I wrote an article on the 1932 German election that brought Hitler to power. There are a number of critical, history-changing analyses one could make from what happened there in 1932.
But it all came from one simple piece of ARITHMETIC: The Nazis got over one-third of the Reichstag members and the Communists got over one-sixth.
Over one sixth plus over one thirds adds up to a MAJORITY. In order to form a government in 1933 you had to have a majority of the elected Reichstag to form a government, you Had to include either the Nazis or the Communists.
The response to this simple piece of arithmetic really depressed me.
Not one single comment had any relation to the point.
Not even close.
In the battle between SOC (Same Old Crap) and simple electoral arithmetic not one person chose to mention the arithmetic.
I am about to do a piece about “Native Americans.”
But one of the basics in understanding why America is not a Nation of Immigrants is, God help us, simple arithmetic.
In this case it’s called geometric progression. On the average, each seventeenth century immigrant produced several HUNDRED offspring living in America today.
But when I mention this I have to wade through responses about how the person had ancestors who got here in 1688.
And the basic, the arithmetic, gets totally lost in the SOC.
The problem is the same old one: people are so tied up in whether I am offending them or dealing with something somebody said that they do not read what I am trying to tell them.
This is especially fatal when Arithmetic appears here. The point is simple but you have to pay attention to exactly what I said, not what you are used to.
You have to have you head on straight when arithmetic is used.
It can make terrific points, or the arithmetic can be lost in a tide of SOC.
#1 by Jason on 06/11/2015 - 8:00 am
TV tells me it is People of Color (POCs) who have the best minds for math. Without POCs to cheat off we are lost.
Not sure if this helps prepare our minds, but Genghis Khan has 16 million decadents alive today! He had hundreds of children through many wives. His sons in turn had many wives – many more than the average man. And so on.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/02/0214_030214_genghis.html
I believe this old example is a type of geometric progression: If you start with a penny and just double it each day … 2 cents, then 4 cents, etc, by the end of the month you have $1,000,000.
So, small numbers if allowed to grow at a certain rate can become huge in a short time.
http://www.shmoop.com/basic-algebra/arithmetic-geometric-exponential-patterns.html
Maybe that lays the foundation for what is to come?
#2 by -Gar5- on 06/11/2015 - 8:27 am
Simple maths: if over 50% was born there, it’s not a nation of immigrants.
A nation is its majority, and even today no nation on Earth is a nation of immigrants by that definition.
The funny thing is, anti-Whites don’t see the obvious contradiction between two things they say.
Whites can’t be both immigrants AND colonists.
#3 by Daniel Genseric on 06/11/2015 - 11:08 am
Yours focuses on the past. I want to move forward.
Politically active White anti-Whites comprise no more than 1% of the population.
If “A nation of Immigrants” votes to send home immigrants deemed detrimental to the longevity of the nation and repatriate “refugees” via referendum, does the population still hold that “democratic” right?
Is 51% still considered a shareholder majority?
Is 51% still considered a voting politics victory?
What is 190 million Whites divided by 320 million “Americans”?
With more than 93 million unemployed it might be close or it could be a landslide victory – depending on your point of view.
I don’t care what we call our nation as long as the problem is corrected.
#4 by Undercover Lover on 06/11/2015 - 2:00 pm
I remember the point you made about the German election. The communists were known at that time for concentration camps. The national socialists had concentration camps. They were both advocates of concentration camps. The point was; more then half of the population voted for concentration camps and that’s what they got. Careful what you vote for, you might just get it.
I’m not quite sure of the point you’re trying to make here though.
“In this case it’s called geometric progression. On the average, each seventeenth century immigrant produced several HUNDRED offspring living in America today.”
I think what you’re trying to say is if you geometrically progressed all the original citizens then compared it to the geometrical progression of all future immigrants… a significant proportion of the population would still be based off those original citizens. But I couldn’t say that for sure without looking at the numbers.
Mathematically it makes sense to me but I would want to have a look at the numbers to be sure. I don’t really know the immigration/birth rates of all American history.
Just from a quick little excel thing and a yearly population growth rate of 1.5% (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_growth) then starting at 1790 (population about 4 million), I would get about 114 million (being from original citizens) in 2015
#5 by WmWhite on 06/11/2015 - 4:10 pm
Synopsis of research if you don’t want to read it all:
By the time of the America Revolution, the vast majority of the white population was NOT from recent European immigration, but from whites “born” in America.
“All the colonies, after they were started, grew mostly by natural growth, with foreign born populations rarely exceeding 10% in isolated instances. The last significant colonies to be settled mainly by immigrants were Pennsylvania in the early 18th century and Georgia and the Borderlands in the late 18th century, as MIGRATION (not immigration) continued to provide nearly all the settlers for each new colony or state.
