Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

A Sense of Humor is a Sense of Proportion

Posted by Bob on August 9th, 2013 under Coaching Session, How Things Work


A professional in politics sees a LOT of surveys.  I remember one consistent theme that appealed to my lonely sense of humor.

Women were asked about qualities they wanted in their children.

“Do you want your child to be beautiful?     Despite the already deep drenching in Political Correctness, eighty or ninety percent answered “Yes.”

But in another part of the survey the girls DID remember their Political Correctness Training.   So when the question was, “How would your ideal husband look?”  at least eighty percent gave the answer expected of them:

“It doesn’t make any difference.”Image Hosted by

As I say, each version of this appealed to my very lonely sense of humor.

I only argued before an audience, and one time I was in a hair salon or whatever they call it and a Politically Correct female I knew had her head in one of those huge machines.  There were other women there, including my wife.   Please do not ask me why that woman had her head in a machine which was making no noise.  I can barely comb my own hair

But for my own LONELY sense of humor, I was began talking to her about intermarriage.    I guided her around to saying, “Looks don’t matter.”

I did it to pass time, but I had no hope that anybody in the room would understand the irony of a woman spending thousands of dollars in  a beauty shop repeating  the Required Line that anyone who is not anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews must repeat, that “looks don’t matter.”

Nobody came near to getting it.    I actually gave it a minute, for “Looks don’t matter” to get across in a fairly expensive beauty shop.    I could have waited until the next  Ice Age and nobody would have gotten it.

Having a consistent moral code and a sense of humor is a LONELY business.

So, while intellectual pro-whites are arguing about HOW MUCH of children’s’ futures are determined by their genes, it would not in a million years occur to them to demand that moralists, including churches, have any morality about genetics.

Not sex, GENETICS.

  1. #1 by Epiphany on 08/09/2013 - 11:00 am

    Strictly speaking, there are so such Nation or People as “Americans”. There are only U.S. Citizens, pursuant to the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Others ignore this!

  2. #2 by Gavin on 08/09/2013 - 12:00 pm

    It’s difficult to live in a world where a good proportion of the people you meet strike you as mindless robots programmed with a few ideas. The more sentient people are a rare treat to encounter…even the ones I despise.

    I loved it when I first heard Bob say on one of his podcasts that the established religion of the West was now political correctness. “Finally…someone who GETS IT!!!” I thought.

    Black and blonde always struck me in the gut as an abomination. I can’t relate to anyone who feels differently. It’s like they are a different species. John McCain advocating in favor of it…I just literally cannot understand how anyone could possibly take that stance. Something that seems to obviously immoral and abominable to me (and a good deal of my friends as well) I just can’t understand how anyone can support it.

  3. #3 by Bob on 08/09/2013 - 12:34 pm

    Yes, Gavin, they are different creatures.
    Which reminds me of our exact subject here.
    The Catholic Church gets frantic when pro-Choice says a woman should do as she wants with her own body in the case of abortion.
    But when a woman decides to use her body to destroy her blondness or intelligence for all of her children, the Church just begs to be allowed to perform the service.

  4. #4 by Harumphty Dumpty on 08/09/2013 - 1:38 pm

    Churches today think that genetics itself is immoral, but they know that’s too absurd to come out and explicitly say so.

    The Beauty Shop story was too funny, along with BBG’s hilarious graphic!

    I suppose the ease with which we humans believe nonsense has had some survival value in providing relief from the harshness of raw existence?

    However we came to have that trait, it isn’t serving us very well now.

  5. #5 by Asgardian117 on 08/09/2013 - 2:09 pm

    Ive always noticed how elderly married white couples ALWAYS compliment my childrens hair color and eye color. Believe it or not it seems more profound when non whites are present. My wife takes great pleasure in that and gets a good laugh after gauging the look of shock on their faces.

    I picked up most on the look of shock, they are actually applaud when a white compliments another white with total disregard as to who is there….that I find interesting.

