Ten years ago I was trying to get a disciplined pro-white approach. We evolved from WOL to BUGS.
Pro-whites had spent endless resources and were visibly dying out.
Those who insisted on the old method had two consistent arguments that kept them in control even when a handful of BUGSERS got national news coverage.
First, my advocacy of fixing on target and using repetition was mentally asphyxiating.
Second, they were Telling the Whole Truth.
The repetition method has made its mark. But BUGS is now increasingly off on a “This is too intellectually limiting” kick which is very, very familiar.
Third, what started out as mini Mantras has become simply the old Stormfront writing whatever makes you feel good crap.
After tens of thousands of repetitions we have blasted the term “anti-racist” to hell.
Having done one things as I knew we could, I was idiot enough to hope that we might follow up that win. I noticed the words they are now hiding behind, “diversity” and “Hate.”
Once again, nobody notices a victory in a national dialogue unless it is succeeded by a Torchlight Victory Parade.
One commenter said he had been attacking diversity for two years, “With great results!”
Then why is the enemy using that word specifically and repeatedly to hide behind?
I may be trying to fight Reality. A band of disciplined warriors going from target to target is a lot to ask. After all, the alternative is having somebody say what you want to hear, as your tiny group shrinks to nothing.
I have always been ready to stick with a winning strategy, but not when it becomes impossible.
In fact, far more has been accomplished in real political warfare than anyone but me could possibly imagine. We CAN make national breakthroughs, a handful of people breaking into national news.
We have demonstrated that a huge constituency is afraid to speak out.
But this effort is coming apart, and I can see it.
I miss the old Whitaker Online where I just gave my opinions, while I drifted in the direction that would lead to BUGS. But from all I can tell, and please remember, seeing this kind of reality is my specialty, BUGS, as a seminar is over.
“We mentioned Diversity two years ago,” “I think I’ll just take my toys and go home and say it’s all the Jews’ doing,” “I said such and such and it really impressed ’em,” and so forth.
I tried it and it worked. When things get a lot worse and people need some results instead of paying people to say what they want to hear, someone can pick it up.
But I am not about to start again to convert the New Stormfronters.
So my proposal is that I go back to Whitaker Online.
Until you understand what our little but NATIONAL steps forward meant, I simply do not have the energy to go back to basics AGAIN.
I propose that Bob’s Underground Graduate SEMINAR is over. It did more than any seminar before it ever did, but it really is time to move on.
#1 by jo3w on 10/28/2013 - 8:05 pm
There is only so much you can say on one topic before it is exhausted. Its a miriacle that you lasted as long as you did.
#2 by Jason on 10/28/2013 - 8:11 pm
Well I could feel something changing. The line about the “New Stormfronters” sums it up.
Every other pro-White group, in person or online, has disappointed and frankly depressed me. This was the first and ONLY group that actually accomplished anything, so my hat is off and I give thanks to all who made it happen, obviously with Bob at the front, but also to those early adopters years ago.
BUGS showed that progress on the pro-White front CAN actually happen. And HOW to do it. That alone is the biggest political accomplishment for our side in the last century.
#3 by StopWhiteGeNOcide on 10/28/2013 - 11:07 pm
“Well I could feel something changing. The line about the “New Stormfronters” sums it up.”
Displacement dimwits on other websites wore me out and now we have ones coming into BUGS, not with the humility to learn, but to convert us to their failed religions.
As we have been trained to say, ‘Show us the real world results!’
“BUGS showed that progress on the pro-White front CAN actually happen. And HOW to do it. ”
Yes he did. Thank you Bob.
#4 by Denounce Genocidists on 10/28/2013 - 9:57 pm
Thank you Bob for showing us what mantra thinking is and how to use it to become a top class strategist, political warfare practitioner, interrogator, racial advocate.
It`s up to us now to use what we have learned to end white genocide and put anti-whitism in it`s cage.
#5 by Henry Davenport on 10/28/2013 - 10:05 pm
“The repetition method has made its mark. But BUGS is now increasingly off on a “This is too intellectually limiting” kick which is very, very familiar.
