Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!


Posted by Bob on March 18th, 2015 under Coaching Session

The fact that a man wears a coat and tie does not mean he is not a thug.  Mafia bosses and cocaine kings are well know to wear nice, conservative clothes.

The fact that Bill Gates’ student subsidies bar white students is routine.  Big Government will always take the side of Big Money, and we live in an age where millionaires tend to be conservatives – though cowardly conservatives, while billionaires are uniformly anti-white.  photo beware-banksters1_1.jpg

Other parties cannot say what I just said because rights depend entirely on lawyers fees.

Today’s coat and tie campus thugs suppress all disagreement. No one is allowed to mention White Genocide if they want to get a degree and certainly if they want to join the faculty.

No one is allowed on campus unless he toes the political line.

Billionaires have all the power simply because they have a team of legal thugs no REAL dissident can fight.  The league of billionaires and coat and tie professors block all pro-white opinion from campus by saying, “It will cause violence”.

If the most viciously and openly anti-White wants to speak on campus, protecting him becomes “freedom of speech.” If a college doesn’t protect anti-White “freedom of speech” it will lose.

If any pro-White speech is not banned on the excuse that college thugs will riot, the college will lose funding. Everybody knows that real dissidents on campus are banned under the Thug Rule.

No matter whether he is a full Professor or a Godfather, if his power comes from threats.

Leftism is the fashion among billionaires, and the Billionocracy is above the law.

  1. #1 by Yankee Rebel on 03/18/2015 - 10:17 pm

    “Over time, whoever controls the money system,
    controls the nation.”
    – Stephen Zarlenga

  2. #2 by WmWhite on 03/24/2015 - 9:49 am

    The distinction made between millionaires and billionaires is very astute. In the realm of power it is like comparing a ‘single’ tradesmen’s political influence against that of the towns wealthiest patriarch …which of course illustrates the utter impotency of radically individualistic ‘regular white folk’ –who have little to no group allegiance outside of their multicultural comradery for the local NFL sports team.

    • #3 by Jason on 03/24/2015 - 10:09 am

      These days the average millionaire comes from the working and/or middle classes. They still share a sense of community with the White masses.

      The Billionaires are a whole other group these days. No connection with the larger White population. They usually come from very wealthy families who prided themselves on separating themselves from the pickup driving crowd.

      • #4 by WmWhite on 03/26/2015 - 9:34 am

        You have made a very good point Jason.
        In our battle against the genocide of our people the super wealthy, oligarchical elite can never be trusted to champion anything but anti-white causes.

  3. #5 by Trager Smith on 04/05/2015 - 4:36 pm

    Bob, do you have an explanation why billionaires are leftist? Is it a fact? The Koch brothers certainly aren’t. I’ve never seen a study. Gates is a kind of mild-mannered liberal, as is his father. It made sense for him back when he was still running for Microsoft to make liberal noises. This is because Republicans don’t believe in vigorous anti-trust enforcement. So if he made liberal noises, liberals would be inclined to lay off him. His foundation does indeed have dysgenic consequences, but I don’t think he ever gives it much thought. Hardly anyone he meets will bring it up.

    Warren Buffett, another billionaire, can bawl all he wants that he *should* pay more taxes, but he needn’t worry that his voice will have much effect.

    Jason says that billionaires “usually come from very wealthy families who prided themselves on separating themselves from the pickup driving crowd.” There’s too much randomness in who, out of all the millionaires, becomes a billionaire. There is, to be sure, a positive correlation between the wealth of parents and the wealth of children, but out at the tail end of the distribution, the correlation will be small.

    We really do need an explanation for why billionaires are leftist, to the extent that it is true. I’ll let you and your fellows work up some explanations. Later, I’ll add my own.

You must be logged in to post a comment.