Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Saying That Disagreement is “Hate” is Childish

Posted by Bob on October 3rd, 2013 under Coaching Session, Political Correctness


Saying that disagreement is “Hate” is childish.

Please note that to the right of the word childish there is a dot.

That dot is called a “period.” The English call it “full stop.”

The English definition is excellent advice.

Lord Nelson has mentioned that I “cleaned out” the Opposing Views section Stormfront using the Mantra.

Most of the Stormfronters replies in OV consisted of some form of “I am not a racist.”Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Almost all of the pro-white replies that weren’t “I am not a racist” were devoted to the proposition, “What I am saying is not ‘Hate.'”

I just read an article in Salon.com about a well-spoken young pro-white in North Dakota.

Totally frustrated at the end, the author wrote, “I couldn’t believe that that young man had spoken such hate.”

If you read the article, you will see not a word of hate in it. “Hate” is used by anti-whites in exactly the same way a six-year-old shouts, “You’re just MEAN!”

TOO probably has long articles arguing that kids who say they’re “mean” are highly intellectual and thoughtful but incorrect.

Not a single six-year-old has been convinced of this by TOO reasoning.

The kid needs to be told he’s being childish.

It must be said, over and over and over, not as a reply, just tossed into Comments on Gummy Bears or anything else:

“Saying that  disagreement is ‘Hate’ is childish.”

Saying that disagreement is “Hate” is childish.

FULL STOP.

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by -frank- on 10/03/2013 - 2:38 pm

    I posted some stuff on that article pointing out that disagreement was not hate, but …

    I forgot to say “Childish” (may have said silly), and I certainly forgot the

    FULL STOP

    I’m learning

    FULL STOP

  2. #3 by -frank- on 10/03/2013 - 2:45 pm

    “Saying that all disagreement is ‘Hate’ is childish.”

    Is a way better than “pointing out that disagreement is not hate”. By pointing out “that disagreement is not hate” I just supplied an opinion, but that doesn’t have the desired effect.

    By using Bob’s phrasing, I’m CALLING the anti-White “Childish”. Bob’s phrase DOES something, imposes something, makes the anti-White look bad in public.

    Just supplying an opinion about “hate” and “disagreement” wasn’t effective.

  3. #4 by Gar5 on 10/03/2013 - 2:53 pm

    Everything is hateful towards someone; everyone views something as hateful.

    Banning pro-White “hate” is censorship.

    Things like murder are banned to protect a society; anti-Whites all agree that pro-White views are dangerous towards “society”.

    However, societies full of White people in the past have not only survived, but have flourished tells us one thing:

    It’s not dangerous to society; it’s dangerous to what anti-Whites say society should be.

    “What society should be” is the line of every dictatorship under the sun.

  4. #5 by Jay on 10/03/2013 - 6:24 pm

    Anti-White Establishment Mommy State driven by emotion.

  5. #6 by Asgardian on 10/03/2013 - 7:16 pm

    White people are the definition of hatred.

    • #7 by Daniel Genseric on 10/04/2013 - 3:38 am

      It’s important to remember, however, while we are Natural Born Haters, European Americans are allowed just one discretion.

      We are gifted the Right to hate ourselves and our own people. More accurately, we are allowed to be WHITE anti-whites.

      That is “acceptable” and Politically Correct.

  6. #8 by Peter Cottontail on 10/03/2013 - 7:49 pm

    “Saying That All Disagreement is “Hate” is Childish” sounds like a great addition to the One Line Wonders on Bugs Buddy. How about it Gar5?

  7. #9 by -cecilhenry- on 10/04/2013 - 12:12 am

    “Calling all disagreement ‘Hate’ is just childish.”

    I think that’s a better phrase, shorter and more concise to say.

    Suggestions?

  8. #10 by Skippy01 on 10/04/2013 - 3:28 am

    “Calling disagreement hate is childish.”

    Shorter is better.

  9. #11 by Daniel Genseric on 10/04/2013 - 3:41 am

    Calling dissent “HATE!” is childish.

    Not only that, but it promotes The Silence.

  10. #12 by -frank- on 10/04/2013 - 7:40 am

    I’m still reading and re-reading ““Saying that all disagreement is ‘Hate’ is childish.”

    There’s one word in there that I keep wondering about: “all”.

    Bob doesn’t usually put ANYTHING in one of his repeaters unless it has a purpose.

    What’s the purpose of “all” in Bob’s version, which isn’t visible in some of the other versions proposed in this thread?

  11. #13 by Bob on 10/04/2013 - 8:27 am

    I now have a seminar to tell me when I use one word too many.

  12. #14 by Bob on 10/04/2013 - 8:31 am

    See the article. The all is all gone.

  13. #15 by Simmons on 10/04/2013 - 2:39 pm

    One word or one variation of this word can be added to Bob’s phrase. That word is the personal pronoun “You.”

    You saying that disagreement is hate, is childish.

    People want to babble the party line they do not want to be responsible for the party line.

  14. #16 by -frank- on 10/04/2013 - 6:07 pm

    “Distributed Particle Networks and Swarm Optimization”

    http://www.aryanlegacy.net/ancestral-traditions-the-national-network-state/

    (Note: for those who think about such things as effective networks of particles and how they do things like “swarm”, this may be useful in seeing “structure”. Hint: it’s kinda GOING ON here.

    I realize it’s “off topic”, so don’t shoot me, yet. I really don’t know where else to put it! If someone knows, please put it there. Don’t shoot me later, either.)

  15. #17 by -frank- on 10/04/2013 - 6:12 pm

    Top line should read …

    “Distributed Networks and Particle Swarm Optimization”

    Editor isn’t working for me.

  16. #18 by AnotherOne on 10/04/2013 - 11:33 pm

    I think the word “disagreement” should be changed to “opposition.” We don’t disagree with Anti-whites and White Genocide. We oppose them.

  17. #19 by RabbitRebel on 10/05/2013 - 12:11 am

    The anti-Whites yelling “hate” is the same ‘ol tailgating.

    We do not wait for the anti-White accusations and slander, we hit them quick and hard without mercy, rince and repeat.

    “Hate” is just an immature way to hide your anti-Whitism

  18. #20 by Bob on 10/05/2013 - 9:44 am

    AnotherOne, it doesn’t matter if you haven’t TRIED it.
    It’s a pointlesspiece of theory.

  19. #21 by Simmons on 10/05/2013 - 10:12 am

    Yes “You” works but a caveat it is an aggressive posture, that of an interrogator and it is not for beginners. I just got bounced from a WN blog because I used “you”, and I understand why I was banned it simply is aggressive.

    I understand these threads are basically for beginners and intermediates so I was hesitant to interject my findings since if you start using “you” directed at an anti-white and personalizing the debate you will get bounced which would set a good many of you fine folks back in your training.

  20. #22 by Skippy01 on 10/05/2013 - 7:40 pm

    “It must be said, over and over and over, not as a reply, just tossed into Comments on Gummy Bears or anything else”…

    Making it my bulletin board signature and making mild replies in gay marriage threads worked great. Lots of stupid, aggressive reactions, “requiring” me to answer them (briefly), and every time my final word is:

    “Saying that disagreement is ‘Hate’ is childish.”

    Finally a use for boring “Gay Marriage / Don’t Be a H8ER!!” threads!

  21. #23 by Daniel Genseric on 10/06/2013 - 9:26 am

    I have found, as others before me have pointed out, that asking a question is often times more engaging than simply stating the truth. Get them to buy in.

    “So, anybody who disagrees with you is a quote hater unquote? Seems kind of childish.”

You must be logged in to post a comment.