Third, what started out as mini Mantras has become simply the old Stormfront writing whatever makes you feel good crap.”
I’ve been out of touch since the petitions and didn’t realize that this was happening.
When I arrived here over two years ago, the group was mostly old-timers who corrected those of us who were new until we got the hang of doing it correctly.
I would copy some of my posts onto the working thread, and someone here would show me how I should have responded instead of how I actually had responded. It took me months before the light suddenly dawned and I started doing it correctly most of the time.
That’s how difficult it is to do this stuff correctly, for most of us (not all). The old-timers themselves spoke of how long it had taken them to get the hang of it.
There seems to be a reliance now on spreading the pre-written mini-mantras, and that is GREAT because it allows bugsters to cover so much ground.
But I’ve gotten the feeling that real competence with the method has suffered some. Some newer members sometimes seem weak on the basics.
And if the minis have drifted off topic, they need to be honestly critiqued and culled.
New entries in the “Debate Advice and Style” thread used to always be visible in the right hand margin…that was a much-used and very central thread back then.
New members, you need to post some of your swarm comments on the working thread where older members can take a look at them.
And I hope that we haven’t gotten shy about correcting each other. An unfortunate consequence of the harsh tone that has often characterized this site is that many…I know it’s true of some…are frightened to expose themselves here.
So let’s be kind in our words and tone here so we can critique each other…and honestly, Bob, if we continue I would ask that of yourself too…people aren’t going to ask for instruction if they believe they may be called “idiots”!
With a collegial feeling, let’s go back to critiquing each others’ swarm posts when it’s necessary.
I urge very strongly that you keep Bugs up and running. Whatever’s been happening, things would be a lot worse without Bugs. This central location is the only hope IMO for keeping the Mantra as it should be, since the centrifugal forces on the Mantra are so strong.
If you need to stop doing the blogs, Lord knows we could spend the next 20 years studying the blogs you’ve done already. Just back up some number of years and start running every two or three days the successive blogs starting from some previous point in time.
That we aren’t in shape to run with some of your new ideas may be true. Without our group having a deep control of just the Mantra material, introduction of anything new will make it seem like “anything goes.” Unfortunately.
Let’s tighten up and sharpen our use of our core weapon, and deepen our mastery of it to the point that we can take up new weapons without making a bungle of all of our weapons.
#6 by Henry Davenport on 10/28/2013 - 10:07 pm
Good grief, I had no idea I’d written something so long, and I can’t edit.
#7 by Jason on 10/28/2013 - 11:22 pm
I agree we need to be able to correct/guide/coach each other on our postings pretty directly, with it being understood we wouldn’t even do it if the respect wasn’t there.
BUT, that should not open the door to abusive macho behavior just because someone gets off on it. Especially if it has nothing to do with actual Mantra work.
#8 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 12:17 am
Your comment makes me sad, because it shouldn’t need to be written. But of course it does need to be written.
And Bob, if you’re reading this, your readiness to vent at us in the way you do when we goof sets a horrible example for anyone here that has a desire to be uncivil. Frankly, that is a critical problem of this site, and IMO is a big reason you ended up needing to write the blog you wrote today.
If we would maintain a feeling here in which everyone felt safe to be critiqued, people would not drift off course so badly, but we can hardly enforce civility among ourselves when you set the example for anyone who wants to tear someone a new one! Yeah, it appears I have a little residue of anger about that.
But I also see with a clear head that I’m correct in this. I’ve been associated with a few groups and I can compare.
#9 by Steadiness on 10/28/2013 - 10:17 pm
With all due respect, Mr. Whitaker, you’re not the only person to have noticed that the anti-Whites love the words “diversity” and “hate”. Here’s some Google ngram data for these words
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=racist%2C+diversity%2C+hate&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cracist%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cdiversity%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Chate%3B%2Cc0
Diversity has been their favorite word since the mid-sixties, jumping in the late ’80s. Racist became more popular in the ’90s, peaking around 2000.
