Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

White Genocide is not a Theoretical Debate, It is a Criminal Charge

Posted by Bob on February 23rd, 2014 under Coaching Session

Adolf Eichmann was convicted in Israel for “Crimes Against Humanity,” a charge that Was invented in Israel and had never been used before.

Who decided where they took place: Nazi occupied Europe. He was not violating the law, he was carrying it out.

At the end of World War II, the saying “I was just following orders” became, for everybody from Goering down to a fourteen-year-old boy who had been ordered to police a concentration camp for the SS, became “No Defense.”

“I was just following orders” became the most discredited phrase in America.
 photo followingorders.png
So BUGS is not theorizing or trying to win a debate with reasonable people.

And anti-whites are, in fact, using exactly the same tactics as any felon who is faced with charges he cannot deny. They shout insults, they say that those bringing the charges are stupid, mean and ugly.

You together see this behavior all the time when a criminal is caught dead to rights.

Pro-whites outside of BUGS begin by accepting the premise that anti-whites are just following orders. They blame aliens for pushing White Genocide.

Those who have overriding loyalties, like anti-white Jews, are as guilty of genocide as any Nazi who carried out his orders. But the minorities are NOT guilty of treason.

As I have repeatedly pointed out, the Tenth Circle, the Circle of Ice, the worst place in Hell, was specifically reserved for TRAITORS. No other crime comes close to Treason.

“I was just following orders” or “I was just doing what my professor told me” is not accepted by any decent person as an excuse.

If we are “arguing,” we are only “arguing” the Case for the Prosecution.

  1. #1 by Richard on 02/23/2014 - 12:30 pm

    Bob, I do not understand what you are saying and implying with this: “Who decided they took place: Nazi occupied Europe. He was not violating the law, he was carrying it out.”

  2. #2 by Richard on 02/23/2014 - 12:42 pm

    After thinking a bit, here is my answer to my own question: Eichmann was involved in a war and supported killing Jews, but he was not a “traitor”. “Crimes against humanity” implies he was a traitor against humanity. It is unreasonable to say those non-Whites who push for White Genocide are “traitors”.

  3. #3 by -Gar5- on 02/23/2014 - 1:38 pm

    @ Richard, I think the point is that a law does not make something right.

    For example it is legal to support and call for White Genocide (a world without or with less White people, brought about by open borders and forced assimilation) in White countries.

    However, it is not right to support or call for White genocide – it is wrong.

  4. #4 by Simmons on 02/23/2014 - 5:41 pm

    Try using the personal pronoun “you” directed at an anti-white. That takes the debate beyond the abstract nonsense that so befuddles our intellectual Mommy Prof worshipping AMPWs and makes the debate personal.

    I’m sure Eichmann would have debated about “The Jews” for decades but you notice the jews were not up for it and specifically held him responsible for whatever he supposedly did. Imagine AmRen holding such a trial, they would end up in prison instead.

    You see folks we have the moral high ground and we really aim to hold those responsible for our plight publically responsible.

  5. #5 by Jason on 02/23/2014 - 6:44 pm

    They are pleading “No Contest” to the charge of genocide. Every time they evade, use personal attacks, accuse Whites of being evil, etc., they are pleading “No Contest”.

    They don’t deny being for White Genocide. Maybe 1 in 50 will say that. The rest attack us or deny such a crime as White Genocide can even exist (another thing criminals do).

    • #6 by Jason on 02/24/2014 - 5:02 am

      By the way, I certainly don’t mean we should accept “No Contest” on their part. They are GUILTY.

      • #7 by Daniel Genseric on 02/24/2014 - 5:03 pm

        “No contest” is the judicial equivalent of ‘the silence’.

        • #8 by Jason on 02/25/2014 - 4:00 am

          Yes. Imagine being accused of the worst crime on earth and not simply saying “Not Guilty”. These Anti-Whites KNOW they are guilty.

  6. #9 by WmWhite on 02/24/2014 - 11:53 am

    Comments of one frustrated white man I spoke to about white genocide:

    He agreed with my argument but thought the cause was hopeless, since the anti-white “power elite” are untouchable and lived in guarded and gated communities (and their children go to security conscious, private schools).

    He made another interesting point: you only get to see the ‘anti-white’ (power elite) and their children on TV, while ours are ‘out in the open,’ and fair game for all atrosities and perversions.

