It seems to imply if Toure were only anti-White rather than militantly anti-White there would be no story. Therefore, it seems to say that a certain level of anti-Whiteness is ok. Perhaps I am reading too much into the headline but wanted to share it with y’all because I see it as a positive sign that the meme is becoming mainstream:
http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/09/msnbcs-toure-founded-militant-anti-white-student-paper/
#13 by A Smiling Weirwood on 04/10/2013 - 3:35 pm
My apologies, Bob, for being off-topic, but I wanted to be sure that this was seen.
I am turning the comments back on (they will still be moderated), as well as the “likes”, for the STOP White GeNOcide video (with the women).
It is only getting around 500 views a day now, so they should be much easier to moderate. That being said, I would appreciate some of you stopping by now and then to smack down the anti-Whites, as I doubt I will have too much time to interact and respond.
Also, if you have multiple accounts, PLEASE “like” it with all of them. If memory serves, it was sitting around 800 likes to 300 dislikes at one point, and that reddit spike alone pretty much put the “dislikes” out in front.
Thanks in advance.
#14 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/10/2013 - 3:58 pm
White House “petition” #5 every month is always about this video:
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/apr-5-6-ask-first-lady-head-biracial-task-force-teach-children-anti-racist-code-word-anti-white/YKb6q7rD
#15 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/10/2013 - 4:34 pm
I’m not clear what understanding(s) Bob hopes we’ll take away from today’s blog.
The thought it engenders in me is that politicians will be politicians, and our job is to take over the function that anti-whites now perform of conditioning the populace in order to set the parameters within which politicians can act.
I listened to an interview with Matthew Heimbach yesterday in which he used the phrase “anti-white racism.” I winced, but then realized that in the context of what he’s trying to do and how he’s doing it, it was probably the perfect phrasing, for him. Heimbach is doing a wonderful job I think (to the extent that I keep up with him) in getting “anti-white” and “white genocide” into play while staying within some bounds of the contemporary mentality (“racism”). He’s a politician with a political job to do, but he’s a politician of the best sort…he would never hire a busing advocate like Nixon did.
We ourselves of course should never ever use that phrasing! We are the ones who maintain the standards…let the message never be contaminated before it leaves our hands!
Should Heimbach use a pure bugster approach when he speaks? Maybe. Or maybe that would leave him with no position to work from except that of one lone voice. No more interviews, no more news articles.
#16 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/10/2013 - 4:57 pm
(I’ll stop with this comment)
Let’s contrast Heimbach’s “political” phrasing I just mentioned with this atrocious attempt (just a one-time slip up, I hope) to be “political” by a man I also respect, Tom Sunic, in his recent letter to the ADL:
“We believe that European-Americans have just as much right to identify as European-Americans and pursue our interests in the American multicultural landscape as do Jews or other groups such as African-Americans and Latino-Americans. One cannot create a multicultural society without legitimizing the identifications and interests of all groups in the society, including European Americans.”
I couldn’t believe what I was reading when I saw that. It’s beyond Nixon hiring a busing advocate. That letter was from Sunic as an AFP (formerly A3P) representative…I’m sure the letter was not approved by the AFP board when Bob Whitaker was present!
Very upsetting. I started a thread about it at WNN, and then found there was already a thread, but I haven’t had time to attend to it further.
But if you want to be even angrier than those sentences already make you, check out the other thread (mine is linked in it…I’m UnclePen) and see the complete indifference/lack of comprehension.
I was not that freaking stupid even BEFORE I was a bugster!
http://www.whitenewsnow.com/tom-sunics-real-professors-cafeteria/38143-letter-adl-re-merlin-miller-american-freedom-party.html
#17 by Bob on 04/10/2013 - 6:03 pm
FirstTube, please take your toys and go home.
#18 by Lord Nelson on 04/10/2013 - 6:13 pm
Sorry if this is way off topic Bob, but you were a Reagan appointee. And so (at this time) someone had to ask you if you ever met Margaret Thatcher? And even you did not meet her in person, what was/is your opinion of her?
