Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Neo-Marxism and NeoConservatism

Posted by Bob on June 13th, 2014 under Coaching Session

“Economics is Soviet leadership and electricity.” ~ V.I. Lenin

Here in a single sentence is the key to the success of Communist economics.

The problem is that Wordists use endless books to cover up the fact that this is ALL there is to Marxist economics.

You really, HONESTLY, HAD a bunch of self-selected “Intellectuals” who tried to run every bit of production and distribution from the Berlin Wall to the Pacific Ocean.  photo electricity-2.jpg

So no one besides Lenin ever stated it in plain English.

NeoMarxism gets by by never stating ANYTHING in plain English.

So, putting it in plain Mantra English, what is neoconservatism?

Neoconservatism means making a living by keeping up to date and only arguing about those neoMarxist programs which you are still allowed to debate.

For a long time I was genuinely puzzled that professional conservatives were such groveling cowards. Many older people today noticed nothing else, but they do remember how the National Rifle Association would never defend the Second Amendment with anything but the Right to Hunt.

We thought they were just salivatingly stupid, but after years I realized they were being professional conservatives.

NeoMarxists are as stupid as Lenin’s definition of economics. Neoconservatism is an “opposition” paid to block telling the simple truth.

We are well on our way to being the first people to die out because we pay people to be too cowardly to tell the truth.

  1. #1 by Jason on 06/13/2014 - 8:28 am

    What baffles me is how borderline sociopath professional “conservatives” could beat out authentic conservatives.

    But they did. I honestly don’t get it, but I am afraid the fault lies, in some way, with US (the general public).

    • #2 by Henry Davenport on 06/13/2014 - 9:24 am

      Wasn’t it primarily the result of liberal propaganda (“racist! racist! racist!) making truly conservative views moral anathema?

      Also, since the Cold War had rather anathematized outright Communist views also, I’m guessing that many operatives on the left saw a niche opening up in which as “neoconservatives” they would be free of the label of “Communist” but could continue to be anti-white.

      And blurred with that group would be the group of political folk who primarily have their eye on “the market” and who saw a new “market” niche opening that was free of both anathemas.

      I suspect that a sizable number of slithery smart people in all fields are of that last sort…yesterday I was catching up on the doings of Michael Shermer the Skeptic (when that word is capitalized, you know something’s not right!), who made his bones by recognizing that Holocaust revisionism offered an opportunity for a professional “Skeptic” to “investigate” it (no other professional skeptics before him had dared to taint themselves by “investigating” it) and deliver the foregone conclusions.

      I’m just speculating about the answer to your question since I don’t know the history. Maybe Bob will feel like commenting further.

      • #3 by Jason on 06/13/2014 - 2:17 pm

        Wasn’t it primarily the result of liberal propaganda (“racist! racist! racist!) making truly conservative views moral anathema?

        I think you are right. Basically it was the psychological war Horus spoke about.

  2. #4 by time for freedom on 06/13/2014 - 11:38 am

    Here’s a couple of new Mantras that this article has inspired in my thinking:

    “Neo-Conservatives get paid to let anti-Whites run amok on the bodies and properties of White people and our Children”

    “Neo-Marxism is the ideological justification for White Genocide…Neo-Conservatism is the ideology paid to publicly justify it to White people and our kids”

    Bob, WE don’t pay them a damned thing…not voluntarily anyways. Money is taken from us by force and then given to these anti-White apologists and facilitators.

    You said the following:

    “We are well on our way to being the first people to die out because we pay people to be too cowardly to tell the truth”

    BOB…We are NOT going to die out. We have been in more dire situations than this before in our history, and with belligerent Mantrafied bastards like me hanging around, our anti-White enemy doesn’t have a goddamned chance…and that’s a promise. We are making progress Bob, there is no doubt about it, we just have to keep hammering away at everybody with our Mantrafied points and memes.

  3. #5 by Daniel Genseric on 06/13/2014 - 12:28 pm

    The truth has no bearing on reality in a society that fears simple truth.

  4. #6 by Daniel Genseric on 06/13/2014 - 1:16 pm


    This story should warm your “little black heart”. Yesterday and some of its paycheck-cons put their money where their mouth is and took a “less than fashionable” view on anti-white terrorism in Cincinnati. Some of the “forward-thinking” Respectables are already in damage control mode. Enjoy!

    • #7 by Ice Knight on 06/13/2014 - 8:17 pm

      I find it ironic that respectables now seem willing to start discussing black on White crime stats as a means of damage control – just at the point where we have weaned many pro-Whites off the subject as it was ineffective for our cause.

      White GENOCIDE is the elephant in the room – for some reason respectables still don’t want to discuss that.

      • #8 by Peter Cottontail on 06/13/2014 - 8:38 pm

        Great point Iceknight. Many of the respectable conservatives in the black crime stat group will be so proud of themselves. They will let the neocons take over the discussion on race and sing hallelujah while we are slated for genocide.

