Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!


Posted by Bob on November 19th, 2014 under Coaching Session, How Things Work, Race Matters, Religion

Jo3w commented that anti-white Christians are anti-white because they assume whites are more supreme than we are.

I replied:

jow3, My problem with what you say is based on my constant repetition that Western morality is based on the Christian lack of morality.

The sore point Old Testament believers have with science is Six Day Creationism.

The sore point with Christianity is never mentioned.

Much more than the Old Testament has a problem with Creationism, the New Testament has the problem that WE EXIST!

One reason Bible Belters quote the Old rather than the New Testament is because there is no FAMILY morality in the New Testament.

To Jesus and St Paul, the very IDEA of family was heresy.

So Christianity went back to the old pagan morality of Human Sacrifice which said that only the best should be sacrificed to the Gods.

Early Christian myths described couples out of the Hitler Youth Guidebook, tall, intelligent, beautiful. In the ideal ending, they would be chaste and childless, for God.

Look at all the popular Nun Movies, where a beautiful talented woman remains chaste.

God wants only the best human sacrifices.  photo abraham3.jpg

It is on the assumption that whites are supreme that the entire basis of our self-destruction is based.

It never OCCURS to anti-white whites that there IS any other race for sacrifice — diversity — than the white one.

Christians, including C.S. Lewis, have long been able to accept their faith without the Six Day Creation clearly stated at the Bible’s beginning.

But they absolutely refuse to accept a genetic morality, without which the Golden Rule has no meaning at all.

Audio Bob

  1. #1 by Jason on 11/20/2014 - 2:56 am

    The “White Privilege” gang reminds me of Old Time Religion. It’s Catholic Guilt all over again (not picking on Catholics, this applies to Protestant Bible Thumpers too).

    If you resist the concept of White Privilege, they will say that just shows how much you need to be FORCED to confront your privilege (sin)! More Diversity training. You must be forced to be “sensitive” (feel guilty) over your privilege.

    They haven’t gotten around to crushing your foot yet, but it will come. Anything to make you face your sin (privilege).

    At it’s base, is a bizarre hatred of human thriving. Ayn Rand talked about this emotion being “hatred of the good for being good” and that sums it up well.

    I say human thriving and not just White, because it is obvious these anti-Whites are not pro-Black, pro-Asian or pro anything else. If Whites are wiped out, it will be the worst catastrophe ever to hit non-Whites.

  2. #2 by Jason on 11/20/2014 - 3:13 am

    “But they absolutely refuse to accept a genetic morality, without which the Golden Rule has no meaning at all”

    I assume this means, I would like my ancestors to have made wise mating choices so that I could be the best person possible. And since that is what I would want for myself, I should do the same for future generations.

    • #3 by WmWhite on 11/20/2014 - 1:24 pm

      Jason, here is one of Bob’s gems on genetic morality:

      “Today there is a fury against the idea of intelligent white women having children (white children that is). It’s considered a form of enslavement, a pure evil. But that is not because of Hitler. They use Hitler. But that fury was here long before Hitler, before GERMANY, existed. That fury is altogether a conservative one that has been ‘adopted’ by anti-whites, NOT one invented by anti-whites.”

      “Judaism is not our worst enemy. What we have made of Christianity is our worst enemy. And it is not just the Catholic Church. White Protestant countries are even more sterile TODAY, than any Catholic country has ever been.”

      • #4 by Jason on 11/20/2014 - 7:52 pm

        Imagine if Jesus had said “the world will still be here for at least another 2,000 years. So, you know, plan for the future.”

        But the constant threat of Immediate Doom seems a better way to get members.

  3. #5 by JPOutlook on 11/20/2014 - 4:45 am

    “quote the Old rather than the New Testament is because there is no FAMILY morality in the New Testament.”

    Who told you this, the lamestream media?

    Please, “Bob”…

  4. #6 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/20/2014 - 4:48 am

    Anti-white Christians are anti-white because they are white wordists who give their loyalty to words instead of their blood.

  5. #7 by JPOutlook on 11/20/2014 - 4:49 am

    P.S. – if there weren’t so much inflammatory rhetoric within this blogpost, I’d link you the relevant article directly.

    • #8 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/20/2014 - 5:35 am

      Oh well that`s a shame JPOutlook, because a BUGSer not wasting their time trawling through a collection of religious essays to prove what we all already know here, that Christianity became just another outlet for white self-hatred, would be such a tragedy.

