“Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason? Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”
This is a profound truth, and it applies to other words than “treason.” 
Real conservatism means conserving the privileges of the ruling class.
Our professors, our billionaires, our yuppies, all our news media, our entire educational system, is still called “liberal,” “progressive,” or even, hardee har har, “revolutionaries!”
In 1789 America, if you still called those who demanded independence “rebels,” you would probably be slapped in an Insane Asylum.
In 1995, no sane Russian would call Communists “revolutionaries.”
One of the chapters of my last book was titled, “We Need Less Marxists and More Revolutionaries.”
We still have to use the word “liberal” for our ruling class, as Polydoros did (Liberals and Witchdoctors), because we must address our general audience at the drooling idiot level that makes them slaves.
#1 by Daniel Genseric on 05/07/2015 - 7:59 am
The religion of Political Correctness has its very own Priest Class and hierarchy:
Mommy Professor
Professors
Teachers
Diversity & Inclusion Professionals (DIP’s)
Judges
Lawyers
Union whips
Respectable Conservatives (ratifiers)
Social scientists
Social workers
Social justice warriors (SJW’s)
Political correction officers (PCO’s)
Expert economists
Billionaire elite
Anti-white “revolutionaries” (thugs, screamers, & thought police)
#2 by WmWhite on 05/07/2015 - 12:14 pm
Yet another Bob Whitaker “GEM.”
“…if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”
perfect example of why ‘White’ Anti-Whites are not only tolerated today but held in high esteem, instead of being imprisoned or executed for what they really are: traitors to their people!
#3 by jo3w on 05/07/2015 - 6:26 pm
@WmWhite That was the line that made me think, this is the origin of the people who give us the Orwellian creeps.
#4 by Jason on 05/08/2015 - 4:54 am
Star Trek shows how conservative the PC crowd is. The Russian character ‘Chekov’ was always referring to Leningrad (assuming the city name would remain the same centuries in the future. It is St. Petersburg again now).
He was always calling people he didn’t like ‘Cossacks’, which was apparently considered a great insult among Communists (because they resisted the glories of Communism).
The implication is this: the writers of Star Trek assumed the Communist worldview would still be in business in the 23rd century. They couldn’t imagine a Russia that didn’t love Lenin.
#5 by polydoros on 05/08/2015 - 6:27 am
I’ve seen how some schools call themselves “courageous” to support “diversity”/white genocide.
That’s the same as someone in the Soviet Union saying it’s “courageous” to support communism.
lol
#6 by Jason on 05/08/2015 - 6:52 am
This is a great point I wish TV Conservatives had the brains to point out. TV Conservatives act like they are in the presence of BraveHeart instead of creepy little toadies.
#7 by polydoros on 05/08/2015 - 7:36 am
Actually if “Respectable Conservative” were to have a dictionary entry it could very well read “creepy little toady”.
They are talking heads who take the Liberals / Witchdoctors seriously. (And they know that if they make devastating points that they won’t get invited back on tv.)
#8 by polydoros on 05/08/2015 - 7:57 am
Laura,
I just sent you three new articles: “Polite Society”, “The Spirit of the Age and the Iron Question – part 1” & “The Spirit of the Age and the Iron Question – part 2”.
Did they get through? (There was a ‘timed out’ message as I was sending them.)
…
Bob,
Approx. 1-2 articles per week I’m able to write, and others such as Laura, BBG, HD, Genseric, Eyeslevel, and others (I hope I haven’t missed anyone) are of course creating articles.
So your ambition is being fulfilled for this non-commercial site to continue the fight against White Genocide.
…
Thank you to everyone fighting in the trenches. One of the best buzzes is to go to post on a non-pro-white website and to see at the VERY TOP of the comments section someone who’s just posted the Mantra!
#9 by Benjamin Newells on 05/09/2015 - 10:15 am
polydoros, just to let you know, I haven’t forgotten about getting back to you on giving you my versions of your short minis for twitter.
#10 by Jason on 05/08/2015 - 8:51 am
So BNP collapsed and even UKIP fell off the political map.
My opinion, it’s earlier than we think. The world isn’t quite ready for a pro-White movement. By movement, I mean successful political party.
Still need to break the hypnosis.
I’m not trying to be Newsy, I am saying we still have basic work to do. And certainly a political party running for 2016 can do a lot of that basic work. 🙂
#11 by Denounce Genocidists on 05/09/2015 - 9:17 am
You`re reading it wrong Jason.
UKIP got half the voting support of the 2 “big parties” but thanks to the undemocratic absurdity of our 1st past the post voting system UKIP got only 1 seat versus their hundreds of seats each.
There is also the demographic nature of the parties, the elderly white “Churchillians” are dying off and the youth know they`ve been betrayed.
This is fertile ground for the BUGS strategy of getting on-message people within and outside these parties to use our discourse redirection tools.
As we`ve seen with people like “Weev” the Hactivist, The Red Ice creations team, Angelo Gage,etc the mantra points “break the hypnosis” by “dividing the social space” very efficiently.
#12 by Benjamin Newells on 05/09/2015 - 10:14 am
Could you please elaborate on what you mean by “dividing the social space”?
#13 by eyeslevel on 05/09/2015 - 10:32 am
Force everybody to declare whether they are pro-white or anti-white/pro white genocide.
#14 by Jason on 05/09/2015 - 10:53 am
Denounce, thanks for that clarification. I see now where they got 13% of the vote, behind the 2 major parties.
#15 by Denounce Genocidists on 05/09/2015 - 11:46 am
My last memory of the results was 16% UKIP 33% for Tories/Labour and notice UKIP vote share increased 10% since 2010 while Tories/labour only 1%.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2015/results
Benjamin, really?