    Finally, after several beers he said something I hadn’t thought of:
    The non-white, anti-whites (my words for his description of the chosen tribe) that have control of our media and culture today didn’t start from the bottom-up … but started top-down by influencing our own ‘white elite’ and gaining control of our universities and schools systems. Interesting perspective.

    —anyway, just a rant (now I’ll go back to posting the real message: diversity IS white genocide).

    • #10 by Henry Davenport on 02/24/2014 - 8:02 pm

      I get that “top down / bottom up” argument sometimes at SF. I tell them that the mass media is at their disposal, but that they refuse to use it. Obama has handed them a Million Watt Megaphone to use to engage the mass media…all they have to do is put a couple of hundred thousand sets of initials on a White House “petition” on the first day of every month.

      After 11 months of that, about 130 non-bugster SF’ers are among the 165 Stalwarts that initial the petitions each month on the first, out of 282,000 SF members and 50,000 visitors to SF per day.

      And most of those not from my harangues, which just allow me to vent and keep my sanity, but from pleasant personal invitations that I mass-PM them.

      Nothing I say to them makes a dent really, IMO.

      I visited a Jewish friend recently that I hadn’t seen in a long time, and she got what we’re doing with my hardly needing to even explain it. I tell the SF’ers that if they were Jews, they’d get it too.

      No amount of sweet talk moves them.

      Apologies, Bob, I think I’m off topic.

      • #11 by Henry Davenport on 02/24/2014 - 8:09 pm

        I got momentarily confused which list I was thinking of…about 100 of the 165 Stalwarts are non-BUGSter SF’ers.

        Some BUGSters advise me to look elsewhere for Stalwarts, but the little experience I have in that convinces me that the huge numbers at SF are still the best place to get Stalwarts.

        A good number of the other 65 Stalwarts are Bugsters.

      • #12 by Henry Davenport on 02/24/2014 - 8:28 pm

        I’ll tell the SF’ers that by not becoming Stalwarts, they are following the orders of the anti-whites who they profess to despise. And that later, pleading “I was just following the orders of the anti-whites” will be no excuse.

      • #13 by Jason on 02/25/2014 - 4:03 am

        Funny thing is, when I post the Mantra or Minis the anti-Whites sometimes accuse me of following some Stormfront plan! Kind of irks me for them to get any credit for our work.

        But, you got some SF’ers willing to sign up every month and that is a miracle. And yeah, more than we can get anywhere else apparently.

        • #14 by Henry Davenport on 02/25/2014 - 11:51 am

          In the past I thought that “people are sheeple” was just a clever thing to say, but after a year of trying to get pro-Whites to initial White House “petitions” sufficiently to engage media in an ongoing and not just occasional way, I’m wiser.

          And TOO was much harder than SF.

          I incorporated “following anti-whites’ orders” into this morning’s SF comment:

          It’s taking me a ridiculously long time to learn that masses of people (such as there are at SF) do not respond to reason except of the most elementary sort, despite that I have understood very well that our practice in the mainstream is strongly based on that fact.

          A few individual pro-Whites presumably respond. But it’s not reason they’re responding to. They either have an ear for what we’re doing or they don’t.

          I heard a host on an internet pro-white radio show say that “Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for EVERYBODY” is demoralizing and that its repetition over and over will make Whites accept that arrangement! He wants to change it to, “Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for Whites.” Make it positive, you know? Sheesh.

          The man has no ear, so what can you say to him? You can explain that the way it’s already written engages because it points out the contradiction, but if he can’t FEEL that it’s stronger when he reads it, any analysis of why most readers DO feel its strength (as shown by our experience) is just empty intellectualization for him.

          Someday I will understand that what I’ve just written is true, and I will quit struggling at SF, and I’ll just write pleasant little comments there occasionally on various topics and send out my Stalwart invitations.

          Horus is always in my mind when I write this sort of thing, because he’s observed my insanity at SF for a couple of years now.

          • #15 by Henry Davenport on 02/25/2014 - 12:01 pm

            Hooray, I can now edit! Sys Op, thank you for whatever you did! 😀

          • #16 by Henry Davenport on 02/25/2014 - 12:55 pm

            “Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for EVERYBODY?” is strong as mass propaganda.

            “Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for Whites” is weak as mass propaganda, because most Whites still feel that they are the main deal in their countries…they already see White countries as being primarily for Whites, and they’ve been made to feel guilty about it. The direction in which things are headed, and how far things have already gone, hasn’t sunk in to them.