  6. #6 by richard on 08/09/2013 - 7:02 pm

    In market research, when female magazine readers are asked their opinion of black and Asian models, they all respond along the lines of “there should be more of them, I’d like to see a black woman on the cover” etc. But whenever a magazine puts a non-white model on the cover, sales plummet. It’s a well-known phenomenon in the publishing world. That’s the difference between what women say, and what they actually do.

    • #7 by cecilhenry on 08/09/2013 - 8:15 pm

      This is kind of like when a woman sayd “I like you too much to ruin our friendship!!”

      Women are notorious for knowing what they are expected to say, and towing the line in public conversation.

      Private opinion is another world.

  7. #8 by Frank on 08/09/2013 - 7:59 pm

    Politically correct? To maintain the ideological looks that matter, one must display what is Politically Required.

  8. #9 by dungeoneer on 08/10/2013 - 6:37 am

    Beauty shops and ugly diversity.

    Marketers that pretend they don`t intend for whites to ingest the messages in their commercials,

    The clown car pro-whites who refuse to laugh to death the joke anti-white worldview.

    Laughter is good.

  9. #10 by Bob on 08/10/2013 - 12:40 pm

    BBG’s illustrations are important to me.
    It’s work to do an article, and I have BBG’s take on it to look forward to when I finish.

    • #11 by Peter Cottontail on 08/10/2013 - 2:45 pm

      Bob, The Swarm is a complete and utter mess…it has become Tailgating Central. One anti-White shows up and Bugsers jump in to sniff his ass.

      I’d prefer to see the Swarm deleted than to see what it has become.

      • #12 by Scythian on 08/10/2013 - 3:33 pm

        Pete, as you know it’s not the Swarm, it’s a separate thread that shows up in the ‘Recent Swarm’ section. I myself used it for some practice and got some use out of it. Generally however I agree and will get back to doing what I do best – RAID.

  10. #13 by Peter Cottontail on 08/10/2013 - 4:53 pm

    The most recent Troll Swarm has 136 tailgating replies that will be read by a single antiwhite troll and some bugsers. A huge waste of time.

  11. #14 by Asgardian117 on 08/10/2013 - 5:36 pm

    Peter did you read the comments? Or did you just see 136 replies and just think tailgating?

    • #15 by Harumphty Dumpty on 08/10/2013 - 6:46 pm

      I think following an anti-white troll onto a thread on our own site for 136 replies is probably tailgating just in itself, whatever the nature of the replies.


      Someone just sent this to me. Check out the headline, “Battling ‘White Genocide’ in Atlanta,” and the fact that the author quotes Patrick Sharp, the student founding the student union in Ga., as having written on his FB page back in Feb. 2012, “The peo­ple car­ry­ing out these pro­grams of White Geno­cide say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White!”

      I never heard of the blogger, Jason Stanford, but he’s apparently a fairly well-known mainstream columnist.

      A delayed payoff…a year and a half later! And if he’s saying it on his blog, maybe it’ll soon be in his mainstream columns!

      • #16 by Harumphty Dumpty on 08/10/2013 - 7:32 pm

        I forgot to include the writer’s twitter account, if that’s of use:


      • #17 by Larry on 08/11/2013 - 1:25 pm

        He just updated his post with the full mantra! Great job.

        • #18 by Daniel Genseric on 08/11/2013 - 3:08 pm

          I guess all it takes is a well-written letter. 😉

          Thanks Bob

        • #19 by dungeoneer on 08/11/2013 - 3:27 pm

          Well done HD and Genseric and anyone else who sent the pleas for discussion.

      • #20 by Jason on 08/11/2013 - 8:14 pm

        Notice that the anti-Whites only strategy is to attack some individual. They never address the underlying issue.

        If we stay MESSAGE focused we win. They can always destroy some Big Name but they cannot do anything about the fast spreading Mantra.

