Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Churches Are Half Moral at the Most

Posted by Bob on August 7th, 2013 under Coaching Session

There is a constant argument about how much of human behavior is inherited and how much is determined by one’s environment.   Occidental Observer devotes much of its writing to that issue.   But a Mantra Thinker, and ONLY a Mantra Thinker, would begin before that massive debate.

A Mantra Thinker will not jump into the argument, but will give a lot of thought to the question itself, to the IMPLICATIONS of the argument itself.

For example, if the only reasonable question is HOW MUCH of us is determined by heredity or environment, why is it that all the churches have no morality whatsoever when it comes to heredity?

The Catholic Church has billions of words devoted to behavior, but what about genetics?

Well, it does ban incest.  But that’s IT!

Please remember that I am not talking here about  SEXUAL morality.  I am discussing GENETIC morality.Image Hosted by

Example: a black man marries a blond woman because he sees her blondness as beautiful, a judgment which is shouted out by every statistic we have on beauty products.   In marrying her, the black man is openly and consciously  destroying blondness.

Exactly this same thinking, on any issue outside of genetics, would be a sin.

But the Church says it is not only moral, it is GREAT.

The Church’s only genetic morality is against incest, a level of evolution already reached by meerkats.

Should morons produce children?

That would depend heavily on whether their feeble mindedness is genetic.

But the Church?   It will dictate freely about behavior in your bedroom, but has no opinion on genetics.

But the big issue is, should only people who have no concern about their children’s future be the ones to have offsrping.

That is the reality, countries that are too dumb for birth control have the kids.

But the outfit that calls itself a Church, of whatever denomination, has no opinion on THESE moral issues at all.



  1. #1 by jo3w on 08/07/2013 - 12:58 pm

    Maybe I’m alone on this, but these comments on church make me think of membership organizations.

  2. #2 by dungeoneer on 08/07/2013 - 1:31 pm

    The modern Christian orthodoxy is to impose ugliness and suffering at the DNA level.

  3. #3 by Hexadecimator777 on 08/07/2013 - 2:45 pm

    Bob Jones University took a lot of heat for refusing to condone miscegenation. They eventually caved like they always do in the end.

  4. #4 by BGLass on 08/07/2013 - 6:48 pm

    It is openly acknowledged that the smarter whites have none or few children, no doubt b/c they are best positioned to see the IMPLICATIONS of the future for their children. Ironically, that is “sold” in msm as an under-reproduction rate due to the yuppified selfishness of the educated whites. In reality, they (by their actions) have seemingly said they have summed up the future and think it is better not to be born, as the future they see isn’t what they see as worth living.

  5. #5 by shari on 08/07/2013 - 6:50 pm

    “The churches are half moral at most.” That would mean that they are half IMMORAL. That might be something like “neither hot nor cold.” Not good. Lives have been ruined.

  6. #6 by BGLass on 08/07/2013 - 6:55 pm

    —The Church Industry thrives on peasant tithes so no time soon will they point out the immorality of the people WHO are most CONCERNED about their children having the least children

  7. #7 by cecilhenry on 08/07/2013 - 8:20 pm

    These are great insights regarding church morality and genetics.

    Nobody asks these questions. If race has value, then it is moral to protect its properties.

    I have a question/request for help from BUGSers regarding how to respond Mantra wise to the follow article in a professional organization. I didn;t know where to bring it up so I ask it here.

    This push is going on in every field, and it is assumed that NOBODY could possible oppose what the writer is saying.

    Any help on how to respond would be appreciated.

    SEE below:

    Falling Short in Organized Dentistry: A Call for Increased Diversity

    This is really the same thing as saying that there are too many white people, and that whites should be diminished and pushed aside racially and politically for others. That’s wrong!! How to condemn this and shame them for their attitude???? I’m sick of seeing this everywhere.

    You can always call for MORE diversity, how come you can;t call for LESS diversity? Who is diversity bad for???

    This writer assumes he can only get brownie points for promoting white disposession. HOw can I shake his complacency??

    • #8 by jo3w on 08/07/2013 - 9:23 pm

      You could start by asking him if he is disturbed by the under-representation of white males as compared to the population in current dental school classes. He cleverly states that he is not for affirmative action. This is done because Asians are grossly over represented in current dental school classes and affirmative action actually harms Asians. If you want to embarass him a little, start asking why Asians are over represented and why he supports it. Most likely he won’t respond, if he does, there will be no answer he can give that wouldnt be considered bigoted by PC standards or hypocritical by normal white person standards. Next ask if he calls for increased diversity in Asian countries dental leadership. Ask if it is only White majority countries that he is concerned about the diversity in dental leadership.