  6. #10 by jo3w on 11/20/2014 - 6:41 am

    What I was saying was far more simple than that.

    Developing customs that are self eliminating are not, in my opinion, the characteristics of supremacy.

    The whole idea of one group being supreme to another has more to do with your definition of supremacy than anything else.

    • #11 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/20/2014 - 7:07 am

      Mud huts, no wheeled vehicles, and peanut butter are only of equal worth to White accomplishments if you`re a wordist nutjob.

      Are you sure you want to plead guilty to that jo3w?

      “Developing customs that are self eliminating”

      So that`s what the commies and the anti-whites were doing, not hijacking state machinery and imposing wordism at gunpoint, but merely developing customs for us!

      • #12 by jo3w on 11/20/2014 - 12:54 pm

        The whole of White People’s accomplishments will not add up to supremacy if in 1000 years the only people left are the ones living in mud huts and using no wheel vehicles.

        The very fact that BUGS exists as a group is at least, in part, contradictory to the notion of White supremacy.

        I’m not sure which group of words I would be paying allegiance to by making these statements.

        • #13 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/20/2014 - 5:20 pm

          A truth does not change with wordist interpretation or the passage of time jo3w.

          Either it is the truth that whites by virtue of our supreme qualities and accomplishments are the only race worth being targeted for global genocide by the anti-whites, or it is not.

          As you cannot offer any evidence to the contrary you concede the point.

          • #14 by jo3w on 11/21/2014 - 6:46 am

            Do supreme beings passionately participate in their own demise? Do supreme beings put the survival needs of others in front of their own children?

            “Either it is the truth that whites by virtue of our supreme qualities and accomplishments are the only race worth being targeted for global genocide by the anti-whites, or it is not.”

            It is not a truth, that is an opinion.

            • #15 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/21/2014 - 1:56 pm

              Is white genocide the supreme manifestation of the crime of genocide in the (recorded) history of genocides?

              • #16 by jo3w on 11/21/2014 - 7:34 pm

                If it happens, White genocide, that can only happen with massive complicity of White people, would, without a doubt, be the most idiotic genocide in all of recorded history.

                • #17 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/22/2014 - 12:27 am

                  You mean after all this time here at BUGS, after seeing all the anti-white idjiots falling like nine pins when hit with the mantra, and you`re still not sure genocide is being committed against us whites jo3w?


                  • #18 by jo3w on 11/22/2014 - 2:19 am

                    I was referring to the completion of genocide when I said, “if it happens”. Obviously i believe it is currently happening and my statement stands. Its idiotic.

                    What exactly about my comments has gotten your panties in a bunch anyway?

                    • #19 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/22/2014 - 8:15 am

                      Well I`m glad you cleared that up.

                      But you`re still proving the point that white anti-whites are holding whites to a higher standard not just to other humans when they only target us whites for their sacrificial altar but also the Gods when you expect a supreme existence to be unblemished by Treason,

  7. #20 by Laura on 11/20/2014 - 9:26 am

    New Audio Bob up.

    I would also like to put it out there to any other BUGsers who would be interested in doing these Audio interviews with Bob. Please let me know.

  8. #21 by Laura on 11/20/2014 - 10:48 am

    “If you followed the Golden Rule you would not be mixing the races.”

    “On Planet Earth, brown people are much worse off than White ones, so I would not want to be of mixed race.. So I would not mix races.” – Bob

    • #22 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/20/2014 - 11:14 am

      Note for new people and those with a short memory:

      There is NO “mixing of the races”. Only whites are targeted for mass immigration and “assimilation”

      “If you followed the Golden Rule you would not be force-blending whites out of existence”

      “On planet Earth, brown people are much worse off than whites, so I would not want a world with only brown people in it”

  9. #23 by Bob on 11/20/2014 - 11:06 am

    JPOutlook, the Thug Approach is not going to work against a bunch of think-skinned BUGSERS, much less against old Warty Bob himself..

  10. #26 by Bob on 11/20/2014 - 1:09 pm

    DenounceGenocide, your reminder about my slipping into “Mixing the races” was dead on target.
    I am ashamed of doing that, as I ought to be.
    Thank you.
    As I said, that comment was aimed at JP Outlook, who never addresses any of my points but just screams, like Maude, “God’ll get you for that!”

  11. #28 by WmWhite on 11/20/2014 - 1:35 pm

    An old post by Bob on how “genetic morality” has been distorted by our centuries-old-misconception of what survival should really mean for white people.

