Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Who’s Peers?‏

Posted by Genseric on December 9th, 2014 under General

One of the Declaration of Independence’s grievances against King George III’s United Kingdom lists English abuse of criminal venue law. This is one of the primary reasons Americans said they would each pursue happiness alone – EQUALLY protected from supreme tyranny.

When the founding fathers later wrote, “Tried by a jury of your peers…” they did NOT mean victims of anti-white murder and rape should be forced to endure a judicial process governed by representatives of the offending party. That concept was too painfully familiar for them to stomach.

Our forebears did not think they had to textualize such simple concepts in the supreme law of the land. Thankfully, they left us bread crumbs…
 photo jury.jpg
If one has peers, then it goes without saying that one must also have unequal partners in the new world. Otherwise, why did Americans list it and then REPEAT it? Equality has repeatedly proven to be tricky business, even for shifty defense lawyers and tyrannical genocidists like Ole “Honest” Abe Lincoln.

The first thing any defense attorney does in a run-up to a case headed for trial is they consider the “venue”, or jury pool, in which jurors will be selected during “voir dire”. Lawyers do this to ensure they seat the most amicable jury for their client. In fact, there is an entire legal industry specializing in making sure DEFENDANTS are not unjustly discriminated against. What you never hear about is a prosecutor who requests a ‘change of venue’ in the name of fair treatment of the VICTIM.

Benjamin Franklin and the so-called “Tea Party Terrorists”, as Progressives derisively call them, never envisioned the New World this way. They never envisioned it as the perverted, anti-white fantasy land that it most certainly has become. Nor did they envision our nation as a haven where criminals would be given the head start that they now most certainly enjoy. This idea not only runs counter to the esprit de corps of the U.S. Constitution – which begins with a pro-white preamble and clearly reminds us to be loyal “…to ourselves and our posterity…” – it also runs counter to Mommy Professor’s haranguing for Equal Treatment.

This country is at a crossroads like never before as the bodies of our women and children pile high to the sky. Just as they did before ratifying the constitution, Americans need to regain composure and perform some serious soul-searching about whether or not we want a nation again – and quick.

What will it be: Loyalty or Equality?

  1. #1 by ElectricWhiteRabbit on 12/09/2014 - 5:13 pm

    Equality would mean having a birth right, a right to a homogeneous homeland so we can continue our existence. (A right all non-whites get)
    Loyality would mean fighting for that right (what we’re doing) and making that right never seizes to exist in the future.

    In that sense im for both Equality and Loyality.

    Hopefully I see an end, or almost an end to White genocide in my life time. We come a long way in the last 2 years.

  2. #2 by Steadiness on 12/10/2014 - 2:03 am

    Bob, do you know what it was like before the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

    Today, everyone is frightened into saying nothing, because they will be fired for speaking out, because HR will drop them like a rock to prevent a lawsuit under the Civil Rights Act from either a redguard coworker or from a customer.

    Of course, getting people fired for saying politically incorrect things is not strictly speaking new post 1964. In The International Jew, article 74 details how the Jews got a lecturer fired for talking about the Jewish question.

    Since I was born in 1987, I don’t know what it was like around then, or how long it took for the Civil Rights Act to take full effect.

    How long did it take? Was there any debate about the Civil Rights Act early on concerning people’s ability to exercise their freedom of speech? Or was the mainstream media completely in the pocket of leftists, and we’re only beginning to talk about things in an uncensored, uncoded way now on the Internet?

  3. #3 by shari on 12/10/2014 - 3:16 pm

    Equality is a code word for treason, genocide and capital stupidity. Thanks Sythian! I might add that equality is a code word for gross lawlessness as well.

You must be logged in to post a comment.