One of the constant sources of pain in Mantra Thinking is the automatic responses one has to sit through so many hundreds of times. One example is the regularly recurring objection to a policy of financial reparations for anti-whites.
PERMANENT ones.
The response one gets to this from newbies is a chest-beating, tear-jerking declaration of how anti-whites deserve death, and newbie will pursue them all to his dying breath.
Bullshit. Once the novelty goes away you’ll do what everybody does:
Nothing.
Heirs to the way over half of our national wealth which can be connected directly to racial treason will be in the same position WE are: We suddenly find all the big money that they got directed at destroying our race. THAT is unfair to US.
Those who have money. or are heirs to those who do, have not the slightest right to claim unfairness when they are disinherited.
They have no more RIGHT to be heirs to the money than they have to be heirs to the crime.
I deal in human nature. As long as going back over history can yield a piece of that titanic pie, no one will forget white genocide.
As soon as I said this, Asgardian said he was getting off his “tribunals” high horse.
But in fact I shouldn’t have to say this. YOU should.
Reparations will yield lots of money, but that is a happy accident. It is effective and keeps down the neo-Nazi Tribunal stuff.
The sentence above is the POINT.
#1 by RobRoy on 08/13/2013 - 11:58 pm
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/07/11/don%E2%80%99t-lose-the-victory/
“When you win the war is the time you must continue it, or you will lose it again.
PAID informers for traitors.
NEVER FORGET!”
#2 by Jason on 08/14/2013 - 3:06 am
Some of us did try to point what Coach said but our comments went into a black hole! This isn’t because we are smart, it’s because we read the original explanation.
It’s not the fault of new people at all, they have to be exposed to the complete idea.
And yeah, the tribunal stuff gets the juices going but it is mainly a whack off fantasy. I notice a lot of conservatives want a single “cleansing event” to make everything better so they can immediately return to their tomato gardens.
Some dream of a big economic collapse. Or hope the electric grid will just collapse. Somehow this is supposed to save us. The underlying theme is that they find regular practical politics boring. So, once the dust has settled in some future world, they will return to their tomato gardens and let the anti-Whites run wild again if we don’t set something up.
#3 by Asgardian117 on 08/14/2013 - 7:16 am
No no I get it..reparations are lasting. I was thinking with my heart while riding my white steed lol. They wont forget this $$$$$$$$$.
#4 by Simmons on 08/14/2013 - 7:44 am
If you are tailgating about Tribunals go punch yourself repeatedly and wake up.
We literally are the spear point of liberation here at BUGs.
Everyone wants to go off and plan for STEP #2. I debate Hunter over at OD constantly about this, he like nearly everyone else skips the liberation of the minds of whites and go into some version of their Mommy Prof type planning like its Plato’s Republic.
#5 by Jason on 08/14/2013 - 8:02 am
I have lost patience with guys like that. Let them go play with Sim City and leave the real world to us. It’s like a group of boys retreating to a tree house to play a game of War.
#6 by Simmons on 08/14/2013 - 8:31 am
I disagree in part Jason. I think these people and thru the political continuum can be made useful in our liberation struggle.
I’m working in my mind now a bit of rhetoric/question/polemic judo. I want it to be so concise that it will require an obnoxious militancy to deny it and stay on Mommy Prof approved Contardism. I also want this sentence or two to be useful thru the “moderate left” those not so enthralled by the nuts of the anti-White cult.
Of course if I have any success with it I will report back.
“Fashionable opinion is still fashion, and soon to be outdated”
#7 by Jason on 08/14/2013 - 8:53 am
Well good for you if you can maintain the patience to influence them in a way that is useful. At least get them to use the right terminology. And yes please report back success or “failure”. Because failure is at least as valuable for knowing how to go forward!
#8 by OldBlighty on 08/14/2013 - 11:27 am
A suggestion for your Hunter debates:
Challenge him to post the mantra and observe the hateful replies.
#9 by dungeoneer on 08/14/2013 - 2:28 pm
As you`ve said before Simmons, the silk glove beats the mailed fist.
We are the social critics. We heal the world.
#10 by Gavin on 08/14/2013 - 3:39 pm
I completely agree.
Now exactly how are we going to do this. I have never set up any sort of reparations program before in my life, nor do I know of anyone who has. I have no idea how to do this. Writing about doing it on a blog is one thing. Actually doing it in reality is another. Now exactly how do we go from suggesting it online to implementing it in reality?
#11 by Jason on 08/14/2013 - 6:06 pm
Reparations couldn’t be pursued until pro-Whites are firmly in power. Then I imagine it would be done the way reparations are done today for the holocaust. But it is not a project to implement now, because unless pro-Whites eventually win, reparations could not happen.
#12 by Gar5 on 08/14/2013 - 7:09 pm
Sorry that I’m off topic here, but a pro-White activist posted this link on SF.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t987506/
Go to the video link, he speaks at about the 23:00 minute mark.
#13 by Jason on 08/14/2013 - 8:06 pm
National Review seems to be accepting comments – I am sure they will be scrubbed later. Please hit.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/355734/no-conference-editors
#14 by Jason on 08/14/2013 - 9:10 pm
Forgive me, I posted on wrong thread above. Meant to put on working thread.
#15 by Jason on 08/15/2013 - 9:45 pm
Anyone else find it difficult to transition from an argumentative/dissident role to a cooperative/leadership role? That’s a bad way to phrase it but what I mean is, getting into debates with anti-Whites is one thing. Dealing with Normal Whites who are slowllllyyyy becoming pro-White is another.
Or so it seems to me. Are the people who spark social change the same ones who go on to lead after the change?