            Of course the host I mentioned finds individuals, and an increasing number of them, who are further along in their deprogramming, and his success in talking to them in the way he does convinces him that his approach is the right one also for the great mass of people that he hopes will tune into his show (but of course his listeners are mostly pro-whites or persons already some way along in that direction).

            Whereas our approach at BUGS is to erode the current anti-white Zeitgeist by introducing our memes and phrases into mass public conversation, is my understanding, rather than our methods being primarily aimed at converting assorted individuals to explicitly pro-white views.

            When we’ve successfully opened up public discussion to pro-white views, then the HUGE numbers of able, intelligent, articulate, but presently silent Whites out there will begin to speak and contribute their high ability to function to the repairs that are needed.

            But we misfits that Eric Hoffer says always populate mass movements in their beginnings will not be able to retire and take a rest, because whatever our disabilities may often be, our knowledge and understandings will be necessary.

  7. #17 by Henry Davenport on 02/25/2014 - 2:10 pm

    “Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for EVERYBODY?” is strong as mass propaganda.

    “Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for Whites” is weak as mass propaganda, because most Whites still feel that they are the main deal in their countries…

    Also, and probably more importantly, the second “version” makes it seem like we’re demanding that Africans and Asians stay in their own countries.* The reader has no clue, as is provided in the first one by the irony, that the first parts are the position of anti-whites, and the last is our own position.

    Look how long it’s taken me to even see that obvious fact.

    Bob’s stuff is almost always best JUST LEFT AS IT IS!

    But you cannot convince people of that any more than you can convince them of any other thing.

    *And of course many pro-whites would respond that that’s exactly what they want to demand! Sigh.

  8. #18 by mandela on 02/25/2014 - 6:37 pm

    Reporting back –

    ‘Pushing White GeNOcide is a Hate crime, and you are pushing White GeNOcide.’

    Has a strong effect on anti-Whites on You tube, they vanish

    Thanks for all that HD, hard to believe how much apathy is out there

  9. #19 by Mimmy Jarr on 02/25/2014 - 8:45 pm

    What a wonderful feeling!

    As Judy and I held a White geNOcide banner, Bryan recommended that a passerby visit Whitegenocideproject on the web. The man responded “I don’t have go on the Internet. This message is all over town!”

    Two protestors, a mother and her son, arrived with scraps of cardboard on which the mother scribbled “End Racism”.

    Bryan politely asked it he could hold it, at which point she flipped it over to the other sider and wrote “Ignorant” and gave it to her son to hold. As Bryan took his photo, the young man hid his face.

    Bryan will upload that photo later. Meanwhile here’s a photo of Bryan and Judy holding the banner in today’s effort in the struggle against White genocide.

    We left after a tattooed, skinhead, thug started calling his friends on a cell phone to come and join him in kicking our asses.

    I think the young man and his mom are probably going to have trouble rationalizing what they saw today. The stereotypes projected by the establishment media are not holding up in the face of reality.,

    • #20 by Jason on 02/26/2014 - 6:33 pm

      She uses the term “supremacist” a thousand times. Are Tibetans being “supremacists” when they protest their genocide? That seems to be their go-to word right now.

      She’s apparently some kind of Women’s Studies professor- LOL! We pay for this stuff! We pay the salaries of these people. Somebody outta write a book about the Professor Priesthood. 🙂

  10. #21 by Simmons on 02/26/2014 - 7:25 am

    Reason is an ideal not a reality, what you do is shove the person’s “authority” face down in the mud. How you do that is the tricky part, with gentleness or with brutality of language, but the “authority” has to be taken down then you fill the void.

    This is aimed at “our” side who are still quoting the dead commander’s written script. But it works across the spectrum of humanity.

  11. #22 by Mimmy Jarr on 02/26/2014 - 8:22 am

    I posted a comment with a link to a photo, which apparently got it stuck in moderation.

    Here is a link to the anti-White version of the same story:

    • #23 by seapea on 02/26/2014 - 10:15 am

      Looks like comments are moderated on

      • #24 by Henry Davenport on 02/26/2014 - 11:55 am

        Ms. Stabile tweeted just a photo of the banner…I tweeted a thank you to her for standing up for her race.