    • #9 by Peter Cottontail on 06/13/2014 - 8:34 pm

      Looks like it was written by neocons or Amren. What’s the difference? Go pat the Amren crowd on their back.

      We aren’t impressed.

      • #10 by Daniel Genseric on 06/14/2014 - 9:31 pm

        It’s not going to happen all at once, Petey.

  5. #11 by Carloman on 06/13/2014 - 2:16 pm

    Jason :
    What baffles me is how borderline sociopath professional “conservatives” could beat out authentic conservatives.
    But they did. I honestly don’t get it, but I am afraid the fault lies, in some way, with US (the general public).

    One thing that I’ve noticed over the past several years is that, in Republican primary elections for president or governor, there will be one or two candidates who take a strong position against immigration. One of them will win, often by trashing the other anti-immigration candidate. Then, in the general election, the Republican becomes fanatically pro-open-borders. This has happened so many times that there must be something behind it. It can’t simply be cowardice, because they were winning with their anti-immigration positions. I’ve often wondered whether they were dishonest all along, or whether threats were made to cause them to change their mind. In these cases, I always vote for the Democrat in the general election, provided he is White. That’s why I voted for Jerry Brown for governor of California over Meg Whitman. Meg Whitman just made me sick.

    • #12 by Jason on 06/13/2014 - 2:22 pm

      I think they were dishonest the whole time. They say what they need to in order to win the primary and then change it in the general election. But why did voters keep falling for it for 50 years!!

      • #13 by time for freedom on 06/13/2014 - 8:57 pm

        Because they were demoralized for 50 years that’s why. But now they are coming out of demoralization very very quickly because of brave White Dissidents like you and the rest of us using Mantrafied points. Keep up the great work because it is working finally. WE WILL HAVE OUR VICTORY OVER THESE VILE ANTI-WHITES, I PROMISE.

      • #14 by WmWhite on 06/14/2014 - 9:55 am

        Bob had another of his insightful posts a while back, describing to us political nascents that the promises made by candidates during the ‘primary’ can be very different (and even antithetical) from those made during the general election.

        Bob gave a reason but I can’t find the original post or remember the explanation.

        *Help on finding Bob’s original blog post.

        • #15 by Jason on 06/14/2014 - 10:06 am

          Thanks … I always find gold going back through Bob’s articles. I encourage anyone to search for terms in the search box below. Bob’s written on a wide range of topics and they all relate to the survival of our people.

  6. #16 by Jason on 06/14/2014 - 11:45 am

    We should be making something of the fact that every White child born today is already a minority. Let your friends and family know how they let the CURRENT generation of White children down.

    They got to grow up in a White America. Why did they choose to deny that to their own kids?

    • #17 by ElectricWhiteRabbit on 06/14/2014 - 1:12 pm

      Anti-Whites are not going to stop until White children are a minority, theyre going to keep going until the last White child is born.

      Funny thing is, when White children officially become a minority in their own country, the anti-Whites start to speed up the process by releasing 500 non-Whites into our neighborhoods per day. Are the anti-Whites speeding up the process because White people are starting to wake up?

      • #18 by Jason on 06/14/2014 - 1:28 pm

        And the thing is, White children are ALREADY a minority among their peer group. That is, for kids 5 and under it has already happened.

        They will push as hard as possible to flood the country by any means necessary. I think we need to guilt older adult Whites on how they got to live in a nice White country but they have forever denied that to all White kids in the future.

  7. #19 by ElectricWhiteRabbit on 06/14/2014 - 1:50 pm

    Yes anti-Whites used guilt as a means to get Whites to accept genocide. It worked for them, it could work for us. Bringing their kids into the discussion will surely get normal Whites thinking about White survival.

    “Black people don’t chase their children with “Diversity”
    “Asian people don’t chase their children with “Diversity”
    “Only White parents are whiling to target their OWN childrens future with ‘Diveristy” and that’s genocide”

    “Diversity” is a code word for White genocide

    • #20 by Jason on 06/15/2014 - 3:12 pm

      Creative! But we should be careful about assigning blame to White parents (yes, I know, I am the one who brought it up). Actually we don’t want to get into naming who anti-Whites are because it leads to tailgating.

      Still, I think in normal conversation with family and friends, bringing up the fact that they aren’t leaving their descendants the same positive situation they inherited is powerful. Don’t let them get off on culture, the economy, politics, etc. What has forever changed is RACE.

      They got to grow up in a WHITE country and they don’t seem to care that none of their descendants will.

  8. #21 by Swarmer E Euro on 06/15/2014 - 3:50 am

    Viking White Genocide Prevention Via Doing A Paradigm Shift: Vikings Need to Create A Covert Parallel White Society That Transcends Borders

  9. #22 by Polar Bear on 06/17/2014 - 10:43 pm

    “Economics is Soviet leadership and electricity.” ~ V.I. Lenin


    “Wow! And if we had Communism, these Intellectuals would plan the economy for us!” ~ BOB

You must be logged in to post a comment.