Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

If Whites Had Gay Rights

Posted by Bob on March 27th, 2015 under Coaching Session

Years ago Pat Boone, a celebrity in the know but pro-white, announced that Gay Lib had a special power which was denied to every other minority group, even blacks and women’s lib:

While every non-white male group has enormous power AFTER a movie is shown, only Gay Lib Representatives were allowed in to cut anything they didn’t like BEFORE the movie left the studio.

Gays are now beginning their campaign to have gays kissing on television.

TV shows have begun gently poking fun at the fact that gays don’t really kiss on TV. Most series have the obligatory part where a black male falls SINCERELY in love with a blondish white girl.

It is NEVER just a black guy wanting a white girl because she’s prettier or to prove he’s a man despite being black, no, sir, every time he is deeply, genuinely in love and there is a deep French kiss to show it.

The Dexter series included that required scenario and so did the House of Cards series and most other series since 2000.

Gays, despite their superior minority power, are still just beginning their campaign because they face religious opposition and a public that can still be openly turned off by SOME things.

But we all know gays will get their way in time, so we should ask why this is true?

And what is NOT true about Gay Power or, for that matter, all of the minority power that we run into every day?

Did the gays or the blacks or the Hispanics gain all this censorship power by a Massive Torchlight Parade that Overthrew the Government on Der Tag?

In the Real World, the Real way the real power we face every day was developed is totally alien to the News and Jews approach.

The way Gay Lib will get its French kisses in daytime TV and the way blacks have achieved their dream of French-kissing between white women and black men is utterly alien to the Torch Light Parade types and totally familiar to BUGSERS:

Gay Lib never lets a single remark which can possibly be interpreted in the most paranoid way as saying something they don’t want said about gays get by without raising hell.

 photo whiteblack.jpg

Sound familiar?

It certainly wouldn’t sound familiar on the pro-white side with one single exception:


ALL of the minority power we are buried under began by a consistent message.

ALL of the minority powers we now face met a puzzled public in its day: the New York Times routinely called homosexuals “queers” a few decades ago.

Gay Lib crushed the crusade to CURE people of homosexuality. We face a similar, and even crazier and more outspoken, program, to “cure” people of being whites, that “cancer of humanity.”

The responses we got on March Against White Genocide on the Spring Equinox were totally familiar to an old history junkie like me:

“What is this?”

“DUHHH! What is white genocide?”

The response to the beginning of every message has always been “What are they talking about?” aka “DUUUH!” and, always, INSULTS.

We are exactly where all the power we are up against began. This is a FACT, a memory, it is NOT identifying WITH them.

I have finally realized what kept bouncing around in my mind all these years when I kept mentioning – not fully understanding – my own statement that revolutions occur when the established party in power and the only real opposition – finally cease their dual control, as Conservative and Labour did in Britain and the two-party system does in America.

Everybody is predicting that whites will become minorities in today’s white countries. But it will be a long, LONG time before whites cease to be the overwhelming MINORITY.

White rule lasted longest in low-state South Carolina and in South Africa. All white areas have always been notoriously anti-white, like Minnesota electing Senator Humphrey, or New York, electing Javits.

Minorities rule. And whites are on their way to being a minority.

The shrinking white population will be many times as large as the most inflated estimates of our gay population.

All the powers that be began exactly the way we did.

Audio Bob

  1. #1 by Jason on 03/27/2015 - 10:54 am

    “Did the gays or the blacks or the Hispanics gain all this censorship power by a Massive Torchlight Parade that Overthrew the Government on Der Tag?”

    Bam! Summarizes it so well for me. Nobody on the Right or the Pro-White side gets this.

    Every new thing in my lifetime was laughed at. The term “gay” was chuckled at when it first appeared. I remember a guy in public saying “Gay stands for ‘Got Aids Yet’?” No one batted an eye.

    NOBODY would say that now. No one dares chuckle when gays hold court.

    And they got all that power WITHOUT a big ol’ stash of guns.

  2. #2 by WmWhite on 03/27/2015 - 12:03 pm

    Bob Whitaker has once again prognosticated what now seems an obvious and very accurate picture of our future as an ‘overwhelming’ minority in what were once white countries:

    “Minorities rule. And whites are on their way to being a minority.”