I appreciate that it’s pretty irrelevant to what we are here for. But her death is pretty big news right now.
(Hope you don’t mind me asking)
#19 by dungeoneer on 04/10/2013 - 6:48 pm
Maybe Ole Bob has some good things to say about her but here`s what one of our swarmers said:
Before Dear Maggie, many areas of the UK were still 99% white.
She fully signed on to global white genocide. She targeted British children for genocide.
She was anti-white.
xxxxxxxxxx
#20 by OldBlighty on 04/10/2013 - 7:47 pm
It looks like Margaret was an Undercover Lover.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2306739/Margaret-Thatcher-unabashed-racist-says-Australian-minister-Bob-Carr.html
Pity she didn’t get coaching from Bob.
#21 by RobRoy on 04/11/2013 - 12:29 am
It’s obvious she was a Paycheck Conservative. She didn’t say that she was entirely opposed to Asian immigration, just the quantity. And we all know that there is no such thing as a little bit of immigration.
Quote:
“(She said) that if we allowed too much of it we’d see the natives of the land, the European settlers, overtaken by migrants”
#22 by OldBlighty on 04/11/2013 - 12:59 am
If she was in favor of White Genocide, she wouldn’t have mentioned race at all.
What this comes down to, is she didn’t know how to fight and she didn’t have the moral courage to fight.
That is why I said I wish she had coaching from Bob. He could have helped her understand the terror tactics the left employs and how to oppose them.
But like most “intellectual” retards, she probably would have thought she was way to clever to accept coaching and would have wanted to do things her own way. Which means weaving tangled webs, opposing things in half measures and not using plain language.
I see this behavior from Pro Whites all the time, so why should Margaret Thatcher be any different?
#23 by RobRoy on 04/11/2013 - 3:37 am
IF she was pro-White she failed to say or do anything to prevent White genocide, took a paycheck as a “conservative” while agreeing with both sides. Isn’t that what a Paycheck Conservative does?
#24 by OldBlighty on 04/11/2013 - 6:34 am
—> I called her an Undercover Lover. <—-
You don't seem to know what that is. An Undercover Lover is secretly on your side, but doesn't have the guts to support you in public, if at all.
If someone is branded "unabashedly racist", it doesn't matter what they do for a living, it is a clue they are an Undercover Lover.
#25 by OldBlighty on 04/11/2013 - 6:54 am
From the comments on that story:
“Margaret Thatcher was a staunch supporter of the apartheid regime of South Africa. She refused to impose sanctions against SA, and regarded the ANC to be a terrorist organization. In her eyes Nelson Mandela was a terrorist who deserved to be behind bars. A lot of innocent people including school kids died during apartheid regime and Thatcher could have helped end apartheid much sooner but she refused. She was mean and harsh. Obviously she wasn’t known as the “Iron lady” for nothing.”
– SlipStream , London., United Kingdom, 10/4/2013 20:38
#26 by Daniel Genseric on 04/11/2013 - 8:24 am
Thank you for this.
I appreciate the ability and courage it takes to [verbally] deal steal.
I had no idea. I wonder if Bob did, then or now.
#27 by RobRoy on 04/11/2013 - 2:27 pm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/africa/south-africans-remain-divided-did-margaret-thatcher-help-or-hinder-the-demise-of-apartheid/2013/04/09/5c91a0e8-a12b-11e2-bd52-614156372695_story.html
Quote:
“But others argue that Thatcher was strongly opposed to apartheid and racism and helped influence the white government to free Mandela.
“Thatcher did more to release Nelson Mandela out of prison than any of the other hundreds of anti-apartheid committees in Europe,” Pik Botha, the last foreign minister of the apartheid regime, said Tuesday on Talk Radio 702 in Johannesburg.
F.W. de Klerk, the last apartheid-era president of South Africa, said in a statement that Thatcher, whom he called a friend, was “a steadfast critic of apartheid.”