  12. #21 by Gar5 on 08/10/2013 - 7:42 pm

    I’m with Pete: no practicing in the war room.

  13. #22 by Peter Cottontail on 08/10/2013 - 8:26 pm

    The Bugsers who fall for the troll trap are like the bumbling generals in Dr. Strangelove. Reminding them “Gentlemen, you cant fight in here. Its the war room.” gets old after the 500th time.

    • #23 by OldBlighty on 08/10/2013 - 10:25 pm

      Telling us to fight anti-Whites out there and then turn around and give them free run of BUGS and say, “Oh no, you can’t fight them in here!”

      That counts as a form of mental torture. Only a sadist would do something like that.

      • #24 by dungeoneer on 08/11/2013 - 1:42 pm

        Did it need 13 replies from you on first two pages though OB?

        I have sinned plenty before as you know and I caught myself typing out another redundant post to that thread.

        The Moderation is a separate thing.

  14. #25 by Asgardian117 on 08/10/2013 - 11:14 pm

    Well I knew these comments were coming about 136 replies. Peter we are not tailgating, did you not notice the transition from integrator to a name calling denier that the anti white was reduced to? Now I understand why you dont like that it happened here BUT we cannot let them come in here and run roughshod over us. THATS WHAT HAPPENED IN WHITE COUNTRIES. Thats why we are here. Thats not stormfront thinking thats mantra thinking, anti whites are running WILD in white countries….should we let them run wild in the place where we are trying to stop them from? We cant afford that.

    • #26 by Jason on 08/11/2013 - 1:52 am

      The answer is to ban them once they are proven anti-Whites. Otherwise, we could literally spend the rest of our lives debating 2 or 3 people who decide to post here constantly.

      It’s hard to resist replying to them, I have, and I would just like to show them the door.

  15. #27 by Asgardian117 on 08/11/2013 - 10:01 am

    Jasons right…we cant let the gremlins run wild in our office. But, I should not be having a two day debate with them.

  16. #28 by Peter Cottontail on 08/11/2013 - 12:07 pm

    We can dominate anti-Whites on sites like youtube where there is a vast audience even when Bugsers are outnumbered 10 to 1.

    Or 10 Busgers can spend days arguing with one single anti-white in our workspace where there is NO AUDIENCE…just to show how tough they are.

    • #29 by Harumphty Dumpty on 08/11/2013 - 12:28 pm

      Peter, we promise that we will never, ever do it again! 🙂

      But you are SO right. During this period when we are insufficiently moderated, it’s important that we maintain discipline. There’ll be other periods like this in the future.

      And my own compulsive nature has actually been turned to a more useful project during this last period, and I’m very proud that this time I didn’t get involved.

      I wish I could also swarm, but I just can’t do it while doing this other. I would need two brains, or one normal one.

  17. #30 by Blanchevictoire on 08/11/2013 - 3:01 pm

    “We can dominate anti-Whites on sites like youtube where there is a vast audience even when Bugsers are outnumbered 10 to 1.”

    Why have your fellow monkeys resulted to censoring individuals who oppose you?
    And why not accept the debate 😉 I didn’t want you TO DEBATE HERE….please learn to read!

    “the transition from integrator to a name calling denier ”

    If you’re judging my intellectual capacity from the point when I let out a bit of wit, “Genocidal Maniac” Anti-White, etc. take the cake 😀

    • #31 by OldBlighty on 08/11/2013 - 3:26 pm

      Pro White discussion is banned everywhere. It is called “hate” by your kind.

      As an anti-White, you can post your drivel anywhere you like, so your freedom of speech is not impinged, unlike ours.

      You anti-Whites have never cared about the free speech of Pro Whites before, you have always moved to silence us.

      So why should you be allowed to speak here at all?

  18. #32 by dungeoneer on 08/11/2013 - 3:37 pm

    Yes Blanche it is the height of bad manners to justify our genocide in this small corner of the uncensored internet especially with Mommy Professor drone script, while we`re denied the ability to discuss it in the public discourse.