I am actually surprised that peak racist was in 1997 and peak diversity was in 2003. I would have expected peak racist to be in 2005 and peak diversity around now, if yet. Hate is still on an upswing, though, it has a curious trajectory compared to their other favorite words, probably since it primarily refers to an emotion.
Anyway, this isn’t like the news, Jews, and crime statistics thing. Those are arguments the anti-Whites _want_ to have. The anti-Whites do not want to discuss the fact that they have defined diversity to mean nothing more than non-Whites.
What do the “anti-racists” say when they want to say that there are too many White people? For example, when that probe landed on Mars and they were embarrassed that in that control room everyone was White.
They say “there needs to be more diversity”.
That’s why diversity just means less Whites, or diversity is code for White genocide.
So they cheer when whatever organization is X% diverse. And then I say that it needs more diversities, and they glare at me (this has happened in real life).
Anyway, they’ve been using the word “hate” since the days of Lincoln Rockwell’s Hate Bus (Yes, We Do Hate). I really don’t know what to do with that. It’s harder to flip the script on an emotion than on a cynically branded concept.
#10 by Steadiness on 10/28/2013 - 10:33 pm
ngram is fun. Here’s a graph of all their favorite words that I can think of
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=racist%2Cdiversity%2Cdiverse%2Cmulticultural%2Cempowerment%2Chate%2Cprejudice%2Ctolerance%2Cprivilege%2Cequality&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cracist%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cdiversity%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cdiverse%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cmulticultural%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cempowerment%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Chate%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cprejudice%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Ctolerance%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cprivilege%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cequality%3B%2Cc0
#11 by Henry Davenport on 10/28/2013 - 10:40 pm
“I really don’t know what to do with that.”
My suggestion for a short response:
“Hate” is just a word you hide behind while you carry out White Genocide, anti-white.
Sidestep and deliver a Mantra punch, or better, flip the script:
If Africa were being flooded with millions of non-Africans, and Africans were forced to assimilate with them and be blended out of existence, would you tell any African who protested the genocide of his race that he was full of “hate”?
No, you just use the h-word to carry out the genocide of Whites.
You say you’re anti-racist. What you are is anti-white!
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
I had to be shown how to do that for months before it suddenly clicked, and then it was suddenly easy.
Old-timers here, be willing to write out something like what I just did for newer bugsters whenever they say or post something that shows they need to see an example of how to do it!
Steadiness, are you someone who’s been here longer than myself but has a new name? Lol! 😀
#12 by Undercover Lover on 10/28/2013 - 11:05 pm
What on earth do you mean by BUGS is over?
Are you telling us all to go home?
Stop spreading the mantra?
Is this some kind of test?
Are you taking a break?
I don’t honestly believe you’ve given up on fighting white genocide.
#13 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 10/28/2013 - 11:24 pm
You”re gonna leave us now?
What are you looking for coach? Perfection? We all know thats not attainable.
We will carry on and we will END WHITE GENOCIDE.
I cant believe you are ending BUGS.
We wont quit on our people.
#14 by Jason on 10/29/2013 - 3:14 am
As long as this link exists, we can continue mass postings and pick categories for easy replies!
http://mantra.awardspace.us/
#15 by LinuxLewis on 10/29/2013 - 7:55 am
I don’t even remember the username/email i used to create that site – so it will be up forever or until awardspace takes it down… regardless – Gar5 has his page up and i also have a few up as well
#16 by Henry Davenport on 10/28/2013 - 11:58 pm
I just posted this comment to the preceding blog, but I think it explains in part why some of the things Bob is upset about have been happening, so I’m going to repost it here:
There is no reason, except the lack of workers, why we should not repeat the Mantra as is with only this change at the end:
“Diversity is a code word for anti-White.”
The whole discussion leads as naturally to that conclusion as it does to “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
Bob, there are two EXCELLENT reasons for your NOT encouraging that, one of which has been made evident by this thread.