    Reminds me of what Sherlock Holmes said to Watson: “Every problem is absurdly simple when it has been explained to you.”

    Even though I find the homosexual lifestyle objectionable, the documentary “Act Up” has been called a ‘role model’ for modern civil disobedience and useful (propaganda / action strategies). –We as pro whites may learn something from it (maybe)?

  3. #3 by Denounce Genocidists on 03/27/2015 - 6:03 pm

    It is difficult to imagine having a pro-white healthiness being pushed as good as the Gay cult.

    • #4 by Denounce Genocidists on 04/01/2015 - 4:17 am

      More to the point:

      If white sensibilities were coddled to the same degree as the Gays there would be virtually no anti-whitism allowed and the pro-white messaging would put ze Nazis to shame.

  4. #5 by Benjamin Newells on 03/27/2015 - 8:04 pm

    Good article.

  5. #6 by Laura on 03/29/2015 - 12:45 pm

    Audio Bob up.

    This audio was recorded prior to Bob writing this article.

    If bugsers have any questions regarding this new direction please write them in the comment section and I will discuss them with Bob in another audio over the next few days.

    “Anti-white Hate Watch”

    • #7 by Henry Davenport on 03/29/2015 - 1:32 pm

      I just got up and haven’t listened to the audio yet, but I’ve had the thought for awhile of someone having a column or some such somewhere called simply “Anti-White Watch.”

      • #8 by Laura on 03/29/2015 - 2:01 pm

        Genseric had “White Genocide Watch” created on Twitter to collate all anti-white comments and calls for White Genocide but it was recently suspended.

        I think this idea needs to extend further than just twitter and target EVERYTHING anti-white, the same way the gays target anything anti-gay.

        • #9 by Fred R on 03/29/2015 - 2:53 pm

          That covers the punishment aspect, but what about rewards?
          Remember the black woman speaking out against the disappearance of blondes in Britain?
          Maybe she, and anyone else who speaks out against White genocide, deserves an award.

        • #10 by Henry Davenport on 03/29/2015 - 3:14 pm

          If we have human resources to do it, maybe a section on called “Anti-White Watch”?

          The advantage of that would be that attention we draw anywhere to #AntiWhiteWatch can be designed to draw people to and thereby to the phrase “White Genocide.”

          “Anti-white” has much wider initial appeal than “White Genocide,”* but proceeding as I just described will lead audience from one to the other, and by association implant the understanding that the more acceptable “anti-white” and the more difficult “White Genocide” are one and the same.

          There might be some advantages to doing this through White GeNOcide Project. No, would be better. Our audience of newshounds at WGP doesn’t need more news. They need to be drawn to a place whose name implants the idea of fighting back. At wgp we could do a lot of linking to the section at fwg.

          I still haven’t listened to the audio yet, and all I’ve just said may be seriously flawed by my lack of knowledge about twitter, etc.

          *I think we all know this, but a Stalwart did test it out specifically one day.

        • #11 by Henry Davenport on 03/29/2015 - 6:41 pm

          I’m excited by the possibilities opened up by Bob’s suggestion in the audio that we imitate gays and other groups by missing no opportunity to point out that something is an attack on White people. Here’s a couple of imagined exchanges of comments to a Segregation “special”:

          Exchange #1
          bugster: This program is anti-white.

          anti-white: “Are you claiming this never happened?”

          bugster: “These programs are aired to make Whites accept the flooding of All White countries and ONLY White countries…”

          Exchange #2
          bugster: This program is anti-white.

          anti-white: “It shows Whites as the oppressors they are!”

          bugster: “You use the program as justification for being anti-white and supporting White Genocide.

          ALL White countries and ONLY White countries…”

          (We don’t tailgate. Instead, we reply with the truth).

          There was a comedy skit from England some time ago that did a scarily effective job of making the phrase “anti-white” look silly.

          But let’s get out ahead of anti-whites in that game. As Bob says, just about everything is anti-white, but (this is me) even if we sometimes slip and call something anti-white that’s not, and commenters pile on and make a big stink about it, well that’s one more event that will implant “anti-white” in the heads of the audience. Let’s create audiences eager to display their acumen in discerning what is anti-white and what is not! (Maybe a hashtag “#IsItAntiWhite?” would provoke involvement with the topic. Maybe we can make it the question of the day, and always tie it to White Genocide).