#28 by dungeoneer on 04/11/2013 - 3:46 pm
OB, you`re normally so level headed and mantra wise, I don`t understand what your investment is in this Thatcherism.
We push a message that forces maximum leverage against anti-white traitors big and small.
#29 by OldBlighty on 04/11/2013 - 4:17 pm
I guess I am tired of always looking for the worst in people and only focusing on that.
#30 by OldBlighty on 04/11/2013 - 5:35 pm
And having to explain this is tiresome, because to me it is DUH… Obvious.
If someone says they oppose non-White immigration in private, like Thatcher did to Carr, its because they have racial feelings.
Something like this is an absolute no brainer, to anyone that does not suffer from autism.
Just because her supporters are denying what she was, doesn’t mean they don’t know it.
#31 by dungeoneer on 04/11/2013 - 10:14 pm
“If someone says they oppose non-White immigration in private, like Thatcher did to Carr, its because they have racial feelings.”
There are plenty of paycheck Cons and even some Liberals who implicitly or explicitly say they oppose non-white immigration while telling us we still have to agree to forced integration and “assimilation”.
Do they also get a pass from the anti-white label and genocide charge or are they not special like Maggie?
Pros` do NOT run after sticks.
Pro`s are NOT impressed with chickenfeed and limited hangouts.
Sort your thinking out OB, you`ve had 2 veteran BUGSers try to put you right on this.
#32 by OldBlighty on 04/12/2013 - 12:49 am
“Do they also get a pass from the anti-white label and genocide charge or are they not special like Maggie?”
This is a strawmen argument. If you want to argue with yourself, go right ahead.
I was pointing out I know what makes these people tick. Why they do what they do.
The way you guys talk, you make it sound like there is a Respectable Conservative “Conspiracy”. That is no better than Jew conspiracy talk.
You really think Bob doesn’t understand what the other side is thinking. You really think he doesn’t try to put himself in their shoes, when he is trying to move them the way he wants?
Stop being an idiot.
#33 by Lord Nelson on 04/10/2013 - 8:01 pm
dungeoneer.
I take your point.
Anyhow. Either way. Good or bad. The Coaches take on Thatcher would be interesting. But maybe it’s best left for another time.
#34 by Cleric Preston on 04/10/2013 - 7:49 pm
Lord Nelson,
Australia’s foreign minister just called her the R-word.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/latest/a/-/latest/16656681/carr-recalls-racist-thatcher-advice/
Edit, Old Blighty beat me to the draw 😉
#35 by jo3w on 04/10/2013 - 8:53 pm
I was born in ’76 so I rely a lot on others accounts of the civil rights movment.
When I read todays blog, it reminded me of Bob saying that in the 50’s the Republicans wanted to focus on getting the negro vote.
I turn on my TV and I see this brain surgeon as the new hope for the republican party.
60 years have passed and the Republicans are still trying to get the negro vote!
This is insane. My wife, a therapist, calls it a repeated failed solution.
The concept is that your solution is good, you just need to try harder to get the result you want.
My wife gets paid to point out that it’s not you effort that is lacking, it’s the logic.
The sad part is that people rarely “get it” on their own,
and they have a very hard time stopping even when it’s been shown what they are doing!
#36 by Conrad on 04/10/2013 - 9:45 pm
I am old enough to know by first hand experience what the civil rights movement was about. It was just the same as what we are seeing today. A Communist led, Communist organized, Communist oriented, anti-white effort to displace whites and effect our genocide. Think Jeremiah Wright, Van Jones and the NBPP. Not much has changed.