1. But first, the simple reason: “Winstons taste good like a cigarette should,” and no ad man would have dreamt of softening the hammering of that into every American’s mind by also introducing, “Winstons smell good like a cigarette should.”
2. The Mantra seems easy to yourself maybe, but it’s taken most of us tremendous effort to break our habits and use the Mantra method. All the deeper mental and emotional habits of those of us who are working with the Mantra, and of those who are coming to the Mantra and will be coming to it, operate constantly and strongly to change the Mantra into the same-old same-old. Maintaining the Mantra method in the years ahead is going to be very difficult, because the Mantra method contradicts all natural habits of mind (e.g., just sticking to one thing, whatEVER it is, is almost un-American!) The centrifugal forces working on the Mantra to spin it out of its orbit and into a zillion pieces flying in every conceivable direction are immense.
I believe the only way to keep that from happening is a rather rigid orthodoxy that is very, very slow to admit ANY new thing AT ALL. (Just look what happened to the Catholic Church when it loosened up a bit…when Catholics all of a sudden didn’t have to eat fish on Friday…I was already an atheist, but I recall the shock…and look what followed)
I think we could probably survive branching out very, very slightly into items like “anti-whitism,” and “diversity is a code word for White Genocide,” but suggesting any alternative rendering of a part of the Mantra itself, and, of all things, an alternative to the Mantra’s signature phrase, I think will create the horrible unintended precedent of “anything goes.” The Mantra will be what goes.
#17 by StopWhiteGeNOcide on 10/29/2013 - 12:00 am
You’re just making it worse.
#18 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 12:24 am
How am I making it worse?
And it’s slipped my memory who you were before the name change, if you feel like reminding me.
#19 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 12:27 am
I suspect the reason you think I’m making it worse is because I’m actually trying to address the problem, or rather the part of the problem I’m aware of. I grew up in a family that never faced problems…it was kind of a White thing in the social stratum of my family back in the 40s and 50s…and I’ve had quite enough of it.
#20 by StopWhiteGeNOcide on 10/29/2013 - 3:25 am
Bob said, the anti-Whites changed their tactics, in response to our attack on “racist”. He pointed out the next target, so we can keep the pressure on and he got stupid blather in response.
HD, your mentality is one that is prevalent at SF. That being, numbers of people is all that matters. You should know by now, numbers mean absolutely nothing, if you are ineffective.
And in your appeal to Bob, of all things, you used a membership organization to make your point! I said you are making it worse, because you’re confirming Bob’s reason to retire.
#21 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 1:26 am
SWG, I remember you now! 🙂
———-
Asgardian can’t post, and asked me to put up this for him:
“This is more demoralizing than ANYTHING a Anti White has ever said to me.”
“You mean alot to us coach, but I refuse to quit.” And I WILL NOT and CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.”
“For almost two years now I have been at this, I have learned so much and I am so grateful. Everything I ever needed to know I learned at BUGS.”
We will carry on coach, we will end White Genocide.
#22 by ElectricWhiteRabbit on 10/29/2013 - 1:55 am
This is just sad. Bob are you really ready to give up on ALL of us just because of a few dimwits?
I will keep swarming, Bob gave up on us, hopefully us BUGSers WON’T give up our fight on White genocide.
#23 by Jason on 10/29/2013 - 3:38 am
I doubt it was any 1 or 3 people that made Bob reconsider. Instead it was the fact that as a group we couldn’t effectively bring them along, couldn’t regulate ourselves, and he realized years of basic work would be necessary all over again.
Some of us are too intellectual.
Some of us are too much into being a “badass” toward others in the group or bragging about how they made an anti-White surrender from a mighty verbal assault.
Some of us see being pro-White as mainly a form of “artistic self expression”, not serious work.
Some of us are very impatient.
Most of us, being human, have a bit all all those traits.
The only think i can suggest, for what it’s worth, to Bob is, continue to go forward AS If you have a disciplined, mature group behind you. You have no idea who is reading this blog. And it might give the rest of us more structure.
#24 by StopWhiteGeNOcide on 10/29/2013 - 3:50 am
Good summation Jason. I still think this place was of far higher quality, before BUGS got attention.