  19. #33 by Simmons on 08/12/2013 - 7:56 am

    I suppose having an anti-white on board could be of some use to our newer members in practicing.

    I have always said the anti-whites are our greatest asset, but I also realize how quickly we can fall back into useless tailgating.

    Actually I am more interested in asking these anti-whites why they became anti-whites and a host of other relevant questions of this genocidal cult.

    One last reminder to our newer members you are morally superior to the anti-whites so discard all your Contard training, quickly.

  20. #34 by John White on 08/12/2013 - 10:00 am

    In line with the last comments, I would like to re-post something important.

    It’s a reply to the anti-white psychopath that is running wild in here recently, but I think it’s an important text for other bugsers, especially if they are new.

    It’s a long reply because there will be no further exchange between that anti-white and me, in here.

    Our work is to expose anti-whites like you who advocate White Genocide through massive immigration & assimilation.

    Since you, anti-whites, are the ones advocating genocide, we don’t have to play by your rules nor let you set the frame of the discussion.

    Because I’ve already made my points and you yourself are doing a great job in showing your rabid anti-whitism, I’ll post no more replies to you after this one, because our work isn’t to “debate” you anti-whites, much less in our own working space, but to expose you anti-whites and your program of White Genocide in front of the white-and-normal audience, those who are the victims of your genocidal policies.

    You said: “You also made an equivocation fallacy by comparing white blondes and white brunettes to the Chinese and Japanese.”

    Wrong. Those are examples of two subgroups within a same group. White brunettes and White blondes are both White, just as Chinese and Japanese are both Asian.

    And I insist: nobody is flooding each & every Asian country with non-Asians, and forcing their assimilation so that eventually no more Asian children be born, and asking an Asian person who would oppose that Genocide: “should the Han and the Zhuang not intermix?”

    The question whether or not White brunettes and White blondes should intermix is irrelevant from the perspective of the ongoing program of White Genocide that anti-whites like you are pushing.

    The genocidal policies you anti-whites advocate lead to a world without White children. That’s why your question about “brunettes and blondes” is not only irrelevant but malevolently sadistic.

    You said: “Name a single European country that is more than 20% non-white.”

    That’s also a sadistically malevolent question who shows that you anti-whites are psychopaths in the truest sense of the word.

    Let’s assume that White children aren’t ALREADY a minority in the USA, the country that their White ancestors built for them and their posterity (US Constitution preamble, I think). Let’s assume, too, that Whites aren’t expected to become a minority in the UK by between 2050 and 2066.

    I understand that, for an anti-white like you, the program of White Genocide through immigration & assimilation might be going slower than you would like.

    Your asking about the “20%” mark shows that you are already operating under the assumption that White Genocide through massive immigration and forced assimilation MUST take place, and hopefully faster.

    If all formerly white countries had become 90% non-white through the ongoing process of massive immigration and forced assimilation that’s ALREADY HAPPENING—and that anti-whites like you are pushing—you would still demand for more.

    The proof? You anti-whites don’t have a problem with certain areas of California being ALREADY majority Hispanic, but oh you absolutely do have a problem with other areas of the country being “too white” and in NEED of “more diversity.”

    In other words, you claim that it isn’t a program of Genocide because according to you, there are still too many whites.

    It’s hard to see white genocide when you’re anti-white.

    • #35 by OldBlighty on 08/12/2013 - 10:37 am

      His main tactic is Genocide Denial and that is it.

      He is saying, that trying to make an entire group disappear using his methods, “is not genocide”. Well that’s not going to convince anyone, unless they are anti-White.

      Genocide deniers are thrown in jail for decades in Europe. The Europeans snatch them from places as civilized as Canada, to make them stand trial.

      That is the real reason, his dear leaders choose to remain silent. The anti-White leadership are stupid, but they are not THAT stupid.

You must be logged in to post a comment.