……
Jack’s War
https://www.createspace.com/3820778/
#37 by Asgardian117 on 04/10/2013 - 9:37 pm
I Wouldnt say we are dream warriors i for one after reading your comments believe that YOU do have the skillset to do this its not YOU that needs to change, its the mindset of other whites that are either brainwashed or to scared to speak up that needs to change and thats OUR job, i believe we will get there sooner than later like some1 said before NATURE is on our side, i have faith in our people….they’re not done yet. 🙂
#38 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/10/2013 - 10:35 pm
“I for one after reading your comments believe that YOU do have the skillset…”
Thank you. But let’s test that:
Would you accept my invitation to become a “Stalwart”? (Is my computer screen the only screen that these requests are showing up on?)
http://whitegenocideproject.com/hey-buddy-can-you-spare-5-minutes-at-the-beginning-of-each-month-to-help-stop-white-genocide/
#39 by Asgardian117 on 04/11/2013 - 1:49 pm
I mean when we get our public discussion on this we will need some1 like u to unfortunately go public…i would be glad to im articulate and fit but im to young i would be dismissed asap i see the value in age and experience now…that is why im so disapointed in my father in law he REFUSES to help.
#40 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/11/2013 - 2:19 pm
You’re so wrapped up in your own swirling head-full of thoughts that you’ve become unable to receive information from the outside.
Purely out of curiosity at this point, I’ll deliver to you for the THIRD time the same message that I’ve already delivered to you TWICE, just to see what you do with it this time:
Would you accept my invitation to become a “Stalwart”? (Is my computer screen the only screen that these requests are showing up on?)
http://whitegenocideproject.com/hey-buddy-can-you-spare-5-minutes-at-the-beginning-of-each-month-to-help-stop-white-genocide/
#41 by Asgardian117 on 04/11/2013 - 3:30 pm
Yes…i went to sign in at the white house but forgot my password i have an outdoor job for a utility company im doing this whn i can lol…and yes my head does swirl with thoughts sometimes my apologies, not trying to be a pain
#42 by dungeoneer on 04/11/2013 - 3:35 pm
HD is right Asgardian117, we need 300 white people good and true to sign a set of 6 petitions once each, just once a month.
We`re not asking for a commitment to swarming, just a few mouse clicks to help the white genocide cause.
#43 by Asgardian117 on 04/11/2013 - 3:57 pm
No no you are right i just went and signed them, and i do swarm i give it my best considering my career alot of the time its not that easy because its from a mobile phone but none the less i hit youtube 5-6 times a day i give it my all.
#44 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/11/2013 - 4:18 pm
“just once a month.”
And that’s on the FIRST DAY of each month! Petitions will be submitted very early the morning of the first, and will be linked immediately at White GeNOcide Project, and we will aim to get them up that same day.
Everyone please “sign up” and become a “Stalwart.” Please trust me on this one…I do know what I’m doing. There are important reasons for this, aside from my wanting to maintain my health and mental equilibrium.
Thank you, Dungeoneer!
And thank you Asgardian…you really gave me a laugh! I responded to you on the Stalwart sign-up thread…thanks a lot for signing up! 😀
http://whitegenocideproject.com/hey-buddy-can-you-spare-5-minutes-at-the-beginning-of-each-month-to-help-stop-white-genocide/#comment-6161
#45 by Asgardian117 on 04/11/2013 - 5:12 pm
Thank YOU for giving me a little kick in the behind…im still learning how to handle all of this i have so much anger built up over the years and now that ive come into adulthood and truly understand whats been done to our people sometimes i just cant help it…its like having the blindfold pulled off and seeing things for what they are for the first time..diarehia of the mouth is involuntary im sorry.
#46 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 04/11/2013 - 12:24 am
This is how I believe that it works:
Politicians live in fear of the Jews (2% of eligible voters) because the “Judeo-Christians” (deluded idiots) will vote however the all powerful Jews order them to.
Nixon knew that good decent normal White Americans were 100% opposed to bussing, but he went with what the Jews demanded, instead of what was right.
#47 by Gar5 on 04/11/2013 - 6:14 pm
@The Old Man
That’s a very exciting conspiracy theory, but Bugs is about simplicity.
The simple fact is, “Racist” is a word everyone wants to shout, but a word no one wants to be.