    “The completely unnoticed basis of today’s revulsion against genetics is the feeling that Nazis were evil because they took genetics into account. It’s this ‘unnatural’ conditioned response that makes it a heresy to advocate any (child bearing) which dares to even suggest or advocate child bearing by (the beautiful and the smart).”

    “It hits us in a weak spot we don’t recognize as a brainwashed, conditioned response. In fact it infuriates us. Today, the mere mention of advocating for “beautiful and intelligent” children by attractive and intelligent white parents is immediately identified with an ‘alien’ mindset or as naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

    • #29 by Jason on 11/20/2014 - 7:17 pm

      Thanks for those reminders. The sheer hatred for happy, healthy White families is obvious.

      But since the world is coming to an end Real Soon Now, it doesn’t really matter. Joking!

  12. #30 by Bob on 11/21/2014 - 1:46 pm

    Whenever I have someone grasping me by the neck and sticking my nose in some Bible quote that “explains everything” I think of Saint Paul, who probably knew the Old Testament verbatim and was personally engaged in writing the new one.
    With all that, Paul said he saw truth “but darkly, as in a mirror.”
    A lot of people insist they have found what Paul missed.
    Saving my race fulfills the Golden Rule.
    Churches have largely become nothing but wordist institutions raising money on people who want to be respectable church-goers, hence Politically Correct, or making their livings on threats of Hell.
    I see that through no glass at all, through no darkness at all.

  13. #31 by -scythian- on 11/22/2014 - 2:29 am

    TRAITORS have told me in no uncertain terms that white countries are superior to non-white countries because they turning non-white.


    “The West” includes Western Europe right? Where the people who founded & populated the two big first world countries in North America come from right? So even an anti-white can’t claim “the West” isn’t a White thing, right?

    “We” (i.e “the west” or whites) are better (i.e. superior) than the very people (non-whites) “we” are allowing to pour into our countries, rule over our children, and forcing our children to assimilate with.

    I can’t even begin to imagine the amount of mental gymnastics required of a human mind to arrive at this ‘head up your ass’ world view.

  14. #33 by Secret Squirrel on 11/22/2014 - 3:11 am

    In America religion is still taken very seriously in some areas. Where I come from we have the left that are on a moral (religious) crusade and the conservatives that have no other reason for their treason, other than they are completely self centered. How does Bob deal with the self centered traitors?

    • #34 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/24/2014 - 6:18 am

      “…the left that are on a moral (religious) crusade…”

      If you believe that you might be interested in my design for a state of the art windmill that can solve your community`s energy problems for the reasonable price of 5 billion dollars.

      “conservatives that have no other reason for their treason, other than they are completely self centered. How does Bob deal with the self centered traitors?”

      In the computing world they say RTFM when asked insultingly basic questions such as that, but I try to be a gentleman most of the time and suggest this line in the mantra is indicative of the general approach:

      “Liberals and respectable conservatives agree……”

  15. #35 by jo3w on 11/23/2014 - 9:12 pm

    I’ve been thinking about genetic morality and I came to an impasse and wanted more discussion.
    Genetic morality would imply that White Genocide through interbreeding is the morally superior thing to do for non-Whites. Give your children White genes if you would want them yourself. Even if non-Whites considered White genocide immoral on the whole, interbreeding would be the morally correct thing to do on a case by case basis. This of course lands the culpability of White Genocide on White anti-Whites, which Bob traces their motives to Christian lack of morality in this article.

    My question is, assuming the golden rule can be universally applied, is breeding with a White person the morally superior thing to do for non-Whites if given the opportunity?

    • #36 by Daniel Genseric on 11/23/2014 - 9:32 pm

      Both the simple fundamental of reciprocity and The golden rule state that we should “Do unto others what you would have them do unto you.” Are you saying that asking for non-white genocide is the morally superior thing for them to do?

      My answer would be, maybe. But, that’s up to them. Personally, I find all genocide deplorable.

    • #37 by Carloman on 11/24/2014 - 4:21 pm

      You say “ASSUMING that the Golden Rule can be universally applied,” but morality, like most things, has a racial basis. Is it moral for the lion to eat the zebra? By the lion’s morality, yes.

      Asians have a Silver Rule: “Confucius says do not do to others what you do not want done to yourself.” However, they don’t seem to apply that rule when it comes to us.

You must be logged in to post a comment.