My latest interview with a San Francisco radio station demonstrates why I don’t get invited twice.
In fact this time they actually hung up on me.
I kept asking the interviewer what the word “racist” means.
He said, “You’ve asked me that four times.”
I replied, “You use the word Racist all the time, so I ask you what it means”
He asked me what I thought it meant.
I replied, it doesn’t mean anything. It’s just a word that is supposed to scare people into silence. 
He said nothing, of course.
I used that moment to say “Respectable conservatives never have the guts to ask that question.”
Racist means “Shut up!”
Racist means grovel.
Racist means “Pee in your pants.”
Racist is word that is never used by anyone but a bully and a coward.
It scares grovelers and cowards.
#1 by Laura on 10/21/2015 - 11:53 am
I am currently trying to locate a copy of the show. I will post it once I have it.
#2 by -Gar5- on 10/22/2015 - 4:55 am
Thanks Laura – if you could find a copy that would be great.
I might be able to write an article on it then. It’s a good hook.
“Radio Station Invites Presidential Candidate for discussion on White Genocide, hangs up halfway through.”
#3 by Ice Knight on 10/22/2015 - 7:29 am
You guys are doing some great stuff over at WhiteGenocideProject.com and setting the news agenda!
Your story about German children cooking and cleaning for migrants
http://whitegenocideproject.com/german-schoolchildren-will-cook-and-clean-for-refugees-as-part-of-work-experience/
was picked up by a lot of mainstream outlets, even made the main front page headline of the UK’s Daily Express which is a really big publication.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/612208/refugee-crisis-asylum-seekers-Lubeck-Germany-Angela-Merkelhttps://www.rt.com/news/318631-lubeck-refugees-schoolchildren-servants/
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/10/14/children-made-cook-clean-migrants-school-project/
Anti-Whites at Huff Post were not amused!
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/10/16/daily-express-children-forced-to-serve-migrants-story-ignores-fact_n_8310822.html
#4 by Denounce Genocidists on 10/21/2015 - 3:14 pm
Whitaker is intolerable.
He rustled my jimmies.
#5 by Jason on 10/21/2015 - 7:00 pm
Your line is a good good guide to finding exactly what needs to be said: find out whatever is considered “intolerable”.
#6 by time for freedom on 10/21/2015 - 6:37 pm
I always say:
‘Racist is an anti-white hate word used by anti-whites who want white genocide’
And I repeat this over and over.
#7 by Jason on 10/21/2015 - 7:30 pm
I agree it’s best not to accept a label. We are hear to make an ACCUSATION of genocide against anti-Whites. Anything else detracts from that. Even if the thing you are labeled as is good, it tends to get things off track.
It can’t always be avoided. But asking them to DEFINE what they mean by “racist” and “supremacist” is an excellent strategy. They have no fixed definition.
It’s a scare word, and acts like an electric shock collar on a well trained dog. You are supposed to either roll over and expose your belly or else play the role of a Hollywood “Sooopreeemacissst” and discredit yourself.
#8 by Yankee Rebel on 10/22/2015 - 1:32 am
I’ve noticed the word racist being used more often again in the media. The difference seems to be they are repeating the word over and over like they’re trying to elicit the old response, but it’s not having the same effect anymore. Therefore, they think that if they repeat it enough times it will work again. Pretty pathetic.