When I was in professional politics, it was not the liberals who truly, personally hated me.
Those who really HATED me were the Nasty Little People, the NLP.
This came up a lot when we were going out and setting up press reviews for real populist uprisings, like anti-busing marches and protests against dirty school textbooks, the Independent Truckers’ Strike and on and on.
The grassrooters loved us.
But when a protest got to a certain level of publicity, their leaders realized that this was the first and last time they would be in the limelight. They must have decided we were going to take their movement from them.
No way we could or would do that, but they, these small-time, temporary leaders, were the ones who hated us with a sincerity Goebbels would have admired.
William Buckley and his protégés really hated me, though that is the LAAAHST thing Buckley would ever have admitted, even to himself.
His partner and life-long friend, who sat in an identical office on the top floor, was William Rusher, and I was HIS protégé. It made for a really unique civil war at National Review.
Rusher’s crowd produced a review of my first book, which had a Foreword by Rusher, that was titled, “Read This One!”
Then Buckley’s crowd produced a front-page article attacking me called “To the Nashville Station,” comparing me to Lenin arriving at the Finland Station in 1917.
Then after the coalition of conservatives and “Wallace Democrats” I had advocated all that time won the 1980 landslide, it turned out the Buckley side had been for it all the time.
The Buckley crowd is now neoconservative, using the REAL definition of that word.
They are what they have always been, the opposition that those in power want.
They have found a way to make a living on the permanently losing side. They go to pieces when some Big Time Leftist says something nice about them.
I am getting some totally second-hand reports about how many AMPWs are going from looking down on us mere peasants to getting red-faced about the Mantra.
Like I said, I am getting this second-hand.
But it sure sounds very familiar.
#1 by Jason on 04/25/2014 - 8:29 pm
But the analogy between AMPW’s and the National Review isn’t perfect, because the NR crowd was respectable. The AMPW’s are heretics. There isn’t one show on TV that would have an AMPW on the air and treat him like a human being.
Getting a positive review from NR meant something. Getting a positive review from the AMPW’s doesn’t carry any water.
Now, when open racial discussions are allowed, they may get their chance before the cameras. Which isn’t the most motivating aspect of doing Mantra.
#2 by Mike M on 04/26/2014 - 12:41 am
Excuse me, what does AMPW’w stands for please ?
#3 by Jason on 04/26/2014 - 4:11 am
Anti-Mantra Pro-Whites. Pro White people who don’t like the Mantra for whatever reason.
#4 by Denounce Genocidists on 04/26/2014 - 6:16 am
The Respectable Paychecks get treated like human beings?
On their knees waiting for their Liberal betters to unzip.
#5 by Mike M on 04/28/2014 - 7:38 am
Thanks Jason.
#6 by Denounce Genocidists on 04/26/2014 - 5:40 am
Tim Wise vs. Jared Taylor – The Merits of Racial Diversity …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQtBFLpGbDw
“They are what they have always been, the opposition that those in power want.”
#7 by Bob on 04/26/2014 - 7:32 am
“Diversity” Means Chasing Down the Last White Person.
Like the Mantra and other things, this works out in the real world better than “Shrewd” substitutes like White Flight.
Anti-whites have been dealing with “White Flight” since your grandmother was weaned.
Every lesson BUGSERS claim to have learned about my sniping expertise has been ignored when it comes to
“Diversity” Means Chasing Down the Last White Person.
#8 by Secret Squirrel on 04/26/2014 - 10:36 am
Aha!
White Flight puts the blame on Whites. How very Respectable! Chasing Down the Last White Person, puts the blame and focus where it belongs. On the anti-Whites that are doing the chasing.
#9 by Henry Davenport on 04/26/2014 - 4:50 pm
I assume you’re suggesting we try out that line,
“Diversity” Means Chasing Down the Last White Person.
#10 by Jason on 04/26/2014 - 8:44 pm
I have test it a few times now. I think it works but I don’t see it as particularly different from other Minis we’ve had. I may be missing something. If someone has any insight please fill me in.
(by insight, I mean insight, not smart ass comments telling me THINK “for once” – not the crap we get from certain poster intended to destroy team morale on the part of us working in good faith.)
For example, we have this Mini already:
No “anti-racists” say a 100% Black area needs more diversity.