#48 by Scythian on 04/11/2013 - 3:33 pm
I have an idea to help you conservatives out: you’ve spent more than half a century trying to convince liberals that you aren’t “racist”, and STILL they call you “racist” just as much and just as vociferously as they did (if not more) as half a century ago. You’ve even gone as far as to constantly accuse them of “playing the race card” while you called them “racist” too.
Here’s my idea to finally convince them you aren’t “racist” and get them on your side, or you on their side: start openly calling for the annihilation of white people by assimilation to ensure an end to “racism”. Let all your words and actions show that is your goal. I guarantee finally after more than half a century, they’ll be convinced and stop calling you “racists”, and I guarantee you’ll get all the colored votes you could have ever dreamed of.
#49 by Asgardian117 on 04/11/2013 - 3:38 pm
That tactic is already being played by DISENGENIOUS WHITE LIBERALS….aka self hating white baby boomers.
#50 by Scythian on 04/11/2013 - 5:44 pm
Appealing to “Wallace voters” was implicitly appealing to White people, period. For decades, politicians openly and explicitly appealed to specific non-white groups, and still do right now, which is racist; and the media for decades were completely silent and are silent. So what’s the media going to say now when a white politician explicitly appeals to White voters? You’re calling ME a “racist” after being SILENT for decades? You’re just anti-white. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
#51 by Jason on 04/11/2013 - 7:06 pm
There is an obvious overlap between the Anti-Whites today and the Communists of old days. The whole language of “there are no countries, no borders, no races, no classes, etc.”, is pure Communism. We all know that, and we know it stems from something deeper.
But I wonder if finding a way to stress this in talking points could be helpful. We see all these dumb-dumb conservatives who push the line that they don’t see race and embrace Political Correctness. Yet they parade as the most strident of “anti-communists”, while embracing every tenet of it, except a few narrow economic ones. Calling them on that could be useful.
#52 by Alice Teller on 04/11/2013 - 8:33 pm
Gentlemen, be of good cheer! In a remarkably short time you have made the term anti-white mainstream. Please remember that between the intellectuals and the thugs there is a vast majority who simply want the terms with which to express their pain and frustration. Mr. Whitaker has provided that – bravo!
I know how frustrating it can be to listen to the same loud, ugly voices but I promise you it is all ‘A tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing’ and more and more people know it. There is a reason Walking Dead is among the most popular shows on TV.
I wonder if there is a good phrase to call out those who simultaneously celebrate our demise and insist that there is no genocide? Thanks.
#53 by Jason on 04/11/2013 - 9:14 pm
Good idea, there is this starting point, the concept of “doublethink”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublethink
#54 by Asgardian117 on 04/11/2013 - 10:06 pm
Ive got a name for them “Disengenious Bastards who perverted every crevice of my childhood”
#55 by Daniel Genseric on 04/12/2013 - 8:18 am
Walking dead is right. You want [WHITE] Zombies? You got it, Mantra style.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J77vkJ-rAeg
#56 by Jason on 04/12/2013 - 8:35 am
I’m amazed at the high quality videos you guys create. I am backward on that.
#57 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/12/2013 - 10:56 am
It’s hard for me to hold my tongue and not say something (something friendly, of course) that might scare Alice away before she may finally become a bugster! Maybe I can even persuade her to become a Stalwart!
Jason, maybe I can persuade YOU to become a Stalwart!
Are you able to add initials to the petitions on the FIRST DAY of the month?
http://whitegenocideproject.com/hey-buddy-can-you-spare-5-minutes-at-the-beginning-of-each-month-to-help-stop-white-genocide/
I’m a little embarrassed to ask that of all you who are swarming so much when I’m not, but I just can’t do what I’m doing and also swarm right now. And I need to ask.
#58 by Alice Teller on 04/12/2013 - 12:50 pm
HD, since you asked so nicely this time, I will explain that I am not very technologically adept. After my first signature on The WH website I was entered into a never-ending loop and thereafter abandoned the attempt. I assumed this is a ploy on the part of the WH, but it may be my inability to understand the process. We all serve in our own way.
