We have gotten an incredible amount of public attention, given that our working membership is well under a hundred.
But the establishment is already finding a way to stop us.
They can’t deal with the Mantra. But they can deal with the Mantra one bite at a time.
They are already dealing with White Genocide.
They are dealing with “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
If you look at the “answers” to the Mantra you will see that they recite it line by line and claim to answer each line.
It took me years to develop the Mantra. It will do pro-whites more good than any person or group has done them in history. But they can counter the really blasting effect by answering it one sentence at a time.
The same person who marvels at how the Mantra works and says how hard I worked on it sees no problem in chopping it up and handing it out in chewable bites. Genocide can be countered without the phrase “All white countries and ONLY white countries.”
With every set of comments I sit here while someone crows about his argument and how brave it was. For every one commenter who brings us back to the Mantra, there are five who say, “Excuse me if this is off-topic.”
We began by talking a viable substitute for the whole Mantra. The present consensus seems to be that you have solved that problem.
You haven’t.
REPLY TO COMMENTS:
You are, of course reading too much into this warning.
Antiracist is a codeword for anti-white has been USED and is GREAT as White Team Spirit says, though the = sign looks cute but drops the deadly accurate term “codeword.”
You have done terrific work this way getting in points.
My point is that, once engaged, many of you start preaching your own stuff. So many times when someone has gotten in there with a mini-Mantra punch he goes off to his own world.
It is an enormous temptation, I know. Just try to keep it in mind.
RAID!
#1 by Jason on 07/04/2013 - 6:21 am
There must be some kind of general response to this sort of approach. Guilty parties are always trying to nitpick the accusations against them. Since when do innocent people respond with tight “textual” readings, letter of the law type thing?
We can respond that they have to understand the Mantra in totality, but that doesn’t sound very good to me. Maybe something sarcastic? Like asking them if they want to comment on the font the Mantra was written in. Hope we get some good responses on this one.
#2 by WhiteTeamSpirit on 07/04/2013 - 8:23 am
ǝʇıɥʍ-ıʇuɐ ɹoɟ pɹoʍǝpoɔ ɐ sı ʇsıɔɐɹ-ıʇuɐ
#3 by Simon on 07/04/2013 - 8:32 am
One of the great problem is with deploying the full mantra is that it is too large to deploy in its entirety. Either comments are fully moderated and the canned mantra will get you, well, canned. Or they are unmoderated but too short to get a full mantra in.
So the full nuclear mantra sits in it silo and we have to deal with spreading “mini-mantra’s” on youtube and twitter. It’s unfortunate but there it is. However, if you have an opportunity to press the red button and go full mantra take the opportunity.
#4 by Asgardian117 on 07/04/2013 - 9:32 am
We should not be going off into our own worlds.
Religion
Sexual Orientation
Wars with the middle east
Gun control
Abortion
Illegal Immigrants
Welfare
I understand that EVERYONE probably has an opinion on these topics, but our opinions cannot and will not be heard until we stop the systematic genocide of our race. Those that wish to see us out the door could care less what are stance is on the above mentioned topics, hell according to them we are already dead. Nothing will change until they hear our roar, things cannot change unless they hear our roar. I myself feel very strongly about the topics above but I have come to realize that they must take a back seat to MY races survival, besides why would I wanna lobby for policies that people 75 years from now will enjoy that I have nothing in common with, and will be celebrating the destruction on MY race
#5 by ErwinRommelRabbit on 07/04/2013 - 10:29 am
I admit it’s Very hard to stay on course sometimes.
“But I’ve learned SO MUCH about this and I’m so well versed in THAT, why won’t they listen to my long, drawn out answers??”
Because it doesn’t work LOL
I’m one of the greatest sinners when it comes to Tailgating and going into Non-Mantra LaLa Land. I guess I need to just remind myself of when I had ALL the answers, ALL the nasty smart ass remarks and….no one listened.
RAID!! >:3
#6 by Asgardian117 on 07/04/2013 - 10:57 am
Its easy to go off into our own worlds, somethings REALLY are important or in a sane world get your point across. Statistics and ratios never work, the mantra does. We go with what works in hopes that ONE day we can discuss the things that matter to us as a race without having our lives destroyed and that will be the beginning of the end for white genocide, we arent there yet but we are making some dents I believe.