Does anyone know what Bob means by returning to Whitaker Online? I assume he is still going to blog. How will that be different to BUGS?
#25 by right-to-live on 10/29/2013 - 3:52 am
I wanted to thank you, Bob, for all your dedication, work and leadership in ending white genocide. I’m very sorry that I will not have a chance to work with you and the others here, as I am a newcomer.
It has been quite a journey to go from being angered by ridiculous anti-white policies to realizing that this is actually about genocide. It took me a while to really accept that and let it sink in. I’ve gone through all the stages of grief around it (anger, denial, depression, etc.) and now I’m ready to fight.
I have found the armaments I was seeking in the BUGS arsenal and the Mantra is a godsend. I realize that I know precious little about this type of defense against genocide, so I hope that this site will remain up so that I can learn and do what I can.
Thank you, Bob. You have offered up some very tough reality and I know I can never go back to sleep again. God bless.
#26 by Cleric_Preston on 10/29/2013 - 4:30 am
Ok, I think I’ve got the basics, find the contradiction and point it out over and over and over and over and over again.
If the comment doesn’t specifically point out ” It’s Genocide ” and ” ‘Anti-racist’ is a codeword for Anti-White ” it’s off topic.
Whatever the enemy justifies Genocide, SAY ‘You’re trying to Justify Genocide’ and keep making your point, ditto for stupid questions (tailgating)
Don’t take my foot of their neck until the corpse starts to stink.
———————-
I don’t care what the rest of you do, tomorrow I’m getting up and will be doing the same thing I’ve done for the last 3 years.
One day Bob isn’t going to be here to hold our hands anymore , I think we need to grow up and get used to it.
At least Bob will still be around to give us the wisdom of his articles, as he is able.
Get back to THE BASICS and everything will be fine.
#27 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 5:52 am
SWG, you posted to me on the preceding blog, Diversity is a Code Word for Anti-White:
You aren’t getting it. Bob says the anti-Whites have changed their tactics, in response to our attack on “racist”. To keep attacking a target that no longer exists is stupid.
You’re correct that I didn’t understand (and thanks)…I still can’t quite believe it…that Bob is actually saying in that blog that we should change the last line of the Mantra.
Now that that last line is finally appearing on banners and signs, etc.
And why? Because:
After tens of thousands of repetitions we have blasted the term “anti-racist” to hell.
Having done one things as I knew we could, I was idiot enough to hope that we might follow up that win. I noticed the words they are now hiding behind, “diversity” and “Hate.”
Okay, Bob and I sort of had a conversation before about “anti-racist,” and I surely have to grant that his sense of there being or not being a shift is extremely likely to be much better than my own.
But I don’t see any sizable shift (but I’m not out there swarming). Six years ago when I was posting at Knoxville’s newspaper, the posters there were screaming “racist,” “diversity” and “hate,” and when I stopped completely about a year ago they were still screaming that.
I’ll accept Bob’s sense of the overall shift over my own sense, but has the shift been so great as to warrant changing the last line of the Mantra now that it’s beginning to seriously spread?
I just googled “racism 2013″…there were articles in Wash Post and Wash Times and elsewhere with headlines saying that even the gov’t shut down was maybe because of “racism.” If I ever get “blasted to hell,” I hope I’ll get up from it in as good shape as the charge of racism still seems to be in.
Okay, at least I understand (I think) what is being said now, and I’ve certainly had my own say, so I hope not to spend any more time on this myself. I have work to do, however antiquated my notion of the target may be.
So Bob you’re right, I lack whatever would be necessary to make that leap, at least overnight, so if that lack in myself and possibly in others is enough to force you into retirement, well, I’m going to resist saying the obvious.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” is no longer that useful????
I feel sorry for all the TV news folk in those Oregon stations and Alabama stations–they’re going to get fired for reporting yesterday’s news.
