I have repeated this theme many, many times, and I have gotten replies about how “heresy” is too theoretical.

This means you can either go back to sleep or make it less theoretical for yourself.

So far you have chosen a nice mental nap.
So on the Working Page there  are a couple of complaints about being told that You Tube allows “Free speech” but not “Hate speech.”

Replied to, presumably, by a dumb silence.

Every tyranny in history claimed free speech. The Stalinist Constitution of 1936 beat our first amendment in wording.

ALL CLAIM FREE SPEECH, EXCEPT….

There is no difference between slavery and freedom EXCEPT….

Then I have said, over and over and over, “Why was this information produced?”    That you have gotten fairly well.

Put them together.

If the exceptions to free speech happen to match an ongoing program, it is censorship.

If the exceptions to free speech happen to match an ongoing program, it is censorship.

If the exceptions to free speech happen to match an ongoing program, it is censorship.

Hitler called it Communism; Stalin  called it fascism; today’s rulers call it Hate Speech.

We all know what it feels like when a joke falls flat, but there is room for analysis here.

This is critical stuff for a professional writer, but it is also critical for the professional explainer, which we are training to be.

We are all painfully aware that the joke is not only dead, but stinking, when we have to explain it. We must be in the audience’s shoes when we tell a joke. Which brings us to professional explanation. When you tell a joke, you are formulating what will happen IN THE HEARER’S MIND immediately after he hears it. This means you have to be intimately aware of what he knows and what will pop into his mind when he hears it.

The above paragraph is also a perfect description of a professional explainer.

In joking and explaining, what is critical is that all the information your listener needs is right there at the end. We all know that the second after a joke is critical to a comedian. It is just as critical to the explainer.
When I write a piece, as when a comedian tells a joke, what I says can get your mind working or it can shut your mind down.

A stand-up tells a joke about his uncle when he went to Heaven. There will be people in the audience whose beloved uncle recently died. Many of them will not respond to the joke, simply because they are quite naturally thinking of their uncle.

This is a work-study outfit. It is all about explanation. You know how a stand-up feels about people who think of their dead uncle when he tells a joke.

My feelings are very similar when members of a work-study group react like members of a membership organization.
When I say something, I do not want you thinking about how it correlates with the big news item. I do not want a listing of the way others have said the same thing.

I do not want you to see a key word like “Communist” or Nazi (God knows!) and freeze your mind on that. I am trying to explain to you what I did for a living. It is difficult if you pay close attention.

It is impossible if your mind locks on something else.

BUGS Radio with Truck Roy, Jeb and Adelheim.

Bugs 2013-06-17

It is in the in the second article below this one.

We have gotten 74 comments on it so far and I want everybody to hear it and make any comment you have on it.

One BUGSER said a mouthful:

“We are getting free expertise from Bob that we couldn’t afford.”

To get a receptionist job on Capitol Hill could require qualifications that would make you an office manager elsewhere.

Not only couldn’t the average person not afford my services, people on the wrong side couldn’t buy them at all.

That’s all a matter of record.

Yet pro-whites who make their livings making speeches refuse to use lines we have produced that big league pros would pay for.

I have said this before so let me repeat it. God knows a speech maker runs no risk just throwing in a few lines written by an experienced pro.

And now it is not just that pro. Now we have mini-Mantras developed by serious workers out in the field. Our seminar now has answers to “what would happen if….” when you deal with a hostile group.

You have taught me, a credentialed pro, a hell of a lot. But the reason I CAN learn from you is that I AM a credentialed pro.

When pro-white speakers throw out lines, they throw MONEY away!

And the last thing BUGS has any intention of doing is taking away any of their thousands of members. I dream of three hundred dedicated, THINKING stalwarts. Three hundred is not even small change to Dave or Jared.

We offer a new way of thinking. The present way of thinking makes most of the population block out pro-whites, as every pro-white speaker can tell you first-hand.

So when we complain that pro-whites refuse to use what we have developed, it is not out any enmity. It is puzzlement.

There is anger there, but that is simply because they are letting our side down.

We offer so much and ask nothing in return.