By 1775 the population of the 13 colonies had reached almost 2.5 million, compared with only 250,000 in 1700, a tenfold increase. Between 1700 and 1775 the rate of growth averaged about 3 percent. This rate was very rapid for the time; the population jumped from one-twentieth to about one-third of Britain’s.
The gap would continue to narrow after 1776 so that, by 1820, the population of the United States had surpassed that of Britain. In contrast to many poor Third World countries today with similar rates of growth, few early Americans experienced starvation or even malnutrition.
In the mid-18th century, Benjamin Franklin, described population change quite accurately. He saw that earlier and more frequent marriages and larger families were drawing America’s total population closer to Britain’s. He predicted correctly that economic power also would eventually shift across the Atlantic.
Birthrates continued to be high. Between 1720 and 1760 in New England births averaged around seven children per family. Earlier marriages, also accounted for the more rapid growth of population in America.
One estimate suggests that white immigration between 1700 and 1775 added 25 percent to the population. By the 1770s, after a decade of slower movement, whites born outside the colonies added no more than 10 percent.
The chief implication of the rising proportion of American-born whites meant that fewer had experienced British or European life. This overwhelming majority of American-born whites probably contributed to the 13-Colonies easier acceptance of independence from Britain.”
#6 by time for freedom on 06/12/2015 - 11:14 am
“America is a nation formed by our White ancestors producing massive numbers of offspring here in America”
#7 by Bob on 06/12/2015 - 11:56 am
UL, that 1.5% is absurdly low.
In Wealth of Nations, 1776, Adam Smith estimated the “natural increase” of Americans at doubling every 20 to 25 years, and no one here or there said that was excessive.
That is 2.8 to 3,5% per year.
Today estimate, never mentioned, if doubling each 25 to 30 years, 2.5 to 2.8%.
The reason for this was that European families were huge just to replace the dead. There was food and health in America and the families were still huge.
I figure the average couple at Jamestown, despite the early die off, has about a thousand people worth of genes in today’s population.
And their last “immigration” was before the Pilgrims “founded” America!
#8 by -Gar5- on 06/13/2015 - 8:35 am
Bob, this is the war room. Not the statistics office.
And since you didn’t make a point about the “nations of immigrants” argument, I will:
It doesn’t matter what the anti-Whites THINK America is.
America, Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand are all full of White people.
Trying to change that is genocide.
A “nation of immigrants” is no excuse for White Genocide.
#9 by Undercover Lover on 06/13/2015 - 3:21 pm
Bob, I figured as much.
I got the 1.5% from the wiki article but that 1.5% was only for recent population growth (I think it said 1950+). I wonder at what rate the population growth was decreasing at. I just used the 2.5-3.5% numbers you suggested and according to that the population of the US should be over 1 billion (from original citizens) but we do know that the original 2.5-3.5% increase eventually did decrease.
Regardless of that decrease (and even using the 1.5%), a large proportion of American whites are still descendants of the original citizens.
I think the point you were making was that a country composed mostly of descendants of its original citizens is not a “nation of immigrants”
#10 by -scythian- on 06/12/2015 - 11:49 pm
Here’s the difference between Aryans and non-Aryans: we don’t need no stinking land-bridge.
#11 by Bob on 06/13/2015 - 8:41 am
OK, you want politics without arithmetic.
I can put my arith stuff on the campaign site now.
But like all facts, a few numbers can really lay out reality.
#12 by Bob on 06/13/2015 - 9:06 am
Gar5, Comment 33,
I still regard myself as the Coach, so I do make suggestions I can’t try out.
I deal with hostile interviews and get denounced, but I can’t be out on the field.
My sixty years, including cleaning out the “Opposing Views” at Stormfront, will have to show I am not asking you to do what I haven’t.
I will do no more arithmetic here, though we did all the time in politics.
On your specific point, Shriekers, Thugs and Thought Police came out when I was in battle on
PalTalk.
They shriek until they have us outnumbered enough to be thugs. They’re cowards, so that takes a lot of them.
But the anti-whites’ favorite is Thought Police, just have the police get us, as they do everywhere outside the US.
Cowardly lowlifes!
#13 by -Gar5- on 06/13/2015 - 10:24 am
Bob –
“I will do no more arithmetic here, though we did all the time in politics.”
This is your Blog Bob, write what you feel is important for us to read.
I thought it needed to be mentioned that the “nations of immigrants” meme is not an excuse for White genocide, to stop the article being derailed off-message.
I did not want to see Bugsters in the field responding to anti-Whites “nation of immigrants” meme by saying “but the majority of Whites were born in America”.
My comments weren’t meant to sound so harsh, but I bet they barely grazed that thick-skin of yours 🙂
#14 by Jason on 06/14/2015 - 1:23 am
Nobody has a problem with arithmetic. So let’s get on with it.