#7 by beefcake on 07/04/2013 - 10:38 am
When they want to pic at the Mantra bit by bit, I like to point out that they are purposely ignoring the main point.
White people in ALL White countries are having conditions forced on us intended to lead to the destruction of our race via forced assimilation. AKA Genocide.
That those perpetuating, justifying, and denying our genocide attempt to silence all speech about it via name calling, and that is the intention of such name calling.
That all these name like racistnaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews are no more than a means for preventing discussion on White Genocide.
OUR goal is to make enough noise on the issue that public discussion must be allowed, since speech on the subject is not allowed under the current state of Anti-Whitism.
They want to pick at each sentence in the Mantra because they know the main point is OBVIOUS.
#8 by markwn on 07/04/2013 - 9:58 pm
@beefcake – I suggest targeting YT videos by
Bill Maher
John Stewart
Fox News
Ron Paul
Have gotten many shrill responses – many from whites which is real sickening.
It’s all about spreading the grey goo.
Question – are BUGsers mentioning “anti-racist” Hitler video? Only 180, 000 hits. We need it in the MILLIONS.
#9 by ErwinRommelRabbit on 07/04/2013 - 10:45 am
I might be putting this in the wrong place but someone asked me to check out a thread on Nelson Mandela and work on a Mantra they were developing.
I was wondering I could get Coaches thoughts, or anyones really.
“Anti-Whitism is Cultish Religion
Nelson Mandela is one of their patron Saints
In this Cultish religion Whites are the sinners and anything White is the sin
The GREATEST Sin in the Cult of Anti-Whitism is a All White Country”
I suppose you could even remove the Mandela Part or add anyone else you like. Thoughts????
#10 by timeforfreedom on 07/04/2013 - 10:59 am
I have seen these attempts by our anti-White enemies to refute the Mantra line by line and I think they just make themselves look stupid.
For example, they will protest the line:
“Everybody says there is a race problem.”
by saying that Everybody doesn’t actually say this.
A great Mantrafied reply for me has always been:
“Everybody who preaches down to White people and ONLY White people in White countries and ONLY White countries definitely say that there is a race problem, and that race problem is the existence of White people and our children. That is why you anti-White always end up proposing White assimilation measures which will bring about a future without White people, i.e. You doggedly pursue the Genocide of White people and our kids. What an ignoble cause.”
Is this not an appropriate Mantrafied reply to give to of these morons?? I always bring it back to programs of measures of White Genocide that are being systematically forced upon White countries and ONLY White countries.
Does anyone here have some examples of an anti-White refuting the Mantra line by line. It seems to me that if they are doing so it’s only because we are not destroying their arguments one by one. There is no reason why we can’t give effective Mantrafied responses to any line by line attempts to refute our Mantra.
#11 by Conrad on 07/04/2013 - 12:22 pm
I like that method it gets back on point. Words like all & everybody or are non-starters anyway.
Maybe the word “everybody” in the Mantra could be changed.
A thought. The Declaration of Independence says, “We the people…” Did ALL of the people say this? Didn’t some of the colonists fight on the side of Britain?
#12 by DennisK on 07/04/2013 - 11:38 pm
The KNOW what we mean by “everybody”. When an anti-white says, not EVERYONE says that, the debate has already finished. They are essentially saying “I can’t debate the anti-white bias of “anti-racism”, so I’m going to nit pick, and if I can find some semantic error, or interpret something in such a way that it is not 100%, I can claim victory.
I deal with this simply, by calling them out on it. I simply state that they have gone to the tactic of nitpicking choices of words instead of the notions and concepts, and that this has shown me they have NO ARGUMENT against the mantra.
Don’t be afraid to say “I don’t believe you”, or “You understand what I mean, and you KNOW it”.
Let me elaborate.
Anti-whites constantly ask “What is white?” as if they don’t know what you are talking about. They are feigning ignorance. Anti-whites use the term WHITE themselves, all the time, without them ever questioning each other. They don’t suddenly ‘forget’ whom the term refer to when dealing with you.
