In response to “Why the Only Answer to the Mantra is Labels and Insults,” some commenters brought up their problems with their families or friends.

I have the same problem. I can’t go through the whole Mantra daily with everybody I see every day.

So I use “anti-white.”

It very seldom comes up that one must describe anybody’s political viewpoint, but I use “anti-white” as often as I can. I drop it in routinely. By now very few people I know even try to deal with it.

I will often say, “Well, he’s as anti-white as you are, but he’s conservative on other issues…”

This is NOT the Mantra. When I tell you how to use the Mantra, we all know what the two standard responses will be.

But you have to develop “anti-white” for yourself, and the results will be fascinating to me. The first thing to remember is that it is a descriptive term, not an argument. More often than not, you will have the satisfaction of their swallowing it without comment.

That is quite a coup. You are dealing with family or friends to whom you have already described the Mantra, so “anti-white” is as good as a repeat. If someone is listening who has not heard the Mantra, you get to repeat your argument.

“An antiwhite is someone who wants the white race to disappear”

What I want to emphasize here is that there is no standard way to handle this, because, at long last, we have something for which no programmed response is available. You are now ready to go out on your own.

You’ll learn to handle the responses, and I get to sit here and see what you learn out in the field.

There is nothing wrong with losing. I certainly didn’t develop the Mantra over years without a LOT of embarrassments. Every word in the rigid full Mantra is the result of hundreds of incidents, most of them embarrassing.

Now it is time for our seminar members to use “anti-white” and learn their own rules.

Obviously, “anti-white” is not something you will use where it is costly or dangerous. But with family and friends, it reminds them of where you stand and what you said.