#28 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 6:16 am
I’ve spent almost 9 hours today solely on this blog. That’s what happens to me if I post on these blogs, or sometimes if I post anywhere on this site other than on the working thread. I need to remember to stop posting here except for the working thread. Any help with that is much appreciated. I simply forget my resolve. My friends here…please remind me when you see that I’ve forgotten.
#29 by Bob on 10/29/2013 - 8:16 am
This is the first time in a long time we have LOOKED like a seminar!
#30 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 9:44 am
So Bob, do you think we should sometimes end a mini as I’ll end this one:
ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with third world non-whites, and Whites are forced by law to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.
The people carrying out this genocide say they support diversity.
What they really support is White Genocide.
Diversity is a code word for White Genocide.
I could see doing that about one out of every 15 times (or one out of every 10 at the MOST), but, for all the reasons I’ve stated above, no more.
The smooth road of the usual would have a sudden bump in it, and that seems good to me. But bumps that occur very frequently seem bad to me. So no more than one bump in ten pieces of good road.
I can’t get my mind around “Diversity is a code word for anti-white.” Having an adjective correspond to a noun will make awkward the two separate statements we usually precede the last statement with.
Maybe this:
The people carrying out this genocide say they support diversity.
What they really support is anti-whitism.
Diversity is a code word for anti-whitism.
I don’t like using “anti-whitism” there as much as I like using “White Genocide.” But maybe once out of every 15 times.
Genocide seems to me the core of the Mantra, and the three statements about anti-whites at the end reinforce the fact that the genocide is against Whites only, and also destroy the term anti-racist, but most importantly they create the phrase “anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” that we want to eventually be as common as was the jingle “Winstons taste good like a cigarette should.”
Isn’t that last goal a very important one?
We’ve made a lot of progress with it doing just as we’ve been doing. I feel nervous suggesting messing with it even one out of every 15 times, because the psychology of giving permission to do that is risky: users will think oh, I can say any old thing I like the sound of at the end of a mini.
#31 by Bob on 10/29/2013 - 10:01 am
You people are right — like I said, this is the first SEMINAR in a long time — I can’t just close up shop here.
#32 by Simmons on 10/29/2013 - 10:15 am
I made the comment Bob quoted than had his tantrum over. I swear sometimes.
It was my initial two second at most reaction to a new soundbite, but NO now I wake up to read temper tantrum and written dysentery.
I’M SORRY
#33 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 10:39 am
Sys Op writes (about our mini-mantras, I’m pretty sure):
“Let us know where culling is needed (by those who have been successfully spreading the Mantra for awhile – Bob style).”
I’m not very familiar with the various sources of minis, and I’m trying to think how we can do that.
Sys Op, should we have a thread, “Suggested minis, etc. to be tossed”?
Then when any of us comes across a mini we think needs to be tossed, we copy it onto that thread with a note of which page on which mini source we spotted it?
Or is there a better way?
I’d wanted to go through all the sources of minis and select out the ones I thought were the very best and put them in a thread on White GeNOcide Project. If someone wants to take over the petition project I’ll get to work on that 🙂
#34 by Bob on 10/29/2013 - 11:20 am
NO, HD, you are doing what we cannot replace!
#35 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 2:19 pm
Thanks, Bob 🙂
Most of the 129 Stalwarts who mainly get the petitions up now are respondees to group invitations I’ve PM’ed at Stormfront.
On the SF threads, I tell Stormfronters that just 1000 of them as Stalwarts will put THIRTY STOP WHITE GENOCIDE “petitions” on public display at the White House every month, and engage the media multiplier to hammer our memes and phrases into the minds of their vast White audience regularly..
I point out that that will be the first time that our voice will be an ongoing part of the national discourse on race.
I explain that that will presage the end of the taboo against our voice being raised in the national conversation on race.
I tell them that lifting that taboo will mean, “free at last”
All of them except 129 say, “ho hum.”
Jack Boot says (twice), “back off!”
Ha! Now I have myself laughing, which is the frame of mind I need to carry on!
One thing bugsters don’t do is back off, and for some reason that gives me hilarious pleasure whenever I observe it.