  8. #9 by Asgardian117 on 08/07/2013 - 10:53 pm

    The church is anti white, it places the burden soley on the white race and at its expense none the less to take care of countries where people are so stupid they should realize they should stop having kids and focus on their problems. But that isnt the case the white race not only financially supports in one way or another many non white countries it also has a open door policy for them. Take all my money and force my posterity to assimilate and intergrate with people we are already supporting in their native countries and in our own.

    Stripped of financial dexterity. ..Check
    Stripped of having any say who comes in my country…Check
    FORCED to live among people that have nothing in common with me and in my opinion want me dead…Check

    That seems like a recipe for White Genocide and the church supports it. Unless its tibet of course…or israel..or africa…

  9. #10 by Asgardian117 on 08/08/2013 - 7:53 am

    Do I believe in god? Id like to think there is one.

    Do I love my country. Yes.

    Do I support the current anti white regimes that are representing my church and country? NO.

  10. #11 by BGLass on 08/08/2013 - 9:46 am

    considering further—

    there is no THE church, as there are about 32,000 sects thinking of themselves as “christian.”

    anti-whiteness is a many-headed hydra— the benchmark that people are indoctrinated to put into everything from dentistry to church tithes, a main principle that individuals pore into new vessels in whatever industry they enter, from “peace keeping” to “military” to “dental school,” etc, ad infinitum

    On one hand, they must be gotten rid of (“they killed all the indians, enslaved all the blacks, gassed all the youknowwhos, etc, they are thee E-Ville)

    On the other hand, they MUST BE SEEN AS IMMORAL if they do not reproduce

    This seems true on two counts: one, they are secretly seen as the paycheck that is disappearing, and so they must live at least enough to invent some things, pay the taxes, etc.

    but also—- by claiming they CHOOSE not to reproduce, (they are always said to be SELFISH as a motive), it covers up Genocide.

    Even all the “wn’s” claim this SELFISHNESS motive.

    Could there be other reasons? Was Magda Goebbels SELFISH (quite)? What are the imperatives for “raising one’s own child, what must one have FIRST? Is this value and imperative the same for all populations, etc.

    No one EVEN POSITS possible OTHER MOTIVES for non-reproduction. Every single Hollywood movie, and every single “WN” are in agreement—- SELFISH!

  11. #12 by Bob on 08/08/2013 - 11:44 am

    “as compared to the population in current dental school classes. He cleverly states that he is not for affirmative action.”
    and “SELFISH!”
    What happened to my SEMINAR!
    This is all TAILGATING and I have to say it!

  12. #13 by jo3w on 08/08/2013 - 12:39 pm

    Sorry Bob, it’s tailgaiting, and I know it. The site being referenced will not allow the mantra or mantra talking points past moderation. If he opens a dialogue, he may be able to steer the conversation toward our talking points and not be “moderated” out of existence. I have had some success sneaking past moderation like this before. If you open with white genocide, your voice will never be heard on a forum like that. If anyone has any insight on how to achieve this without getting off topic, it would be a great skill to discuss.

    • #14 by dungeoneer on 08/08/2013 - 4:56 pm

      jo3w: “Sorry Bob, it’s tailgaiting, and I know it.”

      Oh very nice. What type of vegetable matter would you like us to throw at you?

  13. #15 by dungeoneer on 08/08/2013 - 5:33 pm

    I feel uneasy saying anti-whites are potentially half moral.

  14. #16 by jo3w on 08/08/2013 - 6:28 pm

    @dungeoneer, I’m not sure what you’re getting at.

  15. #19 by Jason on 08/08/2013 - 11:31 pm

    For example, if the only reasonable question is HOW MUCH of us is determined by heredity or environment, why is it that all the churches have no morality whatsoever when it comes to heredity?

    What a great point. Everyone acknowledges some role for genetics in behavior, intelligence and health, so why the heck don’t churches address it? They are supposed to moral institutions, right?

    They have given us zero guidance on what they implicitly admit is one of the biggest factors in human life. So yeah, there is a lot of Idocracy going on out there – the dumbest are breeding the fastest all over the earth. I hope genetic engineering rides to the rescue fast.

You must be logged in to post a comment.