Anti-whites always say “everyone is against you”, or use “everyone” in a general, rather than strict sense, so when they act puzzled when you use everyone, when you mean most or everyone in a practical sense, it’s an act.
Anti-whites always talk about diversity in white places and never advocate it in non-white places. They can never show evidence to the contrary, so when you point this out and they claim not to know, again, they are being dishonest.
Attacking the mantra line by line, is their way of avoiding the point and concentrating on the only thing they have arguments against, the choice of words, and the small degree of inaccuracy in the statement.
Remember, a flat earther could bog down someone arguing that the Earth is round for ages by asking them to define what ’round’ exactly is, by pointing out the fact that they are WRONG and the Earth isn’t strictly round but slightly oblate and that the word “Earth” has many definitions, including dirt.
#13 by Dave on 07/04/2013 - 11:01 am
There is not one sentence of the Mantra that is not a demand for compliance with customary international law that has been ratified by most of the world’s states and certainly the most important ones.
The crime of genocide requires the specific intent not to kill or ill-treat individuals but to annihilate, in whole or in part, the group to which those individuals belong. Race is specifically enumerated and there is no dispute about this. Also annihilation through forced assimilation is unquestionably recognized an as one of the enumerated acts of genocide.
The fact that “specific intent” to commit genocide is exceedingly difficult to prove does not make the Mantra ideological. Many of our BUGSERS do not get this: The Mantra is a demand for examination of the evidence. The Mantra is a pleading in a legal claim. IT IS NOT IDEOLOGICAL.
Our opponents do not understand the law and suborn grave illegalities. The phrase, “One world, one people”, a phrase held in deep esteem by our opponents, is good evidence of intent to commit genocide.
This is not a matter of opinion. Rest assured, it is good evidence.
Our opponents are so colossally ignorant, so vilely extremist and so ideologically blind, they do not know this.
We are fighting extremism. We are fighting ignorance. And we are demanding compliance with the law.
The Mantra IS NOT ideological
#14 by Conrad on 07/04/2013 - 12:29 pm
EXCELLENT THINKING !
#15 by Asgardian117 on 07/04/2013 - 11:06 am
I like to respond with “Welllll if there was not a race problem the SPLC would not exsist would it? They REFUSED to post it at the piece that was recently written. Teds comments are still in moderation. You can see the whole thing in swarm topics.
#16 by Simmons on 07/04/2013 - 11:06 am
IMO the anti-whites are in the position our intellectuals have wallowed in for decades, they are just quibbling the details.
When you get a suspect talking, you encourage it and anything you say is not to shut the suspect up but maybe challenge the suspect or channel the suspect.
SPLC thrives financially on the undercurrent of being anti-genocide (I think its funding is from holocaust haunted jews), DUDE they got hundreds of millions of dollars just waiting to be used to be against the genocide of whites (unless they and their supporters are for the genocide of whites which is illegal and of course evil). By god IMO if those very rich people would love to discuss the Mantra line by line I think we should make an exception, just this once of course.
Please Bob allow the SPLC to mail out to their contributors list a line by line discussion of the Mantra?
#17 by timeforfreedom on 07/04/2013 - 11:08 am
Bob, in my opinion has just given us all another excellent article on how our anti-White enemy is deploying a slightly re-jigged method to get us to tailgate. The differenced here is that they are actually using the one thing that is absolutely vital to our success…that is, the Mantra. They are actually just using the Mantra–in seemingly unconnected bits and pieces–to engage in meaningless discussions that are obliquely concerned with the Mantra.
All that you have to do is to bring every one of their attempts back to the fact that these multiculturalist policies are only being systematically forced upon White countries and ONLY White countries, and that is what constitutes genocide, White Genocide.
But again, this takes some belligerence on our part. You have to mentally stop yourself whenever you recognize one of these anti-White freaks doing this and interrupt with an appropriate Mantrafied reply.
