The language used to create the total despotism in George Orwell’s book “1984” was called Newspeak.
There was nothing new about it.
Here you will see a British political leader using Newspeak:
She wants to ban things like “’Diversity’ = White Genocide,” complete with prison sentences.
This ruler uses language that was on the tongue of Hitler, Stalin, and every other outright dictator who wanted to imprison dissenters.
She says the British Government should ban “extremists.” There was a time when what she says now would be extremist, complete with a prison sentence.
Stalin gave the Soviet Union a Constitution in 1936 and it contained guarantees of free speech that made our first amendment look pale.
But it was understood, at least by those who survived, that no guarantee extended to an “extremist.”
Stalinists looked at things exactly the way the rulers of Britain do today.
To use her very words, he arrested “extremists” who sought to “undermine Soviet unity.”
The British Government does not use a single word that would not have been used by Hitler and Stalin.
It hasn’t been that long in history since she would have been arrested for “extremism” and “undermining British unity.”
I challenge you to find a single phrase in her whole dialogue that hasn’t been used and is not being used by every oppressive regime of which we have a record.
#1 by Undercover Lover on 05/29/2015 - 2:13 pm
That was difficult to watch. The funny thing is that there is nothing “new” about this Newspeak. As you said, such talk is used by every oppressive regime of which we have record. Such talk also reeks of desperation. They are so inept that they feel they are left with no other option but to use violence and intimidation to get what they want. They know as well as we do that there is nothing they can say to beat us.
#2 by Ice Knight on 05/30/2015 - 6:48 am
I drove past a huge billboard for Theresa May about a month ago that had been put up in her local constituency for the UK elections. I thought at the time it was perfect for the addition of our Mantra message – after watching that video I’m seriously regretting not having done so!
On a positive note, we are gradually seeing more and more high ranking people prepared to speak out on the issue of White GENOCIDE. The ‘former liberal’ Foreign Minister of Estonia has just spoken out and refused to back down. I think it is only a matter of time before a real big name breaks ranks and shocks us all!
http://news.err.ee/v/society/d9be1eba-8bed-4969-91f7-e90fa17e9a67
#3 by polydoros on 05/30/2015 - 10:22 am
‘The funny thing is that there is nothing “new” about this Newspeak.’
That is a key phrase.
And it links into Bob’s strategy of undermining the White anti-Whites, by attacking:
… ‘two underlying sub-messages anti-whites keep sending out.
The first is that they are Idealistic, because they are whites who hate whites.
The second is that whites hating themselves is somehow Modern and Progressive.’
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2014/06/24/diversity-white-genocide-self-hatred-sick/
…
By using Stalin and communism as an equivalent to what the White anti-Whites are is also powerful, because everyone knows about that history.
No need for “educating” and thus going off-message.
#4 by Yankee Rebel on 05/30/2015 - 12:46 am
The anti-Whites needed a new term to replace, “racist” and I think they have found it in, “extremist.” -it has that familiar “ring” to it. While I was watching that woman speak, I kept thinking I was watching the face of pure evil.
#5 by Bob on 05/30/2015 - 12:59 pm
Every single ideal, concept and fact we accept today was once extremism.
#6 by Secret Squirrel on 05/31/2015 - 7:30 pm
Yesterday’s normal is today’s extremism.
#7 by Yankee Rebel on 05/31/2015 - 1:48 am
I think the term, “Extremist” fits perfectly in any sentence that once used, “Racist.” We should be aware of this word shift use- in case it catches on.
#8 by Henry Davenport on 05/31/2015 - 4:59 am
Just going by her talk alone, I got the impression that “racism” has been banished from polite conversation in Britain, that it’s now being treated as being so nasty that nice people don’t even talk about it. Everything she said was phrased as if of course every citizen would desire a Britain that was “tolerant,” etc.
To have used the word “racist” would have acknowledged that there are still some holdouts.
#9 by Jason on 05/31/2015 - 6:14 am
“Tolerance” is a term used by Orwellian Creeps meaning they won’t tolerate dissent.
This is One-Way Tolerance: ONLY Whites must “tolerate” being chased down.