No “anti-racists” say a 100% Asian area needs more diversity.
No “anti-racists” say a 100% Muslim area needs more diversity.
According to “anti-racists”, they are already 100% diverse.
They say ALL & ONLY White area need to be more diverse, and that White areas only stop needing to be more diverse when there are no White people left in them.
#11 by Denounce Genocidists on 04/26/2014 - 11:38 pm
The last link in the chain of responsibility.
Genocide for every white.
#12 by -Gar5- on 04/27/2014 - 11:20 am
“Diversity” is a codeword for White Genocide because every White person must be chased down and forced to accept “diversity”.
Lately, as opposed to writing “forced assimilation”, I’m writing, “forced diversity”, people seem to understand it better.
#13 by TabuLaRaza on 04/26/2014 - 12:39 pm
Russell, Bertrand. The Impact of Science on Society. 1951.
#14 by Bob on 04/27/2014 - 9:57 am
Jason, what you say seems to me to make the AMPW attempt at respectability even sillier.
#15 by Jason on 04/27/2014 - 5:41 pm
Yes the AMPW are even sillier.
What I’m trying to say, but not doing a good job of, is this: I feel like our social position as pro-Whites is way, way outside of where conservatives were back 50 years ago. We are much more “marginalized” than they were.
I am not complaining, I’m saying the opinions of AMPWs don’t matter. And that the way things played out in the past (with Respectables vs real conservatives) may not be a perfect guide to the future, because we are so much more radioactive.
#16 by Henry Davenport on 04/27/2014 - 11:51 am
At SF, I see almost zero AMPW activity in recent months.
#17 by Fred Richthofen on 04/27/2014 - 2:45 pm
You are correct, they are no longer AMPW.
They have now become partisans in this war of words.
In battle, partisans are untrained and unrestrained.
They have a tendency to interfere with the work of trained soldiers and commit war crimes based on passion.
Try posting the Mantra in the opposing views section and your comments will be buried by partisan interference. They are on your side but they get in the way attacking things that should not be attacked.
#18 by Fred Richthofen on 04/27/2014 - 3:21 pm
I should have said that they’re not completely untrained. Partisans are somewhat trained, just not as well trained as regular troops. They tend to be passionate civilian volunteers. I feel that the word fits what we are encountering now.
#19 by Asgardian on 04/27/2014 - 6:02 pm
I experience this constantly on twitter. Here I am beating a anti white from pillar to post then a AMPW walks in and starts screaming about superiority and those tht live in the desert. I was just shot n killed by the ppl that im fighting for. It is so aggravating….are they so stupid that they dont see that they are a caricature? A justification for the actions of anti whites?
I want to strangle them when they do that..
They terrorize the audience that we are captivating.
#20 by Daniel Genseric on 04/27/2014 - 3:41 pm
AMPW’s remain as heretical as Respectable Conservatives proved they are when it comes to the destruction of Europids. The Mantra is as pro-white as it gets. Therefore, the terms Anti-Mantra and Pro-White are antonymous. I’ll repeat it again, at least RC’s are intelligent enough to get paid for their treason.
And the PURPOSE of hosting (humiliating) an AMPW on television/radio/or whatever is to prove to the audience WHY whites should be treated like animals. They play their role well. Got Cobb? Got TTGM? Hal Turner? Anybody?
Yeah. heretics…. hahaha! U mad bro?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqrVl4MwWpg
#21 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 04/27/2014 - 6:56 pm
I have been pointing out to the construction workers that I work with that the construction industry for the past fifty years has been fueled by Blacks and Browns chasing Whites. Usually they tend to mention ‘White flight’, to which I correct them and say we are being chased, which is intentional, illegal and genocide. It has seemed to go over well face to face. One who is a horrible tailgating pro-White has started calling it ‘The Great White Chase.’ I thought that clever.
#22 by Henry Davenport on 04/27/2014 - 9:34 pm
Thumbs up, Seeker!
#23 by jo3w on 04/28/2014 - 12:40 pm
“Diversity” means being chased out of your neighborhood.
“Diversity” means being chased out of your school.
“Diversity” means being chased out of your job.
“Diversity” Means Chasing Down the Last White Person.
Help me make this better so I can start using it.