Despite all else, the Western World still considers the final arbiter of truth to be reality.
We all take it for granted that statistical proof MATTERS. In science, no matter who said what, the final authority is evidence.
No other society was ever aware that there was such a thing as statistical proof.
Doctor Ignaz Semmelweis cut childbed fever death, which had killed a major percentage of mothers and babies in that ward, to zero, year after year, but even as late as the mid-nineteenth century, it made no difference. The University Doctors of Medicine would not stoop to washing their hands between dissections and delivering babies.
How did Newton ever convince a world that still looked to translations of Aristotle and the Old Testament for its cosmology to look to gravity instead?
How did we go from Galen and bleeding to real medicine inside the nineteenth century?
Every previous society had built its entire intellectual life on NOTHING.
To be an intellectual you QUOTED: “It is written …”
Every intellectual stated that men have more teeth than women, because Aristotle had said so. Even if someone had counted teeth endlessly they would have convinced nobody.
What is unique is that the West has, in SOME cases, allowed evidence to actually defeat Nothing..
Oriental Wisdom and the American Indian Wisdom we hear about were Nothing.
Creation Myths were adopted because they sounded good and “It is written.”
Then Isaac Newton came along saying that the whole universe could be explained by using simple GRAVITY!
Occam’s Razor knocked the whole gigantic structure of Western Confusionism down!
In a century — AFTER the “Renaissance” — all the Ancient Authorities and all the crap about “balancing humors” was destroyed and modern medicine began.
None of these revolutions could have occurred outside the Western world, because there was no way to go gradually from the Flat Earth to Newton, from Galen to medical sanity.
You simply could not show the slightest respect for Galen’s Balance of Humors and move to Modern Medicine.
In order to introduce Occam’s Razor, you had to state flatly that a thousand years of everything that had been “intellectualism” was pure crap!
Exactly the same holds for Mantra Thinking.
There is no room for Respectful Opposition.
All present political debate is a pile of horsehockey, and there is simply no nice way to say that.
#1 by -Dave- on 11/24/2013 - 12:22 pm
It is just like the now with the white man invented technology of 3D printing.
It is a trip to the gallows for the world’s entire installed manufacturing base. The recycling industry will thrive as China’s industrial platform is sold for scrap.
Yet even today, in the face of overwhelming evidence, the grey eminences are saying “China is the future”. They even taut China’s “superior ability to implement reforms”.
The REAL opposition, which is reality itself, is never respectful. It is called a death sentence.
And those not so deluded inherit the world.
#2 by Jason on 11/24/2013 - 12:55 pm
This was a powerful post and I needed it! No one would speak respectfully to some doctor who refused to wash his hands before surgery and was getting ready to throw a bucket of leeches on you.
Despite the Church of PC, RACE will soon be seen as real by everyone. The only proper response to the crowd that claims race is a “social construct” is sneering laughter. THEY are the ones who truly keeps societies trapped in Dark Ages.
#3 by Jason on 11/24/2013 - 1:06 pm
To be an intellectual you QUOTED:.
“It is written …”
Google will be the ultimate intellectual. No PhD can touch it. It can quote a billion lines a second. Memorizing and Reciting is about to become a dirt cheap skill. Artificial intelligence programs already exist that do a better job at diagnosis medical problems than flesh-and-blood doctors.
If all a person can do is Memorize and Recite, they won’t have anything to do in coming generations. Law, Tax, accounting, all of it, will be made easily available, context sensitive and dirt cheap.
All the support systems that keep Wordism going will be undercut. What will be in demand? People who can THINK. Meaning thought about real concrete facts.
#4 by Simmons on 11/25/2013 - 2:29 pm
“Any proof of that?” “Do you really still believe that?”
We are interrogators, they are the cultists spewing the party line, once the cultists are made to feel the whiplash of responsibility the cult and party line are not so much fun anymore.
#5 by The Beef on 11/25/2013 - 3:10 pm
Dust, Turds, and Elephants.
The way to defeat the “NoTHING” is to point out the contradictions.
Those obvious things, that when pointed out over and over again, can no longer be ignored.
You can point out the dust on the walls and turds on the floor all day while they call you a Heretic – so I prefer to point out the ELEPHANT in the room!
They can deal with turds and dust, they have been teaching the NoTHING to explain all that away for years.
Dust and Turds will be complained about the same way people complain about crime stats and the unfairness of affirmative action.
You can certainly make the NoTHING uncomfortable by talking about the Turds, that is why need affirmative action if Race does not exist. They have been trained on how to clean up that Turd. They don’t like it, but they can handle it.
White Genocide is the Elephant in the room. They cannot deal with that. It destroys any and all credibility. So you just keep pointing it out, over and over, and then point out that they are justifying its presence, or trying to deny it is there, until NONE can ignore the NoTHING.
#6 by Jason on 11/26/2013 - 7:57 am
Excellent new podcast by Beefcake
http://whitegenocideproject.com/beefcakes-advanced-stage-episode-2/
#7 by Simmons on 11/26/2013 - 10:27 am
Our side props up the NOTHINGNESS by quibbling the details, not basically calling it the nothingness.
An example; The Blank Slate Theory ungirds the whole liberal/jewish project of the welfare state scam and of course our genocide.
It is a complete fraud, no evidence exists for it yet our intellectuals and the hangers on only quibble the details, hence it survives. We literally have PHDs and their groupies debating the how many angels hypothesis.
Our side is composed of useful idiots who would never think of asking a liberal for any proof, instead they tailgate, forever.
#8 by -Gar5- on 11/26/2013 - 2:46 pm
Bob, you remember our old enemy Noel Ignatiev?
He’s retired, BUT his final lecture was the most blatantly anti-White thing I have ever heard from a serious anti-White.
http://whitegenocideproject.com/hot-news-anti-white-professor-calls-for-suicide-of-white-males/
#9 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 11/26/2013 - 4:25 pm
That is true Coach, there is nothing correct in Political Correctness. It is not kinda wrong, or sorta wrong, it is just wrong!
#10 by Daniel Genseric on 11/26/2013 - 5:00 pm
Something I have been working on. Putting it in Bob’s article so he can see and critique as he sees fit. This was written in response to #PolarBearing or the #KnockoutGame articles:
—————-
#Diversity’s greatest achievement is to demonize, demoralize and now DEMAND acts of violence against the very people who built the civilization they now enjoy.
“Anti-racists” claim they want to cure The Race Problem through fostering Diversity and Tolerance. They set about doing this by bringing in TENS OF MILLIONS of non-whites into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
What if I said the cure to the RACE problem in Africa was to bring in TENS OF MILLIONS of non-Africans and force-assimilate them? How long would it take any sane black man to realize I’m not championing Diversity, I’m talking about the solution to the Black problem.
But, if I point out this obvious program of genocide against Europeans everywhere I’m a whitesupremacistHATERwhowantstodeportblackstoafrica.
“Anti-racists” claim they want Diversity. What these anti-whites want is Eurocide.
Diversity is a code word for white genocide.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white