#59 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/12/2013 - 1:15 pm
Alice, thanks for that information, and you’re not the only person who has had some frustration at the White House site.
What solves most problems there is to refresh whatever page you’re on so that it will know you’re logged in. It’s an odd site in that they email you a password which you don’t need at that time, since once you go to the link that they also email you, you are automatically logged in! Then if you just refresh each petition, it will know you’re logged in, and the little “sign the petition” button will appear on it.
Within the next few days I plan to write a very clear (I hope) guide to how to have smooth sailing at that site, and I’ll link that guide at all the other articles I’m directing people to.
Thanks for signing the one time you could.
If you still have your password (if not, they would email it to you, but I’m not going to ask that much right now!), you could click on one of these and log in (the log in button is small and is at the upper right of any page, whenever you aren’t logged in already), and then just open each petition from the links below, and refresh each one, and you’d have them signed in no time!
Thanks for signing the one you were able to.
1. http://wh.gov/LLvz
2. http://wh.gov/LLw0
3. http://wh.gov/LLf2
4. http://wh.gov/LLGX
5. http://wh.gov/LLGG
6. http://wh.gov/LL7g
#60 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/12/2013 - 1:21 pm
Actually, that’s pretty much the guide I’ve been planning to write, right there.
Alice, if you or anyone else here can recall problems you’ve had that what I just wrote seems unlikely to cover, I would appreciate being told so I can incorporate solutions to them in the guide.
#61 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/12/2013 - 4:00 pm
Alice, you’ve been immortalized (just your first name, of course).
http://whitegenocideproject.com/guide-to-smooth-sailing-at-the-white-houses-we-the-people-petition-site/
I’m guessing a fourth of the people who go to the White House site to sign a petition are deterred as you were. Your response here helped me a LOT to get this guide up…thanks!
#62 by Jason on 04/12/2013 - 6:22 am
Politics will get more racial even regardless of the Mantra. We don’t have to worry about WHETHER Whites become a voting block – they will.
The REAL issue is what direction Whites take and how they view the situation, which is where the Mantra really comes in.
Whites WILL be looking for a voice; nothing can stop that. It was a bit of revelation to me to realize I don’t have to worry about Whites “waking up”. That will happen.
Our real mission is to frame it in terms of White Genocide. So that they act appropriately.
Sorry, if I have said the obvious, but that makes it more clear for me.
#63 by Alice Teller on 04/12/2013 - 10:22 am
Thanks for the link to doublespeak – I do not do pithy well. You are entirely right about whites waking up. This morning on cspan Ken Burns was promoting his new piece about the central park rape in which the term wilding was made popular. Standard liberal blame whitey nonsense. I was surprised at how many callers told the other side of the story regarding black crime and violence. The times they are achangin. Keep up the good work – before you know it everyone will claim they were among the first to denounce anti-white malice.
#64 by Asgardian117 on 04/12/2013 - 10:02 am
I have an anti white on the anti racist is a code word anthem on youtube using 1492 and bombs over the middle east as an attempt to justify white genocide…priceless i love it when a normal white person looks at the reasoning for anti white policies it makes the lights flicker…the antiwhites dont realize it and i didnt at first but once u drag them out of the shadows the mantra forces them to give reasons y they support white genocide its amazing THANK YOU MR. WHITAKER.
#65 by Bob on 04/12/2013 - 11:03 am
Jason, politics has been going more racial for over fifty years. That is why,while the Republican Party denounces whites all the time, in the real world the reality is that Republicans have survived by the conversion of whites into almost a bloc vote, which is 2-1, for the GOP.
#66 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/12/2013 - 11:34 am
Bob, I don’t know if you’re aware (or maybe would even want to be) of what one of your fellow AFP board members wrote to the ADL about multiculturalism. If you’re interested, it’s in my comment that’s now #16 that was just moderated onto the thread. It’s pretty dreadful IMO.
#67 by Sentinel on 04/12/2013 - 12:40 pm
Q: Why do 67% of our people rally around traitors?
A: Johnny can’t think.