        • #25 by WmWhite on 02/26/2014 - 1:45 pm

          Tattooed-skinhead-white traitor-thugs (code for ‘toady’ anti-white bullies), fighting for their own genocidal destruction –typical of the brain dead.

          Reminds me of what Bertrand Russell once said:
          “The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the “stupid” are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”


          On the east coast we have brave intelligent fellows like Matthew Heimbach. On the west coast we have Henry and Mimmy Jarr.

          Many of us have not yet encountered being spit on or threatened with physical violence –but that does seem like something we might have to face from time-to-time, in the near future.

          –Luck favors the prepared.

          • #26 by Mimmy Jarr on 02/26/2014 - 2:34 pm

            Good advice, WmWhite.

            I’ll begin training myself today 🙂


            • #27 by WmWhite on 02/27/2014 - 7:32 am

              LOL … Mimmy Jarr

              I’ll have to share that ‘de-evolutionary’ technique next time I go to the range.

              “throwing the bullets” –and who says diversity can’t be humorous?

              • #28 by Henry Davenport on 02/27/2014 - 9:52 am

                Yeah, that was hilarious!

                Many Whites have a lot of basic information about race already, but they haven’t been able to construct anything meaningful out of the observations they’re already able to make.

                That’s where we come in.

  12. #29 by Mimmy Jarr on 02/26/2014 - 12:45 pm

    Henry Davenport :
    Ms. Stabile tweeted just a photo of the banner…I tweeted a thank you to her for standing up for her race.

    Pretty swift move for a self-professed technophobe. I’m envious.

    • #30 by Henry Davenport on 02/26/2014 - 3:04 pm

      When someone brings a lady like that to the dance, I feel I should step in and offer a moment of relief! 🙂

  13. #31 by Henry Davenport on 02/26/2014 - 7:53 pm

    White Genocide is not a Theoretical Debate, It is a Criminal Charge

    I know Bob wants us to go beyond just understanding that and feel it in our bones.

    (Also, would it make a good thing to say swarming? When an anti-white argues that it’s not genocide, to reply,

    “White Genocide is not a theoretical debate, It’s a criminal charge. You are an anti-white who is carrying out White Genocide, and you’re as guilty as any other person who carries out a genocide. That you believe this particular genocide is a very good thing is no excuse.”)

    For anyone really new here, or just reading, “treason,” “just following orders,” “genocide” and all the rest are simple truths that arouse strong feeling once seen and understood.

    And anti-whites are, in fact, using exactly the same tactics as any felon who is faced with charges he cannot deny. They shout insults, they say that those bringing the charges are stupid, mean and ugly.

    White anti-whites have the same feeling of entitlement to what’s ours that any thief does…in fact they feel entitled to everything that’s ours.

    We hold the moral high ground completely. Beefcake’s podcast helps slough off any conditioning that may block one’s full sense of that:

  14. #32 by Winston York on 02/26/2014 - 9:19 pm

    We don’t debate, we interrogate.

  15. #33 by Laura aka minervia on 02/27/2014 - 5:33 pm

    Those who enacted the “Crimes Against Humanity” laws and tried Eichmann, did so to keep the atrocity alive. There was no room for “I was just following orders.”

    We will do exactly the same with anti-Whites.

    And when they scream “Stupid, ugly mean…” , our response – Stop being CHILDISH!

    You sell out your Race, that’s TREASON.

  16. #34 by Henry Davenport on 03/01/2014 - 4:38 pm

    Our March petition that had the White Man’s March meme in its headline has been taken down. Please click on the link at the bottom to this replacement petition and initial it. We need 150 initials to make it visible.

    Please get the administration on message that “Diversity” = White Genocide

    That message will be seen throughout the United States and the world during the White Man’s March on March 15.

    Asian countries aren’t being flooded with non-Asians, and Asians forced to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence, and any Asian who protests that genocide of his people called a racist who opposes “diversity.”

    African countries aren’t being flooded with non-Africans, and Africans assimilated by force out of existence, and any African who protests that genocide called a hater who opposes “diversity.”

    This is being done only to Whites in White countries, by people who say they’re anti-racist, but are really anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

    Diversity is a code word for White Genocide.

  17. #35 by Yankee Rebel on 03/02/2014 - 6:59 am

    Signed.( I was just following orders.) lol

  18. #36 by Jason on 03/02/2014 - 9:05 pm

    I want more articles from Bob. I don’t care if I’m whining.

You must be logged in to post a comment.