          Bob didn’t expressly say so in this audio, but I think it’s important to carry out his idea as much as possible using the two terms we want to jockey into the big time, “anti-white” and “White Genocide.”

          “That’s anti-white,” and where it works, “That’s White Genocide.”

          • #12 by Benjamin Newells on 03/30/2015 - 11:51 pm

            I fear many Bugsers wouldn’t be able to handle calling everything anti-white. Many Bugsers are just not good enough at using the mantra.

            • #13 by Mike M on 03/31/2015 - 6:30 am

              Then how about you teach those, me included, that are not good enough ?
              I’d like to become a mantra beast myself. I want to save our people. If you can help me, and the others out there, please do.

              • #14 by Henry Davenport on 03/31/2015 - 7:11 am

                When I was learning how to do this almost 4 years ago, we were still in the habit of frequently posting some of our swarm comments on the working thread.

                I believe strongly that that practice should be revived.

                It makes correction immediate, which IMO is much more effective than any general training program, and it’s how after several months of COURTEOUSLY being shown on the working thread how a purely Mantra post could have been written in the place of my largely tailgating posts, I finally, suddenly one day, got it.

                “COURTEOUSLY” was an essential part of that process, and for any on this harsh site who don’t understand the ageless function of courtesy in human affairs, I ask that you take the word of the great majority of us here who do, even if some of us sometimes fail to practice courtesy ourselves.

                • #15 by Benjamin Newells on 03/31/2015 - 7:54 am

                  Yes, we should start using the debate style thread and I’ll help anyone who asks for it. I believe that each exchange with an anti-white shouldn’t be longer than two lines (the space of a tweet).

                  • #16 by Henry Davenport on 03/31/2015 - 8:29 am

                    If you mean the “Debate advice and style” thread, my own opinion, for the reason I just gave, is that the working thread is a much better place for basic training.

                  • #17 by Mike M on 03/31/2015 - 3:18 pm

                    Can one debate with someone else with only two line replies ? I don’t know if you’ve ever leastened to Asgardian’s debate on the web with Michael Privot, but it sure wasn’t two line answers.
                    But yeah, I’d like to be able to always synthetize answers in two line sentences (a bit compllicated mind you with my language).

                  • #18 by Denounce Genocidists on 04/01/2015 - 3:59 am

                    Everyone here agrees that short sword/less words is best.

                    I smell nothingburger.

    • #19 by WmWhite on 03/31/2015 - 1:23 pm


      Thanks for the Audio supplement, they always add insight after reading Bob Whitakers posts.

      But what is this “height watch” you mentioned towards the end of the recording?


      • #20 by Laura on 03/31/2015 - 6:45 pm

        The SPLC has a blog called HATEWATCH.

        Bob’s pointed out that the SPLC doesn’t consider hating whites as “HATE”

        Now, what if we owned “Anti-White HATEWATCH” where WE would chase down any individual or organization that promotes Anti-Whiteism.

        • #21 by Henry Davenport on 03/31/2015 - 7:00 pm

          I like “Anti-White HATEWATCH” better than my initially preferred “Anti-White Watch.” We need to be explicit and get “hate” in the title.”

          “#AntiWhiteHateWatch” works okay for twitter, right?

          Every time an organization calls us “supremacist” they can be called on it for fueling hatred against us with the lie that we want to rule over other people, etc.

  6. #22 by Bob on 03/30/2015 - 8:41 am

    As usual, HD gets the WHOLE picture!
    Please do as HD does, and go out and TRY it!
    If you want to rumble or bitch or have a male period, Bob the Bartender says, “Take it outside!”
    With this article, I have finally figured out what, as usual, wads the very simple subbasic I have been grappling for for so long.
    My “monetary penalties” are established policy already in Affirmative Action.
    “Attacking whites stops now! Pay us for everything you got from us!”
    Don’t rush into this. TRY it bit by bit,
    But, as usual, HD has the message, and he wants nothing else.