#36 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 3:31 pm
I have to add to my last sentence…I wasn’t planning to have any petitions Nov 1, since the gov’t shutdown has made the Oct. 1 petitions overlap so far into November.
But a bugster/Stalwart insisted and insisted that we needed to stick to the program of having petitions on the FIRST of every month, and not have a gap at the end of November. Finally I realized he was right!
Most people would have stopped after my first “No.” But not a bugster! I LOVE that!!
#37 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 10/29/2013 - 11:58 am
@stopwhite genocide….it couldnt get anyworse.
What bob said yesterday was more demoralizing than anything any anti white has ever said to me.
#38 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 1:11 pm
Asgardian asked me to post this for him:
Bob you built this car.
You put the key In the ignition.
You turned it on.
You were driving by yourself for quite some time.
Then you got a few passengers.
The your passengers read the map and turned on the music.
You cant leave now that the party is just getting started.
Lets drive it through their front window. 🙂
#39 by SwampRabbit on 10/29/2013 - 2:50 pm
I’ve used “Diversity is just a code word for no White people.” several times. Then, follow it up with, “Nobody is going to African, Asian (etc.) nations and saying they need more diversity. They ONLY do it to White countries. ONLY White children are affected. It’s geNOcide”
The word that I’m seeing a lot of is “multiculturalism”, as in, ‘You’re afraid of multiculturalism”. I use it the same as “Diversity”. Just say, “Multiculturalism is a code word for NO White people. Nobody protests for more multiculturalism in Asian or African nations…Or mexico, Israel, etc.
They only want “multicult-” in White nations. It’s Genocide.” I always bring it back to geNOcide. And end with antiRacist is a code word for antiWhite. And it does seem to infuriate some people. I’ve had a some start to say they DO want to get rid of Whites, so I just ask them over and over, “So, you support the geNOcide of MY race, antiWhite?”, getting them to repeat what they said.
Another thing they like to say is “You’re afraid of change.” or “You’re afraid of losing your White privilege.” “Change” is easy to handle. “You only want to change White nations. Nobody says African nations are too Black and need FORCED immigration and assimilation for change.”
Same for privilege, “nobody talks about Black privilege, Arab privilege, Asian privilege in their nations…” Then I bring it back to antiRacist only want to change White nations. antiRacist is a code word for antiWhite.”
One thing I’ve been trying to do is be sure to use “nations”, as opposed to “countries”, because of the UN opposition to “nations”, which has the appearance of actually being opposition to White nations above any others.
#40 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 3:08 pm
Good stuff!
“the UN opposition to ‘nations’”
Could you or someone explain that a little…I’m totally in the dark.
#41 by SwampRabbit on 10/29/2013 - 5:40 pm
In a nutshell, the main reason that I try to use “nations” is because the idea of “Nationalism” is typically based on a group of people with common RACE, language, heritage, cultural values, whereas a “country” typically refers to a political entity, which can be any hodgepodge collection of people with no really distinguishable unifying characteristics.
#42 by -frank- on 10/29/2013 - 3:21 pm
SwampRabbit, I mentioned a “new front” some anti-Whites are opening up, by using the term “denier”.
“Denier” is an interesting word, because it ASSUMES that the target is “doing something wrong” because they don’t go along with “What everybody knows is true”. In one simple word, a huge amount of GUILT is imposed, because the target has been told he is morally defective for “denying” the obvious truth.
I think we should use this term also, precisely because it loads the “burden of proof” on whoever you call a “denier”.
Perhaps I’m looking for critical feedback on this.
I can see this fitting in with your work by asserting “The UN supports nation-hood for any non-White nation, but is in nation-hood denial for White nations.” (or similar)
“The UN punishes nation-denial in all nations but White nations, but where Whites live, the UN supports White Nation Denial”.
#43 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 3:58 pm
Okay, I’m beginning to get the idea about “nations.”