This is One-Way Tolerance: ONLY Whites must “tolerate” NO future for their children.
A “Tolerant” person gets petted like a good doggie for stabbing his own people in the back.
Tolerance Toadies tell their own people to shut up in the face of genocide.
Tolerance Toadies side with Politically Correct Bullies to silence Free Speech.
#10 by Henry Davenport on 05/31/2015 - 4:40 am
She’s a master memester. All she did was bathe the audience in memes. How many times did she say “British values”? And I heard “our pluralistic values” only once or twice, so anti-whites in Britain must still be gentling that in and haven’t yet fully mated it with “British values.” She never combined the two and said “British pluralistic values”…I’m guessing that wouldn’t sound quite natural yet, and might jostle some of her audience out of their trance.
#11 by Jason on 05/31/2015 - 5:10 pm
On Twitter, adding hashtags to my Tweets dramatically increased my impressions and engagements. See this graphic that shows analytical detail of my main account from last week.
https://twitter.com/HopJas/status/605118380685692928
Huge increase for me. Use your own judgement depending on the situation. http://analytics.twitter.com gives you a lot of analytical detail on your tweets. Real numbers.
#12 by Jason on 06/01/2015 - 4:05 pm
Please get Bob’s book “The New Right Papers”, if only for his chapter on Societal Propert Rights. This is a key concept. You can get the book used very cheap – you just have to pay shipping. No new prints available.
It’s a key concept. The rights of a people who make a productive society possible are totally ignored today (at least when it comes to White countries).
Japan and Mexico are used as examples. The Japanese people deserve certain societal property right for building a stable political structure in which business can thrive (as compared to Mexico).
And if you take away those rights, you naturally take away the incentive to work for the common good. If we flooded Japan with 100 million Guatemalans, would we be surprised when young Japanese men quit working as hard for less money?
Current and future generations have been cheated more than they know.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0312569270/ref=dp_olp_all_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=all
#13 by WmWhite on 06/01/2015 - 7:21 pm
Another good lesson from VP Bob Whitaker.
Not responding to the article (per se) but just wanted to mention, out of appreciation, that commenting on any media vehicle using the mantra is just so easy and verbally effective; that it causes me to cringe when I read the responses of pro-whites who don’t have the mantra as a tool yet. –We are very fortunate to have this narrative as a weapon.
Aside: for those not skilled yet in phrasing their own meme battle slogans use (http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/mini-mantras-pro/).
#14 by Jason on 06/01/2015 - 8:06 pm
Yes, it’s painful to see pro-White spout pointless comments. MOST of what any BUGSER does should be using the road tested material. The worst feeling I have is when I look back on some comment chain where I got off topic.
CONSISTENT messages work. When it is mind-numbingly dull to us, when we are sick of repeating the exact same message over and over, it is jussssstttttt barely getting through to the mass public.
#15 by Jason on 06/01/2015 - 9:33 pm
Justice Dept to study “far right” social media and other forms of “extremism” (i.e. unapproved Thought).
http://freebeacon.com/issues/justice-department-studying-far-right-social-media-use/
#16 by Denounce Genocidists on 06/02/2015 - 3:29 am
Forgive us anti-white Lords and Masters we have no choice but to keep pointing out the obvious that Diversity requires Dictatorship.
#17 by Jason on 06/02/2015 - 4:08 am
Diversity requires Dictatorship … that line has potential.
#18 by Denounce Genocidists on 06/02/2015 - 4:08 am
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=myxolOLSQZEC&pg=PA122&lpg=PA122&dq=by+and+by+his+countrymen+would+follow+through+the+breach&source=bl&ots=RNYa4XPMpS&sig=PzLTD1XSSOxvYRCfebYl3qcLclQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=jGJtVaWQNMPC7gbe84CwBA&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=by%20and%20by%20his%20countrymen%20would%20follow%20through%20the%20breach&f=false
#19 by WmWhite on 06/02/2015 - 7:06 am
Diversity requires dictatorship…
Both the old USSR (sort of) and the now defunct “Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia” are good examples of that concept.