  7. #23 by Laura on 03/31/2015 - 8:43 pm

    Scott – The Working Thread;

    “USA Today mentions the activism of National Youth Front against assistant professor Lee Bebout and ASU’s “The Problem With Whiteness Class” in which they refer to how NYF used the term anti-White to describe ASU”

  8. #24 by -scythian- on 03/31/2015 - 10:05 pm

    I’ve been compiling an extensive list of anti-white adverts, mostly tv commercials.

    I saw an interview of the cheerios intermarried couple (after pro-whites forced the shut down of that anti-white propaganda) whereby said couple smugly proclaimed their family to be “the future”. Meanwhile the supposedly “proud” BLACK man wants nothing to do w/ women who look like the mulatto daughter he and his WHITE wife produce, and the White woman wouldn’t be caught dead living in a country that is the product of people who look like the mulatto child she carries in her uterus for 9 months. They are promoting a future they themselves want no part of. How is that not SICK? How is that not sociopathic?

    And of course this mulatto future is for ALL and ONLY White countries. Imagine moving to an Asian country, intermarrying w/ an Asian woman and telling everybody in that country: “my family is your future”. I’m not going to say what kind of punishment these kinds of people really deserve.

    A phantom anti-white pointed out on this site that (despite the fact Whites are being chased down w/ “diversity”) only 10% of Whites intermarry. Advertisers tell us they are portraying society. What they are portraying was/is FORCED on White people and they know it; they are aiding and abetting the crime of White genocide. And that 10% figure and the fact of White flight tells us their claim of “representing society” is BULLSHIT to boot. They obviously have an agenda, an agenda that results in no more White people. Are they going to claim advertising doesn’t work, that they’re not trying to influence people? And if they really believe the Black man is equal to the White man, why do they without fail always portray the Black man as hero and the White man as fool in their commercials? Can there be a more clear indication that they think of the Black man as inferior? Since when does incessant patronizing of someone indicate you think they are “equal” to you?

    Of course all this doublethink is just par for the course for our established religion of political correctness.

    Bob mentioned the possibility of dictatorship; anyone with even just a modest knowledge and more importantly understanding of history and current events history knows this possibility is all too real. Saddam Hussein and the Sunnis ruled over the 60% Shiite population and these people are ethnically the same. Anti-whites say “Hitler’s not coming back”, but the question is who on earth is going to save anti-whites?

    When the U.S. was founded by White men, how utterly retarded would it have been to give the vote to non-whites who could vote for themselves to rule over the founding people with the system the founding people created? Imagine the British giving the vote to non-whites in India after their conquest? Or the ancient Aryans doing the same thing in that same place? So help me God if I hear one respectable conservative tell us we must submit to non-whites ruling over us in the name of “democracy” / “majority vote”. So help me God I’m going to literally smash their faces in and be lauded for it.

  9. #25 by time for freedom on 04/01/2015 - 5:21 am

    I think I covered all of this by coming up with the following template:

    “______” is just an #antiwhite HATE word used by you crazy anti-whites who want #WhiteGenocide

    I made it so that you can insert any word or phrase in the quotes. It’s extremely versatile and effective because it alleges that anything that you put in the quotes is anti-white and aims at white genocide. I’m surprised that the other white dissidents don’t bother using it.

    Another great and useful article by Bob Whitaker.

  10. #26 by Rose on 04/01/2015 - 8:32 am

    NEW VIDEO: Five Stupid Things About White Genocide


    • #27 by Jason on 04/01/2015 - 9:12 am

      Great find – please hit this one hard! Time to show them it is not okay to deal in Anti-Whitism.

  11. #28 by Bob on 04/01/2015 - 9:19 am

    Once again, BUGSERS should swarm this, but you also deserve the warm realization that, after all these years, The Silence is breaking down.

    • #29 by time for freedom on 04/01/2015 - 8:14 pm

      Hillarious…Non-white migration into all and ONLY white countries is portrayed by this anti-white nutcase as a mere ‘democratic shift.’ This one is so easy to answer it’s not even funny. We’ve been dealing with this type of crap for almost a year on Paltalk.

      But a question to Bob if you don’t mind. What are the implications for our side of our enemies ending their silence? Maybe you could talk about this issue on the next Paltalk on Saturday.

      To my mind, the criminal is coming out to try and defend his criminal actions, and to try and convince the victims that nothing criminal was actually done to him and his family. That’s an impossible task if you ask me.

You must be logged in to post a comment.