In Haiti and similar countries, there are thousands of generals with stars and shiny baubles on their uniforms. And there are no lower ranking soldiers.
These aren’t even really armies. They are gangs with most of their countries’ GNP spent on bling bling. Their main defense is they are so disease-ridden that enemies get sick before a shot can be fired. 
Figuratively speaking, Anti-Mantra Pro-Whites (AMPWs) are those who don’t pick up the devastating weapons supplied them. Instead they congregate unarmed behind the front. They discuss “strategy” with one another; they hope a general will overhear and take up suggestions from an undiscovered gee-nius. They debate “reasonable” borders – boundaries they claim will be acceptable to the enemy…
Meanwhile, in an army of only AMPWs, NOBODY is on the front fighting. The enemy continues to take territories at will, while AMPWs play catch-up, debating among themselves the latest negotiation strategy with the enemy.
Later on, AMPWs are still debating among themselves where the enemy would NOW consider “reasonable” boundaries.
Thankfully, many pro-Whites have stopped this insanity and are now using the Mantra, winning spectacular victories. But there are still roughly 300,000 AMPWs debating in a tent behind the front.
So what is the difference between Haitians and AMPWs?
In effect, none whatsoever.
#1 by Henry Davenport on 04/07/2015 - 6:59 pm
What a GREAT article!
And to answer your question at the end, the difference between Haitians and AMPW’s is that Haitians know where life is better.
I just took up a theme similar to yours, or at least related, but I like your article better.
Psychological warfare vs. building a movement: an open letter to pro-whites fighting White Genocide
I spent 3 pages on SF trying to persuade some Aussies to use “anti-white” instead of “Antifa,” beginning here and ending up with the post that became the article I just linked.
I justify such efforts by the size of SF’s huge audience, but I’m driven by fascination and bafflement at the failure of any pro-White to see the value of using “anti-white.”
#2 by jo3w on 04/07/2015 - 10:08 pm
I really liked this article. I can imagine an AMPW reading it and discussing with other AMPWs about how wrong we are. I wouldnt hold them in such contempt for rejecting the mantra if they were just doing SOMETHING instead of “debating in a tent”.
#3 by WmWhite on 04/08/2015 - 10:57 am
” …they hope a general will overhear and take up suggestions from an undiscovered gee-nius.”
Bob Whitaker’s post should make everyone who thinks they are pro-white look closely into the mirror of self-evaluation.
…
Good article HD -thanks.
#4 by Benjamin Newells on 04/09/2015 - 4:21 am
polydoros actually wrote this article. Unless I misunderstood you.
#5 by WmWhite on 04/09/2015 - 7:12 am
–thanks Benjamin for the correction and kudos to “Polydoros” for the excellent and succinct post –it is very Whitakeresque, which is meant as a complement.
…
The article I was referring to was HD’s, “Psychological warfare vs. Building a movement.”
#6 by wretched Whiterabbit on 04/09/2015 - 2:12 am
the obvious irony, straight from the porch, is that the UK is now checking passports to prevent non-White terrorists from leaving the country . . .
http://www.2324online.com/2015/04/uk-starts-exit-passports-checks-today.html
#7 by wretched Whiterabbit on 04/09/2015 - 2:58 am
oops, that comment was meant for the post below . . . not quite sure how that happened.
#8 by Bob on 04/10/2015 - 12:23 pm
Polydoros sounds like what he is, a man who is down there in the fight who takes a few minutes to tell the noncombatants, the AMPWs, exactly what he thinks of them.
Polydoros is speaking our minds.
#9 by Henry Davenport on 04/10/2015 - 6:01 pm
THAT’S why it felt so good to read!
Bob, I’m seeking advice from you or BUGSers about the headline of the White House meme-message below that’s being considered, and about essentially the same line in its text, “We see it beginning in our own families or in families we know.”
It’s accurate in my experience. I’d like to know if its accurate in others’ experience also, along with any other comments you or anyone wants to offer.
Advise White Americans: “White folk, look at your own family, or families you know, and see it happening.”
ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with millions of non-whites, and Whites are forced to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.
Whites today are where the Amerindians of Mexico were shortly after the Spaniards arrived and began interbreeding with them.
In time, Whites will be where those Amerindians are now: nearly interbred out of existence and replaced by a mixed race.
We see it beginning in our own families or in families we know.
We didn’t vote for our countries to be flooded with third-world non-whites, nor did we vote to be chased down by diversity programs wherever we go!
The persons directing our genocide say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
#10 by Jason on 04/11/2015 - 3:22 am
Poly, you have a gift for metaphor. Well done!