Re “denial,” here’s a petition that maybe needs a better title, and all the ones I write (like this one) tend to be pretty much the same because I’m not swarming and not seeing varied minis that I could use. Sunlit Iceberg has written a couple of petitions (this month’s Liberia one, which I think is this month’s best) and has improved quite a few others.
Lol, Frank, I hope you will be inspired sometime during the remaining three years of this project to write a petition! Just open a corner of your fine mind for some idea about a petition to enter, and sometime when you’re in the mood for a little extra fun, sign in at the White House and click the “Create a petition” button and use their windows that make the process really easy and pleasant. You can go all the way to the end, and your petition doesn’t get submitted unless you click the “submit” button. I’m confident that like Sunlit’s, your petition will not read anything like all of mine do!
Denounce White Genocide Denial as Un-American!
The United States and all other White countries are being flooded with third world non-whites, and Whites are forced by law to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.
Massive immigration and forced assimilation is genocide when it’s done in Tibet, and it’s genocide when it’s done in White countries, by UN Convention:
“Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”
And yet, when White Genocide isn’t being justified in our country, it’s being denied!
Mr. Obama, it’s your duty as President to awaken a nation that is in denial!
White Genocide deniers say they’re anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
#44 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 4:48 pm
The idea for this petition was from Bugster/Stalwart Another One.
#45 by AnotherOne on 10/29/2013 - 9:49 pm
Thank you for the acknowledgement. 🙂
#46 by Sunlit Iceberg on 10/30/2013 - 3:35 pm
What if you replace
“And yet, when White Genocide isn’t being justified in our country, it’s being denied!”
With
“Those who are denying White Genocide today will be justifying it tomorrow!”
Or maybe
“Those who are denying White Genocide in our country today will be justifying it tomorrow!”
?
#47 by Henry Davenport on 10/29/2013 - 4:01 pm
Frank, feel welcome to write a petition on the denial idea. It would be a thrill to have two very different ones.
#48 by SwampRabbit on 10/29/2013 - 5:45 pm
I don’t really try to insert the UN into my discussions. But, I try to keep in my own mind that UN policies almost ALWAYS seem directed at the destruction of WHITE nations. They don’t call for diversity, geNOcide, in nonWhite nations. Check out Bob’s Porchtalk, “I Support the United Nations”.
#49 by SwampRabbit on 10/29/2013 - 11:12 pm
“White geNOcide denier” sounds a lot like “holocaust denier”.
Personally, I like the tactic of taking existing familiar terms and making them ours.
But, I try to stick to the Mantra, White geNOcide, and I don’t post about nations/nationhood, per se. That will just confuse the 50% of people with below average intelligence. I just brought “nations” up because Nationalism is part of our subject, in that our NATIONS, rather than countries, are what is being destroyed by White geNOcide.
This introduces to the audience, on a more or less subliminal level, the fact that ‘Nationalism”, specifically “White Nationalism”, is not really a new, or necessarily evil, thing.
#50 by Sunlit Iceberg on 10/29/2013 - 3:14 pm
Bob has grown tired of being one hundred miles ahead of his own team. And of having a clear vision of what exactly must be done and how but not being able to make his team do it.
Everyone is imperfect. Your team is imperfect. But you will have to do what you want to do with what you have. At least until it all becomes popular and profitable and everyone says that they knew it all along.
#51 by SwampRabbit on 10/29/2013 - 5:39 pm
In a nutshell, the main reason that I try to use “nations” is because the idea of “Nationalism” is typically based on a group of people with common RACE, language, heritage, cultural values, whereas a “country” typically refers to a political entity, which can be any hodgepodge collection of people with no really distinguishable unifying characteristics.
#52 by Daniel Genseric on 10/31/2013 - 3:04 am
Words cannot express how pissed I am after reading this article, Bob. You’re right about my failing to push Diversity is a code word for white genocide.
However, this post reads like a thumb-sucking, defeatist, All is Lost, progressive wrote it. “The seminar is over.” You’re wrong.
Diversity is a code word for the genocide of my race.
Diversity is a code word for the genocide of my race.
Diversity is a code word for the genocide of my race.