Archive for January, 2014

The Aussies warming up for the March 15th Banner Drive

As Bob pointed out in his article below:Aus Banner Drop

” … a few dedicated people ON MESSAGE is more effective than a hundred million dollar organization that is OFF message.”

The SPLC raises millions in “terror funds” that finance their anti-White Hate programs, like raising money to force integrate Northern Idaho. Chasing down Whitey for compulsory diversity.

But We at BUGS are a group of fanatics. And we ARE exposing this anti-White system with simple obvious truths, we don’t have millions.

This is exercising TRUE Power.

Way to go to the Guys and Girls in Ozzy for getting this banner knocked up for all the commuters to see on Australia Day. Great work!

March 15th is shaping up to be a huge worldwide coordinated effort. We are going to appear like one hell of a BIG group. Currently the Banner Drive has raised $2,495. With the additional funds, Renegade Broadcasting will be producing stickers and fliers for those willing to distribute them on March 15th.

Should you wish to participate please email me at laura_fitz-gerald@hotmail.com

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

14 Comments

Who is Funding BUGS!?

Shades of our old three-person no-budget Populist Forum!

That group, consisting of me, my wife and a press photographer sposored many press conferences and we sponsored a forty-thousand person joint march against busing and lewd textbooks. We jammed up Washington, DC at Rush Hour to get the Independent Truckers a fair deal during the Oil Boycott.

The Communist Daily World did a feature on us, describing the Populist Forum as an “enormous, heavily financed network of organizations…”

We were the “giant right-wing conspiracy” Mrs. Clinton was to describe some years later.

Well, BUGS, welcome to the “Giant Conspiracy Club!”

Someone in Birmingham or elsewhere saw one of our bridge drop signs and someone else, maybe in Washington State, replied breathlessly, “I saw the same thing HERE!”

She clearly thought that BUGSERS were EVERYWHERE!”

But for me what took the cake was another commenter demanding “Who is FINANCING all this!?”

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

16 Comments

Wanna Try Bigamy?

These are meanderings where I put things that may be of little use to our cause but that fascinate me.

It has been over half a century since I instructed Political Science classes — yes, I started when I was 19 — so my case law is not up to date.

But back then it was perfectly legal for a man to have two legally wedded wives, and vice versa, both marriages officially recognized by the United States Government. A Supreme Court in the 1940s declared that North Carolina was under no obligation to recognize the quick and easy Nevada divorces, so a person who was legally divorced in Nevada and in all the states that recognized Nevada divorces was still legally married in states that sided with North Carolina divorcees.

In the east some of the states that took a North Carolina view were actually right in between states that recognized Nevada divorces. Only a handful of lawyers would knew which way their particular state law went.

The result was some pretty interesting legal and detective work, as well as adventure trying to catch a divorcee down in the right state at the right time to get the spouse’s rights.

As I say, this situation lasted for decades and may have been cleared up now that the Bible Belt is not quite so rigid on divorce.

South Carolina was the last state to allow divorce under ANY circumstances. SC’s first divorce law was passed in 1948.

Stuff like this fascinates me, so I ought to have a place to write it down even if it bores you.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

Indictment

After the official signing of Unconditional Surrender of May 8, 1945, Herman Goering tried to turn himself in. In full uniform, with World War I medals on, he presented himself to the Allies.

They promptly took off his medals, jailed him and put him on trial.

Anti-whites seem to think THEIR genocide is a matter where they can just admit they were not wholly correct and come back into society wearing their medals and degrees like the neoconservatives did.

We are NOT respectable conservatives.

White Genocide is not just a debate.

It is an indictment.

Yes, we demand the right to bring the charges as a matter of free speech. Any group which is just emerging from oppression first has to seek the barest, most basic rights.

But we will not accept neo-pro-whites.

Confessing a crime is the first step. The second is the trial.

The same people who tried to destroy their own people can be expected to produce a lot of rats as their ship goes down.

And we are not demanding that even the last rats aboard die the way they killed Germans convicted of genocide.

They will bleed GREEN.

There will be no neo-pro-whites.

Right now, like all underdogs being bullied, pro-whites must fight for even the most basic rights.

That does NOT mean that we will SETTLE for only the most basic rights.

But “Gosh, we went too far on race!” is not our final goal.

We will not excuse generations of treason and humiliation by anti-white whites the way respectable conservatives welcomed neoconservatives in and gave them the driver’s seat of conservatism. A serial killer is not a hero if he gives up serial killing. One who plans and implements and cheers on the destruction of his own race is not treated as a hero because he switches sides when the heat is on.

What I say here will be warped into a demand for blood. The usual pro-white loudmouths who scream about “Tribunals!” will help the enemy distort what I am saying.

Repeat: Anti-whites will bleed GREEN, not RED.

But now that we’re beginning to see the first flickerings of a grassroots growth of anger, fury and resentment from a white population that has been terrorized into the Stockhom Syndrome for most of a century, we should be clear that that terrorism will have to be paid for as an example for the future.

Treason must once more be made a crime.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

29 Comments

The Knockout Game in a Coat and Tie

One major reason The Knockout Game was the first anti-white gambit to be outed was because the white public recognizes the Knockout Game as the perfect picture of anti-white power in America.

Anti-whites consist of a gang of anti-white minorities and their white toadies who get big cheers for hitting whites any way they feel like it, and the gang protects them. One second they call anyone who protests White Genocide a “white separatist.” The next moment they call anyone who attacks White Genocide a “white supremacist.”

No whites are allowed to defend themselves. No one is allowed to point out the obvious fact that you can’t be a white supremacist and a white separatist at the same time.

Almost every Founding Father was an opponent of slavery. But the solution was that blacks be sent back to Africa. You can’t be pro-slavery and want all the blacks back in Africa at the same time.

There was a black man — in coat and tie — shouting triumphantly at O’Reilly about how inevitable it was that whites would become a minority in America.

O’Reilly may be big stuff, but he is not allowed to shout back. We don’t even notice it by now, but only blacks and their toadies are allowed to shout on television.

Anti-whites routinely scream that white history shows whites are innately evil. They also ban anyone from saying that white history shows whites are innately superior.

Whites have never committed a unique crime, but they have an infinite number of unique achievements.

“Whites have never committed a unique crime, but they have an infinite number of unique achievements.”

We all know, if anyone were allowed to say that, what the instant response would be: Some black or his white toady would scream “HATE!”

They would professionally ruin whoever said it.

But unlike the Knockout Game, the random slugger would be on national TV in a coat and tie.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

26 Comments