James Dewey Watson, aged 34, was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his pioneering work discovering DNA. For 45 years thereafter he was feted. His opinions were sought out. In 2007 he died to polite society. He told the truth and was banished.

Today at 86 he seeks to reenter the public arena. He is selling his Nobel medal to raise funds. Sadly he is also, to some degeree, groveling. His crime was noting that the intelligence levels between races is not exactly equal. In an interview in 2007 he pointed out that Europeans were more intelligence by and large than subSaharan Africans.

At this point he became an unhuman, unacknowledged and shunned. One would almost think he had posted the Mantra so great was the calumny heped upon his aged frame. Yesterday he announced that he had been foolish, foolish to speak the Truth.

Giving a man an award for being intelligent and then demanding that he be cobblestone skulled stupid thereafter is silly. Yet nearly all recipients of such awards are content to cash the checks and buckle under.

These celebrated achievers may be clever about this or that but they are not men. Such Nobelists are lower than the meanest medieval peasant in England who had the right to deny the king or his agents the right of entrance to his home without cause. Their minds are the common property of their overlords. They are uneducated of liberty and servile by habit.

They are evidence that the burst of Liberty occasioned by the events from 1776 through 1787 in America has withered, grown sere, atrophied and finally hardened into chains. This is what we here are reacting to.

James Watson has faltered in his commitment to Truth unique to our heritage. He did not owe anyone the apologies he has uttered. The deity Caesar, surrounded by base acolytes, has been offered a sacrifice. It may not be accepted. His loneliness may continue. Political Correctness is not merciful.

BUGSERS are not often, face it, never, nominated for Nobel Prizes in any field. We’re not even officers. We are grunts slogging along to make some of the same points that James Watson has been ostracized for making. One of them is the reality of White Genocide.

His interview asserting the White race has some unique characteristics implied that these were worthy of being preserved. Verboten thoughts. For this high crime and misdemeanor a bitter pill has been forced upon Watson.

Sometimes in their lives BUGSERS too will be hard pressed for their loyalty to their race. Be of stout heart. Post the Mantra today in solidarity with James Watson in his time of solitude.

One hopes that after James Watson replenishes his purse his courage will regenerate and that his remaining years can be devoted to his earlier, high ideals arrayed in candor. His weapon is science, ours, the Mantra. Both when wielded are powerful. Though he has understandably strayed a bit, fortitude is probably in his genes, and they are our genes. Let us wish him well and bestow upon him the privilege of having the Mantra posted in his honor.

Newbies, kindly click on the Mantra and learn what we are all about. Membership is open. There are no dues. A bit of work is solicited. There are no tangible rewards other than the preservation of your family, your community and your race.

A commenter posted a URL for a Michael Savage YT that condemned the media for not reporting the torture-murder of a White couple by four blacks. A Professor of Journalism who justified leaving the story out of ALL the MSM and local newspapers avoided the issue.

The professor’s reply was rather lengthy, but Savage, even as outraged as he was, couldn’t avoid the true justification for leaving this murder out of the news. The Professor didn’t dare mention it and Savage (for all his famous “courage”) didn’t dare ask Mommy Professor about it.

It is the oldest rule of journalism. It was probably old when Roman government scribes wrote the latest happenings up on a wall in Rome.

That old rule is, “When a dog bites a man it is NOT news. When a man bites a dog it IS news.”

As usual, this rule that everybody knows is not mentioned anywhere but BUGS:

The Professor is dead right. Only his BS explanation is nonsense, and Savage at his most furious is not going to expose it:

If a full news report was required every time a dog bit a man, there wouldn’t be room left for any other news. If a news report was required every time one more black killed one or more Whites, even the twenty-four hour cable news channels would be overloaded.

This is the kind of reality only BUGSERS will even MENTION.

Occam’s Law destroyed the main paycheck of Mommy Professor in his day, Scholasticism.

It is also called Occam’s Razor, because it cut out the crap. Occam’s Razor simply stated that the cause of something was probably the obvious one. So if your foot hurt, it was probably because you stubbed your toe yesterday and not because Socrates could be interpreted, if you really knew your nuances in ancient Greek, that the Great God Zoot has visited you in the night.

According to Mommy Professor, skin color means nothing.

Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, going by Occam’s Law, Skin color is EVERYTHING.

You know the standard of living and average income of any country simply by knowing what color its people are.

On Planet Earth, you know how safe a neighborhood is by the color of its inhabitants.

There are two approaches you can take to this. The Scholastics wrote endlessly trying to make the reality of everything depend on highly complicated interpretations of Classics and the established religion.

Occam’s Razor was the beginning of the end for centuries of Mommy Professors who made their living  on the Scholastic crap.

Everybody is perfectly aware that reality on Planet Earth starts with skin color.

No sane discussion of social issues can be held until we start with the reality, rather than the hideously complicated attempts to explain it away, which is required by our established religion.

No one seems to notice that even Mommy Professors explanations are purely racial.

Every discourse by Mommy Professor blames the comparatively awful state of non-whites on what whites did to them. It never even OCCURS to anybody that non-whites can be blamed for doing anything wrong, because our history is based on the concept we all accept that it does not matter what non-whites do.

Mommy Professor’s non-whites are as helpless as any other animal. No one blames a baboon or a hippo or a nonwhite for anything.

Even Mommy Professor’s reality has to be based on a reality we all take so much for granted that we don’t even see it:

Whites are supreme, in fact they are the only causal group on Planet Earth.

People, white and nonwhite, are as likely to blame non-whites for anything as they are to blame a chipmunk.

I wrote this after I had submitted the article below.

Someone suggested that using this point might distract from concentrating on the Mantra.

It was an excellent point, but, for me, it was wonderful to hear it.

Now I have, after almost twenty years of effort, a cadre that can MAKE a criticism like that!

Can you imagine anyone in the maze of argument and “somebody ought tos” I spent all those years in saying “That might distract from THE point!?”

For me, the fact that it is a valid criticism is totally buried in the sheer joy of this little team of professionals it took so long to develop.

In my own case. I have used this truth, you can hardly call it just an argument, when it was a good lead in to the whole subject, as when some idiot at a cocktail party would start blubbering about how we stole the land from the Indians.

I think it is a good point, but BUGSERS have to make sure they don’t waste precious time dragging it in. But at the right time and place, it really puts some crocodile-tearing, loud-mouthed fashionable anti-white in his place.

So here it is:

Whenever White Genocide is discussed, there is the chorus about how whites stole the land.

Grant that. What is the FIRST obligation of any receiver of stolen goods?

Is a person who believes his property has been stolen from others obligated, first and foremost, to denounce the OTHER people who committed the robbery?

No. Any sane person knows that, IF YOU FEEL YOU HAVE STOLEN GOODS, then your first obligation is to RETURN them to whomever you insist is the RIGHTFUL owner.

The first obligation of an Australian who really believes Australia was stolen from the aborigines or any American who honestly believes America was stolen from the Indians is TO GET THE HELL OUT!

Every adult knows that you cannot hold onto stolen property while denouncing the OTHER thieves.

No Indian or Abo would be happier than I would be if these crocodile-tear-shedding, “The White man STOLE America!” types were to hop on a boat and go elsewhere.