#18 by timeforfreedom on 07/04/2013 - 11:16 am
Of course, we could post youtube videos refuting the Mantra line by line in a way that would in some way validate its assertions of White Genocide. Like a covert operation of sorts. I know that there is another member here that did that several months ago and did a very good job of it.
#19 by timeforfreedom on 07/04/2013 - 12:00 pm
Here is an excellent example of a Youtube video that tries to take apart the Mantra. I have provided a few replies to this guy’s rebuttle of the Mantra that are completely Mantrafied. I’ll add more later.
Have a look
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49vUfqiJQC4
#20 by Conrad on 07/05/2013 - 12:56 am
This guy sounds like a regular genius. Obviously they are hacked off because they are using ground.
#21 by Conrad on 07/04/2013 - 1:03 pm
A thought has occurred to me on this, see what you think.
The mini Mantras are fairly easy to answer, true. But they cannot REFUTE the evidence.
The Mantra can also be frustrated as well, given time. After all, our enemies have plenty of resources for that sort of thing.
But when the enemy is faced with a million people repeating either one of them over and over – well, their done.
The link offered by #17 timeforfreedom on 07/04/2013 – 12:00 pm will convince many people that are all ready on board with the Frankfurt School propaganda. But to be honest it side steps the points of the Mantra with miss-direction and hyperbole. It would be good to make an answer to this.
** DAVE’S approach is very good, maybe that could be a YouTube video. **
“One of the great problems is with deploying the full mantra is that it is too large to deploy in its entirety.” That is why I included the whole thing in my book – Jack’s War, https://www.createspace.com/3820778/.
You can also make fliers.
“Statistics and ratios never work, the mantra does.”
I’ve been saying that for 2 years. Go for the EMOTIONS, this is why the Mantra works so well.
#22 by Dick_Whitman on 07/04/2013 - 1:31 pm
Th anti-White SPLC opposes the idea of people of European origin having spaces and institutions of our own.
But will they go on record opposing the rights of Jews and non-Whites having spaces and institutions of their own?
#23 by patrickwhiterabbit on 07/04/2013 - 6:27 pm
A new anti-White has attempted to ‘debunk’ the mantra!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH-rcOi9aLQ&feature=youtu.be
#24 by Another One on 07/04/2013 - 8:46 pm
I think whenever Anti-whites attempt to discredit the Mantra we should use the talking point that Bob gave us on here a while back, “You aren’t trying to deny White Genocide. You’re trying too justify it.” This is one of the most powerful talking points and most importantly, It keeps us on message.
#25 by Scythian on 07/04/2013 - 10:46 pm
The anti-whites actually draw pictures of their mixed “master race”, LOL. I think it was even on the cover of Time magazine, LOL. All we have to do is point out they ONLY advocate this for ALL white countries. Talk about ‘evidence’.
#26 by Wandrin on 07/04/2013 - 11:07 pm
“Does anyone here have some examples of an anti-White refuting the Mantra line by line. It seems to me that if they are doing so it’s only because we are not destroying their arguments one by one. There is no reason why we can’t give effective Mantrafied responses to any line by line attempts to refute our Mantra.”
I think anti-whites using the line by line approach to refuting the Mantra is simply a distraction and deflection technique to draw people away from the main point which is simply that multicult idealogy leads to White genocide.
There’s no requirement to debate them on the terms they choose. The point they can’t refute is if you extrapolate the policies they support into the future it ends in White genocide. That’s all there is to it.
A lot of things will flow from the recognition that the multicult is genocide but as it’s not recognized yet those things don’t matter yet.
#27 by Wandrin on 07/04/2013 - 11:15 pm
“The fact that “specific intent” to commit genocide is exceedingly difficult to prove does not make the Mantra ideological.”
No need. We can work it backwards. If/when it is recognized White genocide is the inevitable result of the dominant idealogy then it doesn’t matter if the originators of the idealogy intended it to be genocidal or not. Once recognized and accepted by enough people the question becomes one of prevention and not doing anything to prevent becomes intent.
#28 by Asgardian117 on 07/04/2013 - 11:24 pm
The specific intent is OBVIOUS.
