I was a very happy old bigot reading the discussion on my article on using the term “White Nationalism.”
I never wanted members or money. What I dreamed of back in 1998 was finding the message and getting the right people to discuss the right points. It never occurred to me we would have this level of success.
We are such a high level of expertise here that if would be impossible to explain it to someone who has not actually been in the fight with us.
One of the points it is impossible for those not actively in our fight to understand is that it is a DISCUSSION, not a hammering of views into conformance with those of the Leader.
From time to time I make snide comments here that you would be expected to wilt under if it came from The Fearless Leader.
It works both ways. A recent article talked about a tactic that was immediately cut to pieces in the two lead comments. They were respectful, but they amounted to, “Don’t be an ass, Bob, that’s tailgating!”
And they were dead right.
When I start to stagger off into my own little world, You are now able to get me back in line. I used to be the only one doing that. Over a decade of hard work and trying to keep my temper in hand.
What we have now is a real seminar.
Let’s KEEP it that way.
We laugh and we joke but we don’t play.
In all the world, only we know just how serious what we are doing is.
#1 by beefcake on 07/22/2013 - 9:56 pm
I think I am starting to pick up on is how VALUABLE of a skill set we are learning.
The ability to use and stay on and control a message is enough to make us a valuable asset.
The is the power of KINGS. Visible leaders have always a need to control the dialogue. Staying on message IS the job of a visible leader.
We have been learning it by DOING. Trial by fire on the front lines of White Genocide.
Knowing what we now know it seems very simple. I guess that is why it is called the “basics”.
I pay attention to a lot more around me now, including when I overhear or read the comments of people attempting discussing the world around them. -They are all over the place. they don’t influence a single thought other than showing how they conform to comfortable opinion.
Our new found ability is world changing, literally.
This seminar that we are getting in exchange for using the message is one I am just beginning to realize the importance of. I look at leaders of history differently now.
This is the kind of skill under normal circumstances not only would someone have to pay a great deal of money for, they would have to have a lot of pre-requisite classes and expenses for years, and even then they still might never be let in on such a valuable power.
Universities are teaching classes on how to explore an old closet filled with junk, while BUGS are actively learning to explore new worlds.
While Mass-communication professors deliberate over how to best incorporate diversity into their curriculum of nothingness, a small team of Pro-Whites has learned how to wield a message.
RAID!
#2 by Daniel Genseric on 07/23/2013 - 6:54 pm
Bob is THE quintessential kingmaker.
WE are tomorrow’s kingmakers. Everybody stick close. Stay in formation. And this will all work out in the end.
Discard the N&J mantle as the worthless political garb it truly is. We have been tasked with MESSAGING.
They will demand answers to the questions you want them to ask, all on their own. Remember that.
#3 by dungeoneer on 07/23/2013 - 8:13 pm
With the mantra every white man is a king, but no one wears a crown.
#4 by Daniel Genseric on 07/24/2013 - 5:26 am
Almost.
With the Mantra every white man is WORTH SAVING.
Only the Kingmakers make it happen. Who cares about JEWelry.
#5 by dungeoneer on 07/22/2013 - 10:37 pm
I was shamefully wasting white genocide fighting time on Internet crapperoo when I came across this:
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/20/the-anosognosics-dilemma-1/
Boiled down, dumb and smart people are dumb-because they don`t evaluate things properly- a stunning revelation for mantra thinkers, but the money quote of the article:
“This is one of the reasons I often urge my student advisees to find out who the smart professors are, and to get themselves in front of those professors so they can see what smart looks like.”
True enough of course, but also hilarious to someone with a BUGS education.
Thanks Coach.
#6 by Jason on 07/23/2013 - 9:55 am
One tactic I am interested in, as far as real life situations, is using more subtle tactics to open the door for a discussion of white genocide, or to introduce concepts like ‘anti-white’.
I’ve been saying to conservative whites, “at least Putin doesn’t hate people just because they look like you and me”. This comes up due to the Snowden affair. This seems to provoke a puzzled look of thought. I will follow up by saying I can’t say the same about Obama, Eric Holder, Rham Emanuel or the rest of our political leadership.
It’s not Mantra. It might be pre-Mantra? I enjoy getting people to “re-frame” how they think about loyalty, patriotism, race, etc. But is this a good use of time? Does it really soften them up for Mantra concepts? I think it may, but I’d be interested in other BUGSTERS experiences.
#7 by Daniel Genseric on 07/23/2013 - 6:58 pm
Whatever works as your IN.
Take advantage of that mental void and use the opportunity to fill it with our talking points. Weave that velvet and watch their heads spin.
In my experience, you can take damn near ANYTHING political, current events, etc… and get to our talking points. It is all connected.
EVERYTHING is race-based. Everything. Think.
#8 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/23/2013 - 8:09 pm
Jason, sounds good to me. In just a slightly more forceful way, isn’t that what Johnny Mantraseed did in his video with the ladies?
Instead of jumping right into Mantra, which ends with “anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” as a conclusion that follows from the fact of White Genocide, that video introduces the statement in the various more-immediately-believable ways in which it’s probably more commonly interpreted, which softens up the audience before proceeding to the Mantra.
#9 by Simmons on 07/23/2013 - 10:06 am
I admit to doing a load of pre-Mantra work, small end of the wedge tactics.
Outside our seminar are morons, but we need to be there more than here before we become Mommy Prof self-worshippers, that is my opinion.
And thank god for Obama, the anti-whites need Glasnost he delivers the 1935 Supreme Soviet’s 5 Year Plan.
#10 by Bob on 07/23/2013 - 11:36 am
Jason, only you, as a pro, can make that call for yourself.
Lordy, it feels GOOD to say that!
#11 by Jason on 07/24/2013 - 8:19 am
And it is great to have a team of pros to consult with.
#12 by Jason on 07/24/2013 - 8:07 am
Interacting with people in “real life”, I’ve been forced to focus on what my real goal is. Is it to “win arguments” and converts, or rather get them using our terminology? It’s not exactly the same game.
When trying to save souls, you spend a lot of time presenting arguments to get someone to “agree” with you. But nobody wants to admit they were ever wrong. The more you prove your case, the more they put up a block. Or, they may say they agree just to shut you up without ever intending to use the term ‘anti-White’.
I’m thinking it is often more effective to insinuate our terminology into conversations and let it get past their defensive filters. If you tell someone, “I am going to prove you wrong”, they will never admit it. But if you slip in terminology and concepts without activating their defense shields, it works on them over time. It’s like a computer virus. If it goes in unnoticed, it is much more effective