Politicans KNOW that the white race is declining, its been all over national news stories particularly pertaining to england and america, its the WORST kept secret in the world.
They have the above mentioned info and the STILL continue to push the same policies KNOWING that the white race has recessive genes AND it is shrinking. They keep doing the same thing knowing full well what the outcome will be…if you know something is going to happen as a result of your actions and you continue to do it THAT IS deliberate.
I could see if the info was only two months old but this old news folks if you keep flooding a country whose native race is shrinking with other races the outcome is self explanatory they have no chance at pleading ignorance.
#29 by DennisK on 07/04/2013 - 11:43 pm
Yes, thats exactly it.
If someone points out to you, how your actions are leading to Genocide, or your words are advocating Genocide, and you cannot prove otherwise, then if you CONTINUE, your guilty.
You may be innocent if you unknowingly poison someone, but if you are made aware that the coffee you serve people is poisoning them, then CONTINUE, you are guilty.
As I see it, once an anti-white has failed to point out how having ALL and ONLY white nations become multiracial melting pots, as they advocate, wouldn’t lead to whites being assimilated out, they are guilty from that moment on.
Also remember, that we are essentially asking the means to guarantee that whites WON’T be assimilated out and they again, refuse. I always ask, name ONE white nation where it would be acceptable for white people to maintain their white heritage to “anti-racists”, and I never get an answer. One turkey once said “Turkey”, because they had laws protecting their culture, but as I pointed out, these laws had nothing to do with race.
#30 by timeforfreedom on 07/05/2013 - 12:04 am
I totally agree with you here Asgardian.
#31 by Asgardian117 on 07/05/2013 - 7:57 am
Thank you, if someone could help shorten what I said because it is wayyyyyy to long we could ram it straight up their arses.
#32 by Jason on 07/05/2013 - 8:40 am
I think you nailed it there. We must remembe most White genes seem recessive. I don’t actually know the technical genetics of it, but I know blue eyes are recessive. And when I see a White person mate with an Asian, the kid looks mostly Asian. Not some “mix”.
And with Africans and Mestizos it is even less of a “mix”. The White genes get lost. Obama looks like a Black man, period. Genes work that way, as I understand – it’s more of a digital, either/or type of thing, not a true “blending”.
Note sure that can be put in any Mini, but we need to KNOW it. I don’t think most Whites who breed with non-Whites really understand their Whiteness among descendants gets lost almost immediately.
#33 by Scythian on 07/05/2013 - 2:05 am
“Codeword” is essential to make it clear to the anti-whites that we know the anti-whites are lying.
#34 by Bob on 07/05/2013 - 8:22 am
Excellent discussion among PROS!!!!!!!!
#35 by Bob on 07/05/2013 - 9:35 am
A guess, but I think white genes are recessive because they’re newer. The every new genes in the Australian aborigine are so recessive a mix takes almost all of their physical characteristics out.
On the other hand, I understand Neanderthals often had red hair!
Now, forget that and
RAID!
#36 by Asgardian117 on 07/05/2013 - 12:09 pm
Referencing recessive genes is just a side note, the REAL important part of my comment was the DELIBERATE INTENT.
#37 by Gar5 on 07/05/2013 - 5:22 pm
When gene changing technology comes about we can have what ever future generations we want.
Right now our goal is the mantra. When the people wake up, technology will save our skin. As a race we have always been out-numbered; we have always been a global minority: 25% is the highest recorded amount of White people in the world ever.
We win by doing what the Romans did – simple tactics with simple truths.
That’s the mantra.
#38 by Bob on 07/06/2013 - 10:23 am
Thanks, Asgardian! My trainees are now getting ME back on subject!
#39 by Bob on 07/06/2013 - 10:29 am
Gar 5 is right.
Who REALLY wants an ugly baby when it could be given beauty and ability?
Our job may be to be sure they are REAL white babies and not just “paint jobs.”
That cannot happen if we do not win the right to TALK about it.
#40 by Asgardian117 on 07/06/2013 - 11:51 am
“Paint jobs” again coach you made me split my side. That was hysterical we ALL need to laugh, cause what we are doing is DEADLY SERIOUS.